PARAMOUNT: Phase III study of maintenance pemetrexed (pem) plus best supportive care (BSC) versus placebo plus BSC immediately following induction treatment with pem plus cisplatin for advanced nonsquamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

PARAMOUNT: Phase III study of maintenance pemetrexed (pem) plus best supportive care (BSC) versus placebo plus BSC immediately following induction treatment with pem plus cisplatin for advanced nonsquamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Description:

... versus placebo plus BSC immediately following induction treatment with pem plus cisplatin for advanced nonsquamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:347
Avg rating:3.0/5.0

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: PARAMOUNT: Phase III study of maintenance pemetrexed (pem) plus best supportive care (BSC) versus placebo plus BSC immediately following induction treatment with pem plus cisplatin for advanced nonsquamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).


1
PARAMOUNT Phase III study of maintenance
pemetrexed (pem) plus best supportive care (BSC)
versus placebo plus BSC immediately following
induction treatment with pem plus cisplatin for
advanced nonsquamous non-small cell lung cancer
(NSCLC).
  • AuthorsL. G. Paz-Ares, F. De Marinis, M. Dediu,
    M. Thomas, J. Pujol, P. Bidoli, O. Molinier, T.
    P. Sahoo, E. Laack, M. Reck, J. Corral, S. A.
    Melemed, W. J. John, N. Chouaki, A. Zimmerman, C.
    M. Visseren Grul, C. Gridelli
  • Date posted Post ASCO 2011

2
Thank you for downloading this update. Please
feel free to use it for educational purposes.
Please acknowledge OncologyEducation.ca and Dr.
Charles Butts when using these slides.
3
Study Design
N539 Primary OutcomePFS
Treatment A Pemetrexed 500 mg/m2 q 3 weeks
BSC N359
R
Treatment B Placebo BSC N180
Stage IIIB/IV Non-squamous/NSCLC ECOG 0,1 At
least SD post Cis/Pem
4
RESULTS
Treatment A Treatment B p-value
Response Rate () 2.8 0.6 NA
PFS by Investigator (median, mos) 4.1 2.8 0.00006
PFS by IRR (median, mos) 3.9 2.6 0.0002
5
TOXICITY
  • No grade 3 or4 toxicity gt 5 of patients with
    maintenance Pemetrexed
  • No difference in QoL by EQ-5D
  • No difference in Drug related death.

6
STUDY COMMENTARY
  • This is the first trial of induction pemetrexed
    (Cis/Pem) followed by continuous maintenance in
    patient with at least stable to induction chemo
  • Study was powered for OS but insufficient events
    at time of analysis
  • Median of cycles maintenance pem was 4 with
    range 1-19. 23 received gt 6 cycles
  • HR for PFS 0.62 was highly statistically
    significant



7
BOTTOM LINE FOR CANADIAN MEDICAL ONCOLOGISTS
  • It is too early to assess the real value of a
    continuous Pemetrexed maintenance approach.
  • The 38 improvement in PFS (HR.62) is highly
    statistically significant, but the difference in
    median PFS islt 6 weeks.
  • The study is powered for OS and final judgment on
    the value of this strategy should await that
    information.


Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com