Hot Topics New Blood and Plasma Issues - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 35
About This Presentation
Title:

Hot Topics New Blood and Plasma Issues

Description:

Citation #7 Cited 21 times /ID 31 Personnel/Training 21 CFR 606.20(b) The ... HIV-1 NAT and anti-HIV-1/2 EIA NAT Non-reactive anti-HIV-1/2 EIA RR NAT ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:160
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 36
Provided by: BeckyD3
Category:
Tags: blood | hot | issues | new | plasma | topics

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Hot Topics New Blood and Plasma Issues


1
Hot TopicsNew Blood and Plasma Issues
  • Barbara Carmichael
  • Investigator, U.S. Food Drug Administration
  • Florida District - Jacksonville, FL Resident Post
  • June 2, 2011

2
Lecture Outline
  • Clarification of various issues
  • Top 10 Biologics Observations
  • New Guidance Documents
  • NAT Reentry (May 2010)
  • Anti-HBc Reentry (May 2010)
  • HCV Lookback (December 2010)
  • Leukocyte Reduction, Draft ( January 2011)
  • CJD/vCJD (May 2010)
  • Chagas (December 2010)
  • Operations (November 2010)

3
Storage of Thawed FFP or PF24 up to 24 hrs -
Requesting a Variance
  • Storage of thawed FFP or PF24 _at_ 1-6C for up to
    24 hrs as recommended by BPAC, instead of 6
    hours (21 CFR 606.122 (m)(3)). Until the
    regulation is revised a variance must be
    requested.
  • Written request to
  • Director, Div. Blood Applications,
    OBRR/CBER/FDA/HFM-370
  • c/o Document control Center/HFM-99
  • 1401 Rockville Pike, Suite 200N
  • Rockville, MD 20852-1448
  • Phone no. (301) 827-3543

4
MTS Gel Card - Off Label Use
  • MTS Anti-IgG Card - states it is for direct and
    indirect antiglobulin test
  • MTS Buffered Gel Card states it is for detection
    of antibodies to RBCs
  • Neither product includes labeling/directions for
    use as an immediate spin compatibility test
  • The card is not a reliable detector of ABO
    incompatibilities (which are predominantly IgM)
    published studies document reported compatibility
    test failures
  • Discrepancy between AABB Manual device labeling
  • Cannot be used as sole cross-match until Ortho
    submits data for BLA supplement approval and
    labeling change will result in 483 citation

5
Overlay Label?
  • Can we overlay a Codabar label with an ISBT
    label?
  • Can we overlay the whole label when we further
    process one of our units (e.g., irradiate)?
  • Can we overlay the whole label when we further
    process a unit from an outside supplier?

6
Overlay Label?FDA Response
  • We believe it is acceptable to overlay an
    original label provided the current computer
    software or recordkeeping system has the
    capability to preserve the information on the
    original label. If the software or records
    cannot record the information from the original
    label, then overlaying the whole label is not
    permitted.
  • Original information includes collection
    facility, ABO/Rh, special antigen typings,
    anticoagulants, etc.

7
Top 10 Biologics Observations in 2010 As of
05/31/2011

8
Citation 1 Cited 127 times /ID 76
  • Written SOPs Not Maintained or Followed or
    Accessible
  • 21 CFR 606.100(b) Written standard operating
    procedures including all steps to be followed in
    the collection processing compatibility
    testing storage distribution of blood and
    blood components for homologous transfusion
    autologous transfusion further manufacturing
    purposes are not always maintained followed
    maintained on the premises.

9
Citation 2 Cited 49 times /ID 98
  • Investigations Not Conducted or Completed
  • 21 CFR 606.100(c) Failure to perform a
    thorough
  • investigation make a record of the conclusions
    and
  • follow-up of an unexplained discrepancy a
    failure of a
  • lot or unit to meet any of its specifications.

10
Citation 3 Cited 29 times /ID 155
  • Failure to Maintain Records
  • 21 CFR 606.160(b) Failure to maintain donor
  • processing storage and distribution
  • compatibility testing quality control
    general
  • Records.

11
Citation 4 Cited 29 times /ID 9225
  • BPD Reporting
  • 21 CFR 606.171 Failure to submit a biological
  • product deviation report within 45 days from the
  • date you acquired information suggesting that a
  • reportable event occurred.

12
Citation 5 Cited 29 times /ID 154
  • Records Not Concurrent with Performance
  • 21 CFR 606.160(a)(1) Records are not
    concurrently
  • maintained with the performance of each
    significant step
  • in the collection processing compatibility
    testing
  • storage distribution of each unit of blood
    and blood
  • components so that all steps can be clearly
    traced.

13
Citation 6 Cited 28 times /ID 160
  • Records Fail to Provide Complete History
  • 21 CFR 606.160(a)(1) Records fail to identify
    the
  • person performing the work include dates of the
  • various entries show test results include
    interpretation
  • of the results show the expiration date
    assigned to
  • specific products be as detailed as necessary
    so as to
  • provide a complete history of the work performed.

14
Citation 7 Cited 21 times /ID 31
  • Personnel/Training
  • 21 CFR 606.20(b) The personnel responsible for
    the collection
  • processing compatibility testing storage
    distribution of
  • blood or blood components are not adequate in
    number
  • educational background training and
    experience, including
  • professional training as necessary to assure
    competent
  • performance of their assigned functions, and to
    ensure that the
  • final product has the safety, purity, potency,
    identity and
  • effectiveness it purports or is represented to
    possess.

15
Citation 8 Cited 14 times /ID 4425
  • Equipment Not Maintained
  • 21 CFR 606.60(a) Equipment used in the
    collection
  • processing compatibility testing storage and
  • distribution of blood and blood components is
    not
  • observed standardized calibrated on a
    regularly
  • scheduled basis as prescribed in the SOP Manual.

16
Citation 9 Cited 13 times /ID 12202
  • Thorough Investigation of Adverse Reaction
  • 21 CFR 606.170(a)
  • A thorough investigation of each reported
    adverse report was not made.
  • This citation is new to the Top 10 this year
    while Records are Illegible fell off the Top 10
    list this year.

17
Citation 10 Cited 12 times /ID 67
  • Supplies Reagents
  • 21 CFR 606.65(e) Failure to use supplies and
  • reagents in a manner consistent with instructions
  • provided by the manufacturer.

18
New Guidance Documents
19
NAT HIV-1 HCV Reentry
  • May 2010 Guidance (finalizes draft dated July
    2005)
  • 4 new simplified algorithms for reentry
  • Retests - should use the same test as that used
    for the original reactive sample if not
    available use one of same or greater sensitivity
    (e.g. HIV-1 Group O)
  • SOP Revisions will be considered minor change
    to an approved license so date of SOP
    implementation should be reported in Annual
    Report

20
  • HIV-1 Donor Re-entry Algorithm

21
HCV Donor Re-entry Algorithm
22
Anti-HBc Reentry if tested RR on gt1 occasion
  • May 2010 Guidance finalizes draft from 2008.
  • Change due to availability of FDA-licensed HBV
    NAT improved specificity of anti-HBc assays
  • Obtain a new pre-donation blood sample after a
    minimum of 8 wks following last RR anti-HBc test
  • Must be Neg. for HBsAg, anti-HBc AND HBV by NAT
  • If f/u medical testing done during this 8 week
    period, any reactive/positive results would make
    the donor NOT eligible for reentry and indefinite
    deferral is recommended.
  • If implement this method then report in Annual
    Report. If want to use an alternate method,
    licensed establishments must submit a supplement
    for prior approval

23
Lookback for HCV Guidance was updated December
2010 orig. 2007
  • Reflects new anti-HCV testing technologies
  • Changes to make guidance consistent with regs,
    e.g.
  • 21 CFR 610.48 - One time review of historical HCV
    testing records, requires completion of actions
    specified by 2/19/09
  • Asked to go back to Jan 1988, but are aware that
    prior to implementation the requirement for
    record retention was 5 years
  • notification by the transfusion service was
    expanded to include a recipients physician of
    record within the specified time frame 3 days
    after becoming aware of test results

24
Pre-Storage Leukoreduction
  • Draft Guidance January 2011 (replacing 2001
    draft)
  • Recommendations for validation and QC for
    monitoring the process, including an algorithm
    for sample size calculation
  • Testing of donors for traits that affect the
    process, such as hemoglobin S
  • Use of mixing devices during collection
  • Option for supplemental labeling of components
    with low WBC count
  • Calculation of RBC recovery by RBC mass

25
CJD/vCJD
  • Guidance for Industry
  • Revised Preventative Measures to Reduce the
    Possible Risk of Transmission of
    Creutzfeldt-Jakob Disease (CJD) and Variant
    Creutzfeldt-Jakob Disease (vCJD) by Blood and
    Blood Products
  • May 2010
  • (Implement by January 2011)

26
CJD/vCJD (cont.)
  • No changes in CJD deferral policies
  • Blood and plasma donors who have received a blood
    component transfusion in France since 1980 are
    deferred indefinitely for vCJD risk
  • Recognized the AABB full-length DHQ materials
    (v.1.3) as an acceptable mechanism to screen
    blood donors
  • DHQ contains transfusion in France question
  • Guidance advises licensed firms how to report if
    using AABB DHQ (v.1.3)

27
Chagas
  • Guidance for Industry
  • Use of Serological Tests to Reduce the Risk of
    Transmission of Trypanosoma cruzi Infection in
    Whole Blood and Blood Components Intended for
    Transfusion
  • December 2010
  • (Implement by December 2011)

28
Chagas (cont.)
  • Only applies to blood components for transfusion
    (not to Source Plasma)
  • Includes question to ask all donors at each
    donation if they ever had Chagas disease
  • Recommends one-time (selective) testing of
    allogeneic donors and autologous donors whose
    units will be crossed over
  • Nonreactive donors do not need to be tested again
    at subsequent donations
  • Blood banks should have records for testing
    history
  • Reactive donors or donors with history of Chagas
    are indefinitely deferred

29
Chagas (cont.)
  • No donor re-entry at this time
  • Disposition of reactive units
  • Destroy reactive donations
  • Can be used for research or plasma used for
    noninjectable reagents
  • Autologous use only
  • Lookback of units from reactive donor
  • Statement in Circular that blood is from donors
    tested for T. cruzi on at least one donation
  • Advises licensed firms on how to report changes
    to FDA

30
Operational Procedures
  • Guidance for Industry
  • Recommendations for Blood Establishments
    Training of Back-up Personnel, Assessment of
    Blood Donor Suitability and Reporting Certain
    Changes to an Approved Application
  • November 2010
  • (Implement immediately)

31
Operational Procedures (cont.)
  • Replaces November 2009 draft H1N1 guidance
    document
  • Removed reference to H1N1 since pandemic is over,
    but retained those provisions with general
    applicability
  • Training of Back-up Personnel
  • Have adequate trained back-up personnel in the
    event of personnel shortages (e.g., pandemics,
    natural disasters, bioterrorism)
  • Use existing training program recommend train
    more than 1 back-up person for each critical
    function
  • And of course...Document training

32
Operational Procedures (cont.)
  • Donor Suitability 24 Hours to Clarify
  • 640.3(a) and 640.63(a) determine donor
    suitability on day of collection regs dont
    define day of collection
  • Firm may clarify a donors response to a question
    or obtain omitted responses within 24 hours of
    the time of collection
  • Does not apply to missing/unacceptable vital
    signs or hgb/hct
  • Licensed firms must have CBER approved SOPs for
    this, including contacting donor, determine
    donors identity and if in confidential setting
  • Should be handled as deviation included in QA
    tracking and investigation procedures

33
Operational Procedures (cont.)
  • Reporting certain changes to FDA as Changes Being
    Effected (CBE) under 601.12(c)(5)
  • Changes were previously reported as CBE-30
  • Using a different registered outside/contract
    testing lab to perform donor testing
  • However, submit as PAS if using lab not
    registered for donor screening
  • Implementation of written or audio/visual methods
    to self-administer your currently approved donor
    history questionnaire
  • Supersedes July 2003 Guidance for
    self-administered questionnaire that required a
    CBE-30
  • Still follow CCPs described in the July 2003
    Guidance
  • Computer-Assisted DHQ process is still a CBE-30

34
Where can I find the guidances?
  • CBER website
  • Click on Vaccine, Blood Biologics link
  • Scroll down to Forms and Regulatory Information
  • Click on Blood Guidances
  • http//www.fda.gov/BiologicsBloodVaccines/Guidanc
    eComplianceRegulatoryInformation/Guidances/Blood/d
    efault.htm

35
  • THANK YOU!
  • Enjoy the rest of your day!
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com