The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly of Scientific Writing - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 33
About This Presentation
Title:

The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly of Scientific Writing

Description:

The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly of Scientific Writing Mark H. Ebell MD, MS * * * * * * * To quote Dave Barry, I didn t make any of this stuff up Avoid stilted ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:355
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 34
Provided by: MarkE93
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly of Scientific Writing


1
The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly of Scientific
Writing
  • Mark H. Ebell MD, MS

2
  • To quote Dave Barry, I didnt make any of this
    stuff up

3
Avoid stilted language
  • Chest pain is often a harbinger of disease
    that can threaten the life of the organism. So,
    when a patient presents with significant chest
    pain, the prudent examiner is at once poised to
    exclude dangerous disease.

4
Concise, clear, active voice
  • Before
  • It has been shown that rye, wheat, and barley, as
    well as multiple processed products containing
    gluten, may in some cases elicit this immune
    response.
  • After
  • Rye, wheat, and barley, and many processed foods
    contain gluten and may elicit this immune
    response.

5
Concise, clear, active voice
  • Before Though the spiral computed tomogram (CT)
    has revolutionalized the management of emergent
    abdominal pain (2, 3, 4), the currency of this
    approach remains the judicious application of a
    focused history and physical exam.
  • After Even with access to advanced diagnostic
    imaging studies, a careful history and physical
    examination helps the clinician interpret the
    results of these studies and remains a critical
    part of the evaluation.

6
Simplecleardont use fancy words.
  • There have been several randomized controlled
    trials that have evaluated the effectiveness of
    mammography as a screening modality.
  • Several randomized controlled trials have
    evaluated mammography as a screening test.

7
Examples of good and bad style
  • Really bad (wordy, stilted, passive voice)
  • It has been proposed that chest radiography
    should be considered
  • Bad (passive voice, weasel words)
  • Chest radiography should be considered
  • Good
  • Order a chest radiograph if

8
Examples of good and bad style the dreaded
parenthetical fever
  • Bad Admission was less likely in patients
    taking the cephalosporin (43) than in those
    taking placebo (32), a difference that was
    statistically significant (p 0.03).
  • Good Admission was significantly less likely in
    patients taking the cephalosporin than in those
    taking the placebo (42 vs 32, p 0.03).

9
A case of commarhea
  • Chronic kidney disease and more severe stages of
    CKD, can affect not only glomerular blood flow
    and filtration, but also tubular secretion and
    reabsorption, and renal bioactivation and
    metabolism.
  • Chronic kidney disease and more severe stages of
    CKD can affect not only glomerular blood flow and
    filtration, but also tubular secretion and
    reabsorption and renal bioactivation and
    metabolism.

10
Any problems with this?
  • Because the differential diagnosis of
    abdominal pain is extensive and includes multiple
    disease entities that can be placed into the
    broad categories of abdominal and extra-abdominal
    disorders and sub-divided as follows Abdominal
    disorders include four categories of
    intraperitoneal conditions (inflammatory,
    mechanical, malignancy, and vascular disorders)
    and a limited list of extraperitoneal conditions.
  • Run-on (and on and on) sentence
  • Lets rewrite it

11
edited into three sentences
  • Because the differential diagnosis of abdominal
    pain is extensive, it is helpful to organize it
    anatomically into abdominal and extra-abdominal
    disorders.
  • First, recognize that abdominal disorders can be
    intraperitoneal or extraperitoneal.
  • Intraperitoneal disorders can be further divided
    into four categories (inflammatory, mechanical,
    malignancy, and vascular disorders), each of
    which is further subdivided by whether they
    affect hollow, solid, or pelvic viscera or the
    mesentery

12
Anything wrong here?
  • Chest Pain can be defined as an unpleasant
    sensation perceived in or on the anterior trunk
    (costal margin to clavicles) resulting from
    actual or potential tissue damage that may be
    unrelenting, causing the patient to seek the
    advise of a Physician.
  • Non-standard capitalization. Rules are just like
    those for any other writing!

13
Say it well and say it once avoid repetition
  • Data from the 2000 U.S. National Center for
    Health Statistics reveals an incidence of
    abdominal pain of 63/1000 emergency department
    (ED) visits with admission rates for abdominal
    pain varying from 18 to 42 percent, with rates as
    high as 63 percent reported in patients over 65
    years of age (6). While in 2002, there were
    approximately 15 million office visits to
    Physicians and approximately 7 million emergency
    department visits for abdominal complaints in the
    United States, almost all of them were due to
    abdominal pain

14
Proofreading! Internally inconsistent and just
plain wrong
  • The physical examination is unremarkable between
    attacks so this entity has been termed biliary
    colic. Additionally, the patient is afebrile with
    significant right upper quadrant tenderness and
    positive Murphys sign.
  • Cant be both unremarkable and with positive
    Murphys sign! And Murphys sign is
    cholecystitis, not gallstones.

15
Unclear headings
  • Pathophysiology and differential diagnosis
  • Pathophysiology
  • The pathophysiology
  • Differential diagnosis
  • The differential diagnosis is
  • Hard to tell what is a heading and what is text,
    and what hierarchy is intended.

16
Use clear heading indicators
  • ltH1gtPathophysiology and Differential Diagnosis
  • ltH2gtPathophysiology
  • Blah, blah, blah
  • ltH2gtDifferential diagnosis
  • The differential diagnosis for chest pain
    includes

17
How would you rewrite this?
  • Before The clinically relevant pathophysiology
    of significant abdominal pain is based on whether
    pain is parietal or visceral in nature.
  • Dont state the obvious
  • After The pathophysiology of significant
    abdominal pain is based on whether pain is
    parietal or visceral.
  • If it wasnt clinically relevant why would you
    be talking about it in a clinical article? Also,
    in nature adds nothing.

18
Anyone see a problem here?
  • Before Patients with suspected gallbladder
    disease have been traditionally thought of with
    the terms of fat, forty, fertile, and female.
  • Dont offend your readers!
  • After Gallbladder disease is more common in
    women, obese patients, and it becomes more common
    as adults age.

19
Dont name authors in text
  • Before According to Jensen (8), many patients
    for whom this diagnostic code is chosen have
    irritable bowel syndrome, muscle strains, ovarian
    cysts, or any of the other conditions listed in
    the table (Table xx).
  • After Many patients for whom this diagnostic
    code is chosen actually have irritable bowel
    syndrome, muscle strains, ovarian cysts, or one
    of the other conditions listed in Table xx (8).

20
Dont name books in text
  • Before According to Oslers Medical Handbook
    (1), the approach to evaluating abdominal pain
    includes separating potential emergency and
    urgency from low risk or chronic disease and
    acting accordingly.
  • After Although most patients do not have a
    serious condition, and in many cases a final
    diagnosis is never made, it is always important
    to exclude serious or life-threatening disease
    (1).

21
Vague statements that reflect traditional wisdom
  • Patients on beta-blockers sometimes complain of
    fatigue and difficulty concentrating
  • Patients with depression or sleep disorders may
    be adversely affected by all adrenergic blocking
    agents, including clonidine, beta-blockers,
    methyldopa, and reserpine
  • Sexual dysfunction has been ascribed to all of
    the antihypertensive medications, particularly
    beta-blockers.

22
Replaced with evidence
  • It is important to note that beta-blockers have a
    much better tolerability profile than previously
    thought. A meta-analysis of 15 trials involving
    35,000 patients found no significant increase in
    the risk of depression and only small increases
    in the risk of sexual dysfunction (NNH 200 per
    year) and fatigue (NNH 57 per year).(78)

23
  • Do not cite other reviews except as a last
    resort.
  • Do cite
  • Original research
  • Systematic reviews and meta-analyses
  • Authoritative or evidence-based guidelines.

24
Traditional wisdom or evidence?
  • Before Beta-blockers may trigger bronchospasm in
    patients with asthma or chronic obstructive lung
    disease
  • After While it has been conventional wisdom that
    beta-blockers are contraindicated in patients
    with asthma or chronic obstructive lung disease
    because they might trigger bronchospasm,
    cardioselective beta-blockers have proven to be
    safe in such patients and should be prescribed
    when indicated.(63, 64)

25
Avoid weasel words
  • It has been suggested that
  • Some might consider
  • There is growing evidence that
  • Preliminary evidence suggests that

26
  • So much for grammar and style
  • on to formatting

27
Properly format your article
  • Double space all articles submitted to a journal
  • Adequate margins, i.e. 1 to 1.5
  • Insert hard page breaks after title page,
    abstract, body of paper, and each table
  • Ctrl-Enter
  • Do not use hard line breaks (i.e. Enter) except
    for a new paragraph
  • DEMO WITH WORD

28
Properly format your article
  • Use appropriate subheadings
  • ltH1gtMain heading
  • ltH2gtSubheading
  • ltH2gtSubheading
  • ltH1gtNext main heading
  • Use a nice font (not Courier!)
  • Arial
  • Times New Roman
  • Courier

29
References
  • Dont bury me with references ( 30 is a good
    target)
  • Dont cite 5 randomized trials when a single
    systematic review or meta-analysis will suffice
  • Dont use other review articles or monographs
    leads to medical gossip
  • Do use original research, meta-analyses,
    evidence-based guidelines, and systematic
    reviews.

30
References
  • Use proper format
  • AMA style
  • Authors. Title. Journal Year Volume Page range.
  • Ebell MH, Barry HC. POEMs in the medical
    literature. J Fam Pract 1998 43 341-4.
  • For Web citations include URL and date last
    cited.
  • Journals in social sciences use APA style

31
I have seen
  • No abstract
  • No title page
  • Single-spaced
  • No references
  • 10 or more spelling, grammatical, or
    typographical errors on the first page
  • Handwritten!

32
  • Follow the author instructions!!!
  • Be concise overall.
  • One idea per sentence
  • Write clearly and in a conversational tone
  • Use active voice
  • Remember, if it doesnt sound like something you
    could say in the hall to a colleague or in a
    lecture, you probably shouldnt write it.

33
Good luck!
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com