TWO-STAGE CLUSTER SAMPLING (WITH QUOTA SAMPLING AT SECOND STAGE) - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 33
About This Presentation
Title:

TWO-STAGE CLUSTER SAMPLING (WITH QUOTA SAMPLING AT SECOND STAGE)

Description:

two-stage cluster sampling (with quota sampling at second stage) statistical tables: table a random digits simple random sampling stratified random sampling ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:1846
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 34
Provided by: Pamel80
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: TWO-STAGE CLUSTER SAMPLING (WITH QUOTA SAMPLING AT SECOND STAGE)


1
SAMPLING METHODS
2
TWO-STAGE CLUSTER SAMPLING (WITH QUOTA SAMPLING
AT SECOND STAGE)
3
STATISTICAL TABLES Table A Random
Digits
4
SIMPLE RANDOM SAMPLING
5
STRATIFIED RANDOM SAMPLINGGrouped by
characteristic
6
SYSTEMATIC SAMPLING
7
CLUSTER SAMPLING
8
TWO STAGE CLUSTER SAMPLING (WITH RANDOM SAMPLING
AT SECOND STAGE)
9
FLOWCHART
10
TABLE 1
11
TABLE 2
12
POPULATION
  • Population units
  • e.g. children or adults
  • Population observations, characteristics or
    attributes
  • e.g. immunization history
  • Time and resources are limited so that only
    sample units and sample observations can be
    selected from the population.

13
Total Count versus sampling
  • National census is conducted every 10-15 years
  • Less accurate over time.
  • Less accurate in dynamic (shifting) populations.
  • Very expensive.

14
Sample surveys allows obtaining more extensive
information (smaller number of persons)
  • Need to train a limited number of interviewer
  • More in-depth questions or detailed data
  • Can quickly provide useful information
  • Relatively low cost

15
"Less is more" Mies Van der Rohe
  • A sample should be representative to the
    population of interest.

16
Simple Random Sampling
  • Need a list of all eligible persons in the
    population
  • Every person has equal chance (equal probability)
    to be selected in the sample
  • Basic method, important for comparison with other
    sampling methods
  • Provides an unbiased estimate of a variable in a
    population

17
Simple Random Sampling (continued)
  • Permits quantitative assessment of sampling error
  • Rarely used in actual surveys
  • Difficult
  • Expensive
  • Excessive travel time (different location
  • of subjects)
  • Excessive local introduction and organization
    time

18
Sampling with replacement
  • Individuals from a population of observations may
    appear more than once in a sample of population

19
Sampling without replacement
  • Individuals from a population of observations can
    appear only once in a sample of population.
  • This is the usual case.
  • Number of possible samples N!/n!(N-n)!
    (if order is not important)
  • Equal probability selection Method (EPSEM)
  • Use of random tables, or computers

20
Systematic Sampling
  • Similar Procedure
  • List all persons in the population
  • Define selection interval
  • (Sampled population)/(Sample size)
  • N/n
  • An integer for ease of field use

21
Systematic Sampling(continued)
  • Select a random starting point (first person in
    the sample)
  • Next selection the random start
  • the random interval
  • And so on and so forth
  • Data should not be ordered in a special way.

22
Stratified random sample
  • The population is divided into multiple strata
    based on common characteristics
  • e.g.
  • Residence (Urban or rural)
  • Tribe, ethnicity or race
  • Family income (poor, moderate, or wealthy)

23
Stratified random sample(continued)
  • A random sample is selected from each stratum
  • The samples from each stratum are combined for a
    single estimate of the population mean and
    variance.

24
One-Stage Cluster Sampling
  • The population is listed as groups (termed
    clusters), not individuals
  • e.g.
  • Area of residence (village, town, .. etc.)
  • School or classroom within a school
  • All clusters are listed and a sample of clusters
    is selected.
  • All persons in the selected clusters are
    examined.
  • The samples from each of the clusters are
    combined into a single estimate of the population
    mean and variance.

25
Two-Stage Cluster Sampling with Simple Random
Sampling at the Second Stage
  • Stage I A random sample of clusters
  • Stage II A sample from selected clusters
  • The samples from each of the selected clusters
    are combined into a single estimate of the
    population mean and variance.

26
Two-stage Cluster Sampling with Quota Sampling in
the Second Stage
  • The population is divided into multiple clusters.
  • Stage I A random sample of clusters
  • Stage II A random start
  • Interviewer continues
    within a cluster until the quota (constant
    number) is filled.
  • The samples from each cluster are combined into a
    single estimate of the population mean and
    variance.

27
Two-stage Proportionate to size (PPS) Cluster
Sample with Quota Sampling in the Second Stage
  • The population is divided into multiple clusters.
  • Stage I A random sample of clusters with
    probability proportionate to their size (PPS)
  • "Size" means the number of eligible persons
    residing in the cluster.
  • Stage II A random start
  • Interviewer continues within a
    cluster until the quota (constant
    number) is filled.

28
Two-stage Proportionate to size (PPS) Cluster
Sample with Quota Sampling in the Second Stage
(continued)
  • The samples from each cluster are combined into a
    single estimate of the population mean and
    variance.
  • This method is favored by Expanded program on
    Immunization (EPI).
  • Note No random selection in the second stage.

29
Probability sample versus Non-probability
sample
  • Every person has equal chance (equal probability)
    to be selected in the sample.
  • No bias
  • Generalization of the results
  •  
  • On average, the characteristics of people in
    probability samples are similar to those of the
    population from which they were selected,
    particularly if a larger number are chosen.

30
Probability sample versus Non-probability
sample
  • Sampling in clinical trials are usually highly
    selected and biased samples of all patients with
    the condition of interest. (Internal validity)
  • 1 Use of inclusion/ exclusion criteria
  • Restricts the heterogeneity of patients
  • Excludes atypical forms of the disease
  • Improves chances of patients completing the
    assigned treatment used in the study
  • Excludes presence of other diseases
  • Excludes an unusually poor prognosis
  • Excludes patients with contra-indication for the
    treatment

31
Probability sample versus Non-probability sample
(continued)
  • 2 Refusal of patients to participate in the
    study Tend to be systematically different from
    those who agree to enter in the trial
  • Socio-economic class
  • Severity of disease
  • 3 Patients who are thought to be
    unreliable (would not follow the groundrules of
    the trial are usually not enrolled.

32
PRECISION
  • Determine the desired level of precision i.e.
    amount of error in parameter estimates that can
    be tolerated by the decision-maker.
  • Definitions
  • Precision is the size of deviations from the
    average value of some parameters of interest
    obtained by repeated application of sampling
    procedures.
  •  
  • Accuracy is the size of deviations from the true
    mean of some parameter in a population.
  • In surveys, we cannot measure accuracy but can
    measure precision

33
MATCHING
  • Is stratified sampling in which numbers selected
    in each stratum are determined by the numbers in
    that stratum in some other sample.
  • Main stay in epidemiology.
  • 11 is the best.
  • Can have up to 51.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com