PPACA 6402(h): Credible Allegations of Fraud and New York - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 50
About This Presentation
Title:

PPACA 6402(h): Credible Allegations of Fraud and New York

Description:

New York State Office of the Medicaid Inspector General What Providers Need to Know about Payment Suspension James C. Cox, Acting Medicaid Inspector General – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:243
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 51
Provided by: OM0
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: PPACA 6402(h): Credible Allegations of Fraud and New York


1
New York State Office of the Medicaid Inspector
General
What Providers Need to Know about Payment
Suspension
James C. Cox, Acting Medicaid Inspector General
Mark Hennessey, Assistant Medicaid Inspector
General Michael E. Little, Deputy Medicaid
Inspector General for Investigations September 7,
2011
2
Introduction
  • James C. Cox
  • Acting Medicaid Inspector General
  • NYS Office of the Medicaid Inspector General

3
Todays Agenda
  • Fraud Allegations and the Federal Care Act
  • Definitions, Guidance and Examples
  • Preparation Implementation

4
Fraud Allegations and the Federal Care Act
5
Reporting and returning of overpayments
  • Section 6402(a)
  • Adds Section 1128J(d)(1)(A) to the Social
    Security Act
  • Reporting and returning of overpayments In
    general if a person has received an overpayment,
    the person shall
  • (A) report and return the overpayment to the
    Secretary, the State, an intermediary, a carrier,
    or a contractor, as appropriate, at the correct
    address and
  • (B) notify the Secretary, State, intermediary,
    carrier, or contractor to whom the overpayment
    was returned in writing of the reason for the
    overpayment.

6
Subpoena Authority
  • Section 6402(e)
  • Provides state governments with new testimonial
    subpoena authority in exclusion actions.
  • In New York, this was already in place prior to
    the Care Act.

7
Violation without Intention
  • Section 6402(f)(2)
  • Adds new subsection 1128B(g) of the Social
    Security Act
  • Amends the federal health care program
    anti-kickback statute by adding a provision to
    clarify that a person need not have actual
    knowledge of this section or specific intent to
    commit a violation of this section.

8
False Claims
  • Section 6402(g)
  • In addition to the penalties provided for in
    6402, a claim that includes seeking reimbursement
    for provision of items or services that violate
    this section constitutes a false or fraudulent
    claim for purposes of Subchapter III of Chapter
    37 of Title 31 USC.

9
REMINDER
We covered some of these sections in a July 2010
Webinar (see our website)
  • Mandatory Reporting of Medicaid Overpayments
    Under the Obama Health Program

10
TODAYS FOCUS
  • Today, we will focus on a specific section of the
    Care Act which structures suspension of payment
    as a result of a credible allegation of fraud.

11
Pre-Care ActSocial Security Law 1396(i)(2)
provider_name license_num provider_type provider_i
d county city state zip most_recent_action action_
type 1 STOP PHARMACY AND FOOD MART
INC 02935959 Queens JACKSON HEIGHTS NY 11372 02/
03/2009 Exclusion - 18NYCRR515 1055 PHARMACY
INC 00983091 Bronx BRONX NY 10452 01/01/1
987 Exclusion - 18NYCRR515 108 SEIGEL FARMACIA
INC 00015366 00261683 Kings BROOKLYN NY 11206
05/31/1983 Exclusion - 18NYCRR515 1230 FULTON
DRUGS CORP 00018678 00894940 Kings BROOKLYN NY 11
216 06/21/1990 Exclusion - 18NYCRR515 13 1/2
PALISADES DRUG CORP 00018881 00924474 Bronx BR
ONX NY 10455 01/24/1991 Exclusion - 18NYCRR515 14
LAWRENCE AVE PHARMACY CORP 00016123 00394330 Suff
olk SMITHTOWN NY 11787 08/31/1988 Exclusion -
18NYCRR515 149 EAST PHARMACY
INC 00018340 00857676 Bronx BRONX NY 10451 01/15/
1992 Exclusion - 18NYCRR515 1491 DEKALB AVE
PHARMACY INC 00018542 00883385 Kings BROOKLYN NY
11237 07/13/1992 Exclusion - 18NYCRR515 1630
PARK DRUGS INC 00018172 00831118 New
York NEW YORK NY 10029 12/12/1986 Exclusion -
18NYCRR515 168TH STREET DRUGS
INC 00017963 00826004 Queens LONG ISLAND
CITY NY 11101 10/27/1992 Exclusion -
18NYCRR515 1797 DRUG
CORP 00018409 00866546 Kings BROOKLYN NY 11207 01
/23/1991 Exclusion - 18NYCRR515 188 AVENUE A
CHEMIST 00014775 00264342 New York NEW
YORK NY 10009 05/11/1986 Exclusion -
18NYCRR515 195 5 AVE FARMACIA
INC 00016514 00399115 Kings BROOKLYN NY 11217 08/
18/1998 Exclusion - 18NYCRR515 1951 FLATBUSH AVE
PHARM CORP 00016936 01710407 Kings BROOKLYN NY 11
234 03/20/2009 Exclusion - 18NYCRR515 2001 BATH
AVE PHARMACY INC 00027339 Pharmacy 02681327 BROOK
LYN NY 11214 11/11/2009 Exclusion -
18NYCRR515 203 WEST 231 STREET PHMCY
INC 00017620 00732958 Bronx BRONX NY 10463 10/20/
1998 Exclusion - 18NYCRR515 2201 BROADWAY
INC 00014503 00564030 New York NEW
YORK NY 10024 10/05/1992 Exclusion -
18NYCRR515 2258 PHARMACY INC 00024517 01993282 Ne
w York NEW YORK NY 10035 07/10/2003 Exclusion -
18NYCRR515 227 NINTH AVENUE PHARMACY
INC 00017646 00750110 New York NEW
YORK NY 10011 09/03/1997 Exclusion -
18NYCRR515 236 BUSHWICK DRUG
CORP 00877629 Bronx BRONX NY 10455 12/14/1989 Ex
clusion - 18NYCRR515 236 BUSHWICK DRUG
CORP 00877629 Bronx BRONX NY 10455 12/14/1986 Ex
clusion - 18NYCRR515
  • Prevented payment for any amount expended for an
    item or service furnished by an excluded
  • Individual
  • Entity
  • Physician

12
Care Act 2010
  • Signed into law March 23, 2010.
  • Section 6402(h)
  • Prevents payment to any individual or entity
    during any period when there is pending an
    investigation of a credible allegation of
    fraudunless there is good cause not to
    suspend

13
Whats the difference?
  • In the pre-Care Act period, payment would have
    been prevented when there was a determined status
    of exclusion
  • Post-Care Act federal law now says that when a
    credible allegation of fraud against the
    individual or entity is pending or under
    investigation, payment must be suspended.
  • The change to the law lowers the threshold to
    suspend payments to a provider in cases of
    credible allegations of fraud.

14
What Does This Mean?
  • Federal financial participation stops when a
    determination is made that a credible allegation
    of fraud against the individual or entity is
    pending or under investigation.
  • Allegation is transmitted to New Yorks Medicaid
    Fraud Control Unit.
  • Pending and future referrals to the Medicaid
    Fraud Control Unit will be placed on suspension
    (with good cause exceptions more on this later).

15
Definitions, Guidance and Examples
16
Credible Allegation of Fraud
  • Verified allegation that has indicia of
    reliability
  • Can come from any source
  • Complaint made by former employee
  • Fraud hotline
  • Claims data mining
  • Patterns identified through
  • audits
  • civil false claims
  • investigations

17
Important Points
  • NYOMIG is required to review evidence and
    carefully consider the totality of facts and
    circumstances.
  • Suspension or even partial suspension is an
    extraordinary action, not a routine matter.
  • reserved only for cases where there are pending
    investigations of credible allegations of fraud.

18
Good Cause Exceptions What does that mean?
  • CMS regulations allow for discretion in cases
    where the best interest of law enforcement or the
    Medicaid program come into play as a result of an
    allegation of fraud.
  • These are called good cause exceptions.

19
Law Enforcement Good Cause
  • Law enforcement-related reasons to not suspend
    payments, such as where
  • There are requests by law enforcement.
  • It might give a heads up to a perpetrator, or
    it might expose undercover investigators,
    whistleblowers or confidential sources.

20
Other Good Causes
  • Good cause exceptions may be invoked, such as
    where
  • suspension is not in the best interests of the
    Medicaid program.
  • access to necessary items or services may be
    jeopardized.
  • This involves working with the other regulating
    agencies on access to care.

21
Other Good Causes
  • Examples could fall into either category
    depending on context, such as where
  • other available remedies could more effectively
    or quickly protect Medicaid funds than would
    implementing (or continuing) a payment suspension
  • immediate enjoinment of potentially unlawful
    conduct

22
Process Notes
  • The suspension process needs to be documented and
    maintained by NYOMIG.
  • The 6402(h) suspension process will be
    coordinated with regulating agencies and the
    Medicaid Fraud Control Unit.
  • Regulating agencies may be required to work with
    providers to accommodate patients who need care.

23
Common Question Fraud Hotline
  • Weve received the question several times does
    the new requirement mean that a single phone call
    will cause a 100 percent suspension of payment?
  • The answer is not necessarily but lets take a
    look at the process for a more detailed
    understanding.

24
Fraud Hotline Process Example
  • Hotline call comes in with an allegation that
    there is overbilling at a medical facility.
  • NYOMIG reviews and investigates the matter to
    determine the facts of the case
  • Maybe the allegation is unfounded
  • Maybe there is a credible allegation of fraud.
  • NYOMIG will work with our partners at the other
    regulating agencies as it relates to access to
    care.

25
Fraud Hotline Process Example
  • If a credible allegation exists
  • NYOMIG checks to make sure there is not a good
    cause exception and then decides whether to
    suspend and by how much.
  • NYOMIG will inform the other regulating agencies
    of the determination.
  • If theres not a credible allegation
  • No suspension is placed into effect.
  • TAKEAWAY A single phone call does not
    automatically trigger a suspension

26
Common Question Data Mining
  • Weve been asked whether the new requirements
    mean data matches will require a suspension.
  • Lets take a look at the process for a more
    detailed answer

27
Data Mining Process Example
  • Data mining identifies an outlier payment to an
    identifiable caregiver.
  • First, NYOMIG would identify whether there was a
    pattern or whether this overpayment was part of
    an overall concern.
  • As in the previous case, NYOMIG would review and
    investigate the matter to determine the facts of
    the case
  • Maybe the allegation is unfounded
  • Maybe there is a credible allegation of fraud.
  • NYOMIG would work with our partners at the other
    regulating agencies regarding access to care.

28
Data Mining Process Example
  • If a credible allegation is identified
  • NYOMIG checks to make sure there is not a good
    cause exception and then decides whether to
    suspend and by how much, after which NYOMIG will
    inform the other regulating agencies of the
    determination.

Credible Allegation
If theres not a credible allegation Maybe, for
example, there was a data error which looked like
an outlier but wasnt . No suspension is placed
into effect.
X
TAKEAWAY In accordance with federal guidance,
NYOMIG will review all evidence and carefully
consider the totality of facts and circumstances.
29
Notice of Suspension Elements, Part 1
  • Notice needs to
  • Be given within five days of taking action
    (unless the Medicaid Fraud Control Unit or law
    enforcement requests otherwise).
  • Detail general allegations as to the nature of
    the suspension action state that the suspension
    is for a temporary period.
  • State circumstances under which suspension will
    be terminated.

30
Notice of Suspension Elements, Part 2
  • Specify, when applicable, which type or types of
    Medicaid claims or business units are affected by
    the suspension.
  • Inform the provider of the right to submit
    written evidence for consideration by the state
    Medicaid agency.
  • Notice does not need to
  • Disclose any specific information concerning an
    ongoing investigation.
  • Provider may request an administrative appeal.

31
Other Related Information
  • Federal regulations Issued March 1, 2011, with
    effective date of March 25, 2011
  • Managed care also covered
  • Applies to institutional providers as well as
    providers who are employed and contracted by
    institutional providers

32
SHORT TERM IMPACT
  • Pending cases with credible allegations of fraud

LONG TERM IMPACT
New cases with credible allegations of fraud
33
Payment Suspension
  • State suspends payment upon formal referral to
    the Medicaid Fraud Control Unit.
  • Formal referral comes in the form of a letter to
    the Medicaid Fraud Control Unit
  • Informal communications do not constitute a
    referral
  • If the Medicaid Fraud Control Unit rejects the
    referral
  • State can refer to local law enforcement
  • If the Medicaid Fraud Control Unit and/or local
    law enforcement reject,
  • payment suspension under the Care Act is
    released immediately. This does not preclude the
    state from taking other administrative actions.

34
When does implementation of this new requirement
begin?
  • It already has. Implementation started in March
    with our office taking steps to implement this
    new law.
  • The Care Act requires ongoing cases to be placed
    on suspension.
  • OMIG collaborated with the Medicaid Fraud Control
    Unit to work through ongoing cases.
  • This work resulted in a number of cases which
    face immediate suspension.
  • New cases will also be subject to potential
    suspension of payment.

35
Federal Oversight
  • Annual report to CMS by program integrity agency
  • CMS will want to review when our office has
    suspended, when it hasnt and why.

36
What Records does the State Have to Maintain?
  • Five-year document retention requirement from
    date of determination includes all
  • (1) notices of suspension of payment in whole or
    part
  • (2) fraud referrals to the Medicaid Fraud Control
    Unit or other law enforcement
  • (3) quarterly certifications by the Medicaid
    Fraud Control Unit/law enforcement that a matter
    continues to be under investigation and
  • (4) notices documenting the termination of a
    suspension.

37
What Actions Does the Medicaid Fraud Control
Unit/Local Law Enforcement Need to Do?
  • Upon request, provide quarterly certifications to
    the NYOMIG that an accepted matter continues to
    be under active investigation.
  • Quarterly certifications must continue in order
    to continue a suspension.
  • Provide for a 30-day period (renewable in writing
    up to twice for a total not to exceed 90 days) by
    which law enforcement may, in writing, request
    the state agency to delay notification to a
    provider.

38
Preparation and Implementation
39
Preparation
  • NYOMIG realized that implementation of the Care
    Act section 6402(h) would be a state-level issue.
  • Partners at other state agencies were informed of
    the implications of this change in law.
  • The states overriding interest was to ensure
    that education and outreach to all affected
    entities would be part of our approach.
  • Several action items needed to be carried out to
    accomplish this objective.

40
Actions Taken NYOMIG
  • Coordination with Partner Agencies
  • Attorney Generals Medicaid Fraud Control Unit
  • Commission on Quality of Care for People with
    Developmental Disabilities
  • Department of Health
  • Office for Alcoholism and Substance Abuse
    Services
  • Office for Persons with Developmental
    Disabilities
  • Office of Mental Health
  • Office of Temporary Disability and Assistance

41
Actions Taken NYOMIG
  • Sent letter to Commissioners
  • Asking for advice on outreach and implementation
  • Informed the New York State Association of
    Counties (NYSAC), the New York State Association
    of County Health Officials (NYSACHO) and local
    social service districts
  • Briefed Legislative Chairs

42
Working with Providers and Provider Advocates
  • NYOMIG has collaborated with providers and
    provider advocates by organizing
  • Face-to-face meetings with providers, provider
    advocacy groups and patient advocates
  • Phone conferences
  • E-mails
  • Sharing guidance documents
  • Updates
  • Webinars
  • Requests to spread the word

43
Working with Providers and Provider Advocates
  • Samples of Meetings with Providers
  • Greater New York Hospital Association
  • New York City Health and Hospitals Corporation
  • Medical Society of the State of New York
  • Healthcare Association of New York State
  • Chain Pharmacies
  • Independent Pharmacies
  • New York State Conference of Local Mental Hygiene
    Directors
  • Home Care Association of New York
  • New York Association of Home Care Providers

44
Working with Provider Advocates and Patient
Advocates
  • Cerebral Palsy Association of New York
  • Medicaid Matters
  • Community Health Care Association of New York
  • New York State Association of Counties
  • New York State Association of County Health
    Officials
  • Long Term Care Community Coalition
  • Health and Welfare Council of Long Island
  • Southern Tier Independence Center
  • Alcohol and Substance Abuse Providers of New York
  • Continuing Care Leadership Coalition

45
Proposed Plan Action items
  • Partner Agencies
  • Information to providers
  • Advice to NYOMIG
  • Build process for reporting allegations to NYOMIG
  • Providers
  • Contribute to implementation
  • Work with NYOMIG
  • Self-disclose

46
Actions In Process NYOMIG
  • Issue Care Act-related regulations
  • Dedicated page on NYOMIG Web site
  • Continue work with
  • local governments
  • state level partners
  • providers and provider associations
  • patients and recipients
  • OMIG article for Medicaid Update (published
    monthly by DOH)

47
IMPLEMENTATION
  • NYOMIG has been working to implement this law
    since March
  • Throughout this process, NYOMIG has
  • proactively managed the implementation
  • coordinated with our partner regulating entities
    and state law enforcement
  • partnered with the provider community
  • committed to continuing these efforts.

48
RECAP
  • State-level implementation will follow current
    processes.
  • NYOMIG will follow federal law and guidance in
    carrying out suspensions or granting exceptions.
    A suspension is an extraordinary action used in
    cases where there are credible allegations of
    fraud.
  • NYOMIG will soon release regulations and other
    guidance that will speak to this issue.
  • Suspension is an extraordinary measure.
  • If you know of a fellow provider who is not
    participating in this Webinar, please pass along
    the information we will be posting this
    presentation on our Web site.
  • Thank you for listening now its our turn to
    listen to you. Please write to us, send emails,
    or give us a call. Contact information follows
    at the end of this webinar.

49
Reporting Allegations To NYOMIG
PHONE
EMAIL
MAIL
Letter Graphic
Fraud call graphic
Email Graphic
Email us at bac_at_omig.ny.gov or
information_at_omig.ny.gov
Fraud Hotline 1-877-87- FRAUD (1-877-873-7283)
  • NYSOMIG
  • 800 North Pearl Street
  • Albany, NY 12204

50
Other Ways to Participate with NYOMIG
  • Join our listserv receive information about
    upcoming events (sign-up information on home
    page)
  • Follow us on Twitter NYSOMIG
  • Linked In
  • Corporate integrity agreements, Compliance Alerts
    and compliance check lists
  • Audit reports and protocols
  • Excluded provider list
  • And much more on www.omig.ny.gov
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com