APPLICATION OF BAYESIAN BELIEVE NETWORKS FOR CONTINUOUS RISK EVALUATION AND DECISION SUPPORT OF SAFETY MANAGEMENT IN MINING - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 35
About This Presentation
Title:

APPLICATION OF BAYESIAN BELIEVE NETWORKS FOR CONTINUOUS RISK EVALUATION AND DECISION SUPPORT OF SAFETY MANAGEMENT IN MINING

Description:

APPLICATION OF BAYESIAN BELIEVE NETWORKS FOR CONTINUOUS RISK EVALUATION AND DECISION SUPPORT OF SAFETY MANAGEMENT IN MINING Todor P. Petrov University of Minig and ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:155
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 36
Provided by: tpp9
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: APPLICATION OF BAYESIAN BELIEVE NETWORKS FOR CONTINUOUS RISK EVALUATION AND DECISION SUPPORT OF SAFETY MANAGEMENT IN MINING


1
APPLICATION OF BAYESIAN BELIEVE NETWORKS FOR
CONTINUOUS RISK EVALUATION AND DECISION SUPPORT
OF SAFETY MANAGEMENT IN MINING
  • Todor P. Petrov
  • University of Minig and Geology St. Ivan Rilsky
    - Sofia
  • Department of Mine Safety and Ventilation
  • e-mail tpp_at_mgu.bg

2
Today the investigation and registering of an
accident requires
  • more than 60 fields of different data format
    describing quantitative and qualitative
    characteristics
  • more than 3000 massive of data for description of
    approximately 50 accidents annually

3
The psychology and cognitive sciences are
ascertain the fact that
  • the human mind cannot effectively manipulate a
    large amount of data streams and meet serious
    difficulties to make an inference when the
    possible decision have more than three
    alternatives
  • the chance of bad decisions runs high, the
    frequency of wrong actions increasing and the
    safety become pursuit rather than achieved
    purpose.

4
Practical decision making
  • It is well known that taking into account only
    quantificators of occupational safety risk like
    coefficients and indexes of frequency and
    severity of the accidents are not sufficient for
    characterization of safety state.

5
Important features of safety management
  • the probability and fuzzy uncertainty
  • manipulating of multisource quantitative and
    qualitative data
  • rendering the expert opinion.

6
The inherited disease of the typical approach
for safety analisys
  • Analyzing the safety risk by separately studying
    of isolated factors inevitably relates to loses
    of information about the mutuality in the
    examined system
  • In the terms of information such a disjoint is
    irreversible process

7
New synergetic approach should perceive for
decision support in occupational safety
  • A model putting together the dangers, the human
    factors and the control impacts including their
    mutual influences is needed.

8
MAR.NET project
  • Mine Accident Risk dot Net is an expert system
    for decision support of mine safety management
  • providing information fusion of different sources
    and types of evidence such as history databases,
    real time control systems and expert opinions.

9
CALCULATION OF RISK LEVEL
  • Risk Probability x Severity (1)

10
  • The low threshold of occupational risk can be
    calculated on
  • In practice the accident without looses of
    working days are not registered.
  • We can thing about Ro as a threshold of
    sensitivity of the safety monitoring system

11
Calculation of RISK LEVEL
Where Rc is the current risk Ro is the
low threshold of occupational risk.
  • The purpose of risk level is to give one-value
    quantification of the current state of the safety
    relative to the acceptable threshold taking into
    account the sensitivity of the risk measuring.

12
Properties of LR
  • LR is dimensionless
  • LR is always positive
  • If the current and the threshold risk are become
    equal than the safety level is calculated to
    zero. LR0 means no risk upper the threshold
    limit is detected.

Natural way of risk representation because the
human perceptions are determined exactly from
logarithmic levels as stated in psychophysical
law of Veber-Fehner
13
DRAWING OF INFERENCES FOR OCCUPATIONAL RISK
Fig. 1. Annually accident distribution
14
DRAWING OF INFERENCES FOR OCCUPATIONAL RISK
Fig. 2. Time row of accident frequencies
15
DRAWING OF INFERENCES FOR OCCUPATIONAL RISK
Reconstruction of phase space of the accident
frequency per month in 3D Fmonth, Fmonth-1,
Fmonth-2
16
DRAWING OF INFERENCES FOR OCCUPATIONAL RISK
Time row and reconstructed phase space of 15
minutes beats of a human heart
Panchev S. Chaos Theory, Academic Publisher,
Sofia 1996
17
Bayesian approach for statistical inference
  • (1) is a result known as law for complete
    probability
  • (2) is a result known as Bayes Theorem and
  • (3) is a result known as chain rule, with
    significant importance in Bayesian believe
    networks (BBN)

18
MAR.NET project
MAR.NET project Structure of the network
TM Powered by Hugin Lite
19
MAR.NET project
Initial probability table of the chance node 10.
Job
State Probability
A. Transport and load 0.2
B. Ordinary exploration 0.2
0.2
E. Other 0.2
20
MAR.NET project
Initial conditional probability table
P(17.Body18.Injury)
18.Injury A B Z
17.Body
A.Head 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25
B.Hands 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25
C.Legs 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25
D.Body 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25
Total 1 1 1 1
21
MAR.NET project
Learning and adoption of MAR.NET
Learning and adoption of MAR.NET
Learning and adoption of MAR.NET
Posterior probability distribution of node
10.Job about all given states from A to E
22
Learning and adoption of MAR.NET
  • Learning of MAR.NET from data cases

Node01 Node02 Node03 Node21
A N/A Q D
C I N/A N/A

The machine learning method used in MAR.NET is
known as EM-algorithm and it is commonly used in
BBN for graphical associated models with missing
data.
23
Structure Learning of MAR.NET
  • The algorithms for structure learning of BBN are
    known as PC-algorithms

24
Structure Learning of MAR.NET
  • As a result of the structure machine learning of
    MAR.NET with 122 data cases for registered
    accidents in coal mine of Babino Bobov dol, the
    conditional dependency of the following variables
    was accepted in LC0.05
  • Occupation gtgt Time of occurrence of the accident
  • Length of service gtgt Human factor
  • Education Level gtgt Day after weekend
  • Day after weekend gtgt Deviation from ordinary
    actions.

25
Entering Expert Opinions in MAR.NET
  • The algorithm for entering of expert opinion
    used in MAR.NET allows control of the actuality
    of learned experience. The control of the
    actuality uses special data structures for
    reducing the impact of past called fading tables.

26
Simulation of data cases
  • A way to test the safety system in lack of data
    and uncertainty
  • Three approaches for obtaining simulated
    experience are easy applicable in MAR.NET model
  • generating of simulated data cases based on
    variations of the current prior distribution
  • generating data cases with simulation model of
    the object using advanced tools as special
    languages
  • to change structure of the net depending of new
    knowledge, and to derive conclusions against the
    direction of the edges

27
MAR.NET example
  • Example is based on the real data for a Bulgarian
    coal mining company with underground mining, open
    pit mining and dress factory.
  • Structural changes in company are provided in the
    future time. From the company structure will be
    ousting the underground mines and the repair
    shops, but the steam power plant will be
    incorporated.

28
MAR.NET example
  • What we need to expect about the risk for
    different groups of workers and the probabilities
    of environment causes?

29
Prior distributions
The knowledge about the object is extracted from
data cases about registered accidents with
learning algorithm
30
Posterior distribution
  • Structural changes in the company are reflected
    in BBN node structure
  • After Bayesian propagation through the network
    the posterior distribution is computed.

31
Back propagation.Obtaining inference against
the edges of MAR.NET
  • Let now to propagate the opinion that in future
    the fatalities will increase twice
  • It will change the Bayesian probability in
    station F. Fatalities of node 3 from 0.08 to
    0.16
  • Let start the back-propagation of this new prior
    probability distribution
  • The new posterior distribution is achieved.

32
The new posterior distributionis the answer of
the question
  • What we need to expect about the risk for
    different groups of workers and the probabilities
    of environment causes?
  • Using of faulty, unassured machines and
    facilities
  • Using equipment inadequate of working conditions.
  • Will lead to increasing of risk of fatalities in
    the groups of
  • Staff at the surface and
  • Open pit mine workers.

33
Conclusions
  • MAR.NET project produced a decision support
    method with a supporting tool for quantifying
    safety in complex systems using Bayesian Networks
    as a core technology.
  • The system can be adopted for different
    industries
  • The well learned MAR.NET models can be used for
    decision support of safety management, education
    and training.

34
MAR.NET key benefits
  • rationally combine different sources and types of
    evidence in single model
  • identify weaknesses in the safety argument such
    that it can be improved
  • specify degrees of confidence associated with
    prediction
  • provide a sound basis for rational discussion and
    negotiation about the safety system development
    and deployment.

35
  • Thank You
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com