Vertebral Intracavitary Cement - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 37
About This Presentation
Title:

Vertebral Intracavitary Cement

Description:

Vertebral Intracavitary Cement & Samarium (VICS). A Novel Approach to treat Painful Vertebral Metastases H. Ashamalla, M. Macedon,, E. Cardoso, L. Weng,, B. Mokhtar ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:144
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 38
Provided by: MarkandLi
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Vertebral Intracavitary Cement


1
Vertebral Intracavitary Cement Samarium
(VICS). A Novel Approach to treat Painful
Vertebral Metastases
  • H. Ashamalla, M. Macedon,, E. Cardoso, L. Weng,,
    B. Mokhtar, A. Guirguis, N. Panigrahi.
  • Radiation Oncology and Neurosurgery departments
  • New York Methodist Hospital, Weill Medical
    college of Cornell University, NY.

2
Background
  • Each year, more than 100,000 patients in the U.S.
    develop bone metastases.
  • Bone is the third most common site of metastatic
    disease after liver and lung
  • Up to 40 of patients presenting with bone mets.
    will have spinal/vertebral mets, 90 of whom will
    develop severe axial pain

3
Metastatic Bone DiseaseEpidemiology - Etiology
Estimated Number of Persons Living with Cancer1 Number of New Cases in 20041 Incidence of Bone Metastases2
Breast 2,184,125 (24) 217,440 (16) 65-75
Prostate 1,838,653 (20) 230,110 (17) 65-75
Bladder 521,945 (6) 60,240 (4) 40
Lung 388,538 (4) 173,770 (13) 30-40
Thyroid 273,642 (3) 23,600 (2) 60
Other 4,013,458 (43) 705,160 (52)
Total 9,220,361 (100) 1,368,030 (100)
1. SEER Cancer Statistics Review 1975 2001,
National Cancer Institute 2. Coleman, R.E.
Cancer Treatment Reviews. 200127165-176.
4
Metastatic Bone DiseaseMetastasis Sites
  • Most common sites of metastasis
  • Vertebra (69)
  • Pelvis (41)
  • Femur (25)
  • Hip (14)
  • Median time from cancer diagnosis to bone
    metastasis is 30 months

5
Vertebral Compression fractures (VCF)-
  • Metastatic cancer in the bone causes skeletal
    complications every 3 to 4 months.
  • 17 50 of patients with metastatic breast
    cancer will develop VCFs annually.
  • Median time to first fracture among breast cancer
    patients (not on bisphosphonate) is 12.8 months.

6
Metastatic Bone DiseaseTreatment Goals
  • Reduce pain
  • Eradicate or reduce tumor when primary tumors are
    involved
  • Prevent neurologic complications
  • Treat pathologic fractures and prevent recurrent
    fracture

7
A) Surgical Treatment
  • Operative Management
  • Vertebral column reconstruction
  • A or P decompression with internal fixation
  • Oncology patients are generally poor candidates
    for open surgery due to soft bone/tumor mass and
    co-morbidities
  • Minimally Invasive Procedures
  • Kyphoplasty
  • Vertebroplasty

8
Balloon Kyphoplasty
  • Patient placed in lateral decubitus position
  • Trochar inserted into anterior vertebral body
    under fluoroscopic guidence
  • Curretting performed for tissue sample
  • Balloon inflated to decompress the fracture and
    to open up space for cement injection
  • Balloon removed and PMMA bone cement injected
    into cavity to stabilize the vertebra

9
Balloon Kyphoplasty

10
Balloon Kyphoplasty
  • Shown to significantly reduce pain associated
    with VCF in patients with metastatic bony lesions
  • However, this procedure does not address the
    neoplastic component of the problem

11
B) Radiation Treatment for Bony Metastasis
  • External radiation
  • Radionuclides systemic administration, localize
    to all bony mets
  • Strontium-90
  • Samarium-153

12
Samarium-153
  • Created by bombarding Samarium-152 (stable) with
    neutrons
  • Comes from manufacturer complexed to EDTMP
  • Beta particles from Sm-153 travel 3.1mm in
    tissue, 1.7mm in bone
  • Typically administered at the dose of 1mCi/kg

13
Samarium-153 (systemic)
  • When given IV, Sm-153-EDTMP (Quadramet) has an
    affinity for bone and will concentrate in areas
    of high bone turnover, especially bony metastasis
  • Mechanism of relief of bone pain is unknown, but
    may be due to suppression of the growth of the
    tumor cells from radiation
  • Major adverse effect of systemic administration
    is hematologic toxicity with nadir at 3-4wks
  • Leukopenia 60
  • Thrombocytopenia 69
  • Decr. Hemoglobin 40

14
Vertebral Intracavitary Cement and Samarium VICS
  • Procedure
  • Materials
  • Methods

15
Vertebral Intracavitary Cement and Samarium
VICS
  • A novel approach to bony metastasis
  • Employs combination of balloon kyphoplasty and
    anti-tumoral activity of Sm-153 injected directly
    into the affected vertebra

16
Objectives
  • Study feasibility of intravertebral
    administration of Sm-153 with kyphoplasty
  • Assess procedure-related morbidities
    (specifically hematological) related to procedure
  • Monitor pain relief and durability of response

17
Eligibility
  • Inclusion criteria
  • Documented bone mets with intact anterior wall of
    vertebra
  • Recurrent pain or progression of metastases in
    areas treated by prior external RT
  • Acceptable candidate for kyphoplasty
  • Good performance status, Karnofsky 60
  • Exclusion criteria
  • Epidural soft tissue component
  • Cord impingement or compression
  • Inability to undergo anesthesia

18
  • IRB approval was obtained
  • After signing consent, all patients were assessed
    for pre-op pain level.
  • Pre-op MRI, CT and/or bone scan, confirming
    presence of bony metastasis.

19
VICS Procedure
  • Insertion of trochar and balloon as with the
    balloon Kyphoplasty approach
  • Under tight radiation safety measures, Sm-153 in
    escalating doses(1-4mCi) is co-injected and mixed
    with the cement as it is injected into the cavity
    of the vertebra using a three way valve.
  • Equipment, drapes, and room are surveyed
    post-operatively. Contaminated needles etc. are
    taken to the radioactive lab to allow for safe
    decay

20
Procedure
  • Serial Samarium nuclear scans were obtained
    post-op on days 0, 1, 2, and 4.
  • F/U bone scans and MRIs were obtained at least 1
    month post procedure
  • Serial blood counts were also monitored

21
Patients
  • 33 procedures were performed in 26 patients (18
    males and 8 females).
  • Seven patients had procedures performed in two
    vertebral levels.
  • The mean age of the cohort was 64 years (range 33
    to 86).
  • The mean pain score prior to treatment was
    8.8/10.

22
Patients
Type
Lung 12 46
Prostate 5 19
Colon 2 7.5
Multiple Myeloma 2 7.5
Urinary Bladder 1 4
Ovary 1 4
Breast 1 4
Stomach 1 4
Head neck 1 4
23
Distribution of Treated Vertebrae
  • Of the 33 vertebrae treated, 20 were in the
    lumbar spine, 12 were in the thoracic spine and 1
    was in the sacral spine.

24
Escalating Doses of Samarium
Dose of samarium (mCi) Number of Procedures (Patients)
1 4(3)
2 7(7)
2.5 6(5)
3 8(5)
4 8(6)
25
A) Patients tolerance
  • There was no mortality or procedure-related
    complications.
  • There was no hematological toxicity, no
    significant change in the WBC, Hg and platelets
    was seen at one month after the procedure.
  • Estimation of dose contribution to spinal cord
    using diagrammatic and inverse square models was
    40 6 cGy.

26
B) Pain control
  • All patients tolerated procedure very well.
  • The mean pain score (VAS) improved from 8.5 (2)
    prior the procedure to 2.6 (3.1) one day after
    the procedure (plt0.0001).
  • The ECOG performance scores only improved
    marginally from 2.4 (1) before to 2 (1) after
    (p0.035, one-sided test).

27
C) Accuracy and Feasibility
  • Whole body Samarium scans confirmed the local
    absorption injected 153Samarium-EDTMP in the
    intended vertebra in 32 out of the 33 injections.
  • One patient did not demonstrate clear absorption
    of the 153Samarium-EDTMP in the site with no
    evidence of spillage nor there was systemic
    absorption.
  • No appreciable radiation leakage or spillage was
    encountered.

28
Localization of Sm-153 in the injected vertebra
persistently shown at 3, 24, 48, and 96 hours of
post injection.
48 hrs
96 hrs
24 hrs
3 hrs
29
C) Accuracy and Feasibility
  • Prior to treatment (A B) low-signal lesion and
    hyperintensity (arrows) in the anterior aspect of
    the vertebral body.
  • 12 months after procedure (C , D)
  • local control of the disease is observed

30
C) Accuracy and Feasibility
  • On the left side there is evidence of targeting
    at the injected L2. Decrease in signal from day 1
    to day 3 after treatment is observed.
  • The decline of radioactivity was consistent with
    the known half life of 153Sm and followed the
    physical in-vitro decay. On the right side, the
    curve shows the mean in vivo decay of 153Sm in 11
    patients ( 1SD) as compared to in vitro decay.

31
D) Systemic absorption
  • Variable systemic absorption was evident in
    Samarium scans in all patients (9-75). The mean
    ratio between the concentrations of 153Sm in the
    target vertebrae and normal tissues was 3726.3
    (ranging from 9.3 to 92.1).
  • Patients with wide spread bone disease had
    demonstrated Samarium absorption in distant
    metastatic sites.
  • Asymptomatic extravasation of cement/Samarium was
    encountered in 6 vertebrae (6/33).

32
Absorbed Sm-153 targets other skeletal lesions
right clavicle, manubrium, and right posterior
ilium. All these lesions were present on
pre-treatment bone scan.
Ant.
Post
Ant.
Post
Bone scan
Samarium scan
33
D) Cytotoxic effect
  • Reduced intensity of bone tracer (99mTc-MDP)
    uptake was studied in 8 patients
  • The ratio of mean counts in the intended vertebra
    to soft tissue after correction to background was
    12.1 prior to the procedure dropped down to 6.9
    at the last follow up scan (3-12 months)

34
D) Cytotoxic Effect
  • Whole-body bone scans before treatment, at 8 and
    22 months post-treatment. The new scan reveals
    reduction of uptake at the treated vertebra L1,
    while new area of uptake appears at L2.

35
Drawbacks to VICS
  • Radiation Safety Open liquid radiation source.
  • Obtaining Sm-153 on a timely basis from
    manufacturer
  • Unsuitable for open procedures

36
Conclusions Vertebral Intracavitary Cement and
Samarium VICS
  • Injection of Sm-153 is feasible and can be
    performed safely
  • No adverse effects were seen as a result of the
    procedure
  • No hematologic toxicities were seen
  • Indirect evidence for the cytotoxicity of the
    procedure is observed through reduction of the
    intensity of uptake in bone scan.

37
Future Directions
  • Need direct head-to-head comparison of VICS with
    balloon Kyphoplasty to determine if there is any
    net change in the duration of response, or in
    level of pain relief
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com