The Future of Health Care for Older People: Will the Disadvantaged by Left Behind? - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

The Future of Health Care for Older People: Will the Disadvantaged by Left Behind?

Description:

The Future of Health Care for Older People: Will the Disadvantaged by Left Behind? Chad Boult, MD, MPH, MBA Professor and Director Lipitz Center for Integrated Health ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:160
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 24
Provided by: DeptofFa
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: The Future of Health Care for Older People: Will the Disadvantaged by Left Behind?


1
The Future of Health Care for Older PeopleWill
the Disadvantaged by Left Behind?
  • Chad Boult, MD, MPH, MBA
  • Professor and Director
  • Lipitz Center for Integrated Health Care
  • Department of Health Policy and Management
  • Bloomberg School of Public Health
  • Johns Hopkins University

2
Forces that will shape the future of health care
  • Growth in the size of the older population
  • The epidemiology of chronic conditions
  • The costs and effects of chronic conditions
  • The demand for high-quality care

3
Epidemiology of Aging
4
The Disability Problem
5
75 of Medicares funds are expended on 10 of
its beneficiaries
  • (those with chronic conditions)

6
Chronic conditions lead to
  • Functional impairment
  • Disrupted roles and relationships
  • Discomfort
  • Loss of time and money
  • Depression
  • Poor quality of life
  • Premature mortality

7
Compared to seniors of today, many seniors of
2020 will be
  • More affluent
  • More educated
  • More entitled to health and independence
  • More demanding of high-quality care
  • More willing to spend for it

8
Innovations in Therapy
  • Health Enhancement
  • Self management
  • Geriatric evaluation and management
  • ACE units
  • Interdisciplinary home care
  • Case management
  • Group care
  • Disease management
  • Home hospital
  • Transitional care
  • Nursing home teams

9
Effectiveness of Health Enhancement Program
  • Randomized trial of multifaceted intervention
  • 26 lower disability
  • 72 fewer hospital days/1000
  • Leveille et al. J Am Geriatr Soc 1998

10
Effectiveness of Self-Management
  • Randomized clinical trial
  • Function
  • General health, energy
  • Hospital days
  • Costs
  • Lorig et al. Med Care 1999

11
Effectiveness of GEM
  • Randomized trial
  • 33 reduction in loss of function
  • 56 reduction in depression
  • 57 reduction in caregiver burnout
  • 9 higher patient satisfaction
  • highly rated by primary care physicians
  • no effect on mortality
  • cost 1,350 per person treated
  • Boult et al. J Am Geriatr Soc 200149(4)351-359

12
Effectiveness of ACE Units
  • Randomized trial
  • Satisfaction
  • Function
  • LOS ( costs)
  • Landefeld et al. NEJM 1995
  • Covinski et al. J Am Geriatr Soc 1997

13
Effectivenessof Traditional Home Care
  • Functional ability
  • Satisfaction
  • Use of hospitals
  • Use of outpatient care
  • Use of NHs
  • Mortality
  • Total costs
  • none
  • slight increase
  • slight increase
  • slight increase
  • slight increase
  • slight decrease
  • 15 increase
  • No effects are statistically significant _at_ p lt
    0.05
  • Hedrick et al. HSR 1986

14
Cost-Effective Home Care
  • Sick, disabled older people
  • Physician-led interdisciplinary teams
  • Regular patient care conferences
  • Operational efficiencies

15
Effectiveness of IHC
  • Randomized trials
  • Better IADLs, ability to walk
  • Greater satisfaction for pts, families
  • Less use of hospitals/clinics/NHs
  • Total costs reduced by 20
  • Melin et al. Am J Pub Health 1993
  • Cummings et al. Arch Intern Med 1990

16
Effectiveness of CM
  • SW oriented
  • No cost savings
  • Boult et al. J Am Geriatr Soc 2000
  • Nursing oriented
  • No improvement in health, quality of life,
    functional ability, satisfactions with care or
    use of health services
  • Gagnon et al. J Am Geriatr Soc 1999

17
The available evidence suggests that these
innovations will
  • Improve satisfaction
  • Improve function
  • Possibly reduce some costs for insurers

18
Model of Senior Care
Proactive primary care team
Activated person, family
IHC
Self- mgmt
GEM
ACE
HEP
Disease Mgmt.
Trans. Care
Group Care
NH
Home hosp.
19
Requirements
  • Information systems
  • Professional education
  • Quality improvement systems
  • Aligned incentives
  • Investment in innovation

20
Who Will Pay
  • Medicare?
  • Employers?
  • Individuals?

21
Economic Status ofRetiring Baby Boomers
  • Greater income and net worth than parents
  • Haves and have nots
  • Demographic differences

22
Future Care for Chronic Illness
  • Will produce better outcomes
  • Will require out-of-pocket payments by retired
    baby boomers
  • Will be available to affluent retirees
  • Will be unavailable to disadvantaged groups

23
The Choice
  • Two-tiered health care, or
  • (Intra-generational) subsidy for the
  • have nots
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com