Modeling the Dynamics of Urban Development and the Effect of Public Policies - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Modeling the Dynamics of Urban Development and the Effect of Public Policies

Description:

Modeling the Dynamics of Urban Development and the Effect of Public Policies The Human Dimension of PRISM Marina Alberti Alan Borning Paul Waddell – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:141
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 28
Provided by: pwad
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Modeling the Dynamics of Urban Development and the Effect of Public Policies


1
Modeling the Dynamics of Urban Development and
the Effect of Public Policies
  • The Human Dimension of PRISM
  • Marina Alberti
  • Alan Borning
  • Paul Waddell

2
Outline of Talk
  • Scope of the Human Dimension
  • The UrbanSim model system
  • Land cover change model
  • Current research agenda
  • Objectives for this Year

3
The Scope of the Human Dimension
  • Inputs
  • Starting conditions inventories of land use,
    land cover, real estate, business locations, and
    household locations
  • Macro-economic and demographic trends
  • Local infrastructure investments and
    regulations/pricing (transportation, water,
    sewer)
  • Land use policies (growth management,
    comprehensive land use plans, environmental
    regulations)
  • Outcomes
  • Spatial patterns of land use and land cover
    change
  • Spatial patterns of real estate development and
    prices
  • Spatial patterns of business and household
    location

4
UrbanSim Modeling Approach
  • Model choices of agents
  • Discrete choice models (multinomial logit)
  • Microsimulate individual agents
  • Dynamically simulate annual time steps
  • Model market interactions
  • Use very disaggregate spatial units (150 Meter
    grid cells)

5
A 150 Meter Grid Cell in the Queen Anne
Neighborhood
6
Classification of Development Types
7
Current UrbanSim Components
8
Factors Considered in Residential Location Model
  • Household Characteristics
  • Income
  • Age
  • Presence of children
  • Number of workers
  • Number of Vehicles
  • Housing Characteristics
  • Cost
  • Quality
  • Density
  • Neighborhood Characteristics
  • Neighborhood housing density
  • Neighborhood commercial and industrial space
  • Neighborhood retail employment
  • Neighborhood land values
  • Regional Accessibility to Employment by Transit
    and Auto for
  • 0 car households
  • 1 car households
  • 2 car households

All independent variables are endogenous in the
model system
9
Factors Considered in Employment Location Model
  • Employment Characteristics
  • Industry Sector
  • Nonresidential Space Characteristics
  • Cost
  • Type of Space
  • Density
  • Local Characteristics
  • Land values
  • Agglomeration Economies mix of jobs by sector
  • Proximity to Freeways and Arterials
  • Regional Accessibility to Population

All independent variables are endogenous in the
model system
10
Factors Considered in Real Estate Development
Model
  • Site characteristics
  • Existing development characteristics
  • Land use plan
  • Environmental constraints
  • Urban design-scale
  • Proximity to highway and arterials
  • Proximity to existing development
  • Neighborhood land use mix and property values
  • Recent development in neighborhood
  • Regional
  • Access to population and employment
  • Travel time to CBD, airport
  • Vacancy rates

All independent variables are endogenous in the
model system
11
Factors Considered in Land Price Model
  • Site characteristics
  • Development type
  • Land use plan
  • Environmental constraints
  • Regional accessibility
  • Access to population and employment
  • Urban design-scale
  • Land use mix and density
  • Proximity to highway and arterials
  • Vacancy rates

All independent variables are endogenous in the
model system
12
Assessment of Current Status
  • Operational urban simulation system
  • Open Source software at www.urbansim.org
  • Generic SQL Database for read/write
  • Interoperates with GIS
  • Version 2.0 now completed (complete
    re-engineering)
  • Has been applied in Eugene-Springfield, Honolulu,
    Salt Lake City, Houston now starting
  • Puget Sound application to be supported by Puget
    Sound Regional Council

13
(No Transcript)
14
Land Cover Change Model
  • A new model component under development
  • Predicts probability of 30 meter cell changing
    land cover classification during a single year
  • Separate model specifications for differing
    conditions
  • Cells affected by land use change in immediate
    area
  • Urban-rural fringe areas not immediately affected
    by land use change event
  • Urban (built up) areas not affected by land use
    change
  • Rural (agricultural, forest) areas not affected
    by land use change

15
Land Cover Change
The probability of transition of a pixel of
initial land cover i at time t having the same
land cover class at time t1 (j0) or changing
to one of the other land cover classes (j 1J)
can be written as a multinomial logit
Where Pij is the probability of land cover
at a given grid cell at time t having the same
cover class at time t1 or changing to another
cover class. ?j is a vector of estimated logit
coefficients. J is the number of land cover
states

16
(No Transcript)
17
Independent Variables
Intensity of development event Devtype
transition 124 Specific attributes of site
Land cover Slope of cell Aspect
of cell Soil quality Parcel
ownership Parcel size Land value
Distance to critical areas Distance to
nearest road Distance to water
infrastructure Distance to critical areas
Distance to nearest road Distance to
CBD Distance to forest source area
Distance to nearest land cover transition
Distance to nearest development event
Restriction on minimum lot size
Continued.
18
Independent Variables
Spatial context of development Built-up
density Road density High erodible soils
of prime farmland Mean patch size of
land use/cover Contagion of land
use/cover Dominant land use/cover Transition to
land cover Residential units recently
added Commercial units recently added Road
capacity recently added Change in mean patch
size Position on the urban gradient Urban Growth
Boundary
19
(No Transcript)
20
(No Transcript)
21
(No Transcript)
22
Current Research Projects
  • National Science Foundation, Urban Research
    Initiative, Reusable Modeling Components for
    Simulating Land Use, Transportation, and Land
    Cover, Marina Alberti, Alan Borning, Scott
    Rutherford, Paul Waddell, 439,357, 1999-2001.
  • National Science Foundation, The Impact of Urban
    Patterns on Ecosystem Dynamics, Marina Alberti,
    Derek Booth, Kristina Hill, and John Marzluff,
    424,977, 1999-2003.

23
Current Research Projects
  • National Science Foundation, Information
    Technology Research Initiative, Interaction and
    Participation in Integrated Land Use,
    Transportation, and Environmental Modeling, Alan
    Borning, Batya Friedman, Mark Gross, David
    Notkin, Zoran Popovic, and Paul Waddell,
    3,500,000, 2001-2006.
  • National Science Foundation, Digital Government
    Program, Software Architectures for
    Microsimulation of Urban Development,
    Transportation, and Environmental Impact, Alan
    Borning, David Notkin, and Paul Waddell,
    600,000, 2001-2004.

24
Current Research Projects
  • National Science Foundation, Biocomplexity
    Program, Modeling the Interactions between Real
    Estate Development, Land Cover Change, and Bird
    Diversity, Marina Alberti, Mark Handcock, John
    Marzluff, Paul Waddell, 1,128,818, 2001-2004.
  • Federal Highway Administration, Case Study on
    the Application of UrbanSim to the Salt Lake City
    Region, Paul Waddell and Alan Borning, 150,000,
    2002-2003.
  • Puget Sound Regional Council, Development of a
    Land Use Model, Paul Waddell, Alan Borning,
    Marina Alberti, 150,000, 2002-2003.

25
Proposed Research Objectives for 2002-3(funded
by sources other than PRISM)
  • Development of the data and calibration of the
    existing UrbanSim model specification for the
    Central Puget Sound region (King, Kitsap, Pierce,
    and Snohomish counties) pending funding from
    PSRC.
  • Development of land cover classification and
    accuracy assessment for Landsat images every two
    years from 1986 to 2001.
  • Calibration and testing of the initial version of
    the land cover change model for at least King
    County pending funding from King County DNR.
  • Work on an indicators and evaluation component
    for UrbanSim, to support a set of predefined
    indicators, and flexibility to allow users to
    modify and add indicators.

26
PRISM-Specific Objectives
  • Developing close collaboration with the Crystal
    Team, to set up the protocols for coupling
    UrbanSim and Crystal, jointly defining the
    specifications for a water demand model, and
    implementing the model as a component within the
    UrbanSim architecture.
  • Developing close collaboration with the DHSVM
    Team to set up the protocols for coupling
    UrbanSim and DHSVM through the land cover change
    model and jointly defining specifications to add
    the artificial drainage to the hydrological model
    in urbanizing landscapes.

27
PRISM-Specific Objectives
  • Expanding the scope of the UrbanSim Indicators
    and Evaluation component to incorporate more
    environmental indicators, with input from other
    PRISM teams. Some or all of these additional
    indicators would come from other PRISM model
    outputs, so this would also require setting up
    protocols for passing the information from those
    models to the indicator component.
  • Restructuring and teaching an Introduction to
    Urban Simulation course, scheduled for Spring
    2003. It will serve as a workshop and
    introduction to urban simulation using UrbanSim,
    focusing on the application of the model to the
    Puget Sound, and development of indicators and
    the creation and evaluation of scenarios.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com