Will a Wealthier India be a Healthier India? - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Will a Wealthier India be a Healthier India?

Description:

Will a Wealthier India be a Healthier India? Jishnu Das, Shanta Devarajan, Jeff Hammer, Lant Pritchett India has been growing rapidly since the 1980s – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:85
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 53
Provided by: jdas2
Learn more at: https://www.icrier.org
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Will a Wealthier India be a Healthier India?


1
Will a Wealthier India be a Healthier India?
  • Jishnu Das, Shanta Devarajan, Jeff Hammer, Lant
    Pritchett

2
India has been growing rapidly since the 1980s
3
And increases in income have translated into
4
Higher life-expectancy (population sized circles,
India is big blue, China big red
5
Lower child-mortality
6
And lower fertility
7
And yet
8
There are three good reasons to worry
9
Reason 1 Improving health outcomes further may
require substantially higher investments in
public health services
10
where our performance is not stellar (not even
lunar)
Source WDI Indicators Database
11
Reason 2 Morbidity is taking a toll on Indias
productive capabilities
12
Reason 3 and the poorest 20 are not doing that
well at all (worse than BGD)
13
But we have known this for 60 years
  • If it were possible to evaluate the loss, which
    this country annually suffers through the
    avoidable waste of valuable human material and
    the lowering of human efficiency through
    malnutrition and preventable morbidity, we feel
    that the results would be so startling that the
    whole country would be aroused and would not rest
    until a radical change has been brought about.
  • Bhore Committee Report 1946

14
A Roadmap
  • Three things you should know about the Indian
    health system (and are fairly well known by now)
  • Four more things you should know about the Indian
    health system (and are fairly new)
  • What doesnt work (but is often done)
  • What might work

15
The Indian health system according to The
Mindset (at least on record)
The system is Pyramidal
Basic Care is universally given by the state
  • Most people use public facilities
  • The private sector is just quackery and
    crookery
  • Sub center for every 5,000 people
  • PHC for every 30,000 people etc. etc.
  • Integrated referral chain

16
Mindset (at least on record)
Poor people rely on the public system the
benefits of public care mostly accrue to them
17
In Reality(and this is well known)
18
Fact 1 Most spending is private the fraction
on genuine public goods is tiny
19
(No Transcript)
20
(No Transcript)
21
(No Transcript)
22
(No Transcript)
23
75 Boxes on Private Care!
24
In factIndia is one of the most private systems
of health care in the world
25
And its becoming even more private
  • The public share of institutional deliveries (of
    babies) fell from 57.3 to 48.2 between 1992 and
    1998 (NFHS I, II)
  • The public share of all deliveries fell between
    1998 and 2001 (RCH I, II) as the private
    sectors share rose from 9.4 to 21.5
  • Recall Pay commission raises of 1997 makes this
    unlikely to be due to lack of money health
    ministries are very labor intensive

26
Fact 2 The poor use private care as much as the
rich
27
Fact 2 The poor use the private system as much
as the richeven of hospitals there is
substantial private use
28
Fact 3 More public money on health goes to the
rich than the poor (because hospital use is
regressive)
29
One Reason that is often given to explain why the
poor have worse health outcomes
30
But this perceived wisdom is wrong
31
Recent data show that
  • Households in Rajasthan visit doctors more than
    in the U.S.
  • And the differences between rich and poor in
    visits to health providers is small
  • In Delhi, the poor go to doctors more than the
    rich
  • Click here to see a table looking at doctor
    visits from Delhi

32
Despite the frequent use of health care providers
  • There is no relationship between the presence of
    health facilities and health outcomes

33
One important questionWhy dont the poor use
public health facilities more?
34
4 Reasons based on 4 lesser known facts
35
Reason 1 Public Doctors in India are among the
most absent in the world
Absenteeism among health workers
36
Reason 1 (cont) Absences are never below 30
percent!
37
Reason 2 When public doctors do show up for
work, the exert very little effort
What they do
What they know
Effort deficit
38
What does very little effort mean? 2, 1, 0
39
Fact 3 And public doctors in PHCs are not
particularly competent to begin with
40
Reason 4 And you still have to bribe public
doctors to do their work
41
A summary of why poor people may not be using the
PHC system
  • The doctors are low on competence
  • They dont show up for work
  • When they do show up, they dont work to the
    level of their knowledge
  • And patients have to pay bribes anyway

42
The visible hand Example 1
  • Public Doctors are
  • paid by salary
  • not monitored by supervisors
  • cannot be fired or have pay reduced under
    virtually any circumstances
  • have higher social status and have much greater
    political power than your clients complaints
    dont touch you
  • have lucrative alternative work in the private
    sector
  • What would you do?

43
One oft-advocated solution
  • That probably does not work
  • Training Doctors

44
Training and the Invisible Hand
  • With public doctors, problem is NOT that they
    dont know what to do, its that they dont do it!
  • No public doctor needs training to know that
    he/she should come to work!
  • Yet

45
Training and the invisible hand (II)
  • The percentage of essential care given by a
    doctor with 6 months training in the private
    sector the percentage of essential care given
    by a doctor with 5 years training in the public
    sector

46
(No Transcript)
47
The losses from low effort
48
Training and the invisible hand (III)
  • If we train doctors in the private sector, what
    guarantees that they will practice in ways
    commensurate with their training?

49
(No Transcript)
50
Approaches to a solution
  • Indias public health system bundles five
    potentially separate components
  • Hospital-based curative care
  • Ambulatory curative care
  • Prevention and health promotion
  • Health-sector-based public health (disease
    surveillance, etc.)
  • Non-health-sector based public health (safe
    water, sanitation)

51
Each of these is subject to a different market
failure
Sub-system Market failure
Hospital-based curative care Insurance-market failure
Ambulatory curative care
Prevention and health promotion Merit goods, some externality
Health-sector based public health Pure public goods
Non-health-sector based public health Externalities
52
and to a different government failure
Sub-system Government failure
Hospital-based curative care Political capture by elites
Ambulatory curative care Monitoring of effort/quality, asymmetric information
Prevention and health promotion Monitoring of effort/quality, logistics
Health-sector based public health
Non-health-sector based public health No middle-class support for reforms
53
Matching the sub-system to the market and
government failure
Sub-system Institutional arrangement
Hospital-based curative care Health insurance with autonomous hospitals
Ambulatory curative care Money follows the patient
Prevention and health promotion Devolve to local governments
Health-sector based public health
Non-health-sector based public health
54
The solution is the problem
  • The mindset of universal, hierarchical, poor
    oriented public production of health care is now
    only the planners fantasy
  • Deer in the headlights of reform
  • System reform cannot work as there is no
    coherent system
  • Must be broken to be reset.

55
Indias drugs are cheap(Example 1)
56
Indias drugs are cheap(Example 2)
57
Training and the Invisible Hand (IV)
  • And what guarantees that they will remain in the
    place they were trained?
  • (Invisible hand will allocate better private
    doctors to richer areas)

58
Doesnt matter what data or method
  • NFHS I no regression effect (nothing)
  • NFHS II (kucch bhi nahin)
  • Reproductive and Child Health survey (kicchu na)
    1998
  • RCH 2001 ditto
  • Torture the data as much as you like and it still
    wont talk (in contrast education, income
    proxies, water source, sanitation habits, pucca
    roads, etc., etc. all squeal at the slightest
    provocation samples are very large)

59
Delhi doctor visits
Click here to return to the main presentation
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com