Trends in Mode of Delivery and Neonatal Complications in New Jersey, 1997-2005 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 25
About This Presentation
Title:

Trends in Mode of Delivery and Neonatal Complications in New Jersey, 1997-2005

Description:

Compare relative risk of specific neonatal complications by cesarean trial of labor and cesarean no trial of labor vs. Vaginal delivery Are there any covariates that ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:201
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 26
Provided by: Neetu6
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Trends in Mode of Delivery and Neonatal Complications in New Jersey, 1997-2005


1
Trends in Mode of Delivery and Neonatal
Complications in New Jersey, 1997-2005
  • Neetu J. Jain BHMS MPH
  • Lakota K. Kruse MD MPH
  • Kitaw Demissie MD PhD
  • Meena Khandelwal MD
  • New Jersey Department of Health and Senior
    Services
  • Maternal and Child Health Epidemiology
  • MICHEP Conference - December 12th 2007
  • Neetu.Jain_at_doh.state.nj.us

2
Background
  • Nationally as well as in New Jersey overall
    deliveries by cesarean section are on the rise,
    while instrumental and unassisted vaginal
    deliveries are declining.
  • In 2006, New Jersey cesarean delivery rate were
    37, higher than national average rate.
  • This change in trends may have also had an impact
    on the short and long term maternal and neonatal
    outcomes.
  • 2

3
Study Question?
  • What are the trends in the risk of selected
    neonatal complications associated with mode of
    delivery?
  • Do the changing trends in mode of delivery have
    an impact on neonatal complication rates?
  • Compare relative risk of specific neonatal
    complications by cesarean trial of labor and
    cesarean no trial of labor vs. Vaginal delivery
  • Are there any covariates that are confounding
    these trends?
  • Gestational Age
  • Mothers medical risk factor
  • 3

4
Method and Subject Selection
  • Created a linked perinatal dataset by matching
    New Jerseys 1997 to 2005 electronic birth
    certificate (EBC) records to hospital discharge
    (UB) records for mothers and newborns, resulting
    in a total of 1,004,116 records (births).
  • This linked perinatal dataset including EBC and
    UB data will provide us an opportunity to examine
    trends in outcomes and comparisons by method of
    delivery for all New Jersey births.
  • 4

5
Data Source
  • The International Classification of Disease
    (ICD-9-CM) codes from UB records and check boxes
    from EBC records were used to identify the mode
    of delivery and selected neonatal complications.
  • Mode of Delivery Categorized into Instrumental
    Delivery, Unassisted Vaginal Delivery,
    Cesarean/Trial of Labor and Cesarean/No Trial of
    Labor.
  • Neonatal Complications Respiratory Distress
    Syndrome, Transient Tachypnea of Newborn,
    Intraventricular Hemorrhage and Injuries to the
    Newborn. 5

6
Diagnostic Codes
  • ICD-9 codes Neonatal Complication
  • Respiratory Distress Syndrome 769
  • Transient Tachypnea of Newborn 770.6
  • Intra-Ventricular Hemorrhage 772.1
  • Injuries 767.1 (brachial), 767.2 (clavicle),
    767.3 (skeleton) and 767.6 (scalp).
  • Check boxes from EBC were used for Respiratory
    Distress Syndrome and Transient Tachypnea of
    Newborn
  • 6

7
Trends in Mode of Delivery in NJ, 1997-2005
8
Trends in Select Neonatal Complications in NJ,
1997-2005
9
Respiratory Distress Syndrome by Mode of Delivery
10
Intra-Ventricular Hemorrhage by Mode of Delivery
11
Transient Tachypnea of Newborn by Mode of Delivery
12
Injuries in Newborn by Mode of Delivery
13
Relative Risk Cesarean After Trial of Labor v.
Vaginal Delivery
14
Relative Risks Cesarean/No Trial of Labor V.
Vaginal Delivery
15
Explanation for these declining trends?
  • Cesarean and complication are not rising in
    parallel
  • Are there some underlying factors/covariates that
    are confounding the risk of the mode of delivery
    on these complications.
  • So the first step we took was to explore the
    relation of the gestational age to individual
    complication and compare by mode of delivery
    irrespective of the time period.
  • 15

16
Respiratory Distress Syndrome by Mode of Delivery
Gestational Age
17
Intra-Ventricular Hemorrhage by Mode of Delivery
Gestational Age
18
Transient Tachypnea of Newborn by Mode of
Delivery Gestational Age
19
Injuries in Newborn by Mode of Delivery
Gestational Age
20
Results for Gestational Age Stratification
  • Stratification based on gestational age shows
    that gestational age is very important for all of
    these neonatal complications.
  • IVH have higher incidence in early preterm
    newborns (24-30 weeks), while RDS has higher
    incidence in late preterm newborns (32-34), while
    TTN Injuries is more prevalent in near term
    newborns (34-37weeks).
  • 20

21
Trends in Mothers Medical Risk Factors
22
Limitations
  • Reliance on coding of ICD-9 neonatal
    complications.
  • Limited to 9 discharge diagnoses.
  • Coding changes over time.
  • Under-reporting of mothers medical risk factor
    during pregnancy in both these datasets.
  • 22

23
Conclusion
  • Overall trend for neonatal complications are
    either decreasing or leveling off.
  • Relative risks hasnt change much over 3 time
    periods.
  • Gestational age is important for all the
    complications we looked at.
  • 23

24
Further Research Agenda
  • The next steps would be to control for
  • Analyze the interventions
  • Prenatal steroids for the mothers.
  • Surfactant therapy for the newborn.
  • Re- analyze the trend for these complications by
    mode of delivery after adjusting for gestational
    age to see if cesarean and complications are
    rising in parallel?
  • 24

25
Collaborators
  • We are jointly working with clinicians
    (Obstetricians Neonatologists) and researchers
    who are expert and knowledgeable in this field
  • Dr. Kitaw Demissie, MD, PHD Division of
    Epidemiology Associate Professor at UMDNJ-SPH.
  • Dr. Meena Khandelwal MD Division of Maternal
    Fetal Medicine Associate Professor at Cooper
    Hospital.
  • THANK YOU 25
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com