Creation vs. Evolution - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Creation vs. Evolution

Description:

Creation vs. Evolution Is there a God? Is there purpose? Is there faith? Is there evidence? Bones of Contention Marvin Lubenow Michael Charney On the question of ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:127
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 25
Provided by: MarkMa73
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Creation vs. Evolution


1
Creation vs. Evolution
  • Is there a God?
  • Is there purpose?
  • Is there faith?
  • Is there evidence?

2
(No Transcript)
3
Bones of Contention
  • Marvin Lubenow

4
Michael Charney
  • On the question of biological, especially human
    origins, Lubenow is not content to merely quote
    biblical theory. Like a true scholar he
    researches in depth the literature in the
    scientific journals, sifting the evidence,
    searching out the areas open to interpretation.

5
Michael Charney
  • He does his homework so thoroughly that he makes
    someone like me who would carry on a dialogue
    with him also do his homework. He is a pleasure
    to fence with intellectually.

6
Bones of Contentionp. 7
  • The human fossil record is strongly supportive of
    the concept of Special Creation. On the other
    hand, the fossil evidence is so contrary to human
    evolution as to effectively falsify the idea that
    humans evolved.

7
Bones of Contentionp. 7
  • This book is the fruit of twenty-five years of
    research. Because its conclusions are different
    from what is almost universally believed, it is
    heavily documented from the most recent
    scientific literature.

8
Bones of Contentionp. 9
  • It is impossible to deal with the subject of
    human fossils without also dealing with the
    subject of the radiometric dating methods... The
    appendix of this book is a case study of the
    torutred ten-year attempt to date the famous
    fossil KNM-ER 1470 discovered in 1972

9
Bones of Contentionp. 9
  • This case study clearly reveals that the
    radiometric dating methods are not independent
    confirmations of evolution and an old earth
    These dating methods are, instead, faithful and
    obedient servants of evolution.

10
Bones of Contentionp. 178
  • The facts of the big picture are that first,
    fossils that are indistinguishable from modern
    humans can be traced all the way back to 4.5
    m.y.a, according to the evolution time scale.

11
Bones of Contentionp. 178
  • Second, Homo erectus demonstrates a morphological
    consistency throughout its two-million-year
    history. The fossil record does not show erectus
    evolving from something else or evolving into
    something else.

12
Bones of Contentionp. 178
  • Third, anatomically modern Homo sapiens,
    Neandertal, archaic Homo sapiens, and Homo
    erectus all lived as contemporaries at one time
    or another.

13
Bones of Contentionp. 179
  • Fourth, all of the fossils ascribed to the Homo
    habilis category are contemproary with Homo
    erectus. This, Homo habilis not only did not
    evolve into Homo erectus, it could not have
    evolved into Homo erectus.

14
Bones of Contentionp. 182
  • David Pilbeam There is no clear-cut and
    inexorable pathway from ape to human being.

15
Bones of Contentionp. 182
  • David Pilbeam on whether man evolved from
    gibbons, chimp, or orangutans The fossil record
    has been elastic enough, the expectations
    sufficiently robust, to accommodate almost any
    story.

16
Bones of Contentionp. 182
  • Mary Leakey on the constructing of evolutionary
    family trees in the present state of our
    knowledge, I do not believe it is possible to fit
    the known hominid fossils into a reliable plan.

17
Bones of Contentionp. 182
  • Robert Martin So one is forced to conclude that
    there is no clear-cut scientific picture of human
    evolution.

18
Bones of Contentionp. 8
  • The fossil humans with a somewhat different skull
    shape (morphologically) are actually products of
    the post-Flood Ice Age. The Ice Age, in turn, is
    inseperably linked in terms of cause and effect
    to the world-wide Genesis Flood.

19
Bones of Contentionp. 8
  • The scientific community, rejecting the Genesis
    Flood, has been singularly unsuccessful in
    developing an adequate explanation for the Ice
    Age.

20
(No Transcript)
21
Luke 1727
  • People were eating, drinking, marrying and being
    given in marriage up to the day Noah entered the
    ark. Then the flood came and destroyed them all.

22
Hebrews 117
  • By faith Noah, when warned about things not yet
    seen, in holy fear built an ark to save his
    family. By his faith he condemned the world and
    became heir of the righteousness that comes by
    faith.

23
2 Peter 25
  • if he did not spare the ancient world when he
    brought the flood on its ungodly people, but
    protected Noah, a preacher of righteousness, and
    seven others

24
2 Peter 36
  • By these waters also the world of that time was
    deluged and destroyed.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com