Title: ORAL HEALTH POLICY: WHAT DOES IT DO FOR RURAL AND REMOTE COMMUNITIES?
1ORAL HEALTH POLICY WHAT DOES IT DO FOR RURAL AND
REMOTE COMMUNITIES?
A/Prof Erica Bell Dr Len Crocombe Centre for
Research Excellence in Primary Oral Health Care
2ORAL HEALTH POLICY WHAT DOES IT DO FOR RURAL AND
REMOTE COMMUNITIES?
A/Prof Erica Bell Dr Len Crocombe Centre for
Research Excellence in Primary Oral Health Care
3Why oral health matters
- Expenditure on dentistry in 2009-10
- In Australia was 7.7b (AIHW, 2012).
- Those missing out on primary oral
- health care
- frail and older people (Chalmers 2002)
- rural residents (Crocombe et al. 2010)
- Indigenous Australians (Slack-Smith 2011)
- Australians with physical and intellectual
disabilities (Pradhan et al. 2009) - People of low socio-economic status (Sanders et
al. 2006)
4Research evidence of what works and what does not
work in oral health
- Poor hygiene (Davies et al. 2003 Hujoel et al.
2006) - Poor diet (Rugg-Gunn, 1993)
- Lack of access to primary health care
(National Oral Health Plan 2004-2013) - Social determinants (Sanders et al. 2006)
- Smoking (Do et al. 2008)
- Low fluoride exposure (ARCPOH, 2006)
5Aims of the oral health policy study
-
- Aim The ultimate aim of the study was to
contribute to better understandings about what
national government oral health policy has been
developed and is needed for rural and
disadvantaged communities - Research questions 1)What kinds of content
define national government oral health policy in
OECD countries, particularly for rural and
disadvantaged groups? and - 2) What assumptions underpin the way national
oral health policy documents describe the policy
problems and solutions for rural oral health? -
6The sample
Policy document and country Year
Together for health a national oral health plan for Wales draft consultation document 2012
Oral health program strategic plan 2011-2014 USA 2011
Oral health strategy for Northern Ireland 2007
Good oral health for all, for life The strategic vision for oral health in New Zealand 2006
A Canadian oral health strategy 2005
Choosing better oral health An oral health plan for England 2005
An action plan for improving oral health and modernising NHS dental services in Scotland 2005
Healthy mouths, healthy lives Australia's national oral health plan 2004-2013 2004
7Analytic procedure
- Stage 1. Policy document content scoping and
quantification. - Stage 2. Discourse analysis of key assumptions in
policy problems and solutions for rural oral
health.
8Results
9Results contd
- The rural concept is relatively infrequent (2)
but often occurs with the more common workforce
concepts - The language of oral health policy documents is
dominated by workforce and practitioner
development concepts - The 7 concepts for the rural and other
disadvantaged groups are not the least frequent
concepts in the study - The rural concept is most present in the
Australian and Scotland documents (7 and 4
likelihood) 1 likelihood in the Canadian policy
and is not found at all in the USA policy
document. - For the concept rural the three most frequent
paired concepts are students (43),
recruitment (36), Aboriginal and Torres
Strait Islander (30-29). All other paired
co-occurrences for the rural concept range from
12 to 1. Generally speaking, the workforce
development concepts tend to be more frequently
paired with the rural concept than the wider
social determinants of health concepts.
10Critical discourse analysis key enabling
assumptions of policy stories about rural oral
health
- In relation to causality, policy documents have
three policy stories - 1.1 The socio economic causality policy story.
- asserts a wide range of socio-economic factors
contribute to unequal oral health outcomes in
rural and remote Aboriginal communities, not
clear which ones or how (AUS) - asserts that the overall poorer health of rural
and Aboriginal communities is linked to poorer
oral health, not clear why or how (AUS) - asserts lack of access to dental care by
vulnerable groups, particularly rural communities
and rural children, is driving inappropriate use
of medical services (AUS)
11e.g
- Rates of edentulism (total lack of natural
teeth) reflect the distribution of poor general
health in the population. While about 10 percent
of the Australian population is edentulous, this
rises to 16 percent for the Indigenous
population, and to nearly 25 percent for Health
Card holders (AUS)
121.2 The service model causality policy story
- Asserts private structure of oral health services
a major barrier to preventative care and early
treatment (AUS) - Asserts declining oral health in some vulnerable
groups linked to decline of public infrastructure
(NZ, AUS) - Complexity of mixed public and private service
structures part of the problem of access for
disadvantaged groups (SCOTLAND)
131.3 The workforce causality policy story
- Asserts rural and remote workforce supply
challenge is about culturally conditioned choices
made by practitioners (CANADA) - Asserts even when practitioners/services present
there is unequal service utilisation and this is
about the cultural appropriateness of
practitioners and services (CANADA, AUS) -
14In relation to solutions, policy documents have
three policy stories
- 2.1 The prevention policy solution story
- Asserts culturally appropriate health promotion
and prevention is important, especially for
children (CANADA, AUS) - Fluoridation seen as a critical strategy for
rural oral health (AUS) - Asserts better access to preventatively focussed
dental care important (AUS)
152.2 The service model policy solution story
- Asserts community oral health services can
achieve a service hub approach to childrens
oral health esp. (NZ) - Integrated hubs with regionally-agreed referral
and care pathways are necessary (WALES) - School-based oral health services can help in
rural communities (CANADA) - Aboriginal-controlled oral health services have
demonstrated effectiveness (AUS)
162.3 The workforce policy solution story
- Integration of workforce development approach and
expanded scope of practice important (i.e.
encompass a wide range of oral health
professionals and non oral health professionals
for alternative service delivery) (CANADA,
SCOTLAND, AUS) - Incentives can be wide-ranging (financial
emphasised but not sure what ones really work)
(CANADA, SCOTLAND) - Range of strategies needed for increasing supply
through training, recruitment and retention,
including for public services (unclear what
works) (SCOTLAND, AUS) - Wide-ranging strategies for optimal distribution
needed but unclear which ones really work (AUS)
17Preliminary conclusions
- Australia and some other nations have a strong
in-principle policy commitment to rural and
Aboriginal and other disadvantaged groups - Butthe absence of policy documents, their dated
nature, as much as their limitations in
explaining poor oral health causes and providing
solutions supports the view that oral health
policy has been formed on an ad hoc basis - The next step is to systematically examine the
research evidence for key policy assertions
18Key references
- Bell E. Research for Health Policy. Oxford
Oxford University Press, 2010. - Nutley S, Davies H, Smith P. What Works? Evidence
Based Policy and Practice in Public Services
Bristol The Policy Press, 2000. - Nutley S, Walter I, Davies H. Using Evidence How
Research Can Inform Public Services Bristol The
Policy Press, 2007. - Majone G. Evidence, Argument Persuasion in the
Policy Process USA Yale University Press, 1989. - Stone D. Policy Paradox The Art of Political
Decision-Making. 2nd ed. ed New York W.W.
Norton, 2002.