ORAL HEALTH POLICY: WHAT DOES IT DO FOR RURAL AND REMOTE COMMUNITIES? - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

ORAL HEALTH POLICY: WHAT DOES IT DO FOR RURAL AND REMOTE COMMUNITIES?

Description:

ORAL HEALTH POLICY: WHAT DOES IT DO FOR RURAL AND REMOTE COMMUNITIES? A/Prof Erica Bell &Dr Len Crocombe Centre for Research Excellence in Primary Oral Health Care – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:208
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 19
Provided by: Cecili55
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: ORAL HEALTH POLICY: WHAT DOES IT DO FOR RURAL AND REMOTE COMMUNITIES?


1
ORAL HEALTH POLICY WHAT DOES IT DO FOR RURAL AND
REMOTE COMMUNITIES?
A/Prof Erica Bell Dr Len Crocombe Centre for
Research Excellence in Primary Oral Health Care
2
ORAL HEALTH POLICY WHAT DOES IT DO FOR RURAL AND
REMOTE COMMUNITIES?
A/Prof Erica Bell Dr Len Crocombe Centre for
Research Excellence in Primary Oral Health Care
3
Why oral health matters
  • Expenditure on dentistry in 2009-10
  • In Australia was 7.7b (AIHW, 2012).
  • Those missing out on primary oral
  • health care
  • frail and older people (Chalmers 2002)
  • rural residents (Crocombe et al. 2010)
  • Indigenous Australians (Slack-Smith 2011)
  • Australians with physical and intellectual
    disabilities (Pradhan et al. 2009)
  • People of low socio-economic status (Sanders et
    al. 2006)

4
Research evidence of what works and what does not
work in oral health
  • Poor hygiene (Davies et al. 2003 Hujoel et al.
    2006)
  • Poor diet (Rugg-Gunn, 1993)
  • Lack of access to primary health care
    (National Oral Health Plan 2004-2013)
  • Social determinants (Sanders et al. 2006)
  • Smoking (Do et al. 2008)
  • Low fluoride exposure (ARCPOH, 2006)

5
Aims of the oral health policy study
  •  
  • Aim The ultimate aim of the study was to
    contribute to better understandings about what
    national government oral health policy has been
    developed and is needed for rural and
    disadvantaged communities
  • Research questions 1)What kinds of content
    define national government oral health policy in
    OECD countries, particularly for rural and
    disadvantaged groups? and
  • 2) What assumptions underpin the way national
    oral health policy documents describe the policy
    problems and solutions for rural oral health?

6
The sample
Policy document and country Year
Together for health a national oral health plan for Wales draft consultation document 2012
Oral health program strategic plan 2011-2014 USA 2011
Oral health strategy for Northern Ireland   2007
Good oral health for all, for life The strategic vision for oral health in New Zealand 2006
A Canadian oral health strategy 2005
Choosing better oral health An oral health plan for England 2005
An action plan for improving oral health and modernising NHS dental services in Scotland 2005
Healthy mouths, healthy lives Australia's national oral health plan 2004-2013 2004
7
Analytic procedure
  • Stage 1. Policy document content scoping and
    quantification.
  • Stage 2. Discourse analysis of key assumptions in
    policy problems and solutions for rural oral
    health.

8
Results
9
Results contd
  • The rural concept is relatively infrequent (2)
    but often occurs with the more common workforce
    concepts
  • The language of oral health policy documents is
    dominated by workforce and practitioner
    development concepts
  • The 7 concepts for the rural and other
    disadvantaged groups are not the least frequent
    concepts in the study
  • The rural concept is most present in the
    Australian and Scotland documents (7 and 4
    likelihood) 1 likelihood in the Canadian policy
    and is not found at all in the USA policy
    document.
  • For the concept rural the three most frequent
    paired concepts are students (43),
    recruitment (36), Aboriginal and Torres
    Strait Islander (30-29). All other paired
    co-occurrences for the rural concept range from
    12 to 1. Generally speaking, the workforce
    development concepts tend to be more frequently
    paired with the rural concept than the wider
    social determinants of health concepts.

10
Critical discourse analysis key enabling
assumptions of policy stories about rural oral
health
  • In relation to causality, policy documents have
    three policy stories
  • 1.1 The socio economic causality policy story.
  • asserts a wide range of socio-economic factors
    contribute to unequal oral health outcomes in
    rural and remote Aboriginal communities, not
    clear which ones or how (AUS)
  • asserts that the overall poorer health of rural
    and Aboriginal communities is linked to poorer
    oral health, not clear why or how (AUS)
  • asserts lack of access to dental care by
    vulnerable groups, particularly rural communities
    and rural children, is driving inappropriate use
    of medical services (AUS)

11
e.g
  • Rates of edentulism (total lack of natural
    teeth) reflect the distribution of poor general
    health in the population. While about 10 percent
    of the Australian population is edentulous, this
    rises to 16 percent for the Indigenous
    population, and to nearly 25 percent for Health
    Card holders (AUS)

12
1.2 The service model causality policy story
  • Asserts private structure of oral health services
    a major barrier to preventative care and early
    treatment (AUS)
  • Asserts declining oral health in some vulnerable
    groups linked to decline of public infrastructure
    (NZ, AUS)
  • Complexity of mixed public and private service
    structures part of the problem of access for
    disadvantaged groups (SCOTLAND)

13
1.3 The workforce causality policy story
  • Asserts rural and remote workforce supply
    challenge is about culturally conditioned choices
    made by practitioners (CANADA)
  • Asserts even when practitioners/services present
    there is unequal service utilisation and this is
    about the cultural appropriateness of
    practitioners and services (CANADA, AUS)

14
In relation to solutions, policy documents have
three policy stories
  • 2.1 The prevention policy solution story
  • Asserts culturally appropriate health promotion
    and prevention is important, especially for
    children (CANADA, AUS)
  • Fluoridation seen as a critical strategy for
    rural oral health (AUS)
  • Asserts better access to preventatively focussed
    dental care important (AUS)

15
2.2 The service model policy solution story
  • Asserts community oral health services can
    achieve a service hub approach to childrens
    oral health esp. (NZ)
  • Integrated hubs with regionally-agreed referral
    and care pathways are necessary (WALES)
  • School-based oral health services can help in
    rural communities (CANADA)
  • Aboriginal-controlled oral health services have
    demonstrated effectiveness (AUS)

16
2.3 The workforce policy solution story
  • Integration of workforce development approach and
    expanded scope of practice important (i.e.
    encompass a wide range of oral health
    professionals and non oral health professionals
    for alternative service delivery) (CANADA,
    SCOTLAND, AUS)
  • Incentives can be wide-ranging (financial
    emphasised but not sure what ones really work)
    (CANADA, SCOTLAND)
  • Range of strategies needed for increasing supply
    through training, recruitment and retention,
    including for public services (unclear what
    works) (SCOTLAND, AUS)
  • Wide-ranging strategies for optimal distribution
    needed but unclear which ones really work (AUS)

17
Preliminary conclusions
  • Australia and some other nations have a strong
    in-principle policy commitment to rural and
    Aboriginal and other disadvantaged groups
  • Butthe absence of policy documents, their dated
    nature, as much as their limitations in
    explaining poor oral health causes and providing
    solutions supports the view that oral health
    policy has been formed on an ad hoc basis
  • The next step is to systematically examine the
    research evidence for key policy assertions

18
Key references
  • Bell E. Research for Health Policy. Oxford
    Oxford University Press, 2010.
  • Nutley S, Davies H, Smith P. What Works? Evidence
    Based Policy and Practice in Public Services
    Bristol The Policy Press, 2000.
  • Nutley S, Walter I, Davies H. Using Evidence How
    Research Can Inform Public Services Bristol The
    Policy Press, 2007.
  • Majone G. Evidence, Argument Persuasion in the
    Policy Process USA Yale University Press, 1989.
  • Stone D. Policy Paradox The Art of Political
    Decision-Making. 2nd ed. ed New York W.W.
    Norton, 2002.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com