EVALUATION OF EFFICACY OF PALONOSETRON VERSUS PLACEBO FOR PREVENTION OF POSTOPERATIVE NAUSEA AND VOMITING - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

EVALUATION OF EFFICACY OF PALONOSETRON VERSUS PLACEBO FOR PREVENTION OF POSTOPERATIVE NAUSEA AND VOMITING

Description:

CO-AUTHORS Prof & HOD Dr.I.Chandrasekaran M.D.,D.A., Prof Dr.S.P.Meenakshisundaram M.D.,D.A., Asst. Prof Dr.D.S.Sudhakar M.D.,DNB., AUTHOR : G.N.Jeevanandam IIyr M.D. PG – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:208
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 34
Provided by: JEEVANA4
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: EVALUATION OF EFFICACY OF PALONOSETRON VERSUS PLACEBO FOR PREVENTION OF POSTOPERATIVE NAUSEA AND VOMITING


1
EVALUATION OF EFFICACY OF PALONOSETRON VERSUS
PLACEBO FOR PREVENTION OF POSTOPERATIVE
NAUSEA AND VOMITING
  • CO-AUTHORS
  • Prof HOD Dr.I.Chandrasekaran M.D.,D.A.,
  • Prof Dr.S.P.Meenakshisundaram M.D.,D.A.,
  • Asst. Prof Dr.D.S.Sudhakar M.D.,DNB.,
  • AUTHOR G.N.Jeevanandam IIyr M.D. PG
  • INSTITUTE OF ANAESTHESIOLOGY , Madurai Medical
    College

2
Post Operative Nausea Vomiting
  • Second most common complaints reported
  • Unpleasant experience often rated worse than
    postoperative pain
  • Medical risks Aspiration of gastric contents,

    Suture dehiscence,

    Esophageal rupture,

    Subcutaneous emphysema, Pneumothorax
    HR BP
    elevation(risk for MI dysrhythmias )


    Bradycardia and hypotension.


3
RISK FACTORS
  • APFEL Simplified risk scoring for adults

4
PALONOSETRON
  • Potent and selective 5-HT3 antagonist
  • Plasma elimination T½ 40 h
  • Metabolized primarily by liver.
  • Age, hepatic dysfunction or mild-to-moderate
    renal impairment have no clinically significant
    effect on the pharmacokinetics

5
MECHANISM OF ACTION
  • Antagonism of 5HT3 receptors
  • Also has an allosteric binding site
  • Causes receptor interanalisation and prolonged
    inhibition

6
USES
  • Prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting
  • Prevention of acute and delayed nausea and
    vomiting associated chemotherapy.
  • Dosage and Administration
  • Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting
  • IV 0.075 mg before the induction of anesthesia.
  • Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting
  • IV 0.25 mg administered 30 min before the start
    of chemotherapy.
  • PO 0.5 mg administered 1 h prior to the start of
    chemotherapy.

7
SIDE EFFECTS
  • COMMON Headache
  • Constipation
  • OTHERS
  • Cardiovascular ECG QT prolongation, bradycardia,
    hypotension,
    tachycardia.
  • CNS Headache, anxiety,
    dizziness, weakness.
  • Gastro Intestinal Constipation, diarrhea.
  • Genitourinary Urinary retention.
  • Hepatic Increased ALT, increased
    AST.

8
AIM
  • To evaluate the efficacy of Palonosetron versus
    placebo for prevention of Postoperative Nausea
    and Vomiting

9
DESIGN
  • Randomized double blind control study
  • Female patients undergoing laproscopic surgery
    under GA
  • Inclusion criteria
  • Age 18 - 60 yrs
  • ASA I - II
  • Non - Smokers
  • Exclusion criteria
  • Patients received antiemetics 24 hrs prior to
    surgery
  • Patients received / undergoing chemotherapy or
    radiotherapy
  • Pre existing heart blocks , bradycardia, QT
    prolongation,
  • Duration of procedure lt1 hr

10
METHODS
  • Ethical committee approval
  • Informed consent
  • Randomised allocation into 2 groups
  • Group Pn Inj.Palonosetron 0.o75mg I.V
  • Group Po Placebo ( Normal Saline 1.5ml ) I.V

11
  • All patients premedicated with Inj.Midazolam
    0.05mg/kg Inj.Glyco 0.2mg im 45 min before
    induction
  • I.V lines will be secured
  • Preinduction monitors NIBP, Pulse oximetry, ECG,
    connected
  • Just prior to Induction of anesthesia patients
    will receive the allocated drug or equal volume
    of normal saline I.V
  • Induced with Inj.Thio 5mg/kg ,Inj.Fentanyl
    2mics/kg ,Inj.Suxa 2mg/kg
  • Maintainence with intermittent titrated dose of
    Inj.Atracurium , Inj.Fentanyl and N2O O2 ( 60
    40 )
  • Reversal with Inj.Neostigmine 40mics/kg
    Inj.Glyco 10mics/kg and extubation

12
DATA COLLECTION
  • EMETIC episodes (vomiting and retching)
  • Intensity of Nausea (VAS scoring for nausea)
    both at 2 ,6 , 24, 48, 72 hrs with
    respect to their occurrence over the previous
    observation period
  • Rescue therapy Inj.Metoclopromide 10mg I.V when
    VAS gt 4 / emetic episodes
  • Complete response (defined as no emetic episodes
    and no rescue medication) will be noted for the
    time interval of 0 24 hrs 24 72
    hrs

13
  • Patients Age ,Weight,BMI
  • Risk factors for PONV (H/O PONV , H/O motion
    sickness )
  • Duration of surgery
  • Total intra operative opioid (fentanyl) dose
  • Post operative opioid use will be noted (proposed
    post operative pain relief Inj.Tramadol 100mg
    I.M)
  • Side effects like headache ,constipation and
    other adverse events will be noted

14
ANALYSIS OF COLLECTED DATA
15
Physiological parameters
VARIABLE GROUP Pn (n 30) GROUP Po (n 30) p
Age in years 27.3 4.4 26.3 3.9 0.3808
Weight (in kgs) 53.7 5.4 54.8 3.5 0.5428
Height ( in cms) 151.2 3.1 151.7 2.7 0.4796
BMI 23.4 2 23.8 1.3 0.4289
16
ASA RISK
ASA GROUP Pn GROUP Pn GROUP Po GROUP Po
ASA n n
I 26 86.7 27 90
II 4 13.3 3 10
p 0.691 0.691 0.691 0.691
17
Duration of Procedure
Dur of Proc GROUP Pn GROUP Po
Range 80 - 140 80 135
Mean 107.8 105.2
S.D. 15.2 12
p 0.4898 0.4898
18
TOTAL INTEROPERATIVE OPIOiD USED
Tot. opiod used GROUP Pn GROUP Po
Range 130 - 210 140 200
Mean 167 163.3
S.D. 17.4 17.9
p 0.3156 0.3156
19
APFEL SCORE
APFEL SCORE GROUP Pn GROUP Pn GROUP Po GROUP Po
APFEL SCORE No. No.
3 25 83.3 27 90
4 5 16.7 3 10
Total 30 100 30 100
Range Mean S.D. 3 4 3.17 0.38 3 4 3.17 0.38 3 4 3.1 0.31 3 4 3.1 0.31
p 0.4513 0.4513 0.4513 0.4513
20
INTENSITY OF NAUSEA ( VAS )
INT OF NAUSEA GROUP Pn GROUP Po p
0 2 hrs 2.43 2.21 4.43 1.65 0.0008
2 6 hrs 1.53 1.63 3.07 1.31 0.0004
6 24 hrs 1.3 1.66 2.3 1.52 0.0034
24 72 hrs 0.9 1.49 2.07 1.51 0.0013
21
EMETIC EPISODES 0 24 HR Interval
EMETIC EPISODES GROUP Pn GROUP Pn GROUP Po GROUP Po
EMETIC EPISODES n n
YES 10 33.3 22 73.3
NO 20 66.7 8 26.7
p 0.0044 0.0044 0.0044 0.0044
22
EMETIC EPISODES 24 72 HR Interval
EMETIC EPISODES GROUP Pn GROUP Pn GROUP Po GROUP Po
EMETIC EPISODES n n
YES 8 26.7 10 33.3
NO 22 73.3 20 66.7
p 0.7763 0.7763 0.7763 0.7763
23
COMPLETE REMISSION 0 24 HR Interval
COMPLETE REMISSION GROUP Pn GROUP Pn GROUP Po GROUP Po
COMPLETE REMISSION n n
YES 20 66.7 8 26.7
NO 10 33.3 22 73.3
p 0.0044 0.0044 0.0044 0.0044
24
COMPLETE REMISSION 24 - 72HR Interval
COMPLETE REMISSION GROUP Pn GROUP Pn GROUP Po GROUP Po
COMPLETE REMISSION n n
YES 22 73.3 20 70
NO 8 26.7 10 30
p 0.7763 0.7763 0.7763 0.7763
25
SUMMARY
  • Randomised controlled study
  • Two groups, 30 patients in each
  • Female patients ,non-smokers ,undergoing
    laproscopy of more than one hour duration
    receiving opioids for postoperative pain relief
  • Inj.Palonosetron 0.075 mg Vs Placebo
  • Data collected regarding the incidence of emetic
    episodes the intensity of nausea by VAS scoring
  • Statistical analysis revealed that both groups
    were comparable with regared to their demography

26
OBSERVATIONS
  • Patients receiving Palonosetron compared to
    control group have
  • Significant reduction in incidence of Emetic
    episodes and greater Complete remission in the
    first 24 hrs following surgery
  • Significantly low VAS scores for nausea over the
    period of 72 hrs
  • No significant difference in Emetic episodes and
    complete remission over 24-72hr period
  • Treatment effect of PALONOSETRON in this trial
    was most pronounced during the first 24 h
  • No side effects

27
CONCLUSION
  • PALONOSETRON 0.075mg was statistically superior
    to placebo for all end-points during the first 24
    h, including Complete remisison ,emetic episode
    incidence intensity of nausea with no adverse
    effects
  • In the 24-72 hr it has the advantage of having
    good control of intensity of nausea

28
REFERENCES
  • A Randomized, Double-Blind Study to Evaluate the
    Efficacy and Safety of Three Different Doses of
    Palonosetron Versus Placebo in Preventing
    Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting Over a 72-Hour
    Period(Anesth Analg 2008107439 44)
  • A Randomized, Double-Blind Study to Evaluate the
    Efficacy and Safety of Three Different Doses of
    Palonosetron Versus Placebo for Preventing
    Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting(Anesth Analg
    200810744551)

29
THANK YOU
30
(No Transcript)
31
(No Transcript)
32
OBSERVATIONS
  • p value calculated for

    age,
    weight, height, BMI,
    ASA
    statusApfel scores
  • p value calculated for the
    duration of
    procedure

    total dose of fentanyl used
  • No adverse effects were observed in both groups

gt0.05 insignificant
gt0.05 insignificant
33
OBSERVATIONS contd
  • p value for VAS scoring of nausea in the
    interval
    0 2 hr ( p0.0008) 2 6 hr (p0.0004)

    6 -24 hr (p0.0034) 24 72 hr(p0.0013)
  • 0 24 hr time interval, p value for

    emetic episode incidence (p0.0044)

    complete remission (p0.0044)
  • 24-72 hr time interval interval p value for

    emetic episode incidence
    (p0.7763)
    complete remission
    (p0.7782)

lt 0.05 significant
lt 0.05 significant
gt 0.05 insignificant
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com