Title: EVALUATION OF EFFICACY OF PALONOSETRON VERSUS PLACEBO FOR PREVENTION OF POSTOPERATIVE NAUSEA AND VOMITING
1EVALUATION OF EFFICACY OF PALONOSETRON VERSUS
PLACEBO FOR PREVENTION OF POSTOPERATIVE
NAUSEA AND VOMITING
- CO-AUTHORS
- Prof HOD Dr.I.Chandrasekaran M.D.,D.A.,
- Prof Dr.S.P.Meenakshisundaram M.D.,D.A.,
- Asst. Prof Dr.D.S.Sudhakar M.D.,DNB.,
- AUTHOR G.N.Jeevanandam IIyr M.D. PG
- INSTITUTE OF ANAESTHESIOLOGY , Madurai Medical
College
2Post Operative Nausea Vomiting
- Second most common complaints reported
- Unpleasant experience often rated worse than
postoperative pain - Medical risks Aspiration of gastric contents,
Suture dehiscence,
Esophageal rupture,
Subcutaneous emphysema, Pneumothorax
HR BP
elevation(risk for MI dysrhythmias )
Bradycardia and hypotension.
3RISK FACTORS
- APFEL Simplified risk scoring for adults
4PALONOSETRON
- Potent and selective 5-HT3 antagonist
- Plasma elimination T½ 40 h
- Metabolized primarily by liver.
- Age, hepatic dysfunction or mild-to-moderate
renal impairment have no clinically significant
effect on the pharmacokinetics
5MECHANISM OF ACTION
- Antagonism of 5HT3 receptors
- Also has an allosteric binding site
- Causes receptor interanalisation and prolonged
inhibition
6 USES
- Prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting
- Prevention of acute and delayed nausea and
vomiting associated chemotherapy. - Dosage and Administration
- Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting
- IV 0.075 mg before the induction of anesthesia.
- Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting
- IV 0.25 mg administered 30 min before the start
of chemotherapy. - PO 0.5 mg administered 1 h prior to the start of
chemotherapy.
7SIDE EFFECTS
- COMMON Headache
- Constipation
- OTHERS
- Cardiovascular ECG QT prolongation, bradycardia,
hypotension,
tachycardia. - CNS Headache, anxiety,
dizziness, weakness. - Gastro Intestinal Constipation, diarrhea.
- Genitourinary Urinary retention.
- Hepatic Increased ALT, increased
AST.
8AIM
- To evaluate the efficacy of Palonosetron versus
placebo for prevention of Postoperative Nausea
and Vomiting
9DESIGN
- Randomized double blind control study
- Female patients undergoing laproscopic surgery
under GA - Inclusion criteria
- Age 18 - 60 yrs
- ASA I - II
- Non - Smokers
- Exclusion criteria
- Patients received antiemetics 24 hrs prior to
surgery - Patients received / undergoing chemotherapy or
radiotherapy - Pre existing heart blocks , bradycardia, QT
prolongation, - Duration of procedure lt1 hr
10METHODS
- Ethical committee approval
- Informed consent
- Randomised allocation into 2 groups
- Group Pn Inj.Palonosetron 0.o75mg I.V
- Group Po Placebo ( Normal Saline 1.5ml ) I.V
11- All patients premedicated with Inj.Midazolam
0.05mg/kg Inj.Glyco 0.2mg im 45 min before
induction - I.V lines will be secured
- Preinduction monitors NIBP, Pulse oximetry, ECG,
connected - Just prior to Induction of anesthesia patients
will receive the allocated drug or equal volume
of normal saline I.V - Induced with Inj.Thio 5mg/kg ,Inj.Fentanyl
2mics/kg ,Inj.Suxa 2mg/kg - Maintainence with intermittent titrated dose of
Inj.Atracurium , Inj.Fentanyl and N2O O2 ( 60
40 ) - Reversal with Inj.Neostigmine 40mics/kg
Inj.Glyco 10mics/kg and extubation
12DATA COLLECTION
- EMETIC episodes (vomiting and retching)
- Intensity of Nausea (VAS scoring for nausea)
both at 2 ,6 , 24, 48, 72 hrs with
respect to their occurrence over the previous
observation period - Rescue therapy Inj.Metoclopromide 10mg I.V when
VAS gt 4 / emetic episodes - Complete response (defined as no emetic episodes
and no rescue medication) will be noted for the
time interval of 0 24 hrs 24 72
hrs
13- Patients Age ,Weight,BMI
- Risk factors for PONV (H/O PONV , H/O motion
sickness ) - Duration of surgery
- Total intra operative opioid (fentanyl) dose
- Post operative opioid use will be noted (proposed
post operative pain relief Inj.Tramadol 100mg
I.M) - Side effects like headache ,constipation and
other adverse events will be noted
14ANALYSIS OF COLLECTED DATA
15Physiological parameters
VARIABLE GROUP Pn (n 30) GROUP Po (n 30) p
Age in years 27.3 4.4 26.3 3.9 0.3808
Weight (in kgs) 53.7 5.4 54.8 3.5 0.5428
Height ( in cms) 151.2 3.1 151.7 2.7 0.4796
BMI 23.4 2 23.8 1.3 0.4289
16ASA RISK
ASA GROUP Pn GROUP Pn GROUP Po GROUP Po
ASA n n
I 26 86.7 27 90
II 4 13.3 3 10
p 0.691 0.691 0.691 0.691
17Duration of Procedure
Dur of Proc GROUP Pn GROUP Po
Range 80 - 140 80 135
Mean 107.8 105.2
S.D. 15.2 12
p 0.4898 0.4898
18TOTAL INTEROPERATIVE OPIOiD USED
Tot. opiod used GROUP Pn GROUP Po
Range 130 - 210 140 200
Mean 167 163.3
S.D. 17.4 17.9
p 0.3156 0.3156
19APFEL SCORE
APFEL SCORE GROUP Pn GROUP Pn GROUP Po GROUP Po
APFEL SCORE No. No.
3 25 83.3 27 90
4 5 16.7 3 10
Total 30 100 30 100
Range Mean S.D. 3 4 3.17 0.38 3 4 3.17 0.38 3 4 3.1 0.31 3 4 3.1 0.31
p 0.4513 0.4513 0.4513 0.4513
20INTENSITY OF NAUSEA ( VAS )
INT OF NAUSEA GROUP Pn GROUP Po p
0 2 hrs 2.43 2.21 4.43 1.65 0.0008
2 6 hrs 1.53 1.63 3.07 1.31 0.0004
6 24 hrs 1.3 1.66 2.3 1.52 0.0034
24 72 hrs 0.9 1.49 2.07 1.51 0.0013
21EMETIC EPISODES 0 24 HR Interval
EMETIC EPISODES GROUP Pn GROUP Pn GROUP Po GROUP Po
EMETIC EPISODES n n
YES 10 33.3 22 73.3
NO 20 66.7 8 26.7
p 0.0044 0.0044 0.0044 0.0044
22EMETIC EPISODES 24 72 HR Interval
EMETIC EPISODES GROUP Pn GROUP Pn GROUP Po GROUP Po
EMETIC EPISODES n n
YES 8 26.7 10 33.3
NO 22 73.3 20 66.7
p 0.7763 0.7763 0.7763 0.7763
23COMPLETE REMISSION 0 24 HR Interval
COMPLETE REMISSION GROUP Pn GROUP Pn GROUP Po GROUP Po
COMPLETE REMISSION n n
YES 20 66.7 8 26.7
NO 10 33.3 22 73.3
p 0.0044 0.0044 0.0044 0.0044
24COMPLETE REMISSION 24 - 72HR Interval
COMPLETE REMISSION GROUP Pn GROUP Pn GROUP Po GROUP Po
COMPLETE REMISSION n n
YES 22 73.3 20 70
NO 8 26.7 10 30
p 0.7763 0.7763 0.7763 0.7763
25SUMMARY
- Randomised controlled study
- Two groups, 30 patients in each
- Female patients ,non-smokers ,undergoing
laproscopy of more than one hour duration
receiving opioids for postoperative pain relief - Inj.Palonosetron 0.075 mg Vs Placebo
- Data collected regarding the incidence of emetic
episodes the intensity of nausea by VAS scoring
- Statistical analysis revealed that both groups
were comparable with regared to their demography
26OBSERVATIONS
- Patients receiving Palonosetron compared to
control group have - Significant reduction in incidence of Emetic
episodes and greater Complete remission in the
first 24 hrs following surgery - Significantly low VAS scores for nausea over the
period of 72 hrs - No significant difference in Emetic episodes and
complete remission over 24-72hr period - Treatment effect of PALONOSETRON in this trial
was most pronounced during the first 24 h - No side effects
27CONCLUSION
- PALONOSETRON 0.075mg was statistically superior
to placebo for all end-points during the first 24
h, including Complete remisison ,emetic episode
incidence intensity of nausea with no adverse
effects - In the 24-72 hr it has the advantage of having
good control of intensity of nausea
28REFERENCES
- A Randomized, Double-Blind Study to Evaluate the
Efficacy and Safety of Three Different Doses of
Palonosetron Versus Placebo in Preventing
Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting Over a 72-Hour
Period(Anesth Analg 2008107439 44) - A Randomized, Double-Blind Study to Evaluate the
Efficacy and Safety of Three Different Doses of
Palonosetron Versus Placebo for Preventing
Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting(Anesth Analg
200810744551)
29THANK YOU
30(No Transcript)
31(No Transcript)
32OBSERVATIONS
- p value calculated for
age,
weight, height, BMI,
ASA
statusApfel scores - p value calculated for the
duration of
procedure
total dose of fentanyl used - No adverse effects were observed in both groups
gt0.05 insignificant
gt0.05 insignificant
33OBSERVATIONS contd
- p value for VAS scoring of nausea in the
interval
0 2 hr ( p0.0008) 2 6 hr (p0.0004)
6 -24 hr (p0.0034) 24 72 hr(p0.0013) - 0 24 hr time interval, p value for
emetic episode incidence (p0.0044)
complete remission (p0.0044) - 24-72 hr time interval interval p value for
emetic episode incidence
(p0.7763)
complete remission
(p0.7782)
lt 0.05 significant
lt 0.05 significant
gt 0.05 insignificant