Title: Aerospace Systems Engineering as an Integrating Function for the Georgia Tech Graduate Program in Aerospace Systems Design
1Aerospace Systems Engineeringas an Integrating
Functionfor the Georgia Tech Graduate Program in
Aerospace Systems Design
- Dr. Daniel P. Schrage
- Professor and Director
- Center of Excellence in Rotorcraft Technology
(CERT) - Center for Aerospace Systems Analysis (CASA)
2Presentation Outline
- Overview of the Graduate Program Aerospace
Systems Design Program - The Evolution from an IPPD to an IPPD through RDS
to a Modern Aerospace Systems Engineering
Approach - Description of the Graduate Course in Aerospace
Systems Engineering - Opportunities for Collaboration with the School
of ISYE
3Georgia Tech School of AE
- School of Aerospace Engineering
- One of original six Guggenheim Schools of
Aeronautics - 34 full time faculty
- 600-700 undergraduate students (AE majors)
- 250 -300 graduate students
- Highest Rated Public Aerospace School (Overall
UG 2nd to MITGR-3rd to MIT Stanford, U.S.
News World Report) - Six Disciplinary Groups (Full A.E. School)
Aerodynamics and Fluid Mechanics Structural
Mechanics and Materials Propulsion and
Combustion
Flight Mechanics and Controls Structural
Dynamics and Aeroelasticity System Design and
Optimization
4Graduate Program in Aerospace Systems Design
- Includes core and elective courses to
- Provide a Practice-oriented M.S. Program
- Provide a Integrated-Discovery Focused Ph.D
program - Includes a combination of disciplinary, methods
and synthesis courses for System Design of
Complex Systems - Aircraft and Rotorcraft
- Missiles and Space
- System of Systems Army/DARPA FCS FAA/NASA NAS
- Integrates Research and Education
- Two active research laboratories, ASDL and SSDL
- Approx. 100 students (80 supported)
- Approx. 15 research engineers
- Uses an IPPD through RDS Approach and a modern
Aerospace Systems Engineering Course as an
Integrating Function for the Program
5Evolution of the Georgia Tech Aerospace Systems
Design Program
6Why it is Unique?
- Is the Only Formal Graduate Aerospace Systems
Design Program in the U.S., and probably
throughout the world - Addresses the System Design of Complex Systems
(Not Conceptual Design) utilizing a Generic IPPD
Methodology, as a modern approach for Systems
Engineering - Provides an engineering approach to Risk Based
Management through Robust Design Simulation (RDS)
environment for Implementing the IPPD Methodology
at the Front End that can be continued for
Process Improvement and Merging with Six Sigma
methods - Provides a practical way of incorporating lean
and other initiatives into the front end of a
complex systems life cycle - Has spun off various methods, tools, and
techniques from this IPPD through RDS approach
for a variety of customers - Have moved to address System of Systems
problems such as FCS and air transportation
architectures for the NAS
7Who are the Primary Supporting Faculty?
- School of A.E.Primary Faculty
- Dr. Dimitri Mavris, Director of ASDL and Boeing
Chair Professor in Advanced Aerospace Systems
Analysis - Dr. John Olds, Associate Professor and Director
of SSDL - Dr. Jim Craig, Professor and Co-Director of CASA
- Dr. Dan Schrage, Professor and Director, CASA
CERT - Two recruitments Lewis Chair in Space Systems
Technologies Junior Faculty in Design
Methodology Tools - Supporting Faculty Dr. Amy Pritchett (AE/ISYE),
Dr. Eric Johnson, Dr. JVR Prasad - Some Participation from the School of M.E.
- Dr. Farokh Mistree, Professor and Director of
SRL - Dr. Bob Fulton, Professor
- Some Participation from the School of E.C.E
- Dr. George Vachtsevanous, Professor and Director
of the Intelligent Control Laboratory
8Overview of Center for Aerospace Systems Analysis
(CASA)
- Established in1998 based on successful
development of the ASDL from 1992 and the
successful development of the SSDL from 1995
Serves as oversight for these labs - Through its laboratories provides the primary
research support to the graduate program in
Aerospace Systems Design which currently has
100 students of which over 80 are U.S. citizens - Research support provides over 5M per year in
sponsored research and supports 80 students
15 research engineers - Provides a modern approach to systems engineering
based on an Integrated Product/Process
Development (IPPD) methodology executed through
Robust Design Simulation (RDS)
9Why Systems Analysis?
- Systems Analysis is a scientific process, or
methodology, which can best be described in terms
of its salient problem-related elements. The
process involves - Systematic examination and comparison of those
alternative actions which are related to the
accomplishment of desired objectives - Comparison of alternatives on the basis of the
costs and the benefits associated with each
alternative - Explicit consideration of risk
- NASA, DoD, and Industry are realizing that more
emphasis must be placing on enhancing systems
analysis at the front end of the life cycle using
modern systems engineering approaches
10CASAs Laboratories
Aerospace Systems Design Lab www.asdl.gatech.edu
Space Systems Design Lab www.ssdl.gatech.edu
Flight Sim Lab
B.S.A.E. - M.S. - Ph.D Degrees
Design, Build, Fly Lab
Design Frameworks Lab
Uninhabited Aerial Vehicle Research Facility
IPERT Lab
11An Integration and Practice-Oriented M.S.Program
in Aerospace Systems Design
Summer
Semester II
Semester I
ISE/PLMC Development
Design Methods/Techniques
Aerospace
Propulsion
Disciplinary
Systems
Electives
Systems
Engineering
Design
Special
Project
Applied
Applied
Systems
Systems
Design I
Design II
Design I
Design II
Safety
By Design
Modern
Modern
Product
Design
Design
Life Cycle
Methods I
Methods II
Management
Internship
Design Tools/Infrastructure
Mathematics (2 Required)
Other Electives
Legend
Core Classes
Elective Classes
12Aerospace Systems Design Education Research
Philosophy
Industry
Government
Relevant Problems
Partners GEAE RRA LMTAS Boeing Sikorsky
- Methods Formulation
- Supports Basic Research
- Implementation of Methods
Partners ONR NASA AFRL NRTC
Data Tools
Funding
Funding
Methods
Students
13Design Process Paradigm Shift(Research
Opportunities in Engineering Design, NSF
Strategic Planning Workshop Final Report, April
1996)
- A paradigm shift is underway that attempts to
change the way complex systems are being designed - Emphasis has shifted from design for performance
to design for affordability, where affordability
is defined as the ratio of system effectiveness
to system cost profit - System Cost - Performance Tradeoffs must be
accommodated early - Downstream knowledge must be brought back to the
early phases of design for system level tradeoffs - The design Freedom curve must be kept open until
knowledgeable tradeoffs can be made
14What is IPPD?
- Integrated Product/Process Development (IPPD) is
a management methodology that incorporates a
systematic approach to the early integration and
concurrent application of all the disciplines
that play a part throughout a systems life cycle
(Technology for Affordability A Report on the
Activities of the Working Groups to the Industry
Affordability Executive Committee, The National
Center for Advanced Technologies (NCAT), January
1994) - IPPD evolved out of the commercial sectors
assessment of what it took to be world class
competitive in the 1980s - The DoD has required IPPD and the use of IPTs
where practical throughout the DoD Acquisition
Process for Major Systems (DoD 5000.2R) - Conduct of IPPD requires Product/Process
Simulation using Probabilistic Approaches
15Quality Revolution - Where Competition is Today
NCAT Report, 1994
16Japanese Auto Industry Made Changes Earlier Than
U.S. Auto Industry
17Concurrent vs Serial Approach
18Traditional Design Development Using only a Top
Down Decomposition Systems Engineering Process
19IPPD Requires the Computer Integration of Product
and Process Models and
Tools for System Level Design Trades and Cycle
Time Reduction
20Integrated Product and Process Development
Modeling Flow (Aircraft Example)
21HSCT Integrated Design Manufacturing Ph.D
Thesis (W. Marx, 1997)
Wing Point Design Regions
William J. Marx
22Aircraft Life Cycle Cost Analysis (ALCCA) -
including Economic Analysis
23 Aircraft Process Based Manufacturing Cost Model
24Cost Time Analysis for Theoretical Production
25Cost/Time Constraint Curve for Candidate
Selection
Ref. MIL-HDBK-727
26Probabilistic Cost/Time Production Analysis
Cumul. time
Cost/Time Curve
End Points for Wide Range of Projected Lot Sizes
Finishing Operations
Largest Run
Production
Theoretical First Unit Cost (TFUC)
Setup
Smallest Run
Design Tools
Cost / Unit
Purchase Material
Material Cost
Setup Cost
Tool Design Cost
Finishing Operations Cost Smallest Run
Production Cost Largest Run
Finishing Operations Cost Largest Run
Production Cost Smallest Run
Ref. MIL-HDBK-727
27Georgia Tech Generic IPPD Methodology
- Methodology provides a procedural design
(trade-off iteration) approach based on four key
elements - Systems Engineering Methods and Tools (Product
design driven, deterministic, decomposition
approaches MDO is usually based on analytic
design approach) - Quality Engineering Methods and Tools (Process
design driven, nondeterministic, recomposition
approaches MDO is usually based on experimental
design approach) - Top Down Design Decision Process Flow (Provides
the design trade-off process) - Computer Integrated Design Environment(Information
Technology driven) - Methodology has been implemented through Robust
Design Simulation (RDS) for a number of
applications
28Georgia Tech Generic IPPD Methodology
29The Systems Engineering Process
- Process Input
- Customer Needs/Objectives/ Requirements
- - Missions
- - Measures of Effectiveness
- - Environments
- - Constraints
- Technology Base
- Output Requirements from Prior Development
Effort - Program Decision Requirements
- Requirements Applied Through
- Specifications and Standards
System Analysis Control (Balance)
- Requirements Analysis
- Analyze Missions Environments
- Identify Functional Requirements
- Define/Refine Performance Design
- Constraint Requirement
- Trade-Off Studies
- Effectiveness Analysis
- Risk Management
- Configuration Management
- Interface Management
- Performance Measurement
- - SEMS
- - TPM
- - Technical Reviews
Requirement Loop
- Functional Analysis/Allocation
- Decompose to Lower-Level Functions
- Allocate Performance Other Limiting
Requirements to - All Functional Levels
- Define/Refine Functional Interfaces
(Internal/External) - Define/Refine/Integrate Functional Architecture
Design Loop
- Synthesis
- Transform Architectures (Functional to Physical)
- Define Alternative System Concepts,
Configuration - Items System Elements
- Select Preferred Product Process Solutions
- Define/Refine Physical Interfaces
(Internal/External)
Verification
Related Terms Customer
Organization responsible for Primary Functions
Primary Functions Development,
Production/Construction, Verification,
Deployment, Operations,
Support Training, Disposal Systems Elements
Hardware, Software, Personnel, Facilities, Data,
Material,
Services, Techniques
- Process Output
- Development Level Dependant
- - Decision Data Base
- - System/Configuration Item
- Architecture
- - Specification Baseline
30Modeling and SimulationVarying Fidelity of
Synthesis and Sizing
Safety
Safety
Economics
Aerodynamics
Aerodynamics
Economics
S
ynthesis Sizing
SC
Manufacturing
Manufacturing
SC
Integrated Routines
Increasing
Table Lookup
Sophistication and
Structures
Complexity
Performance
Conceptual Design Tools
(
First-Order Methods)
Approximating Functions
Direct Coupling of Analyses
Propulsion
Structures
Performance
Preliminary Design Tools
(
Higher-Order Methods)
Propulsion
31The Quality Engineering Process provides
Recomposition Methods Tools
Knowledge Feedback
Quality Function Deployment Off-Line
Seven Management and Planing Tools Off-Line
Statistical Process Control On-Line
Robust Design Methods (Taguchi, Six - Sigma,
DOE) Off-Line
Customer
- Variation Experiments
- Make Improvements
- Hold Gains
- Continuous Improvement
Having heard the voice of the customer, QFD
prioritizes where improvements are needed
Taguchi provides the mechanism for identifying
these improvements
32Computer Integrated Environment
Product LifeCycle Management
Create Optimize
33CoVE Collaborative Visualization Environment
for Complex Systems Design
- Funded by the
- Defense University Research Instrumentation
Program (DURIP) - February 2003
34CoVE Objectives
- A semi-immersive, very high resolution,
Collaborative Visualization Environment (CoVE). - Used to investigate the use of semi-immersive
virtual environments in collaborative design
processes. - Basic concept for the CoVE is a large, high
resolution display wall similar to those
developed for media companies and operations
centers. - It will allow us to apply emerging probabilistic
design methods to problems at an industrial
scale. - It is expected to promote new research in design,
visualization and usability with other leading
centers on campus.
35CoVE Features
- A single CoVE with a 25 M-pixel resolution curved
data wall measuring 20 ft wide by 12 ft tall. - Seating for up to 12 participants, each with
their own computers and local displays. - The basic design will be configured so that it
can be used with another CoVE to execute
distributed collaborative design with another
team at a remote location. - The CoVE will include both single person and
group video conferencing capabilities. - Project budget 630k
36Examples
37Examples
38Example ASDL Application
Unified Trade-off Environment
Morphological Matrix
QFD
Mission Profile
Constraint Analysis
Video Conference
Technology Impact Matrix
RAM Model
Technology Profiles
JPDM
CDF
CFD Visualization
39Weber 2nd Floor Site
Operations
Video Conferencing
Observers
Data Wall
Participants
40CoVE Tentative Schedule
- Award announcement February 2003
- Final specifications April 2003
- Site preparations May 2003
- Construction Installation July 2003
- Testing September 2003
- Acceptance October 2003
41Aerospace Systems Engineering Course AE 6370
- Introduces new graduate students to Aerospace
Systems Engineering and a methodology for
Implementing it through IPPD through Robust
Design Simulation (RDS) - Consists of covering traditional systems
engineering methods and tools introduces quality
engineering methods and tools introduces
multi-attribute decision methods and introduces
the need for a computer integrated environment - Course consists of a mid-term exam and team
projects (5 students per team) addressing the
concept formulation for complex systems or system
of systems - Utilizes a simple set of integrated tools to
allow the teams to conduct the first iteration
through a complex system design - Will be offered as a distance learning course for
the first time in Fall 2003
42Aerospace Systems Engineering Taught using an
Integrated Set of Tools
43 Ten Complex System Formulation Projects from
AE6370, Fall 2002
- AIAA Graduate Student Missile Design Competition
Future Target Delivery System(Missile
Multipurpose Target - RFP for a High Firepower Payload for Missile
Defense (Missile Interceptor) - NASA Sponsored University Competition for the
Conceptual Design of a Titan (Saturns largest
moon) Vertical Lift Aerial Vehicle - AHS/NASA Student Design Competition for VTOL
Urban Disaster Response Vehicle - NASA Personal Air Vehicle Evaluation Program to
identify VTOL and ESTOL Concepts - RFP for a Quiet Supersonic Business Jet in
conjunction with Gulfstream Aerospace Company - DoD Potential Joint Program for an Air Maneuver
Transport Concepts for the Objective Force - AIAA Student Competition for Subsonic
Commercial QuEST - AUVS International Aerial Robotics Competition
and DARPA Project Intelligent Uninhabited
Aerial Vehicle (UAV) using Software Enabled
Control (SEC) - Army Aviation Recapitalization Program
Technology and Risk Assessment for the Armys
UH-60M Helicopter Improvement Program
44What is IPPD Through RDS
- Integrated Product/Process Development (IPPD)
means applying Concurrent Engineering at the
front end of a systems life cycle where design
freedom can be leveraged and product/process
design tradeoffs conducted in parallel at the
system, component, and part levels - Implementation of IPPD requires moving from a
deterministic point design approach to a
probabilistic family design approach to keep the
design space open and from committing life cycle
cost before the system life cycle design
trade-offs can be made - Robust Design Simulation (RDS) provides the
necessary simulation and modeling environment for
executing IPPD at the System level - Continuation of RDS along the system life cycle
implies the creation of a Virtual Stochastic Life
Cycle Design Environment - An Overall Evaluation Criterion (OEC) based on
System Affordability should be identified early
and its variability tracked along the life cycle
time line
45Roadmap to Affordability Through RDS
Robust Design Simulation
Subject to
Robust Solutions
Design Environmental Constraints
Technology Infusion Physics-Based
Modeling Activity and Process-Based Modeling
Objectives Schedule Budget Reduce LCC Increase
Affordability Increase Reliability . . . . .
Economic Life-Cycle Analysis
Synthesis Sizing
Operational Environment
Simulation
Impact of New Technologies-Performance Schedule
Risk
Economic Discipline Uncertainties
Customer Satisfaction
46Interactive RDS Environment
47Risk Uncertainty are Greatest at the Front
KNOWNS
KNOWN-UNKNOWNS
UNKNOWN-UNKNOWNS
48Coninuous RDS along the System Life Cycle to link
the fuzzy front end to the process capability
approaches
Continuous Product Improvement / Innovation
Uncertainty
Risk Management/Reduction
Overall
Fuzzy Front End
Evaluation
Criterion
Upper Specification
(OEC)
Response
OEC Target
Lower
Specification
System Definition
System Integration
Manufacturing
System Design
(Detail/Tolerance)
(On-Line Quality)
(Preliminary/Parameter)
Tech. Development
(Conceptual/System)
Traditional C
and C
Approach for Continuous, On-line Process
Improvement
p
p
k
Overall
Upper Specification
Evaluation
Criterion
(OEC)
Response
OEC Target
Lower
Specification
Initial Distribution
Reduced Variability and Improved Mean Response
Time
49The VSLCDE- Key Characteristics
The purpose of VSLCDE is to facilitate design
decision- making over time (at any level of the
organization) in the presence of uncertainty,
allowing affordable solutions to be reached with
adequate confidence. It is a research testbed.
- Virtual . . . Simulation-based system life-cycle
prediction - Stochastic . . . Time-varying uncertainty is
modeled temporal decision-making - Life-Cycle . . . the design, engineering
development, test, manufacture, flight test,
operational simulation, sustainment, and
retirement of a system. The operational
simulation includes virtual testing, evaluation,
certification, and fielding of a vehicle in the
existing infrastructure, and tracking of its
impact on the economy, market demands,
environment. - Design . . . Implies that the environments main
role is to provide knowledge for use by
decision-makers, especially for finding robust
solutions - Environment . . . Implies the support of
geographically distributed analyses and people
through collaboration tools and data management
techniques
50Some Opportunities for Collaboration between the
Schools of AE and ISYE
- Integration of ISYE Logistics with AE Aerospace
Systems Design Program for a variety of customers
(Industry and Government) - With Lockheed Martin on a Modern Systems
Engineering Approach (addressing Product Life
Cycle tradeoffs from the Outset) based on the
Joint Strike Fighter (JSF) Development Approach
successes and Lessons Learned (POC Bill Kessler,
LM Lean Enterprise Mgr and Tom Burbage, LM JSF
VP) - With OSD/DOD/USAF New Focus on Systems
Engineering Education and Research - With USAF GT(CEE) Initiative in taking over the
Lean Sustainment Initiative from MIT - With NASA Langley National Institute of Aerospace
(NIA) and with NASA Ames Engineering of Complex
Systems (ECS) programs - Others?