Title: The European Union and the single currency in the global economy
1The European Union and the single currency in the
global economy
- 2 from the euro to the sovereign debt crisis.
2Euro timetable
- 11/09/2001, attack on the Twin Towers
reverberates on the world economy. - In 2002 national currencies are replaced by the
Euro. The switch was a complex and difficult
operation and was handled with a degree of
success. - In 2003 Duisenburg is replaced as President of
the ECB by the Frenchman Jean Claude Trichet. - Summer 2007 first signs of the global financial
crisis.
3The ECB and the governance of the Euro.
- Maastricht Treaty negotiations. Two different
views the full independence of the Central Bank
according to the German model, or a closer
dependence from the political authority according
to the French model. The first view prevails. - Two ruling bodies of the ECB the Governing
Council and the Executive Board. The Governing
Council is composed of Governors of all the
national central Banks. The Executive Board has
six members, elected by the European Council. The
President has a casting vote.
4(No Transcript)
5Powers of the ECB
- The ECB sets it own inflation target, its main
mandate being the achievement of price stability.
- Monetary policy is designed to be independent
from political pressures. The ECB President and
Executive Board are appointed for eight years. - National central banks remain in charge of
banking supervision. - On matters relating to the exchange rate of the
Euro with other currencies, decision rests with
the Eurogroup and the ECB carries it out. - Market interventions by the ECB are carried out
through national central banks. - The ECB has no direct power over fiscal policies
of the member states, It can, however, issue
recommendations. National governments are barred
from intervening on matters of monetary policy. - The Treaty forbids monetary financing of public
expenditure (art 101)
6The Eurogroup.
- The Eurogroup is composed of the finance and
economics ministers of the countries that have
adopted the Euro. Currently they are sixteen.
The President of the ECB takes part in its
meetings, which are scheduled once a month. - The Eurogroup
- A) monitors fiscal policy in the member states.
- B) is in charge of setting the Euros exchange
rate policy (the Euro runs a flexible exchange
rate) - C) rules on admitting other countries in the
Euro. - The European Parliament conducts a yearly review
on the policy of the ECB and the Eurogroup
7The ECB and its monetary policy.
- The ECBs stated objective is the achievement of
an inflationary target of below 2 over the
medium period (12 to 18) - The ECB has only one objective price stability.
- The Fed on the other hand has the objective both
of price stability and of GDP growth. The ECB
does not have the political mandate to pursue
objectives outside monetary policy. It is a
federal body but with a limited mandate.
8The Euro in the world economy
- One of the key issues has been the Euro-dollar
exchange rate. It was first set at 1,19 dollars
for a euro. - It first fell dramatically (1999-2002) due to the
strength of the US economy in the late 1990s and
the scarce credibility of the Euro in its initial
stage. This weakness brought with it as a
consequence higher Euro interest rates. - After 2003 the Euro appreciated by about 90, to
achieve 1,60 to the dollar. This was due to the
growing balance of payments deficits in the US
which triggered the dollar rate decline. The Euro
also appreciated against all other currencies by
about 40
9(No Transcript)
10(No Transcript)
11(No Transcript)
12(No Transcript)
13The Euro and the world economy
- Globalization accelerates, both financially and
technologically. - 2001-2007 Emerging economies accelerate in
Asia, but also in Latin America, in some part of
Africa and in Eastern Europe. Rates of growth go
up sharply. Strong growth in world trade. - Raw material prices shoot up.
- Savings from fast growing emerging nations are
channeled to finance the growing debt of the US
and other developed economies. Low rates of
interest world-wide fuel short term capital
movements and highly leveraged financial
activities.
14The world economy before the crisis.
- 1999-2008 average rates of growth remain
relatively high. - Eurozone 2,1 (against 1.9 nel 1993-8)
- World 4 (against 3 in 1993-8)
- USA 2,6 (against 3).
15(No Transcript)
16Provisional balance sheet of the Euro
- The BCE succeeds in enforcing a degree of
anti-inflationary discipline. The inflation rate
remains low. Nominal interest rates in the
period 2000-2007 are on average below 5. - The Euro has a positive impact on intra-EU trade
and FDI. - International Status. The Euro becomes the second
international reserve currency.
17The discipline of belonging to the Euro
- Members of the Eurogroup have renounced a
national monetary policy. They can not change
their interest rates, nor obviously can they
devalue or revalue their currencies. - Costs need to be kept in line with productivity.
If costs raise above productivity they are not
justified and carry the consequence of a general
loss of competitiveness in the natinal economy.
A key indicator of competitiveness is the labour
cost per unit of output - A loss of competitiveness means relative falls in
exports and increases in imports. This leads to a
need for adjustment, which can only be carried
out in real terms and not in nominal terms. Real
term adjustment implies bringing costs in line
with competitors, pushing down inflation, and
restructuring of the economy.
18Euro countries performance
- The three main Eurogroup countries, Germany,
France and Italy scored a weak economic
performance. Germany, however, accelerated after
2005. - Peripheral countries, such as Ireland, Finland,
Spain and Greece, grew more rapidly, exploiting
relatively low interest rates. Their growth
however was tied to a high national debt (both
state and privately owned). This made them
vulnerable to the financial crisis of 2008 and
its aftershocks.
19(No Transcript)
20Italy and the Euro
- Italy benefited from low interest rates inside
the Eurozone. This factor alone accounted for a
fall of 4,5 in its annual deficit between 1997
and 2006. Public expenditure however was not
kept in check and in fact continued to move
upwards, making it necessary to keep taxes high. - Italy Labor Costs have increased 20 above
Germanys. This points to a competitive gap
which will threatens Italys economic prospects.
21(No Transcript)
22Labour costs per unit of ouput.
23Stability pact
- The first Growth and Stability Pact among EU
members was signed in December 1996, under German
insistence. - Member states committed themselves to
- Balancing their budgets after joining the Euro
- Being fined if they overshot the 3 ceiling set
at Maastricht.
24The new Stability Pact of 2004
- In 2002-3 Italy, France, Germany and other
countries showed budget deficits of over 3 of
GDP. Attempts to fine France and Germany, the
main offenders, were voted down by the Eurogroup,
against the opinion of the European Commission
Ireland and Portugal, however, for the same
reason had been fined one year earlier. This
brought into evidence a disparity between the big
and the small members of the Eurogroup, which was
divisive and contributed to the negative
responses of referenda in France and the Low
Countries on the new Constitutional Treaty,
preventing its passage into law (a new revised
and scaled down treaty has come into force in
2009). - In 2004 the Stability Pact was reformed, making
it more flexible in times of economic recession,
and more stringent during favorable economic
conditions, during which countries are supposed
to achieve a yearly improvement of 0,5 in the
budget deficit.
25Performance in 2006-2007
- Fairly good overall growth rates in 2006 and
2007. - Germany was able to restore its public finances,
by carrying out a considerable fiscal correction.
Growth resumed from 2005. Domestic market reform
(labour market and others) have improved
efficiency. Exports rose rapidly. German export
were able to capture an important share of the
Chinese market. Germany was able to meet the
world crisis in 2008 from a position of relative
strength. - France did not carry out all the needed
corrections.
26Performance in 2006-2010
- Italy undertook a fiscal correction to its
budgetary deficit in 2007. However it used up
public revenue to boost domestic expenditure. It
found itself exposed to the crisis, which it met
with extreme budgetary prudence. Good performance
of Italian exports between 2005 and 2007. - In 2009-2010 conditions for a new fiscal crisis
build up. All countries build up deficits to
offset the effects of the 2008-9 crisis and are
then forced to engage in a sharp tightening of
fiscal policies. Under threat from international
hot money flows is the very existence of the Euro.
27The Euro and the 2008 crisis.
- Banks in the UK and Switzerland are severely hit.
- In the Eurozone German banks such as Deutsche
Bank and HypoReal Estate suffer most. - Some banks belonging to Euro members are heavily
exposed in Eastern European countries. In Italy
this was the case with Unicredit, which had
recently taken over the German HypoVereinsbank
(HVB). - Other banks in trouble are Dexia (French-Belgian)
and Fortis (Belgian-Dutch). - As a reaction to the crisis, the ECB lowered
rates dramatically on October 2008. - European governments recapitalized their banks.
- Temporary suspension of the Growth and Stability
Pact leads to mounting deficits which impose a
dramatic correction in the first few months of
2010.
28The Euro and the sovereign debt crisis
- Greece joined the Euro in 2001. However in order
to meet the criteria its national account
statistics seem to have been forged. After a
few years new calculations brought its budget
deficit up from 3.4 to 13.6 of its GDP. - As a result there was a dramatic rise of the
spread of Greek bonds, with immediate effects on
the weaker members of the Euros periphery, such
as Portugal, Ireland and Spain, the so-called
PIGS. - May 2010. An agreement is reached on a EU aid
package to Greece of 110 bn Euros in 3 years,
with the IMF also playing a role. - The financial turmoil spreads to Ireland the
Irish government intervenes to rescue the
Anglo-Irish Bank, the countrys main financial
institution. The EU discusses a permanent rescue
fund as well as new monitoring procedures to
check member states accounts.
29(No Transcript)
30(No Transcript)
31(No Transcript)
32(No Transcript)
33(No Transcript)
34(No Transcript)
35(No Transcript)
36Great Britain and the Euro
- At Maastricht Great Britain negotiated an opt-out
clause. - Joining the euro would require a referendum in
the UK. - Convergence with the Eurozone. There has always
been imperfect convergence. The UK has enjoyed
slightly higher average growth during 1999-2008,
but also higher interest rates. Its budget
deficit has been above 3 and it has run a
balance of payments deficit. If the UK had joined
the Euro it would have determined higher interest
rates throughout the Eurozone, and this might
have impacted on overall growth rates. - The UK government has blamed the lack of
convergence for its refusal to join the Euro, but
there are also underlying political resistances
in the UK body politics.
37Great Britain and the euro
- London has retained its status of main financial
centre in Europe. In 2007, 67 of international
bonds were issued in London, and nearly three
quarters of euro-denominated offerings were also
issued in London. - The effects of the financial crisis. The UK
economy and the Uk banking system was hit very
severely by the crisis. Large scale government
intervention means the UK has run a large
deficit, which needs a dramatic correction. - To regain competitiveness the UK economy will be
able to use devaluation. In fact during 2007-8
sterling has lost 16 of its value against the
euro and more since then.
38New member countries and the euro.
- New member countries enjoyed higher growth rates
than EU-15 members. Between 2004 and 2007 the
Baltic states grew by between 8 and 10 a year,
Poland and the Czech Republic by about 5, while
the Eurozone only by 2. The crisis has meant a
deep recession for new as well as old member
countries. - Joining the euro would have meant adopting the
same monetary policy as the founding members of
the Eurogroup. Between 2004 and 2008 the ECB has
held short term interest rates at around 3,2
and long term rates at 4. These rates would have
been too low for countries growing as fast as the
new member countries. Had they adopted them, they
would have suffered inflation. In fact the Baltic
states, having pegged they currencies to the
euro, experience high rates of inflation... - Joining the euro, would entail for these
countries a strong deflationary policy effect,
with drastic fiscal measures likely to endanger
their growth prospects.
39The new members and the adoption of the Euro.
- One option would be to revalue their currencies
before joining the Euro. This is what Slovakia
did in 2009. However this is only a short term
solution. Once inside the single currency they
would have to adjust to a different set of
variables. - The seven EU member states that have not adopted
the Euro are relatively small, economically.
There total GDB is no more than 6 of the total
EU GDP. They have an important stock of FDI from
the rest of the EU. The crisis of 2008-9 has led
to some repatriation of FDI. It may also lead to
a closer convergence with the Eurozone, and
encourage early entry in the Single currency. But
there are many big ifs.
40Current issues in the Euro area
- Will the current fiscal correction and
restructuring lead to a stronger, centralized
Eurozone decision-making, expanding integration
further from monetary to fiscal policies? A
stronger Eurogroup co-ordination seems to be on
the cards. - Tackling the deficit. How will corrective
measures impact on growth rates? Is it possible
to sustain a fiscal correction when recovering
after a severe recession, or will this impact on
rates of growth? - In the medium term, the key factor will be the
ability of the Eurozone to meet the challenge of
competition from emerging countries in the global
economy. - Is the enlargement of the euro area still on the
cards? Or has the crisis postponed it,
indefinitely?
41Europe in the global economy issues
- Can the Euro survive?
- Can the Euro replace the dollar? In 1999-2002 the
dollar accounted for 67 of global reserves, the
euro for 13.4 and yen and sterling respectively
for 5 e 4. The current crisis has weakened
both currencies, but the Dollar is still the main
reserve currency and likely to remain so for some
time. - Fortress Europe or a liberal Europe?
- Can the EU adjust to the needs of the global
economy?