Managing Refractory Symptoms in the Child with Severe Neurological Insult: The Role of the Pediatric Acute Care Nurse Practitioner - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 28
About This Presentation
Title:

Managing Refractory Symptoms in the Child with Severe Neurological Insult: The Role of the Pediatric Acute Care Nurse Practitioner

Description:

Managing Refractory Symptoms in the Child with Severe Neurological Insult: The Role of the Pediatric Acute Care Nurse Practitioner Maria Rugg, RN, MN, ACNP, CHPCN(c), & – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:3240
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 29
Provided by: MAH109
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Managing Refractory Symptoms in the Child with Severe Neurological Insult: The Role of the Pediatric Acute Care Nurse Practitioner


1
Managing Refractory Symptoms in the Child with
Severe Neurological Insult The Role of the
Pediatric Acute Care Nurse Practitioner
  • Maria Rugg, RN, MN, ACNP, CHPCN(c),
  • Sherri Adams RN MSN CPNP
  • The Hospital for Sick Children
  • Toronto, Canada

2
TORONTO
3
(No Transcript)
4
(No Transcript)
5
(No Transcript)
6
Objectives
  • Examine a framework to understand refractory
    symptoms in the pediatric patient at the end of
    life using problem based learning
  • Describe the health care teams application and
    use of the framework within a tertiary/quaternary
    academic health care centre setting
  • Describe a potential body of research to evaluate
    the role of the acute care nurse practitioner
    within this setting

7
Case History
  • 7 year old female previously well child had
    near drowning incident in while at camp
  • Prolonged resuscitation on site
  • Suffered severe neurological damage secondary to
    hypoxia
  • Initially in PICU then transferred to General
    Pediatric Ward
  • No CPR plan established team told in handover
    from ICU that the family did not wish to discuss
    this any further
  • Primary caregiver Mother (parents separated),
    Father rarely visited

8
Case History
  • Childs Condition
  • Severely neurologically impaired
  • Vegetative state
  • Non communicative, no suck or swallowing ability
  • Dependent for all ADLs
  • Severely opisthotonic, rigidity
  • Constantly sweating, moaning
  • Grimacing, repetitive facial movements
  • Very disturbing for caregivers to observe

9
Case History
  • Initial Plan
  • Form a relationship with the family
  • Ongoing stabilization of patient
  • Insert Gastrostomy Tube
  • Manage perceived pain and symptoms
  • Teach family care of child and counsel on
    prognosis
  • Discharge child home or to an institution
    depending on familys needs and ability to do
    caregiving for child

10
Case History
  • Problems with initial plan
  • Rigidity and opisthotonus was refractory to
    medical management
  • Severe GERD, did not tolerate NG or NJ feeds
    (reflux/aspiration/pneumothorax)- consider - GJ
    or PICC
  • No good scale to quantify pain in neurologically
    impaired children
  • Tried to titrate medications for comfort a
    comfort level was not reached
  • Mother shouldering family and making all care
    decisions

11
Case Summary
  • Severe neurologic injury
  • Prognosis no improvement
  • Quality of life perceived as poor by family and
    health care team
  • Mother just wanted patient to be comfortable
  • Multiple specialists/professionals involved
  • Symptoms becoming unmanageable by traditional
    methods

12
Framework For Symptom Management Dodd et. al.
(2001) JAN, 33(5) 668-676
13
Framework For Symptom Management Dodd et. al.
(2001) JAN, 33(5) 668-676
  • Assumptions of The Model
  • Gold standard is self-report
  • Do not have to experience symptom, just be at
    risk
  • Nonverbal patients experience symptoms-caregiver
    report assumed accurate
  • Management may be targeted at the individual,
    group, family or work environment
  • Symptom Management is a dynamic process

14
Framework for Symptom Management, Dodd et. al.
(2001) JAN, 33(5) 668-676
15
Framework For Symptom Management
  • Symptom Experience
  • Perception-changes from the norm
  • Response-physiological, psychological,
    sociocultural and behavioral
  • Evaluation-judgments on severity, cause, treat
    ability and effect on lives

16
Framework for Symptom Management, Dodd et. al.
(2001) JAN, 33(5) 668-676
17
Framework For Symptom Management
  • Symptom Management Strategies
  • Patient
  • Family
  • Healthcare system
  • Healthcare Provider

18
Framework for Symptom Management, Dodd et. al.
(2001) JAN, 33(5) 668-676
19
Framework For Symptom Management
  • Symptom Outcomes
  • Functional Status
  • Emotional Status
  • Mortality
  • MorbidityCo-morbidity
  • Quality of Life
  • Self Care
  • Costs

20
Discussion Points -Symptom Outcomes
  • What is an Refractory Symptom?JOP
    12(3)40-45(1996)
  • What is the symptom and how is it manifested?
  • For whom is it difficult?
  • What are the childs preferences and/or capacity
    to tolerate the symptom?
  • What are the family or caregivers preferences
    and/or capacity to tolerate the perceived
    distress?
  • Have various approaches and alternative trails
    been fully explored?

21
Discussion Points - Symptom Experience/Management
  • What is the most comfortable way to live and die?
  • GJ tube/PICC Prolonged life with severe
    neurologic injury with multiple medical
    interventions and eventual death from secondary
    complications
  • NG feeds Respiratory failure secondary to
    aspiration
  • Withdrawal of fluid with sedation up to 2-3
    weeks of sedation, dehydration and eventual death

22
Discussion Points Symptom Experience
  • Moral Distress Is it ethically appropriate to
    treat or withdraw
  • Sanctity of life
  • Child should not be denied life-saving treatment
    because of any degree of mental of physical
    disability, nor because of the presence of
    overwhelming suffering
  • Quality of life
  • Life is not always better than death
  • When life is felt to be worse than death, then
    death is the treatment of choice
  • Social utility
  • Refusal to allow the extreme needs of one patient
    to outweigh the competing needs of others
  • Greatest good for the greatest number

23
Discussion Points Symptom Experience/
Management
  • Withdrawal of Fluids and Nutrition
  • Few controlled studies
  • Case reports
  • Emerging consensus
  • Seriously ill or dying patients experience little
    if any discomfort upon the withdrawal of tube
    feedings, TPN, or IV hydration

24
Comfort Care for Terminally Ill Patients JAMA
27216. 1994
  • Prospective case series in inpatient setting
  • Determine frequency of symptoms of hunger, thirst
    and determine whether these symptoms could be
    palliated without forced feeding, forced
    hydration, or parental nutrition
  • Adults with terminal illnesses
  • 32 patients monitored over 12 month period
  • 20 patients (60) never experienced any hunger,
    11 (34) experienced hunger only initially
  • 20 patients (62) experienced no thirst or thirst
    only initially during their terminal illness
  • In all patients symptoms of hunger, thirst, and
    dry mouth could be alleviated with small amounts
    of food, fluids and/or by application of ice
    chips and lubrication of lips
  • Patients who are terminally ill did not
    experience hunger and those who did needed only
    small amounts of food for alleviation
  • Food and fluid administration beyond the specific
    requests of patients may play a minimal role in
    providing comfort to terminally ill patients

25
What Happened?
  • Teams collaborated to provide effective symptom
    management and transition from active treatment
    to comfort care
  • Provided pain control through subcutaneous
    butterfly (morphine and methadone)-responded by
    reduction in hypertonia and mom able to hold in
    arms for first time since admission to hospital
  • Died comfortably (as per parent and healthcare
    provider report) 4 days after withdrawal of
    fluids and addition of round the clock sedation
    with family at bedside
  • Debrief sessions with team members identified
    changes in practice needed Led by Palliative
    Care NP

26
APN Role in Pediatric Palliative Care
  • Who Does What?
  • Concern that palliative care practitioners were
    only used as symptomatologists
  • By definition palliative care aims to manage the
    physical, emotional and spiritual needs of
    patients facing life threatening illness and
    their families
  • Pediatric APN is ideally positioned to support
    team and families through the complex dynamic of
    symptom experience, symptom management, and
    symptom outcomes

27
Areas for Further Research
  • The Palliative Care NP
  • Critical elements that characterize APNs and make
    these nurses uniquely qualified for an expanded
    role within this area include
  • In depth knowledge of a specific patient
    population
  • Decision making capability
  • Leadership skill
  • Capacity to negotiate a complex integrated health
    network (Weggel,1997)
  • APN Role
  • Using the Sick Kids model the APN is well
    positioned to enhance and lead complex systems
    involved in the care of complex patients and
    their families

28
Summary
  • Symptom management must consider the whole
    patient and team
  • Approach to care should be holistic and
    collaborative - Utilizing a model to guide your
    practice
  • Comfort and understanding with end of life care
    requires experience and support from expert
    consultants ( such as a Palliative care team)
  • APN can be leaders in this specialized area of
    care-managing symptoms, families and teams
    experience of those symptoms and outcomes of that
    experience
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com