Guardian - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Guardian

Description:

Design Steam Path Bucket Tip Leakage Steam Deflectors (Spill Strips) Packing Leakage Packing Ring Rotating Blade Turbine Rotor Rotor Wheel Stationary Diaphragm ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:73
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 25
Provided by: TUR56
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Guardian


1
Guardian Vortex Shedder Sealing System
Presentation
2
Advanced Sealing Technology For Steam Path
Efficiency Improvement Above OEM Design
3
Bucket Tip Leakage
Steam Deflectors (Spill Strips)
Stationary Diaphragm
Design Steam Path
Rotating Blade
Stationary Blade
Packing Ring
Rotor Wheel
Packing Leakage
Turbine Rotor
Typical Impulse Steam Path (i.e. GE, Hitachi,
Toshiba, etc.)
4
Reduced Bucket Tip Leakage form the Vortex Shedder
Conventional Spill Strip
Vortex Shedder Shape Applied to the Spill Strip
only on the 1st up stream tooth
Stationary Diaphragm
Design Steam Path
Rotating Blade
Stationary Blade
Guardian Packing Ring
Rotor Wheel
Reduced Packing Leakage
Turbine Rotor
Typical Impulse Steam Path With TPLs Advanced
Seals
5
Typical Reaction Steam Path (i.e. Westinghouse,
ABB, Mitsubishi, Kraftwork Union) uses inserted
Seal Strips
Stationary Cylinder
Steam Flow
Rotor
6
Typical Efficiency Losses per Stage for General
Electric Turbines
7
What Can Cause Rubs
  • Misalignment, Alignment is Critical for all
    current seal Designs
  • Balancing
  • Thermal Distortion
  • Harmonics
  • Bearing Oil Whip
  • Steam Whirl
  • Generator Transients
  • Incorrect Operation of the Boiler, Condenser,
    Generator, or Extractions
  • Improper Starting and Loading Procedures for the
    Turbine Generator

8
What Occurs During RubsFor Other then Guardian
Designed Seals
  • Practical Application Concerns
  • If a rub does occur there is a permanent loss of
    seal efficiency
  • Springs do afford very little give or release if
    a rub conditions does happen
  • Conventional tooth material has a relative high
    coefficient of friction.
  • A rub can result in a hot spot which could lead
    to rotor bluing, scoring, or cutting. Worst case
    a bowed rotor.
  • Hard and prolonged contact of the seal in a rub
    can result in a heat effected zone on the rotor
    increasing the possibility of a hydrogen
    embrittled area.
  • Conventional tooth material mushrooms increasing
    the discharge area of the seal. This adds to a
    greater efficiency loss

9
Guardian Packing
10
Guardian Seals
  • Theory Behind Design
  • Prevents damage to conventional seal in any rub
    situation
  • No stationary fit modifications required
  • Works in any OEM designed turbine
  • Will not cause bowed rotors
  • Works in any Labyrinth Seal Ring
  • Location or Application
  • Works in any steam condition
  • Works in any Pressure condition
  • Extends Seal Efficiency Life
  • Extends unit Heat Rate between
  • Overhauls
  • Improves unit reliability

11
Guardian Seals
  • Practical Application
  • Lighter coil springs lessen radial forces only
    during startup
  • The Guardian Post contacts the rotor first and
    prevents damage to the conventional teeth
  • When rubs do occur with the Guardian they do not
    grow in intensity as with conventional materials
    or Brush Seals
  • Conventional teeth still maintain factory radial
    Clearance during and after the rub occurs
  • Guardian Post Material with its low coefficient
    of friction and long wearing characteristics
    prevents damage to the rotor body even during
    extreme rub conditions.
  • Rubs during startup are proven not to cause rotor
    instability and/or higher bearing vibration
  • Long term rubs due to misalignment have been
    proven not to cause any adverse effects in
    turbine operations.
  • The Guardian Seal Can Not remain in a Retracted
    position. Thus eliminates this potential for
    major efficiency losses due to this situation

12
Laboratory Hard Rub Test
  • Standard Tooth
  • Guardian with Standard Teeth
  • Note the discoloration cased by hard rubbing
    which generated intense heat at the tooth tips
  • Note only light contact because of the Guardian
    Seal Protection

Test Procedure Rotor Spinning at 3600 RPM, Seal
pushed downward against the rotor with 5,000 lbs.
of force for 40 minutes
13
Test Rotor
Before Cleaning
After Partial Cleaning
  • Guardian transferred a protective layer of
    Proprietary Material to the rotor.
  • Proprietary Material rubbing on Proprietary
    Material has an extremely low coefficient of
    friction.
  • Low coefficient of friction means very little
    heat generated by contact
  • No Scoring or Grooving on rotor where the
    Guardian seal contacted the rotor.
  • No heat effected zone where the Guardian Seal
    contacted the rotor.
  • No change in rotor hardness where the Guardian
    seal contacted the rotor

14
BRG 2 HP-IP
Turbine ran without oil, there was 1/8 of
babbit prior to accident. The rotor dropped
straight down and ran on the seals
15
N3 Grv 5
HP-IP
  • This gland is adjacent to the 2 Bearing in the
    previous slide

16
N3 Grv5
N3 Grv6
HP-IP
Note Oil Deflector damage to rotor, No
damage where the Guardian Posts made contact to
rotor, it only polished the rotor. Even the
conventional teeth did not cause any damage
because of the protection provided by the
Guardian Posts
17
Guardian Post
Conventional Teeth
N3 Grv 6 HP-IP
This is the bottom center segment from N3 Grv 6,
Note the minor damage to the Guardian Post and
conventional teeth. The packing ended up
supporting the weight of the rotor during the
accident.
18
Bottom Segment
Bottom center segment view, Note minimal damage
to Guardian Post and conventional teeth
19
N3 Grv 6 HP-IP
Opposite end view of the bottom center segment
NOTE Where all conventional packing rings were
installed in the unit, the rotor required
machining to remove heat effected zones created
from the sever rubs at these locations. No rotor
machining required where Guardian Rings were
installed.
20
Conventional Spill Strips
21
  • Design Applications
  • Seals by providing pressure drops using relative
    tight radial clearances (same principle as a
    nozzle)
  • Stationary
  • Typically Material selection based on Stage
    operating temperatures
  • Spring backed NOT Spring loaded. This design
    allows for ease of installation only.

22
Vortex Shedder
Efficiency Improver
23
  • Design Applications
  • Reduces axial flow or leakage in a CFD modeling
    by 5.7 when compared to a conventional straight
    shape.
  • This savings translates into 1.5-2.2 turbine
    steam path efficiency improvement above design
  • The reduction in flow is accomplished by
    creating vortices at the tip of the seal. These
    vortices act as a pressure barrier thus reducing
    the pressure drop across the seal.
  • Lower flow means higher efficiency.
  • Lower flow also means less wear.
  • All tip seals are manufactured from a
    non-sulferized 12Cr material
  • Uses OEM design Radial Clearances

24
Typical Reaction Steam Path using inserted Seal
Strips
Radial Seal Height must be at least 0.200 inches
in order to effectively install the Vortex Shedder
Stationary Cylinder
Only one tooth on the steam admission side gets
the Vortex Shedder
Steam Flow
Rotor
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com