Scintillometer and eddy covariance comparisons over sagebrush and invasive cheatgrass communities in Idaho EPSCoR Project Suported by NSF - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 29
About This Presentation
Title:

Scintillometer and eddy covariance comparisons over sagebrush and invasive cheatgrass communities in Idaho EPSCoR Project Suported by NSF

Description:

Scintillometer and eddy covariance comparisons over sagebrush and invasive cheatgrass communities in Idaho EPSCoR Project Suported by NSF Authors University of Idaho ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:91
Avg rating:3.0/5.0

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Scintillometer and eddy covariance comparisons over sagebrush and invasive cheatgrass communities in Idaho EPSCoR Project Suported by NSF


1
Scintillometer and eddy covariance comparisons
over sagebrush and invasive cheatgrass
communities in IdahoEPSCoR Project Suported by
NSF
2
Authors
  • University of Idaho
  • Wenguang Zhao, Rick Allen, Clarence Robison,
    Jeppe Kjaersgaard, Ricardo Trezza, Aureo
    Oliveira, Ramesh Dhungel
  • Idaho State University
  • Matt Germino
  • Boise State University
  • Venkat Sridhar
  • Wageningen University
  • Henk de Bruin

3
Background
  • 1. Sensible heat flux (H) is an important energy
    dissipation in surface energy balances and
    evapotranspiration (ET) studies.
  • 2. Representation of H and ET measured by
    traditional methods (EC and BR etc) is limited,
    especially for heterogeneous fields.
  • 3. Large aperture scintillometry (LAS) is an
    alternative method to estimate H from a
    relatively large footprint (source) area.

4
Questions
  • 1. How can we accurately calculate H from the
    LAS measurement, structure function constant of
    refractive index fluctuations for the wavelength
    used by the LAS?
  • 2. How does the H calculated by the LAS
    measurement compare to the traditional EC
    measurement result?

5
Experiment sites
6
Instrumentation
7
Hollister Site Sagebrush
8
LAS Transmitter
9
LAS Receiver
10
Eddy Covariance Site 1
11
Eddy Covariance system
12
Radiation System
13
Soil Sensors
14
Raft River Site Cheatgrass
15
LAS Transmitter A Receiver B
16
Eddy Covariance Site 1
17
Macks Inn Site Alpine forest (south tower)
18
Macks Inn Site Alpine forest (north tower)
19
Results and Discussions
20
LAS data (Cn2) ? H
  • Four scenarios were used to calculate H from Cn2
  • Scenario 1
  • Ta, u and L from CSAT3 (RM Young) ET used in
    the Bowen Ratio correction for the LAS was from
    the EC.
  • Calculate Ft, T and H directly.
  • Scenario 2
  • Ta and u from CSAT3 (RM Young) ET used in the
    Bowen Ratio correction for the LAS was from EC.
  • Calculate L, Ft, T and H iteratively.

21
LAS data (Cn2) ? H
  • Four scenarios were used to calculate H from Cn2
  • Scenario 3
  • Ta and u from CSAT3 (RM Young ET used in the
    Bowen Ratio correction for the LAS was from EC.
  • Calculate u, L, Ft, T and H using TCLI method.
  • Scenario 4
  • Measured Rn (NR01), G (HFT), Ta (HMP) and P
    (PTB110) u from CSAT3 (RM Young).
  • Calculate u, L, Ft, T, H and ET iteratively
    (three-concentric-loop-iterative method). ---
    note this is the most generally used method.

22
(No Transcript)
23
(No Transcript)
24
(No Transcript)
25
(No Transcript)
26
(No Transcript)
27
(No Transcript)
28
Conclusions
  • 1. Good agreement was obtained between H
    measured by CSAT3 and RM Young 81000 3-D sonic
    anemometers
  • 2. H measured by Scintec BLS900 compared well
    with both EC systems (CSAT3 and RM Young).
  • Thank you!

29
Questions?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com