Title: Looking Back to the Future: Integrating Health and Social Care In Troubled Times
1Looking Back to the Future Integrating Health
and Social Care In Troubled Times
Tom Forbes Robin Fincham, Stirling Management
School Paul Williams, Cardiff Metropolitan
University
2The context
- There is a long and chequered history of efforts
to integrate health and social care in the UK - A number of apparent benefits of integration have
been suggested - However, a combination of professional,
organisational, financial, statutory and other
factors have conspired against integration - There is now a wide literature base offering
theoretical insights and practical guides to
assist policy makers, managers and practitioners
on various aspects of integration
3Health and social care integration
- One problem that has bedeviled the policy
community is the rate and pace of repeated change
and lack of stability - Another problem facing people working with
integration is that the notion itself lacks any
universally understood meaning - The frustration with getting integration to work
in practice has attracted the attention of
researchers and policy makers - One reflection of this work is that it often
favours a structural and institutional focus and
arguably underplays the role of agency - This resonates with the type of policy
interventions that predominate in this policy
field which assume falsely that structural
changes will induce changes in behaviour in key
actors - The institutional environment is complex . Stated
policy direction often underplays/states or
deliberately glosses over the institutional role
division among groups of providers and recipients
4Integration is.
Integration is a coherent set of methods and
models on the funding, administrative, organisatio
nal, service delivery and clinical levels
designed to create connectivity, alignment and
collaboration within and between the cure and
care sectors. The goal of these methods and
models is to enhance quality of care and quality
of life, consumer satisfaction and system
efficiency for patients with complex, long term
problems cutting across multiple services,
providers and settings. The result of such
multipronged efforts to promote integration for
the benefit of these special patient groups
is called integrated care. (Kodner and
Spreeuwenberg, 2002 3)
- Micro a diverse range of approaches to deliver
care to individuals and their carers - Meso focusses on the needs of particular groups
of individuals - Macro focusses on delivering care to specific
populations
5Scotland
- Partnership working and integration has a had a
key role in health and social care policy since
1997 - However, Joint Future in 2000 the key driver for
the integration of health and social care
services - Community Health Partnerships continued on this
theme and absorbed most of the JF initiatives on
health and social care - CHPs mainly a health driven agenda but some NHS
Boards/Councils saw a greater opportunity for
integration and several integrated CHP models
emerged - Community Health Partnerships now to be replaced
by Health Social Care Partnerships
6Wales
- Health and social care agenda continues to be the
subject of a range of legislative, organisational
and policy drivers - Welsh Assembly Government has chosen a
distinctive approach to public services based on
the need to be citizen-centered and client
focussed - Partnership the key delivery mechanism
- The aim is to enhance cross boundary working
between organisations and sectors, integrate
services and respond to citizens needs and views - A number of health and social care partnerships
established
7Northern Ireland Experience of Integration
- Enhanced professional cooperation
- Efficient system for discharge from hospital
- Improved delivery of community care to vulnerable
groups - More efficient use of resources
- Improved focus on client need
- Junior Partner issues
- Funding locked in acute services
- Engagement of Independent contractors
The need to continue to develop a culture of
integration.
8Some common integration issues
- Acknowledgment of the need for partnership
working - Skepticism about the reality of partnership
working - Limited sense of interdependence between Health
Social Care staff - Poor reward structures
- Trust important
- Confusion over role of committees
- Integration outcomes unclear
- Co-location has mixed benefits
- Partnership capacity
- Terms conditions and professional and Line
management - Evidence needed of the benefits on partnership
working
9A process towards integration??
- Identify appropriate relationships
- Understand the context
- Obstacles?
- Pull factors?
- Push factors?
10Conclusions
- Managing in a partnership environments is
materially different from other forms of
organising - Policy makers need to acknowledge there real
differences between the health and social care
sectors when it comes to partnership working - Managers and practitioners must learn and
practice leadership skills