9th Incremental Development of National Air Quality Forecasting Capability at 4 km horizontal resolution for the CONUS - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 1
About This Presentation
Title:

9th Incremental Development of National Air Quality Forecasting Capability at 4 km horizontal resolution for the CONUS

Description:

... Weather Research and Forecasting Non-hydrostatic Mesoscale Model (WRF-NMM) ... Both WRF-NMM and CMAQ are running at 12 km horizontal resolution. – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:67
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 2
Provided by: cmascente
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: 9th Incremental Development of National Air Quality Forecasting Capability at 4 km horizontal resolution for the CONUS


1
9th Incremental Development of National Air
Quality Forecasting Capability at 4 km horizontal
resolution for the CONUS
Pius Lee1, Hsin-Mu Lin2, Fantine Ngan3,
Hyuncheol Kim4, David Wong5, Daniel Tong4,
Tianfeng Chai4, Yunsoo Choi4, Daewon Byun1, Rick
Saylor1, Ariel Stein4, Youhua Tang2, Jeff
McQueen6, Marina Tsudlko2, Jeff Young5, Ho-Chun
Huang2, Sarah Lu2, Catarina Tassone2, Ken Carey7,
and Ivanka Stajner7
(a)
(b)
  • INTRODUCTION
  • National Air Quality Forecasting Capability
    (NAQFC) is providing 48 hour forecasts of
    surface ozone concentration and its corresponding
    daily one-hour and 8-hour maxima for the
    CONtiguous United States (CONUS). The NAQFC
    numerical modeling system consists of coupling
    the National Centers for Environmental Prediction
    (NCEP) Weather Research and Forecasting
    Non-hydrostatic Mesoscale Model (WRF-NMM) with
    CMAQ. Both WRF-NMM and CMAQ are running at 12 km
    horizontal resolution.
  • The Earth Systems Modeling Framework compliant
    National Environmental Modeling System NMMB still
    at 12 km horizontal grid spacing will replace the
    current WRF-NMM. However, multiple finer inner
    nested grids will be provided, including a 4km
    horizontal resolution grid covering CONUS. In
    anticipation of this planned upgrade of the
    meteorological model, hardware requirements of
    CMAQ running at 4km horizontal resolution over
    CONUS (Fig. 1) is investigated in this study.
  • A prototype version of NAQFC on a finer
    horizontal grid is used to investigate challenges
    and advantages of refined spatial resolution for
    the CMAQ model. Comparison of such a 4km and 12
    km CMAQ forecasts for a late summer case 2009
    were performed. Fig. 2 shows initialization Fig.
    3 shows emission Figs. 4 and 5 show CMAQ output
    hourly averaged surface O3 concentration at
    forecast hours 1 and 5, respectively.
  • This study focuses on hardware resource required
    to through-put CMAQ 4.6 with cb05 gas mechanism
    and aero4 configuration. The model runs in NCEPs
    Power6 IBM super-computer (Table 1).
  • Deficiency of the emission handling procedure in
    this makeshift 4km run were manifested Namely,
    in this study the 4km emission is simply a
    smearing thin of the 12 km merged emission file
    using a 1/9 factor, as in proportion to the
    reduced cell-areas. Therefore although the
    NOx/VOC ratios are retained, the chemical regimes
    are very different as shown in Figs. 3 a and b.
  • This study reinforces the importance of accurate
    emission modeling as shown in the very different
    forecast results shown in Figs. 4 and 5. A sample
    4 km grid spacing NO emission derived properly
    utilizing GIS technology is shown in Fig.6b.
    Preparation of such emission inputs for the 4km
    CONUS grid entails a considerable data processing
    effort as numerous surrogate files need to be
    reprocessed.

Table 1 Hardware requirement for 24 h 4km CONUS
(22 Layer 132679523191740 grid
cells)
RAM Disk No. Nodes PE configuration Projected Wall-clock to finish 24 h
RAM 55G Disk/24h 295G 10 13131431 8 h 10 min
RAM 55G Disk/24h 295G 12 15121801 8 h 28 min
(a)
Fig.2 Initialization for O3 (ppb) at surface for
12UTC September 2010 run (a) 12 (b) 4 km
(b)
(a)
(b)
Fig.3 NOx emission (mole s-1) at surface at
12UTCSeptember 2010 (a) 12 (b) 4 km
(c)
(a)
(b)
Fig. 6 GIS derived NO emission (mole s-1) for
(a) 12km and (b) 4 km grids, and (c) with b
minus a for 12UTC 21 September 2009 over
region Houston and vicinity
(b) 4 km horizontal grid spacing
  • Summary
  • An engineering test to investigate the
    feasibility of running 4 km horizontal grid
    spacing for CONtiguous U.S. (CONUS) with CMAQ
    version 4.6 configured with cb05 gas phase
    mechanism and aero4 totaling 103 species has been
    tried out in NCEPs Power6 IBM super-computer.
  • At 22 vertical levels, the required run time
    memory is about 55 Gbytes. And for a 24 hour
    forecast, the needed disk space for I/O is about
    0.3 Tbytes.
  • The parallelization speed-up showed negative
    return beyond 144 Processing Elements (PE). It is
    demonstrated that parallelization efficiency
    requires improvement to take advantage of
    massively parallel computers.
  • The 4 km run with 144 PE completed about 11
    forecast hours worth of simulation when it
    exhausted the 4 hours CPU limit allowed on the
    NCEP Power6 computer. Further effort of
    aggressively optimize CMAQ is desired to fit the
    48 hour forecast with the 4 hours limit.
  • Deficiency of the emission handling procedure in
    this makeshift 4km engineering test run were
    manifested. Emission derived properly utilizing
    GIS technology is required to prepare emission
    inputs for the 4km CONUS grid.

Fig.4 Model predicted hourly averaged surface O3
(ppmV) at surface valid at 13UTC September 2010
(a) 12 (b) 4 km
795 GC
(b)
(a)
1326 GC
Fig.1 Decomposition _at_ 12x12 PEs for CONUS _at_ (a)
12 (b) 4 km
  • ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
  • The authors are grateful to Drs. Rohit Mathur,
    Jon Pleim, Tanya Otte, Shaocai Yu, George
    Pouliot, and Ken Schere of the Atmospheric
    Modeling Division, USEPA , for their technical
    input and discussion. Advice from Dr. Daiwen Kang
    of CSC is deeply appreciated.
  • 1 NOAA/OAR/ARL, 1315 East West Hwy, Room 3316,
    Silver Spring, MD 20910 pius.lee _at_noaa.gov
  • 2 I. M. System Group, Inc. , Rockville, MD.
  • 3 University Corporation for Atmospheric
    Research, Boulder, CO.
  • 4 Earth Resources Technology, Annapolis
    Junction, MD.
  • 5 EPA, Research Triangle Park, NC.
  • 6National Centers for Environmental Prediction,
    Camp Springs, MD.
  • 7Noblis, Inc., Falls Church, VA.

Fig.5 Same as Fig. 4 but for 17UTC September
2010
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com