Vlamboog Respiratory Unit - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 40
About This Presentation
Title:

Vlamboog Respiratory Unit

Description:

Z Vlamboog Respiratory Unit Globalness Environment Performance GPR group Veldi Specialities participants Ljubljana Mechanical Engineers Technique Assignment ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:76
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 41
Provided by: www2Leca
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Vlamboog Respiratory Unit


1
Vlamboog Respiratory Unit
  • Globalness Environment
  • Performance

2
GPR group Veldi
  • Slovenija
  • Janez Rihtaršic
  • Ivan Demšar
  • Janez Benedicic
  • Switzerland
  • Ahmed Bufardi
  • The Netherlands
  • Geert van den Boogaard
  • Iris Dijkstra

3
Specialities participants
  • Ljubljana
  • Mechanical Engineers
  • Technique
  • Lausanne
  • Mechanical Enigineers
  • Environment
  • Delft
  • Industrial Design Engineers
  • User, Management

4
Assignment
  • Respiratory Protection System
  • for
  • Industry workers
  • as a
  • Global Product

5
Background
  • New severe legislation respiratory will be used
    more, hence sold more
  • Existing product needs re-design to continue good
    market position (compete with Adflo)

6
Topics
?
!

7
Analysis
?
!

User who, how, where?
Product performance ?
Global aspects
Legislation CE, NEN, worldwide?
Life Cycle Analysis old vs. new?
8
Users who...
?
!
  • ... Need to protect themselves every day from
    toxic air
  • ... Work where regulations are checked
    regularly

9
Users how
?
!
  • Although this product protects your health, it
    should not become a burden
  • Away from working area
  • Comfortable small and light

10
Product Characteristics
?
!
  • Health Protection
  • Wearable Product
  • Mass Product
  • Global Product

11
Protection
?
!
  • level of urgence
  • Eyes bright light
  • welding goggle
  • lungs
  • aluminum flakes
  • Toxic air

12
Clean air
?
!
  • Suction in the working area
  • Suction on the welding pistol
  • Fresh air supply on the body

13
Working principle
?
!

Filter
Ventilator
air
Motor
Hose
14
Working principle
?
!
  • Motor
  • Type 2230003S
  • Manufacturer Faulhaber
  • Voltage 3V
  • Max. power 2,94 W
  • Rotor speed 8,000 rpm/min
  • Mass 50 g

15
Working principle
?
!
  • possible filters
  • A particle/ dust filter TMyP
  • 2. An odor filter
  • 3. A gas filter TMyGasz
  • Gas type of the filter A,B,E,K

16
Working principle
?
!
  • Batteries
  • Type Ni-Cad rechargeable
  • Voltage 4.2 Volt
  • Fuse 1.6 A
  • Operation time 7 hours min.
  • Charging time 16 hours max.
  • Charging cycles Min. 500
  • Weight 660 grams
  • Dimensions 100 x 80 x 70 mm 

17
Working principle
?
!
  • Hose
  • Hose length 800 mm.
  • Hose diameter (int.) 22 mm.
  • Hose connection EN 148-1 bayonet

18
Main objectives for re-design
?
!
  • Same performance
  • Additional functions
  • Reduction of battery weight

19
Global
?
!
  • ?Designing and producing a product that can be
    sold in different parts of the world?
  • Level of adaptability

20
Global
?
!
  • levels of adaptability
  • Dedicated
  • Platform
  • Transformable
  • Smart
  • Hybrid

21
Global
?
!
  • Core elements
  • Lower casing
  • Motor
  • Covering plate
  • Belt
  • Changing element
  • Filter casing

22
Global
?
!
  • Respiratory Unit
  • Awareness
  • Money
  • Control on legislation

23
Global
?
!
  • America
  • Companies responsible for workers safty
  • Over-exaggerating very safe look
  • Asia
  • Companies choose equipment of the welder
  • Clean, with a high level of technology
  • Europe
  • Workers choose their own r.p.u
  • Appreciate innovative design and ergonomics

24
Legislation
?
!
  • NEN CE norms
  • Air flow gt120 l /min.
  • pressure in helmet lt7 mbar.
  • duration of batteries gt4 h.
  • noise of the device lt75 dB.
  • thread for apparatus M45x3.
  • Recommended voltage lt60 V (D.C.) or lt25
    V (A.C.)
  • Hoses and couplings gt(500 ?50)N applied
    axially for (10?1)s.
  • Total mass lt5 kg
  • Weight on the head lt1,5 kg

25
Problem Definition
?
!
  • Safety
  • Indication when the filters have to be replaced.
  • After welding it should be possible to remove the
    headpiece, but to keep the respiratory protection
    on.
  • No parts of the r.p.u. should stick out of the
    back of the welder.

26
Problem Definition
?
!
  • Ergonomics
  • Easy replacement of the filters.
  • Indication of full filters
  • Low level of noise (lt 75db).
  • Vibrations from the motor should not reach the
    welder.
  • The airflow should not cause discomforts while
    being used.
  • The r.p.u. should not limit the sight on the work
    piece.

27
Problem Definition
?
!
  • Technique/adequate performance
  • The inside of the unit should be protected
    against dust and small particles, to increase
    lifetime of the motor
  • The weight of the battery should become less then
    1/3 of the present battery
  • The welding sparks should not affect the r.p.u.

28
Problem Definition
?
!
  • Global Design
  • The r.p.u. should have a uniform look, in stead
    of just a combination of different parts.
  • The r.p.u. should look conform the preference of
    American, Asian or European market.

29
Problem Definition
?
!
  • Financial advantage
  • Where possible use of standard products
  • Avoid complex design of the non-standard parts
  • As few parts as possible, avoid screws
  • Finding a compromise between costs of dismantling
    and lowest possible costs of the R.P.U

30
Conceptualization use


?
!
Indication of full filter Printplate measures
the airflow low airflow indicates full filter or
empty battery
31
Weight seize


?
!
32
Global


?
!
Batteries Sold in pack and also separate gt
obtainable everywhere
Filter Bigger diameter gt One size filtercasing
beholds all kinds of filters combinations
longer lifetime of filter Filters that dont
fulfil the most severe regulations can be sold in
other countries for less money
33
Concept
!

?
Filter upper casing
Motorventilator cover
Batteries
Green plate
Lower casing
Filter
34
Life cycle analysis of the models with Tornado


?
!
35
Conclusions LCA


?
!
From the end-of-life comparison of the two models
with Tornado, we can see that
  • The two models have similar financial lines,
  • The disassembly time of the two models is much
    shorter with respect to that of Tornado,
  • The total cost/profit cumulative of the two
    models is much lower with respect to that of
    Tornado.

These characteristics are very important since in
the near future, producers will have more
responsibilities about the treatment of their
end-of-life products.
36
Conclusions LCA


?
!
From the life cycle comparison of the two models
with Tornado, we can see that
  • The two models have similar environmental effects
    (MET points) lines,
  • The total environmental effects of the two models
    is worse with respect to that of Tornado,
  • The difference is more significant at the
    production stage,
  • There is a potential for improvement by focusing
    on types of materials (thermoplastics), weights
    of parts and manufacturing processes,
  • The end-of-life destinations associated to
    disassembled parts are compliant with legislation
    even if they have negative environmental effects.

With respect to the priorities of the near
future globalisation, lower end-of-life costs
and compliance with legislation on environment,
we can consider that the developed models are
quite satisfactory.
37
Realization
?
!

38
Realization thanx to....
?
!

Filter Colf d.o.o.
Casing
Life Lycle Analysis
39
Questions...??
40
Assembly movie
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com