?? ?? Discrete Mathematics - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

?? ?? Discrete Mathematics

Description:

Title: R. Johnsonbaugh, Discrete Mathematics 5th edition, 2001 Author: user Last modified by: Hyogon Kim Created Date: 5/12/2002 10:17:07 AM Document presentation format – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:304
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 52
Provided by: widenKor
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: ?? ?? Discrete Mathematics


1
?? ??Discrete Mathematics
Hyogon Kim ??? 303 hyogon_at_korea.ac.kr / 3204
2
?? ??
  • ??
  • Discrete Mathematics(7/e), R. Johnsonbaugh,
    Prentice Hall, 2008
  • ?? ??
  • 2 Midterms 30 (9? ?, 10? ?)
  • 4 Quizzes 25 (23? ??, from Homework)
  • 1 Final 25 alpha
  • 6 HWs/PGs 1218
  • Plagiarism policy
  • ?? ?? widen.korea.ac.kr ? Courses ? ????

3
8/28 Ch 1
30 Ch 1 Hw 1 Ch 1, 2
9/4 Ch 2
6 Ch 2
11 Ch 3
13 Ch 3 Hw 2 Ch 3, 4
18 Ch 4 Quiz 1 Ch 1, 2
20 Ch 4
25 Ch 5
27 Ch 5 Hw 3 Ch 5, 6
10/2 Ch 6
4 Ch 6 Quiz 2 Ch 3, 4
9 Ch 7
11 Ch 7 Hw 4 Ch 7, 8
16 Wed Exam 1 Ch 16
18 Ch 8
23 Ch 8
25 Ch 9
4
30 Ch 9
11/1 Ch 9 Hw 5 Ch 9, 10
6 Ch 10 Quiz 3 Ch 7, 8
8 Ch 10
13 Ch 11
15 Ch 11 Hw 6 Ch 11, 12
20 Wed Exam 2 Ch 710
22 Ch 12
27 Ch 12
29
12/4 - Quiz 4 Ch 11, 12
6 - Final All chapters
5
Discrete Mathematics 7th
edition, 2009
  • Chapter 1
  • Sets and logic
  • Chapter 2
  • Proofs

6
1.1 Sets
  • Set a collection of distinct unordered objects
  • Members of a set are called elements
  • How to determine a set
  • Listing
  • Example A 1,3,5,7
  • Description
  • Example B x x 2k 1, 0 lt k lt 3

7
Finite and infinite sets
  • Finite sets
  • Examples
  • A 1, 2, 3, 4
  • B x x is an integer, 1 lt x lt 4
  • Infinite sets
  • Examples
  • Z integers , -3, -2, -1, 0, 1, 2, 3,
  • S x x is a real number and 1 lt x lt 4 1,
    4

8
Some important sets
  • The empty set ? has no elements.
  • Also called null set or void set.
  • Universal set the set of all elements about
    which we make assertions.
  • Examples
  • U all natural numbers
  • U all real numbers
  • U x x is a natural number and 1lt xlt10

9
Cardinality
  • Cardinality of a set A (in symbols A) is the
    number of elements in A
  • Examples
  • If A 1, 2, 3 then A 3
  • If B x x is a natural number and 1lt xlt 9
  • then B 9
  • Infinite cardinality
  • Countable (e.g., natural numbers, integers)
  • Uncountable (e.g., real numbers)

10
Subsets , Power set
  • X is a subset of Y if every element of X is also
    contained in Y
  • (in symbols X ? Y)
  • Equality X Y if X ? Y and Y ? X
  • X is a proper subset of Y if X ? Y but Y ? X
  • Observation ? is a subset of every set
  • The power set of X is the set of all subsets of
    X, in symbols P(X),
  • i.e. P(X) A A ? X
  • Example if X 1, 2, 3,
  • then P(X) ?, 1, 2, 3, 1,2, 1,3,
    2,3, 1,2,3
  • Theorem 2.1.4 If X n, then P(X) 2n.

11
Set operations
  • Given two sets X and Y
  • The union of X and Y is defined as the set
  • X ? Y x x ? X or x ? Y
  • The intersection of X and Y is defined as the set
  • X ? Y x x ? X and x ? Y
  • Two sets X and Y are disjoint if X ? Y ?
  • The difference of two sets
  • X Y x x ? X and x ? Y
  • The difference is also called the relative
    complement of Y in X
  • Symmetric difference
  • X ? Y (X Y) ? (Y X)
  • The complement of a set A contained in a
    universal set U is the set Ac U A

12
Venn diagrams
  • A Venn diagram provides a graphic view of sets
  • Set union, intersection, difference, symmetric
    difference and complements can be identified

U
A
B
13
Properties of set operations
  • Theorem 2.1.10
  • Let U be a universal set, and A, B and C subsets
    of U.
  • The following properties hold
  • a) Associativity (A ? B) ? C A ? (B ? C)
  • (A ? B) ? C A ? (B
    ?C)
  • b) Commutativity A ? B B ? A
  • A ? B B ? A
  • c) Distributive laws A?(B?C) (A?B)?(A?C)
  • A?(B?C) (A?B)?(A?C)
  • d) Identity laws A?UA A??
    A
  • e) Complement laws A?Ac U
    A?Ac ?

14
Properties of set operations
  • f) Idempotent laws A?A A A?A A
  • g) Bound laws A?U U A?? ?
  • h) Absorption laws A?(A?B) A A?(A?B) A
  • i) Involution law (Ac)c A
  • j) 0/1 laws ?c U Uc ?
  • k) De Morgans laws for sets
  • (A?B)c Ac?Bc (A?B)c Ac?Bc

15
1.2 Propositions
  • Logic the study of correct reasoning
  • Statements as a single datum having (binary)
    truth value
  • Representing facts digitally
  • Q what about statements that have degree of
    truth value?
  • How can we manipulate them to derive new things?
  • Use of logic
  • In mathematics
  • to prove theorems
  • In computer science
  • to prove that programs do what they are supposed
    to do
  • AI / DB Theorem prover
  • Software engineering Program correctness

16
Propositions
  • A proposition is a statement or sentence that can
    be determined to be either true or false.
  • Examples
  • John is a programmer" is a proposition
  • I wish I were wise is not a proposition (?)
  • Well, you can still assign some value
  • Computers dont really care

17
Connectives
  • If p and q are propositions, new compound
    propositions can be formed by using connectives
  • Most common connectives
  • Conjunction AND. Symbol
  • Inclusive disjunction OR Symbol v
  • Exclusive disjunction OR Symbol v
  • Negation Symbol
  • Implication Symbol ?
  • Double implication Symbol ?

18
Truth table
  • Truth table of conjunction
  • , and, ???
  • Truth table of Negation
  • , not, ??

p q p q
T T T
T F F
F T F
F F F
p p
T F
F T
  • Truth table of (inclusive) disjunction
  • v, or, ???
  • Truth table of exclusive disjunction
  • Either p or q (but not both), ?, exclusive or

p q p v q
T T T
T F T
F T T
F F F
p q p v q
T T F
T F T
F T T
F F F
19
More compound statements
  • Let p, q, r be simple statements
  • We can form other compound statements, such as
  • (p?q)r
  • p?(qr)
  • (p)?(q)
  • (p?q)(r)
  • and many others
  • Example
  • truth table of (p?q)r

p q r (p ? q) r
T T T T
T T F F
T F T T
T F F F
F T T T
F T F F
F F T F
F F F F
20
1.3 Conditional propositions (????) andlogical
equivalence (??)
  • A conditional proposition
  • If p then q , "p only if q"
  • In symbols p ? q
  • Truth table
  • p antecedent or hypothesis (??)
  • sufficient condition (?? ??) for q
  • q consequent or conclusion (??)
  • necessary condition (????) for p

p q p ? q
T T T
T F F
F T T
F F T
21
Logical equivalence
  • logically equivalent
  • ??
  • two truth tables are identical.
  • converse
  • ?
  • converse of p ? q is q ? p
  • contrapositive
  • ??
  • contrapositive of the p ? q is q ? p.
  • logically equivalent

p q p ? q p ? q
T T T T
T F F F
F T T T
F F T T
p q p ? q q ? p
T T T T
T F F F
F T T T
F F T T
p q p ? q q ? p
T T T T
T F F T
F T T F
F F T T
22
Logical equivalence
  • double implication
  • ???
  • p if and only if q
  • p ? q
  • logically equivalent to
  • (p ? q)(q ? p)
  • tautology
  • ?? ??
  • truth table contains only true values for every
    case
  • contradiction
  • ?? ??
  • truth table contains only false values for every
    case

p q p ? p v q
T T T
T F T
F T T
F F T
p q p ? q (p ? q) (q ? p)
T T T T
T F F F
F T F F
F F T T
p p (p)
T F
F F
23
De Morgans laws for logic
  • The following pairs of propositions are logically
    equivalent
  • (p ? q) and (p)(q)
  • (p q) and (p) ? (q)

24
1.4 Arguments and rules of inference
  • Deductive reasoning the process of reaching a
    conclusion q from a sequence of propositions
    p1, p2, , pn.
  • The propositions p1, p2, , pn are called
  • premises (??) or hypothesis (??).
  • The proposition q that is logically obtained
    through the process is called the conclusion.

25
Rules of inference
  • 1. Law of detachment or modus ponens
  • (mode that affirms)
  • p ? q
  • p
  • Therefore, q
  • 2. Modus tollens
  • (mode that denies)
  • p ? q
  • q
  • Therefore, p
  • 3. Rule of Addition
  • p
  • Therefore, p ? q
  • 4. Rule of simplification
  • p q
  • Therefore, p
  • 5. Rule of conjunction
  • p
  • q
  • Therefore, p q
  • 6. Rule of hypothetical syllogism
  • p ? q
  • q ? r
  • Therefore, p ? r
  • 7. Rule of disjunctive syllogism
  • p ? q
  • p
  • Therefore, q

26
Rules of inference for quantified statements
  • 1. Universal instantiation
  • ?x?D, P(x)
  • d ? D
  • Therefore P(d)
  • 2. Universal generalization
  • P(d) for any d ? D
  • Therefore ?x, P(x)
  • 3. Existential instantiation
  • ? x ? D, P(x)
  • Therefore P(d) for some d ?D
  • 4. Existential generalization
  • P(d) for some d ?D
  • Therefore ? x, P(x)

27
1.5 Quantifiers (????)
  • A propositional function P(x) is a statement
    involving a variable x
  • For example P(x) 2x is an even integer
  • Domain of a propositional function
  • if x is an element of a set D, D is called the
    domain of P(x)
  • For example, x is an element of the set of
    integers
  • the domain D of P(x) must be defined
  • (cf.) P(x) x is an even integer
  • if D is a set of even integers
  • if D is a set of odd integers

28
Universal quantifier
  • universal quantifier
  • for every
  • ?x P(x) P(x) for every x in a domain D
  • True if P(x) is true for every x ? D
  • False if P(x) is not true for some x ? D
  • Example
  • Let P(n) be the propositional function n2 2n is
    an odd integer ?n ? D all integers
  • P(n) is true only when n is an odd integer,
  • false if n is an even integer.

29
Existential quantifier, Counter example
  • existential quantifier
  • for some
  • ?x P(x) P(x) for some x in a domain D
  • true if there exists an element x in the domain D
    for which P(x) is true.
  • counter example
  • ?x P(x) is false if ?x?D such that P(x) is false.
  • The value x that makes P(x) false is called a
    counter example to the statement ?x P(x).
  • Example
  • P(x) "every x is a prime number", for every
    integer x.
  • But if x 4 (an integer) this x is not a primer
    number. Then 4 is a counter example to P(x)
    being true.

30
Generalized De Morgans laws for Logic
  • If P(x) is a propositional function,
  • then each pair of propositions in a) and b)
    below
  • have the same truth values
  • a) (?x P(x)) and ?x P(x)
  • "It is not true that for every x, P(x)
    holds" is equivalent to
  • "There exists an x for which P(x) is not
    true
  • b) (?x P(x)) and ?x P(x)
  • "It is not true that there exists an x for
    which P(x) is true" is
  • equivalent to "For all x, P(x) is not true"

31
1.6 Nested Quantifiers
  • Nested quantifier multiple quantifier
  • Example
  • ?x?y P(x,y)
  • For every x in D, there is y in D such that
    P(x,y) is true
  • ?x?y (xlty)
  • For every x, there exist y such that xlty. D
    integer
  • ?x?y L(x,y)
  • L(x,y) x loves y
  • Everybody(x) loves somebody(y)
  • E.g. False there is someone who loves nobody
  • ?x?y P(x,y)
  • For every x in D and for every y in D, P(x,y) is
    true.
  • ?x?y ((xgt0) (ygt0))?(xy gt 0)), D real number
  • If there is at least one x and at least y such
    that P(x,y) is false
  • Like in ?x?y ((xgt0) (ylt0))?(xy ? 0)), D
    real number
  • Counter example x1, y-1

32
Nested Quantifier
  • Example
  • ?x?y P(x,y)
  • There is at least on x such that P(x,y) is true
    for every y in D
  • ?x?y (x?y), D positive integer
  • x 1
  • ?x?y (x?y), D positive integer
  • False for every x, there is at least one
    positive integer y (ex. yx1)
  • ?x?y P(x,y)
  • There is at least one x in D and at least one y
    in D such that P(x,y) is true.
  • ?x?y ((xgt1) (ygt1) (xy6))
  • ?x?y ((xgt1) (ygt1) (xy7))

33
Nested Quantifier
  • Xa,b,c, Y1,2,3,4
  • ?x?y P(x,y)
  • ?x?y P(x,y)
  • ?x?y P(x,y)
  • ?x?y P(x,y)

34
2.1 Mathematical systems, direct proofs and
counterexamples
  • A mathematical system consists of
  • Undefined terms
  • Definitions
  • Axioms

35
Undefined terms, Definitions
  • Undefined terms are the basic building blocks of
    a mathematical system. These are words that are
    accepted as starting concepts of a mathematical
    system.
  • Example in Euclidean geometry we have undefined
    terms such as
  • Point
  • Line
  • A definition (??) is a proposition constructed
    from undefined terms and previously accepted
    concepts in order to create a new concept.
  • Example In Euclidean geometry the following are
    definitions
  • Two triangles are congruent if their vertices can
    be paired so that the corresponding sides are
    equal and so are the corresponding angles.
  • Two angles are supplementary if the sum of their
    measures is 180 degrees.

36
Axioms, Theorems
  • An axiom (??) is a proposition accepted as true
    without proof within the mathematical system.
  • There are many examples of axioms in mathematics
  • Example In Euclidean geometry the following are
    axioms
  • Given two distinct points, there is exactly one
    line that contains them.
  • Given a line and a point not on the line, there
    is exactly one line through the point which is
    parallel to the line.
  • A theorem (??) is a proposition of the form p ?
    q which must be shown to be true by a sequence of
    logical steps that assume that p is true, and use
    definitions, axioms and previously proven
    theorems.

37
Lemmas and corollaries
  • A lemma (????) is a small theorem which is used
    to prove a bigger theorem.
  • A corollary (????) is a theorem that can be
    proven to be a logical consequence of another
    theorem.
  • Example from Euclidean geometry "If the three
    sides of a triangle have equal length, then its
    angles also have equal measure."

38
Types of proof
  • A proof is a logical argument that consists of a
    series of steps using propositions in such a way
    that the truth of the theorem is established.
  • Direct proof p ? q
  • A direct method of attack that assumes the truth
    of proposition p, axioms and proven theorems so
    that the truth of proposition q is obtained.

39
Direct proof example
  • If n is even, then n2 is even.
  • Suppose n is even. 
  • Then by definition of even there is an integer
    m for which n 2m. 
  • If we square both sides, we get n2 4m2 22m2.
  • 2m2 is an integer because m is an integer, so by
    definition of even, n is even.

40
2.2 More methods of proof
  • Proof by contradiction
  • Proof by contrapositive
  • Proof by cases
  • Proofs of equivalence
  • Existence proofs

41
Indirect proof
  • The method of proof by contradiction (a.k.a.
    indirect proof) of a theorem p ? q consists of
    the following steps
  • Assume p is true but q is false
  • (p ? q) ? p ? q
  • 2. Using p, q, axioms, previously derived
    theorems and rules of inference, derive r (r),
    a contradiction
  • In particular, r could be p
  • 3. Conclude q cannot be false, hence p ? q
  • The only difference is the negated conclusion in
    our assumptions
  • Use when direct proof is difficult

42
Special case proof by contrapositive
  • If rp in the proof by contradiction, it is
    called the proof by contrapositive
  • Since in effect we have shown (q) ? (p), which
    is logically equivalent to p ? q
  • Example Show for every n ? Z, if n2 is even,
    then n is even.
  • Suppose n2 is even, but n is odd.
  • Then there exists an integer k s.t. n 2k1.
  • If we square both sides we obtain n2 4k2 4k
    1 2(2k2 2k)1.
  • But the equation tells us n2 is odd, a
    contradiction.
  • We have proved that for every n ? Z, if n2 is
    even, then n is even.

43
Proof by contradiction example
  • Prove ?2 is irrational.
  • Suppose ?2 is rational.
  • Then there exist integers p and q such that ?2
    p/q.
  • Assume the fraction p/q is in lowest terms so
    that p and q are not both even.
  • Squaring both sides gives 2 p2/q2
  • Multiplying by q2 gives 2q2 p2.
  • It means p2 is even, then p is even (!).
  • Therefore, there exists an integer k s.t. p 2k.
  • Substituting into 2q2 p2 gives q2 2k2.
  • Therefore, q is even.
  • Thus both p and q are both even, contradicting
    our assumption.
  • Therefore, ?2 is irrational.

44
Others
  • Proof by cases
  • Prove (p1 ? p2 ? p3 ? ? pn) ? q
  • Instead prove (p1 ? q) ? ? (pn ? q)
  • Also called exhaustive proof
  • Use when the number of cases to prove is small
  • Proof of equivalence
  • Prove p ? q
  • Prove p ? q and q ? p
  • Existence proof
  • Prove ?x P(x)
  • Just find one x that satisfies above and that is
    it
  • Sometimes it is not so easy to find that x

45
2.3 Resolution proofs
  • Due to J. A. Robinson (1965)
  • A clause is a compound statement with terms
    separated by or, and each term is a single
    variable or the negation of a single variable
  • Example p ? q ? (r) is a clause
  • (p ? q) ? r ? (s) is not a
    clause
  • Hypotheses and conclusion are written as clauses
  • If a hypothesis is not a clause, it must be
    replaced by an equivalent expression that is
    either a clause or the and of clauses
  • Only one rule
  • If (p ? q) and (p ? r) are both true then (q ?
    r) is true
  • Can be checked by truth table but think
  • If (p ? q) ? (p ? r), wouldnt (q ? r) follow?

46
Resolution example
  • Prove a ? b, a ? c, c ? d ? b ? d
  • Resolution procedure
  • a ? b, a ? c ? b ? c
  • c ? b, c ? d ? b ? d
  • Special cases
  • If p ? q and p ? q is true
  • If p and p ? r are true, ?r is true

47
Resolution example -- Prolog
  • (just click on likes.p and make queries
  • Sam's likes and dislikes in food
  • Considering the following will give some
    practice
  • in thinking about backtracking.
  • ?- likes(sam,dahl).
  • ?- likes(sam,chop_suey).
  • ?- likes(sam,pizza).
  • ?- likes(sam,chips).
  • ?- likes(sam,curry).
  • likes(sam,Food) - indian(Food), mild(Food).
  • likes(sam,Food) - chinese(Food).
  • likes(sam,Food) - italian(Food).
  • likes(sam,chips).
  • indian(curry).
  • indian(dahl).
  • indian(tandoori).

48
2.4 Mathematical induction
  • Useful for proving statements of the form ?n?A
    S(n)
  • N is the set of positive integers or natural
    numbers,
  • A is an infinite subset of N
  • S(n) is a propositional function

49
Mathematical Induction
  • Suppose we want to show that for each positive
    integer n the statement S(n) is either true or
    false.
  • 1. Verify that S(1) is true.
  • 2. Let n be an arbitrary positive integer.
  • Let i be a positive integer such that i lt n.
  • 3. Show that S(i) true implies that S(i1) is
    true,
  • i.e. show S(i) ? S(i1).
  • 4. Then conclude that S(n) is true for all
    positive integers n.

50
Mathematical induction terminology
  • Basis step
  • Verify that S(1) is true.
  • Inductive step
  • Assume S(i) is true.
  • Prove S(i) ? S(i1).
  • Conclusion
  • Therefore S(n) is true for all positive integers
    n.

51
(No Transcript)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com