Institutional Review Board Application Procedures ...and more! - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Institutional Review Board Application Procedures ...and more!

Description:

Title: All you need to know and more about... Committee on the Protection of Human Subjects Application Procedures Author: Graduate and Research Affairs – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:379
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 36
Provided by: Graduatea9
Learn more at: http://coe.sdsu.edu
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Institutional Review Board Application Procedures ...and more!


1
Institutional Review Board Application
Procedures ...and more!
  • Choya Washington
  • Division of Research Affairs
  • Graduate Research Affairs
  • San Diego State University

2
Overview
  • What is the IRB?
  • Important Historical Events
  • What is reviewed by the IRB
  • How to submit a protocol to the IRB

3
What is the IRB?
  • The IRB stands for the Institutional Review Board
  • IRBs are composed of individuals with the
    expertise and background needed to conduct a
    complete and adequate review of the research
    planned by an institution
  • The IRB reviews all research with human subjects
    conducted at SDSU

4
Who is on the Board
  • M.D.s
  • Faculty members from various colleges
  • Community Member
  • Non Scientist
  • We also invite outside experts to assist with the
    review of protocols as necessary
  • Advocates for certain classes of participants are
    invited to aid in the review of certain types of
    research

5
Why Does the IRB exist? Important Historical
Events
  • Willowbrook Study
  • Tuskegee Study
  • 1974 National Research Act
  • 1979 The Belmont Report

6
The Willowbrook Study Mid 1950s Early 1970s
  • Vulnerable population Involved infecting
    mentally retarded children with a Hepatitis virus
    to study the progression of the disease and to
    test new vaccinations.
  • Undue Influence The study was extremely coercive
    as parents often had a difficult time getting
    their children admitted to any mental health care
    facilities.
  • Parents were manipulated by the researchers into
    allowing their children to participate and were
    told that their children could not enroll at
    Willowbrook unless they agreed to participate.
  • Risks The nature of the experiments were
    extremely cruel and unjust.

7
Tuskegee Study-200-300 Black men w/ syphilis were
enrolled to document the effects of the disease
untreated over time
  • This study exemplifies
  • Unfair subject selection syphilis can
    potentially affect all human beings not just
    African American men.
  • Denial of informed consent subjects were not
    told of their disease or given the option to opt
    out of the study.
  • Excessive Risk The risks far exceeded any
    potential benefits. 1943-Penicillin was
    discovered as a treatment, but was withheld from
    the subjects.

8
1974 National Research Act
  • Created the National Commission for the
    Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical
    Behavioral Research
  • Required informed consent for all government
    sponsored studies
  • Established IRBs

9
1979 Belmont Report
  • Belmont Report outlines acceptable ethical
    practices in research
  • Foundation of current federal regulations
  • Three basic tenets of the Belmont Report include
  • Respect
  • Informed Consent
  • Voluntary Participation
  • Privacy Confidentiality
  • Beneficence
  • Maximize benefits
  • Minimize risk-Qualifications of researcher to
    carry out the study in a safe and appropriate
    manner?
  • Justice
  • Fair subject selection
  • Equitable distribution of risks benefits

10
What is Reviewed by the IRB
  • Is it research?
  • Are human subjects involved?
  • Types of review and risk

11
What is Reviewed by the IRB
  • Research involving human subjects
  • Defined by 45 CFR 46.102(d) as
  • A systematic investigation designed to develop
    or contribute to generalizable knowledge
  • Generalizable knowledge
  • publication (article, thesis or dissertation)
  • professional presentation

12
Are Human Subjects Involved? A few examples
  • Reviewed by the IRB
  • Studies that use medical records, or case files
    (this is individual information about subjects)
  • Studies that will involve the opinions, feelings,
    experiences, or characteristics of individuals
  • Not reviewed by the IRB
  • Studies concerning amount of people using a given
    resource center (does not involve individual
    information about subjects it is information
    about individual facilities). 
  • Aggregate data (e.g., census data, etc)

13
Read the Guidebook
14
Pass the Tutorial
15
Benign Exempt
Minimal Risk Expedited Greater than
Full Committee Minimal Risk
1 gt1 gt6
Risk level Reviewers required
Review level
16
Full Committee Review
  • Research that involves
  • an intervention or manipulation of the subject's
    environment (sometimes but not always-whether
    full committee review is required is dependant on
    risk involved)
  • deception
  • vulnerable subjects e.g. children, prisoners,
    mentally disabled, pregnant women (sometimes but
    not always-whether full committee review is
    required is dependant on risk involved)
  • greater than minimal risk

17
Full Committee Example
  • Research concerning factors that may lead to
    low school performance in a particular racial
    group
  • Includes interviews about students sexual
    practices, illegal behaviors (drug use)

18
Full Committee Deadline Dates
  • Protocols due 2 weeks prior to meeting.
  • Dates are listed on the web site
  • Expect notification of review outcome within
    one-week of IRB meeting

19
Common Problems in Full Committee Research
  • Adequately addressing risks and risk management
    plans for vulnerable subject populations and/or
    asking subjects to complete high-risk tasks.
  • Know the possible repercussions and how you will
    protect subjects whether it is their safety, or
    from social risks, or illegal risks that may come
    from participation.
  • Undue Influence during recruitment
  • Vulnerable populations
  • Informed Consent Process

20
Expedited Review
  • Expedited review includes certain kinds of
    research involving no more than minimal risk
  • Deadline dates do not apply
  • Minimal risk probability of harm/discomfort in
    research is not greater than that encountered in
    daily life

21
Expedited Example
  • Using confidential methods like survey, focus
    group, interview to obtain information.
  • Interviewing teachers in a focus group at their
    place of employment -Includes questions about
    what their feelings on administration, school
    policies and their peers.

22
Exempt Review
  • Children in a normal classroom setting
  • Adults who complete a non-sensitive survey
  • Observation of public behavior
  • Non-anonymous data as long as no risk is posed if
    confidentiality is breached
  • Food studies of wholesome foods without additives
  • Analysis of existing data-may need to ck w/ IRB

23
Exempt Prospective Examples
  • Anonymous survey of teachers opinions on current
    school policy and improvements needed.
  • Non-anonymous, benign study in which parents are
    asked about which produce their children like to
    eat and how often they eat it.

24
Prior to Submission
  • Access the templates on IRB website
  • Submit a vIRB Questionnaire by following these
    steps
  • Login to the vIRB through the WebPortal
  • Choose Yes to access the Questionnaire then
  • You will receive a response within 5-7 days.
  • Have your faculty sponsor READ and APPROVE of
    your protocol and supporting documents before
    submitting!!!

25
Step 4 Using the virtual IRB (vIRB)
  • Access your WebPortal Account
  • Click Activate Research Role
  • Click Launch IRB
  • All notifications are electronic
  • You will receive an email when your submission
    is
  • received
  • reviewed
  • approved

26
Contact Information
  • List yourself as the Principal Investigator (PI)
  • Email address
  • Phone number
  • List your Thesis Chair (Masters) or Faculty
    Sponsor (Doctoral) as the Co-I
  • Email address
  • Office phone number

27
Be Consistent!
  • Anonymity vs. Confidentiality
  • example, the study is anonymous no identifying
    information will be collected
  • example, the study is confidential, data will be
    stored in a locked cabinet, a code will be
    created between data and subject information,
    this link will be destroyed at the end of the
    study

28
Subjects and Research Activities Complete and
Consistent
  • Protocol Document
  • Respond to section directions for EACH subject
    group AND research activity. Use subheadings.
  • E.G. Subject Involvement Section
  • Students/Patients Will take 15 minute online
    survey
  • Staff Will take a 10 minute online survey and
    will participate in audiotaped 30-minute
    interview
  • Administrators Will participate in two
    consecutive audiotaped 60-minute interviews (for
    a total of 120 minutes spread over two days)
  • Supporting Documents
  • Upload recruitment materials, consent documents
    and study instruments for EACH subject group.

29
Common Issues
  • Inadequate responses to conditions-comments often
    have several parts ensure you respond to each
    part of the comment
  • Inadequate consent forms-Language should be
    understandable
  • Non -coercive
  • Not just a written form, but an on-going open
    discussion of participants rights and study
    details

30
Types of Consent Forms
  • Informal Consent (Exempt)
  • Formal Informed Consent (Full Committee and
    Expedited)
  • Children in research
  • Assent forms
  • Parental Permission forms
  • Save yourself time and stress use SDSU templates!

31
Beneficence/ Fair Subject Selection
  • Subjects should be chosen to participate because
    they best represent the population under study
  • Recruitment should be done in a neutral fashion
    avoid persuasive language or situations.
  • Maximize benefits
  • To the individual, scientific knowledge, the
    population from which study participants are
    drawn
  • Minimize risks
  • Some risk in research is acceptable, but risks
    should be minimized to the greatest extent
    possible

32
Upload Supporting Documents
  • Upload all applicable documents
  • Letters of Authorization
  • Recruitment Materials
  • Informed Consent Forms
  • Study Instruments
  • Grant Narrative (if funded)

33
Additional IRB Review
  • If you have other affiliations
  • Joint Students
  • Hospital
  • University
  • If you will be conducting a study through another
    institution, you must receive their IRB approval
    before submitting to the SDSU IRB.

34
Step 5 Protocol Maintenance
  • Once you have approval, you are responsible for
    submitting requests for changes to your protocol
    in the form of a Modification request.
  • Pay attention to expiration dates!!! You must
    renew your protocol to continue research
    activities before it expires by submitting a
    Report of Progress!!!

35
Good luck!
  • IRB Contact Information
  • Phone (619) 594-6622
  • Office Student Services East, 1410
  • E-mail irb_at_mail.sdsu.edu

Amy McDaniel amcdanie_at_mail.sdsu.edu
619-594-0758 Brianne Larsen blarsen_at_mail.sdsu.ed
u 619-594-3380
Choya Washington cwashing_at_mail.sdsu.edu 619-594-38
22
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com