Addressing Assessment in an Elementary Mathematics Methods Course: Helping Prospective Elementary Teachers Use a Variety of Assessments to Enhance Children - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 33
About This Presentation
Title:

Addressing Assessment in an Elementary Mathematics Methods Course: Helping Prospective Elementary Teachers Use a Variety of Assessments to Enhance Children

Description:

Title: Helping Prospective Elementary Teachers Use Whole-class and Individual Assessments to Enhance Children s Mathematics Understanding Author – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:64
Avg rating:3.0/5.0

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Addressing Assessment in an Elementary Mathematics Methods Course: Helping Prospective Elementary Teachers Use a Variety of Assessments to Enhance Children


1
Addressing Assessment in an Elementary
Mathematics Methods Course Helping Prospective
Elementary Teachers Use a Variety of Assessments
to Enhance Childrens Mathematics Understanding
  • Nadine Bezuk and Rachelle Feiler
  • San Diego State University
  • CMC-S 2004
  • November 5, 2004

2
Context of Our Classes
  • Elementary (K - 6) mathematics methods course
  • Fifth-year credential program
  • Most students are also student-teaching while
    taking the methods course

3
How We Address Assessment in Our Course
  • Purposes of assessment
  • Types of assessment
  • Using assessment to guide instruction

4
California Teacher Performance Expectations
Addressed
  • TPE 3 Interpretation and Use of Assessments
  • TPE 8 Assessing Individual Students Skills
  • TPE 9 Instructional Planning
  • TPE 13 Evaluates and Reflects on Practice

5
What Our Students Believe About Assessment
  • Its not fair to assess if they (children)
    havent been taught it.
  • If they (children) dont do well on an
    assessment, its either because they havent been
    taught it or because they dont get it--its not
    the teachers fault.
  • Students have a difficult time just listening to
    what kids have to say without any input during
    an interview--they think their job is to TEACH.

6
Your Turn
  • What successes and/or challenges have you
    experienced in helping prospective elementary
    teachers learn how to assess childrens
    mathematics understanding?

7
Our Embedded Assessment Assignment
  • This assignment was developed collaboratively
    with our colleagues, including Judy Bippert,
    Lisa Clement, Vicki Jacobs, Carole Manderson,
    Kate Masarik, and Randy Philipp.

8
Overview of Embedded Assessment Assignment
  • Whole-Class Assessment
  • Individual Student Interviews

9
Embedded AssessmentWhole-Class Assignment
  • Consult with classroom teacher to choose
    whole-class assessment from the ones we provided
  • Administer assessment (approx. 10 min.)
  • Write up the results, including data summary and
    conclusions and
  • Select two children to interview and explain why
    those students were chosen.

10
Algebraic Reasoning
Are these number sentences true or false? (Circle
TRUE or FALSE for each number sentence) 1. 5 4
9 TRUE FALSE 2. 7 3 4 TRUE FALSE 3. 8
2 10 4 TRUE FALSE 4. 8 8 TRUE
FALSE 5. 7 4 14 - 3 TRUE FALSE 6. 7 4
11 - 2 TRUE FALSE 7. 6 5 6 5 TRUE
FALSE 8. What number can you put in the box to
make this a true number sentence? 8 4
5
11
Fraction Comparison and Computation
  • 1) For each of the following, circle the larger
    or write if they are equal.
  • a) 1/6 1/8 c) 3/6 1/2
  • b) 1/7 2/7 d) 4/3 1
  • 2) Choose the best estimate for the sum of 9/10
    6/7
  • a) 1 b) 2 c) 15 d) 17 e) None of these
  • 3) Change 4 1/3 into an improper fraction.
  • 4) 1/2 1/3
  • 5) 4 1/8
  • 6) If you had 4 pizzas, and you ate 1/8 of one
    pizza, how much pizza would be left?

12
Fractions - Identify One Half
13
Computation and Place Value
  • 143 789
  • 256 - 463
  • 435 294
  • 169 - 157
  • 365 519
  • 743 -242
  • 296 403
  • 754 - 124

14
Identifying Triangles
15
Identifying Rectangles
16
Completed Table for Rectangle Task
17
Items Organized by Percent Correct
Percent Correct Item Number
100 9
100 15
94 1
94 4
94 11
94 12
83 13
78 14
67 5
67 8
33 3
22 6
22 10
6 2
0 7
18
Embedded Assessment Interview Assignment
  • Provide student with a blank copy of the
    assessment and ask the student to explain her/his
    thinking while completing the assessment again,
    or
  • Use follow-up questions or tasks we provided.
  • Ask questions to extend/explore student thinking.

19
Embedded Assessment Interview Assignment
  • Describe what happened during the interview
  • Analyze student understanding
  • Compare what you learned in the interviews with
    what you learned from the whole-class assessment
  • Reflect on what you learned about assessment from
    this assignment and
  • Discuss specific next steps for instruction based
    on the assessment (whole class and interviews).

20
What Our Students Learned From This Assignment
  • Childrens thinking
  • Assessment
  • About themselves

21
What Our Students Learned About Childrens
Thinking
  • From the whole-class assessment, I assumed that
    Jenny knows everything about a standard triangle
    except for triangles coming in different sizes.
    However, after doing the interview I learned that
    she does not know that the base of a triangle can
    be in any direction and still be a triangle.

22
More About Childrens Thinking
  • It was interesting to learn that the students
    considered factors such as size and orientation
    on the page when deciding if an item was or was
    not a rectangle. Prior to administering the
    assessment, I had not anticipated that third
    grade students would rely on that type of
    reasoning to form an answer.

23
What Our Students Learned About Assessment
  • I liked seeing how all the data came together
    and it made much more sense of what they all were
    thinking. I thought the hardest thing about
    interviewing students was getting them to give me
    more descriptive details about their criteria for
    triangles.

24
More About Assessment
  • After doing this interview assessment, I
    learned not to make assumptions based on the
    whole-class assessment.
  • From doing the interviews I learned that
    sometimes assessments do not truly reveal a
    childs capabilities. It was a revelation that
    abilities may be measured through many different
    ways.

25
More About Assessment
  • After conducting both the whole-class assessment
    and the individual student interviews, I saw the
    importance of both. The whole-class assessment
    provided an overview of what the class
    understands conceptually and what they need
    further instruction on. The one drawback of this
    type of assessment is that it does not explain
    exactly how the students are thinking and the
    strategies they use to answer the questions.
    This on the other hand is the number one benefit
    of individual interviewing time. It allowed me
    to identify strategies like the folding over
    method that students used to recognize one-half.

26
More About Assessment
  • I think whole class assessments are a great tool
    for teachers to use when they want to get a big
    picture of what their class knows about a
    particular concept, but they should constantly
    check in with their students and monitor their
    mathematical thinking.

27
More About Assessment
  • If the items on the assessment are chosen
    carefully to represent a range of difficulty, a
    teacher is able to get a good general view of
    what conceptions the students have heading into a
    unit of study. However, while it is possible to
    see general trends, it is quite difficult to
    understand why students choose the answers they
    do. There is no place for them to explain their
    thinking.

28
More About Assessment
  • The whole group class assessment . . . allows a
    teacher to get an idea of what in general the
    class needs help on and what they do all
    understand. . . It does not provide proof of
    what they were actually thinking, though. The
    individual interviews allowed me to find out more
    specifically what they were thinking. It also
    allowed me to see the steps they followed to
    answer a question, instead of just seeing the
    result of it.

29
What Our Students Learned About Themselves
  • I think this type of assessment would help me to
    better structure my lessons and manage time
    wisely.
  • I learned . . that I was rooting for everyone
    to succeed. In fact, I felt some disappointment
    when some children did not do well.

30
More About What Our Students Learned About
Themselves
  • As a result of this assignment I learned that it
    is extremely difficult for me to not assist a
    student when he or she does not understand a
    concept. I really had to force myself to not
    give obvious clues to help D__ and J__ reach the
    correct answer. This realization actually made
    me even more excited to teach due to the
    confirmation of my desire to help students learn."

31
Reflections on Assignment Modifications
  • Share classroom data and conduct separate
    interviews
  • Extend to include planning, conducting, and
    reflecting on a lesson based on assessment

32
Reflections on Using This Assignment in Our Course
  • Surprised at how much modeling students need
  • Still working on finding/creating more assessment
    tasks (e.g., more choices for lower primary
    students)

33
Your Turn Again
  • What ideas from this session might you implement
    in your classes?
  • What potential barriers might you encounter, and
    how might you overcome them?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com