Detecting the Unidentified Victims: Recognized Versus Unrecognized Child Sexual Abuse Sarah DeGue1, John Clemmons1, David DiLillo1, and Issac Martinez2 University of Nebraska-Lincoln1 Family Violence and Injury Lab Our Lady of the Lake University2 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 1
About This Presentation
Title:

Detecting the Unidentified Victims: Recognized Versus Unrecognized Child Sexual Abuse Sarah DeGue1, John Clemmons1, David DiLillo1, and Issac Martinez2 University of Nebraska-Lincoln1 Family Violence and Injury Lab Our Lady of the Lake University2

Description:

Vocational Rehabilitation Specialists Perspectives of Schizophrenia and Employment Kristen Laib, M.S.1,2; Yuliana E. Gallegos, M.A.1; Dennis R. Combs, Ph.D.2 ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:37
Avg rating:3.0/5.0

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Detecting the Unidentified Victims: Recognized Versus Unrecognized Child Sexual Abuse Sarah DeGue1, John Clemmons1, David DiLillo1, and Issac Martinez2 University of Nebraska-Lincoln1 Family Violence and Injury Lab Our Lady of the Lake University2


1

Vocational Rehabilitation Specialists
Perspectives of Schizophrenia and
Employment Kristen Laib, M.S.1,2 Yuliana E.
Gallegos, M.A.1 Dennis R. Combs, Ph.D.2
William D. Spaulding, Ph.D.1 1Department of
Psychology, University of Nebraska-Lincoln 2Depart
ment of Psychology, University of Texas at Tyler


RESULTS
METHOD
INTRODUCTION OBJECTIVES
  • The 20 questions in Part 2 of the questionnaire
    was divided into three symptom categories based
    on the DSM-IV criteria for schizophrenia
    positive symptoms, negative symptoms, and
    neurocognitive symptoms. Each of the subscales
    was converted to item based mean score positive
    symptoms (mean 2.97 SD .94), negative
    symptoms (mean 2.88, SD .82),
    social/neurocognitive symptoms (mean 3.12, SD
    .85). A repeated measures ANOVA was conducted
    comparing the three subscales. The results of
    Wilks Lambda .862, F (2, 113) 9.05, p lt
    .001, was significant. Pairwise comparisons
    between the mean subscale scores showed higher
    ratings for social/cognitive factors than
    negative symptom factors as barriers in job
    attainment there was no difference with positive
    symptom scores.
  • Principal components analysis (PCA) with
    varimax rotation was conducted to assess the
    underlying structure for the twenty items in Part
    2 of the questionnaire. The results of the first
    PCA, based on the eigenvalue greater than 1 rule,
    revealed a 4-factor solution as the best fit for
    the data . The total variance accounted for by
    this analysis was 71.21. The first factor,
    appears to reflect disorganized and catatonic
    behavior, had strong factor loadings on variables
    4-10. The second factor, appears to reflect
    decreased thought processes, had high loadings on
    variables13-20. The third factor, appears to
    reflect paranoia, loaded highly on variables 1-3.
    The fourth factor, appears to reflect flat
    affect, had high loadings of variables 11-12.
  • A second PCA was run with a forced 3 factor
    solution. The total variance accounted for by
    this analysis was 65.18, which is approximately
    6.03 less variance than the initial PCA. The
    first factor, appears to reflect catatonic and
    disorganized behavior, includes the same
    variables as in the first analysis, variables
    4-10. The second factor, appears to reflect
    negative processing, includes variables 11-18
    20. The third factor, appears to reflect
    paranoia, includes variables 1-3 19 (Table 3).
  • The 3-facotr solution was considered a better
    reflection of underlying constructs (see
    discussion). As such, based on the 3-factor
    solution, a repeated measures ANOVA was conducted
    comparing the three subscales identified in the
    PCA catatonic and disorganized behavior,
    negative thought processing, and paranoia. The
    results of Wilks Lambda .721, F (2, 113)
    21.89, Plt.001, was significant. Pairwise
    comparisons between the mean subscale scores
    shows a significant difference between all three
    subscales with paranoia rated the highest,
    followed by disorganized and cationic behavior,
    and negative thought processing rated as the
    lowest barrier to employment.
  • Schizophrenia is often a debilitating condition
    that negatively impacts ones level of
    functioning, including employment.
  • U.S. unemployment rates for individuals diagnosed
    with schizophrenia averages 90 (Geertsen, Davis,
    Ellis, 2002). In the UK, unemployment rate
    averages 80-90 (Marwaha Johnson, 2004).
  • In the research literature, negative symptoms of
    schizophrenia are more associated with
    unemployment than positive symptoms (Rosenheck,
    et al., 2006).
  • Negative symptoms may lead to microbehaviors and
    interview skills that are not rated favorably for
    employment (i.e., poverty of speech, flat affect,
    restriction in goal directed behavior, or
    avolition) (Solinski, et al., 1992).
  • However, the association between negative
    symptoms and unemployment is not entirely clear.
    Part of the difficulty lies in the inability to
    separate certain negative symptoms from social or
    cognitive deficits associated with schizophrenia.
  • While social/cognitive deficits are not formally
    included in the diagnosis of schizophrenia, the
    DSM-IV includes 7 references to cognitive
    dysfunction in the disorder (Keefe Easley,
    2006).
  • Additionally, in neuropsychological testing, 27
    of the population diagnosed with schizophrenia
    are classified as neuropsychologically normal,
    compared to 85 of the general population
    (Palmer, et al., 1997).
  • Research also indicates deficits in social
    cognition, including theory of mind (Roncone, et
    al., 2002), and the identification and
    discrimination of facial affect (Pinkham, Penn,
    Perkins, Bieberman, 2003).
  • To date, research on schizophrenia and employment
    has considered the characteristics of the
    consumer to understand the various symptoms of
    schizophrenia that negatively affect employment.
    The current study focuses on the perspective of
    the vocational rehabilitation specialist to
    identify the barriers they face when working with
    individuals diagnosed with schizophrenia in
    finding employment.

This study was approved by the University of
Texas at Tyler Institutional Review Board and
supported by the Texas Department of Assistive
and Rehabilitative Services (DARS).
Participants The Vocational Rehabilitation
program of DARS serves individuals with mental
and physical disabilities in obtaining
employment. Participants included Vocational
Rehabilitation Specialists (VRS) ,as their job
duties are solely in the area of employment. A
total of 171 individuals started the
questionnaire. Of those individuals, 127 (75.6)
were currently employed as a VRS at the time of
the questionnaire and 41 individuals (24.4) were
not employed as a VRS. Only individuals
currently employed as a VRS were included in the
analysis of the hypotheses. Measures A lengthy
search was conducted to identify an existing
questionnaire to identify the barriers to
employment for those with schizophrenia from the
perspective of the vocational specialist. No
measures were identified that addresses the
perspective of the vocational provider. Since an
appropriate questionnaire was not identified, a
questionnaire was created by the examiner. The
questionnaire consists of three parts. Part One
includes questions about the personal and
professional characteristics of the participant.
Part Two of the questionnaire consists of 20
questions regarding the symptoms and/or features
of schizophrenia. These questions were based on
positive, negative, and social/neurocognitive
features of schizophrenia. Part Three of the
questionnaire asks demographic questions about
the participant including race/ethnicity, gender,
marital status, age, etc. Procedure The
questionnaire was converted to an online survey.
Participants were requested to complete the
survey by email, via the survey website.
Table 1 Table 1
VRSs Demographics VRSs Demographics
n ()
Gender
Male 38 (29.9)
Female 81 (63.8)
Age Range
23-30 yrs 13 (10.2)
31-40 yrs 23 (18.1)
41-50 yrs 29 (22.8)
51-60 yrs 40 (31.5)
61 yrs 14 (11.0)
Ethnicity
European American 69 (54.3)
African American 21 (16.5)
Hispanic/Latino 22 (17.3)
Native American 3 (2.4)
Educational Level
Some College 3 (2.4)
Bachelors Degree 15 (11.8)
Masters Degree 98 (77.2)
Doctoral Degree 3 (2.4)
Marital Status
Single 16 (12.6)
Married 66 (52.0)
Separated 2 (1.6)
Divorced 22 (17.3)
Widowed 6 (4.7)
Table 3 Table 3 Table 3 Table 3
Factor Analysis Three Factor Solution Disorganized Catatonic Behavior Negative Thought Processes Paranoia
1. Barrier - hear voices, noises, sounds .391 .041 .660
2. Barrier - see images or objects .543 -.023 .668
3. Barrier - have delusions .223 .275 .666
4. Barrier - incoherent speech .813 -.078 .343
5. Barrier - speech is derailed .554 .422 .347
6. Barrier - dresses in unusual manner .758 .227 .150
7. Barrier - dresses inappropriately for work .875 .212 .075
8. Barrier - grooming habits inappropriate .774 .382 -.016
9. Barrier - client is non-responsive to environment .829 .186 .331
10. Barrier - has unusual/rigid body positions .713 .242 .323
11. Barrier - has flat/restricted affect .119 .682 -.111
12. Barrier - responds in brief replies .204 .733 -.119
13. Barrier - does not engage in goal directed activity .308 .653 .071
14. Barrier - unable to maintain attention .341 .597 .359
15. Barrier - unable to learn or retain information .299 .599 .392
16. Barrier - cannot adapt to new environment .258 .682 .302
17. Barrier - slow processing speed .172 .640 .327
18. Barrier - cannot discriminate affect of others .111 .690 .447
19. Barrier - cannot identify others intentions .012 .565 .621
20. Barrier - does not find pleasure/interest -.057 .783 .208
Table 2
Positive Symptoms
1. Barrier - hear voices, noises, sounds
2. Barrier - see images or objects
3. Barrier - have delusions
4. Barrier - incoherent speech
5. Barrier - speech is derailed
6. Barrier - dresses in unusual manner
7. Barrier - dresses inappropriately for work
Negative Symptoms
8. Barrier - grooming habits inappropriate
9. Barrier - client is non-responsive to environment
10. Barrier - has unusual/rigid body positions
11. Barrier - has flat/restricted affect
12. Barrier - responds in brief replies
13. Barrier - does not engage in goal directed activity
20. Barrier - does not find pleasure/interest
Social/Cognitive Deficits
14. Barrier - unable to maintain attention
15. Barrier - unable to learn or retain information
16. Barrier - cannot adapt to new environment
17. Barrier - slow processing speed
18. Barrier - cannot discriminate affect of others
19. Barrier - cannot identify others intentions
DISCUSSION
  • A questionnaire was created to identify the
    symptoms of schizophrenia that are the greatest
    barriers to employment based on the perspectives
    of VRS. The DSM-IV diagnostic criteria of
    schizophrenia is comprised of positive and
    negative symptoms. In addition to the DSM-IV
    criteria, research has identified
    social/cognitive deficits associated with
    schizophrenia. The questionnaire included 20
    items which related to the three underlying
    constructs positive symptoms, negative symptoms,
    and social/cognitive deficits (Table 2).
  • Research shows that negative symptoms are more
    associated with unemployment, as compared to
    positive symptoms. The presented results did not
    support this research finding, as the
    participants rated social/cognitive deficits as
    the greatest barrier in assisting consumers to
    obtain employment, when compared with positive or
    negative symptoms. However, it should be noted
    that social/cognitive features of schizophrenia
    are a more recent interest of research and have
    probably not been studied specifically as a
    predictor of (un)employment. It is anticipated
    that VRS would benefit from additional training
    in the area of schizophrenia and the symptom
    areas associated with the disorder. More
    specifically, VRS should receive training about
    the negative symptoms of schizophrenia and the
    effect of these symptoms on ones ability to
    obtain and/or maintain employment.
  • PCA of the 20-item questionnaire was conducted
    twice. First, allowing SPSS to determine the
    number of factors based on eigenvalue greater
    than 1. Second, a three factor solution was
    specified based on the fact that the items were
    designed to index three primary constructs
    positive symptoms, negative symptoms, and
    social/cognitive symptoms. The results of the
    first analysis revealed four factors, while the
    results of the second analysis revealed three
    factors. While the first factor accounted for
    slightly more variance (71.28) than the second
    factor (65.89), the second factor analysis is a
    better representation of the underlying
    constructs as it is more precisely aligned with
    the DSM-IV diagnostic category of schizophrenia.
    The three factors identified are paranoia,
    disorganized and catatonic behavior, and negative
    thought processes (Table 3).
  • Based on the second PCA (Table 3), an analysis
    was conducted to determine which of these
    subscales are rated as the greatest barrier to
    obtaining employment, as rated by VRS. While
    the first analysis was based on the DSM-IV
    criteria of positive symptoms, negative symptoms,
    and social/cognitive deficits (Table 2) the
    second analysis is based on the subscales of
    paranoia, disorganized and catatonic behavior,
    and negative thought processes identified by the
    PCA (Table 3). The results were not consistent
    with the first analysis, as the symptoms of
    paranoia , were rated as the greatest barrier to
    assisting consumers in obtaining employment.
    This was followed by disorganized and catatonic
    behavior. Negative thought processes were rated
    as the lowest barrier to assisting consumers in
    obtaining employment. Notably, the positive
    symptom subscale includes items of paranoia, as
    well as disorganized speech and behavior. When
    separating paranoia from disorganized behavior,
    these symptoms are seen as a greater barrier to
    employment. Thus, a subset of positive symptoms,
    paranoia, are rated as the greatest barrier to
    employment in this analysis. This is not
    consistent with the first analysis which
    identified social/neurocognitive deficits as the
    greatest barrier. The factor analysis revealed
    that the symptoms of schizophrenia are not
    consistent with the current DSM-IV-TR diagnostic
    category of schizophrenia. While the diagnostic
    criteria of positive symptoms includes symptoms
    or paranoia and disorganized symptoms, the factor
    analysis separated these symptoms into two
    clusters. As such, when just analyzing paranoid
    symptoms alone, they are reported as the greatest
    barrier to obtaining employment. Further
    research is needed to corroborate these results.
    If corroborated, the underlying structure of
    schizophrenia symptoms should be examined.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com