EFFECT OF DEXMEDETOMIDINE AS AN ADJUVANT TO EPIDURAL ROPIVACAINE 0.75% - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

EFFECT OF DEXMEDETOMIDINE AS AN ADJUVANT TO EPIDURAL ROPIVACAINE 0.75%

Description:

... combined with 1.5% lignocaine for patients undergoing hystrectomy 8 times greater selectivity than clonidine towards 2 adrenergic receptor DEX.. – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:85
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 37
Provided by: rajar9
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: EFFECT OF DEXMEDETOMIDINE AS AN ADJUVANT TO EPIDURAL ROPIVACAINE 0.75%


1
TOPIC
EFFECT OF DEXMEDETOMIDINE AS AN ADJUVANT TO
EPIDURAL ROPIVACAINE 0.75
DR.Rajaram MD(Final)
2
NAME DR.J.RAJARAM
COURSE MD FINAL(ANESTHESIA)
CENTER KILPAUK MEDICAL COLLEGE HOSPITAL
GUIDE DR.P.S.SHANMUGAM MD.DA
PROF HOD OF ANESTHESIA DEPT OF
ANESTHESIA KILPAUK MEDICAL
COLLEGE
3
INTRODUCTION
  • Hypothesis of this study is to evaluate and
    compare the effect of added dexmedetomidine to
    epidural ropivacaine 0.75
  • 40 patients under going elective lower limb
    orthopedic procedures under epidural were
    selected and divided into two groups of 20 each
  • Control group- epidural ropivacaine 0.75 20ml
    (150mg)
  • Dex group- epidural ropivacaine 0.75 20ml
    (150mg) Dexmedetomidine 1µg/kg

4
METHODS
  • Ethical committee approval
  • Informed consent
  • Randomised double blind study
  • 40 paients under going elective orthopedic
    procedures were selected
  • Absolute fasting of 8 hours , without
    premedication

5
METHODS
  • INCLUSION CRITERIA
  • EXCLUSION CRITERIA
  • ASA I II
  • BOTH SEXES
  • AGE BETWEEN 18-70 yrs
  • ELECTIVE ORTHOPEDIC PROCEDURE
  • UNDER EPIDURAL ANESTHESIA
  • WITHOUT COMORBID ILLNESS
  • ALLERGY TO LOCAL ANESTHETICS
  • NM DISEASES
  • USING a2 ANTAGONISTS
  • WEIGHT MORE THAN 120 kg

6
CONTD..
  • I.V line secured for administration of
    RL,10ml/kg/hr
  • Monitors include pulse oximetry, NIBP, ECG
  • Epidural
  • Performed with 16G Tuohy needle
  • Lumbar epidural space
  • Sitting position
  • Loss of resistance technique

7
GROUPS
  • CONTROL GROUP(N20)
  • Epidural ropivacaine 0.75 20ml(150mg)1 ml NS
  • DXMEDETOMIDINE GROUP(N20)
  • Epidural ropivacaine 0.75 20ml(150mg)
    Dexmedetomidine 1µg/kgNS to complete 1ml
  • 20ml 0.75 injected at the rate of 1ml/3sec
  • Patients were treated with titrated doses
    ephedrine 6mg if systolic BPlt90mmhg, with
    atropine 0.6mg if HRlt60/min
  • Patients were sedated on demand basis

8
VARIABLES
  • BLOCK ONSET TIME
  • MAXIMUM DERMATOMAL LEVEL OF ANESTHESIA
  • DURATION OF SENSORY AND MOTOR BLOCKADE
  • MOTOR BLOCK INTENSITY-BROMAGE MOTOR SCALE
  • SENSORY BLOCK-SENSORY SCALE
  • LEVEL OF SEDATION-RAMSEY SEDATION SCALE
  • HEMODYNAMICS
  • DURATION POST OPERATIVE ANALGESIA-VAS SCORE

9
DEFINITION OF VARIABLES
  • SENSORY BLOCK ONSET TIME
  • Time interval between end of anesthetic injection
    and appearance of cutaneous analgesia in
    dermatomes T-12,T-10,T-8,T-6
  • DURATION OF MOTOR BLOCK
  • Administration of anesthetic and attainment of
    grade 0 in Bromage motor scale
  • DURATION OF ANALGESIA
  • Administration of anesthetic and disappearance of
    cutaneous level at each dermatomal level
  • POST-OP ANALGESIA DURATION
  • Administration of anesthetic and time of
    analgesic usage in PACU
  • SUPPLEMENTAL SEDATION
  • If patient felt pain or uncomfortable , with
    pentazocine 0.3mg/kg and or midazolam 0.02mg I.V

10
BROMAGE MOTOR SCALE
GRADE CRITERIA DEGREE OF BLOCK
0 FREE MOVEMENT OF LEGS AND FEET NIL(0)
1 JUST ABLE TO FLEX KNEES WITH FREE MOVEMENT OF KNEES PARTIAL(33)
2 UNABLE TO FLEX KNEES,BUT WITH MOVEMNT OF FEET ALMOST COMPLETE (66)
3 UNABLE TO MOVE LEGS OR FEET COMPLETE (100)
11
RAMSEY SEDATION SCALE
12
SENSORY SCORE
SCORE RESPONSE
0 NORMAL SENSATION
1 ANALGESIA(LOSS OF PIN PRICK SENSATION)
2 ANESTHESIA(LOSS OF TOUCH)
13
STATISTICS
  • Variables were analyzed with Student t test,
    Chi Square test
  • Variables like age, sex, weight, height were
    compared using Levenes test for equality of
    variance
  • Sample size obtained according to previous
    background study
  • p value less than 0.05 was taken as significant

14
RESULTS
  • One patient in control group was excluded for
    failure of epidural block and need for GA
  • Distributions of age, weight, height, sex and
    type of surgery , duration of surgery between
    groups(pgt0.05)
  • Block onset time T-12,T-10,T-8,T6 between
    groups-shortened onset time, with less
    significance(plt0.08)
  • Regression time is prolonged in dex group(plt0.01)
  • Maximal level of analgesia assessed after 60mins
    between groups were T-4 to T-6, without
    significance

15
Block Onset Time
Regression Time
16
Upper Level Of Analgesia
17
SEX DISTRIBUTION
18
DISTRIBUTION OF SURGERY
19
EPIDURAL CATHETER LENGTH
20
VARIABLES CONTROL DEX
Age Age 42.25 39.10
Sex Female 3 4
Sex Male 17 16
Height (cm) Height (cm) 169.35 163.15
Weight (kg) Weight (kg) 69.95 66.75
Level Of Epidural L1-L2 2 2
Level Of Epidural L2-L3 10 10
Level Of Epidural L3-L4 8 8
Cathetar Length (cm) Cathetar Length (cm) 6.5 6.85
Surgery IM / IL Nailing 10 9
Surgery Illizarao ring fixation 4 2
Surgery DHS 2 5
Surgery TKR 1 1
Surgery THR 1 0
Surgery DCS 0 1
Surgery Encirclage / TBW L Patella 1 0
Surgery Plate Screw fixation 0 2
Surgery Hemiarthroplasty 1 0
ASA I 12 15
ASA II 8 5
DURATION OF SURGERY (mins) DURATION OF SURGERY (mins) 158.25 177
21
CONTD..
  • Duration of analgesia-prolonged in Dex group,
    level of significance-(plt0.05)
  • Motor block duration-prolonged in Dex group,
    level of significance(plt0.05)
  • Intensity of motor block-increased intensity in
    dex group,without significance(plt0.37)
  • Supplemental sedation-reduced need in Dex group ,
    level of significance
  • Patient given supplemental mask O2 if SpO2 lt94
  • Duration of post-op analgesia-significantly
    prolonged in Dex group, level of significance
    (plt0.01)

22
VARIABLES CONTROL DEX P VALUE
Block Onset Time (T-12)mins 13.90  12.45   0.085
Duration Of Analgesia (mins)  236.35 304.25   0.021
Regression Time  115.55  177.30  0.051
Motor Block Duration (mins)  204.65 248.00  0.042 
Post Of Analgesia (mins ) 309   496.95 0.001 
23
(No Transcript)
24
Contd..
  • Need for vasopressors- similar between groups
    with out much significance(pgt0.13)
  • Occurrence of hypotension with need for
    vasopressor
  • Occurrence of bradycardia and need for vagolytic
  • Hemodynamic stability-stable in both groups
    without much significance(plt0.06)
  • Occurrence of other complications like shivering,
    nausea , RS depression in intra and post-op
    period similar between groups
  • Epidural catheter was used for giving rescue
    analgesia with 0.2 ropivacaine 10ml (20mg)

25
SEDATIVE USAGE
26
ROPIVACAINE
27
ROPIVACAINE
  • It is a long acting amide local anesthetics
  • Ropivacaine is S isomer of the propyl analogue
    of mepivacaine and bupivacaine
  • Similar to bupivacaine ,but with better
    cadiotoxicity profile,
  • dissociates from Nachannels more rapidly
  • Produces less accumulation of Nachannel block
  • Significantly better sensory-motor
    differentiation,due to lower lipid solubility
    than bupivacaine
  • Has mild intrinsic vasoconstricting properties
  • unsuitable for infiltration in tissues without
    collateral blood supply
  • Reason for longer cutaneous anesthesia

28
PROPERTIES-ROPIVACAINE
  • pKa is 8.07
  • Protein binding is 94
  • Partition co-efficient is 115
  • CCCNS ratio is 51
  • Potency 4

29
DISCUSSION
  • According to result,
  • There is a synergistic interaction of dex and
    ropivacaine during epidural administration
  • Addition of Dex prolongs analgesic and motor
    blockade duration and post-op analgesia
  • Decreases the requirement of supplemental
    sedation
  • It does not affect onset time

30
DEXMEDETOMIDINE
31
(No Transcript)
32
DEXMEDETOMIDINE
  • Dex is an agonist of a2 adrenergic receptor
    agonist where ratio among a2 a1 is 16001
  • Dex epidural effect is dose dependent and
    superior than I.V due to its high affinity for
    a2 adrenergic receptors in spinal cord
  • Dex first administered epidurally in 1997,
    combined with 1.5 lignocaine for patients
    undergoing hystrectomy
  • 8 times greater selectivity than clonidine
    towards a2 adrenergic receptor

33
DEX..
  • After epidural administration of Dex , it is
    rapidly detected in CSF within five mins,however
    only 22 is absorbed into intra thecal space
  • Dex inhibition of locus caeruleus results in
    disinhibition of of NA nuclei and exerts
    descending inhibitory effect on nociception in
    spical cord
  • Anti-nociceptive effect is
  • Dose dependent
  • Related to affinity of located a2 in spinal card
  • Higher lipid solubility
  • Prolonged analgesic action of LA is due to
  • Reduced systemic absorbtion caused by local
    vasoconstriction mediated bya2C in smooth muscle
    of epidural venous plexus

34
DEX..
  • Sedative effect of Dex,
  • Mediated by binding to a2A receptors in locus
    caeruleus
  • Diminishes release of norepinephrine
  • During epidural administration cephalad spread
    into meninges may be responsible for sedation
  • Dex cause more sensory than motor block duration
  • 4 times the dose is required for inhibition large
    ,myelinated Aa fibers when compared to small
    unmyelinated C fibers
  • Bradycardia
  • Is dose dependent
  • Occurs in epidural if level is higher
  • Shivering incidence may be reduced with a2
    agonists due to central inhibition of
    thermoregulatory centre

35
CONCLUSION
  • DEX has significant synergistic interaction with
    epidural Ropivacaine in
  • Prolonging duration of analgesia(plt0.02)
  • Prolonging duration motor block(plt0.04)
  • Post-op duration of analgesia(plt0.001)
  • Ref. brazilia scandinavia ,journal

36
THANK U
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com