Title: Bridging Policy and Finance: Integrating Financial Consideration into the Policy Life-Cycle
1Bridging Policy and FinanceIntegrating
Financial Consideration into the Policy Life-Cycle
- Murray Lindo
- Director, Financial Management Control Policy
- Office of the Provincial Controller
- Ministry of Finance
21. Purpose
- To understanding the key strategic challenges,
facing the government is pivotal to designing
policy and achieving program value-for-money. - Describe five key financial lenses that can
enable you to identify, assess and mitigate the
financial risks and establish risk-based
financial measures. - Provide a framework to better integrate financial
considerations and measures, across the policy
life-cycle from design, implementation,
maintenance and evaluation.
32. Policy and Financial Management Definitions
- What is Policy?
- Policy is the translation of governments
political priorities and principles into
programmes and courses of action to deliver
desired outcomes. - What is Financial Management?
- Financial management is the process by which
financial aspects of public sector organizations
are directed and controlled in order to achieve
the organization's goals.
43. Strategic Financial/Policy Challenges
- Economic managing program expenditure and
evaluating performance/alternatives during a
global economic recession that has constrained
revenues. - Stewardship of the Long-term balancing immediate
program funding over infrastructure investments,
while understanding the long-term financial
legacy of current policy/program decisions. - Public Expectations access to information and
heighten public expectations will drive greater
transparency and the need to demonstrate
effectiveness, efficiency and value-for-money. - Core Programs demographics changes will impact
the sustainability of large, open programs in
the health, social services and education
sectors. - Broader Public Sector (BPS) changing
governments role as a social-investor
overseeing BPS management and leveraging
performance through agreements that codify
expectations. - Capital and Investments Increasing complexity of
integrating financing, capital investment and
operations planning to ensure efficient and
effective delivery of services. - Public Reporting Strengthen public accounting
and financial disclosure standards will
necessitate more rigorous financial analysis and
data supported by attestations of its integrity.
54. 2009-10 Budget Expense
Program expense equals total expense minus
interest on debt.
65. Key Messages
- Only by integrating financial analysis into
policy and programs proposals can ministries
design high-quality, sustainable and cost
effective policies. - In an constrained economic environment, the
strengthen of your policy proposal (and its
success) will depend on the ability to
demonstrate savings, value-for-money and positive
cost/benefit analysis. - Evaluating your existing portfolio of policies
and programs, using objectives financial
analysis, to find efficiencies and effectiveness
improvements is going to be essential to maintain
services with less resources.
76. Financial and Policy Decision Process
Legislature
Voted Appropriations
Proposals with Financial Implications
Cabinet
Governance
Treasury Board/ Management Board of Cabinet
Eight (Policy) Subcommittee (e.g. Legislation and
Regulations Committees)
- Treasury Board authorizes annual and in-year
spending plans and ensure compliance. - Reviews policies with financial implications.
- It approves the government's overall human
resource, information technology plans and also
makes decisions about government land and
buildings.
- Ministry of Environment
- focused on policy development
- program delivery and managing service partners
- managing within the fiscal envelope
- establishing performance expectations and
evaluating program outcomes - financial management and results reporting
- Policy committees review and make recommendations
to Cabinet on the policies and programs
government delivers.
Mandate
- Ministry of Finance
- (Treasury Board Office)
- supporting Treasury Board in its fiduciary
responsibilities - financial long-term stewardship
- responsible for the development of the fiscal
plan (budget), Fall Economic Statement and
publishing the Public Accounts. - managing the Results-based Planning process.
- developing financial policies
- Cabinet Office
- supports Cabinet and sub-committees
- manages how the government makes decisions
-
- works with ministries to coordinate policy,
communications and intergovernmental strategy -
- monitors government strategies and supports
implementation and delivery of results
Processes
87. Five Financial Lenses for Developing
Policy/Programs
- Efficiency
- Inputs over outputs
- Effectiveness
- Outputs over outcomes
- Economy
- Cost/benefits against alternatives
- Economic/ Fiscal Impact
- What are the economic and fiscal implications and
risks? - How can these risks be mitigated through policy
and program design? - What are the financial and fiscal trade-offs
in supporting the decisions?
- Financial Transparency Risks
- Disclosure of financial information consistent
with public accounting and financial reporting
standards. - Financial information is completes, reliable,
timely, comparable, relevant, clear and
verifiable.
- Impairing Future Decisions
- Impacts on (future) revenues/ assets/
liabilities (e.g. auto sector pensions) - Impacts on budgets, the multi-year
fiscal/capital plans, transfers/ cash flows and
appropriations.
- Public Reporting (consolidation)
- Ensuring appropriate financial accountability
and transparency provisions are incorporated into
program delivery and design.
98. An Integrated Financial-Policy Model
Policy Analysis
Risk-based reviews
Policy Decision
Financial non-financial risks/options
Program Implementation
Program Evaluation
Financial Analysis
Asset Management
Asset Implications
Efficiency
Financial Performance and Public reporting
Consolidated Public Reporting
Forecasts/ fiscal impacts
Effectiveness
Integrity of financial data and reporting
Sustainability and Value-for-Money
Assurance of controls
Value-for-money
109. Integrating Financial Considerations into
Policy-Making
- Integrated Policy should be
- Positive benefits complete and objective
cost/benefit analysis that includes immediate and
on-going capital, operational and administrative
costs - Forward looking consider the complete and
long-term fiscal and financial impacts over the
policys lifetime - Outward looking understand the financial
trade-offs of the recommendation - Innovative and creative embed the identification
and management of financial risks in the policy
design and implementation - Evidence based costing, budgeting and estimates
must be build on complete information, solid
assumptions and objective analysis - Joined up horizontal connect with other policy
areas and ministries. Provide opportunity to
realize efficiencies or economies of scale - Evaluated financial and non-financial
performance must be measured against objective
and weighted leading and lagging indicators and - Demonstrate Value-for-money the initiative must
be able to efficiency (outputs/inputs),
effectiveness (outputs/outcomes) and economy
(cost effective comparisons).
1110. Policy and Program Design Financial
Considerations
- Cost-benefit analysis all options should be
valued against full net benefits and costs
calculations. Costs should be expressed in terms
of relevant opportunity costs. Categorising costs
(fixed, variable and semi-variable) will
strengthen sensitivity analysis, including
market interest and demographic fluctuations. - Cost-effectiveness analysis assess the
comparative costs and merits of different
delivery mechanisms. This should be balanced
against an assessment of the relative financial
risks. - Delivery Options transfer payments and agency
methods of service delivery place increasing
(financial) oversight, evaluation and
accountability requirements on the ministry. - Short and Long-term Financial and Fiscal Impact
understand integrated program, operating and
capital costs. Amortized capital costs and sunk
program commitments will constrain downstream
ministry fiscal envelopes. - Full cost of service delivery All costs
associated with the program should be factored
into its cost/benefits analysis. Direct and
indirect costs borne by another ministry or
central agency (e.g. OSS) come from the same
Central Revenue Fund Peter/Paul scenario. - Investment Proposals Capital projects (for
example buildings, ITT and fleet vehicles)
require a complete asset life-cycle analysis from
the initial investment, post-build and periodic
cost/asset evaluations, maintenance, replacement
and disposal. - Cost utility analysis accurate forecasting and
modeling. Fees and revenues program need to be
substantiated by robust sensitivity analysis
using different scenarios.
1211. Policy Implementation, Maintenance and
Evaluation
- Sustainability using robust forecasting and
modeling to assess the fiscal and financial
sustainability and opportunity cost of the
program. Should alternatives delivery mechanisms
or changes in service offerings be considered? - Transfer Payment/ Agency Oversight review of the
recipients or service delivery organizations
service and financial results. Assurance of
effective controls, accurate financial reporting
and analysis of the organization's financial
well-being. - Non Tax Revenue legal constraints on fees (Eurig
decisions), the need to demonstrate transparent
costing and pricing, and associated accounting
structures for Special Purpose Accounts. Are the
revenues directly adversely and
disproportionately effecting another government
revenue stream? - Cost Recoveries what are the full and associated
costs of collecting fees, fines and defaults
(particularly during an economic recession)? - Influence and Control the concept of
arms-length is governed by an understanding of
the degree of influence and control over a given
organization. Provincial control defines
whether an entity is consolidated into the Public
Accounts and is subject to Ministerial
responsibility. - Oversight, Program and Technology Enhancements
sustainability of a program with a substantial
infrastructure footprint requires an evaluation
of the key enhancement milestones and their
associated costs. - Assessment of Outcomes performance measures
should be able to indicate whether the intended
client are benefiting (and to what extend) from
the program/policy and demonstrate its
cost-effectiveness as a service delivery method.
1312. Policy Design Questions
- What are the key financial risks faced by your
programs and core policies? How do you mitigated
these financial risks? - What financial analysis gaps do you typically
find when developing a policy proposal? - What are the key financial drivers impacting the
sustainability of your policies and programs? - What tools and approaches are you using to
evaluate policies and programs efficiency,
effectiveness and value-for-money?
1413. Looking Forward
- Integrating financial risks, analysis and
measures are critical to evaluating policy,
programs and ensuring sector sustainability. - Only by balancing and weighting efficiency,
effectiveness and value-for-money measures can a
full picture of a policy/programs performance be
established. - Increasing financial reporting requirements and
the complex relationships between capital,
financing and operational require an integration
of these considerations into policy decisions. - Forward looking policy that seeks horizontal
sectoral solutions cannot be divorced from robust
financial, cost/benefit, business and capital
investment decisions.