Performance Audit in Washington - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Performance Audit in Washington

Description:

Title: Performance Audit in Washington Author: klotzk Last modified by: juttej Created Date: 6/8/2006 9:40:44 PM Document presentation format: On-screen Show – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:197
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 27
Provided by: klotzk
Learn more at: http://www.psfoa.org
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Performance Audit in Washington


1
Performance Audit in Washington
  • How I-900 affects local governments

Puget Sound Finance Officers Association,
February 14, 2007
Jan Jutte Director of Legal and Client Affairs
WASHINGTON STATE AUDITORS OFFICE
2
Overview
  • Brian Sonntags vision
  • Definition of performance audit
  • Integration progress
  • Outreach
  • I-900 requirements
  • Performance audit process
  • Who, what, when, how
  • Status report
  • Questions and answers

3
Brian Sonntags vision for performance audit
  • Conduct independent, constructive, evidence-based
    audits that
  • Improve transparency
  • Identify exemplary practices
  • Report what is working and identify opportunities
    for improvement
  • Are valued and used as a management tool
  • Promote continual improvements in quality,
    efficiency and effectiveness

4
Definition of Performance Audit
  • An objective and systematic assessment of the
    performance and management of an entity, program,
    activity or function in order to
  • Provide information to improve performance and
    operations
  • Facilitate decision-making by parties with
    responsibility to oversee or initiate corrective
    action
  • Improve public accountability and transparency

5
Integration of performance audits
  • Work done by the Auditors Office
  • Financial audits
  • Federal single audits
  • Accountability (state and local compliance/fiscal
    integrity) audits
  • Performance audits
  • Fraud investigations

6
Outreach efforts
  • Citizen Outreach
  • Town hall meetings
  • Focus groups
  • Results posted on Web site
  • Telephone surveys
  • Survey posted on Web site
  • Entity Outreach
  • Interviews
  • Surveys

7
Outreach efforts
  • Six top performance audit priorities for citizens
    (not in order)
  • Public schools
  • Health care
  • Transportation
  • Social services
  • Public safety
  • Environment

8
What we have learned from citizens
  • Outreach results revealed
  • Performance audit is not a silver bullet
  • Governmental performance is about accountability
    and transparency
  • The feeling that state government represents
    citizens interest is at a record low
  • Fewer citizens think taxes are relatively high
  • One-third think money is not well spent

9
Initiative 900 requirements
  • Identify
  • Best practices
  • Services that can be reduced or eliminated
  • Programs or services that can be transferred to
    private sector
  • Cost savings
  • Analyze
  • Roles, functions and recommend changes,
    eliminations.

10
I-900 requirements, cont.
  1. Gaps, overlaps in programs or services.
  2. Feasibility of pooling technology systems.
  3. Departmental performance data, performance
    measures and self-assessment systems.
  4. Recommend regulatory changes that allow entity to
    carry out its functions.

11
Phases of a performance audit
  • Outreach/research
  • Notify entity of intent to conduct audit planning
    and survey work
  • Audit planning/survey work
  • Develop audit objectives, scope, methodology
  • Notify top executive/entity of intent to conduct
    performance audit

12
Phases of a performance audit, cont.
  • Entrance conference with entity
  • Field work
  • Draft report
  • Pre-exit conference with entity
  • Receive comments from entity officials
  • Exit conference
  • Final report issued
  • Legislative body holds public hearing within 30
    days

13
Performance audit reports
  • Will be available on State Auditors Web site and
    given to entity and legislative body
  • Reports will contain
  • Background, including results of outreach efforts
  • Objectives, scope and methodology
  • Recognition of exemplary or best practices
  • Opportunities for improvement
  • Fraud, illegal acts, violations of provisions of
    contracts or grant agreements and abuse, if found
  • Conclusions
  • Recommendations
  • Response from interested officials

14
Who will perform your audit?
  • Local governments will be in contact with
  • Chuck Pfeil, Director of Local Government Audits
  • Chris Cortines, Local Government Performance
    Audit Coordinator
  • Local government auditors
  • Contractors, including subject-matter experts,
    that may be hired to conduct audits or provide
    assistance.

15
What will we be looking for?
  • Six performance audit themes
  • Public interest
  • How dollars flow between state and local
    governments
  • Inherent, recurring challenges
  • Matters that affect all agencies, example
    pensions or fuel purchases
  • Administration
  • Capital project management

16
When will local audits start?
  • Local government performance audits we plan to
    issue by April 30, 2007
  • Educational Service District Audit

17
When will local audits start?
  • Local government performance audits we plan to
    issue by June 30, 2007
  • Audit of public records systems
  • K-12 Travel Practices

18
When will local audits start?
  • Local government performance audits we plan to
    issue starting June 30, 2007 and continuing
  • Overtime practices
  • Take Home Vehicles

19
When will local audits start?
  • Individual Local Government Audits Planned
  • Sound Transit
  • Port of Seattle

20
State Audits to be issued
  • State Audits that will be issued soon
  • GA Motor Pool later this month
  • DOT Inventory/Project Management (March/April)
  • Collection of State Debt (April/May)
  • Health Care Licensing (June/July)

21
How are audits funded?
  • Performance audits of state and local governments
    are not billed to the entity. The audits are
    funded from a small portion of the state sales
    tax.

22
What criteria will the Auditors Office use?
  • Chapter 7.28 of Yellow Book reads
  • Criteria are the standards, measures,
    expectations of what should exist, best
    practices, and benchmarks against which
    performance is compared or evaluated. Criteria,
    one of the elements of a finding, provide a
    context for understanding the results of the
    auditIn selecting criteria auditors have a
    responsibility to use criteria that are
    reasonable, attainable, and relevant to the
    objectives of the performance audit.
  • The following are some examples of possible
    criteria

23
Criteria, cont.
  • Purpose or goals prescribed by law or regulation
    or set by officials of the audited entity
  • Policies and procedures established by officials
    of the audited entity
  • Technically developed standards or norms
  • Expert opinions
  • Prior periods performance
  • Performance in the private sector, or
  • Best practices of leading organizations

24
How do criteria factor into the performance audit
process?
  • Our auditors ask how the entity measures its own
    performance.
  • We determine whether we agree or disagree with
    those performance criteria.
  • We ask whether additional criteria or benchmarks
    are necessary.

25
What can you do to prepare?
  • Get training/education on performance
    measurements
  • Developing meaningful performance measures
  • Model your program on other entities that are
    leaders in performance
  • Take steps toward publishing goals, measures,
    outcomes

26
Performance Audit contacts
  • Chris Cortines, Local Government Performance
    Audit Coordinator
  • cortinec_at_sao.wa.gov
  • (360) 725-5570
  • Chuck Pfeil, Director of Local Government Audit
  • pfeilc_at_sao.wa.gov
  • (360) 902-0366
  • Jan Jutte, Director of Legal and Client Affairs
  • juttej_at_sao.wa.gov
  • (360) 902-0363
  • Web site www.sao.wa.gov
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com