Problem Solving / Decision Making - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 30
About This Presentation
Title:

Problem Solving / Decision Making

Description:

Decision Making Kepner-Tregoe The New Rational Manager Chapter 4 Chapter 4 Contents Conditions & Skills of Making Choices Major Elements of Decision Analysis The ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:138
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 31
Provided by: Authorized374
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Problem Solving / Decision Making


1
Problem Solving /Decision Making
  • Kepner-Tregoe
  • The New Rational Manager
  • Chapter 4

2
Chapter 4 Contents
  • Conditions Skills of Making Choices
  • Major Elements of Decision Analysis
  • The Techniques of Decision Analysis (DA)

3
People and Decisions
  • Almost universally, people will tell you they
    want to be included in making decisions that
    impact them
  • But, many shun the task of making a decision
  • Controversy
  • Lack of unbiased procedure
  • Power play vs non-confrontational

4
People and Decisions
  • When people are provided a common approach they
    find they can work well in teams and arrive at
    mutually acceptable decisions
  • more sharing of information
  • differences are effectively reconciled
  • decision making is less biased

5
Decision Analysis
  • Decision Analysis (DA) is a systematic procedure
    based on the thinking pattern we use when making
    reasoned choices.
  • Recognize a choice must be made
  • Consider specific factors to be satisfied
  • Decide on an action
  • Consider the risks

6
DA Thinking Pattern
  • These four elements of the decision making
    thinking pattern play a roll in every decision we
    make.
  • For simple and repetitive decision we may not
    even be conscious of this process because memory
    and experience play such an important roll.
  • Contrast when you were first learning to drive
    with your driving decisions today.

7
DA and Information
  • For complex decisions, there are a myriad of
    details behind every decision.
  • But the information available may not match the
    need
  • not enough information
  • poor quality information
  • too much information
  • questions of relevancy accuracy

8
K-Ts Decision Making Procedure
  • What we need is a systematic procedure that will
    do the following
  • blend experience and judgement
  • with the best, most relevant information
    available
  • to produce good decisions.

9
K-Ts Decision Analysis
  • The purpose of K-Ts DA is to
  • identify what needs to be done,
  • develop the specific criteria for its
    accomplishment,
  • evaluate the available alternatives relative to
    the criteria
  • identify the risks involved.

10
Major Elements of DAThe Decision Statement
  • The decision statement is the identification of
    the choice dilemma to be resolved.
  • Provides focus
  • sets limits
  • Wording deserves careful attention
  • implies level of decision
  • implies prior decisions

11
Major Elements of DAThe Objectives of the
Decision
  • Objectives are the criteria for the decision.
  • Identification of MUSTs and WANTs
  • the specific results and benefits to be achieved
  • This approach is the antithesis of identifying a
    course of action and then building a case to
    support it.

12
Major Elements of DAMUST Objectives
  • MUSTs are mandatory
  • They must be achieved by a successful decision
  • MUSTs may not be the most important objectives
  • MUSTs must be measurable
  • MUSTs operate as a screen for decision
    alternatives

13
Major Elements of DAWANT Objectives
  • All other objectives are WANTs
  • They are used to evaluate relative performance
    among the alternatives
  • WANTs create a comparative picture
  • MUSTs decide who plays WANTs decide who wins
  • The same objective (slightly reworded) may be
    both a MUST and a WANT

14
Major Elements of DAAlternatives
  • An ideal alternative (1) satisfies the MUSTs (2)
    is the best relative performer against every
    WANT (3) doesnt add new difficulties.
  • Ideal alternatives are rare so seeking a balanced
    choice among the alternatives is common.

15
Major Elements of DAAlternatives
  • Choices among alternatives may take the form of
  • Choosing between several alternatives,
  • Deciding whether a single alternative is good
    enough to accept,
  • Choosing between a current and proposed method.

16
Major Elements of DAIdentification of Risks
  • The final step in DA is to search for possible
    adverse consequences of all feasible
    alternatives.
  • Before the final choice is made
  • Judgement, experience, and intuition are
    critically important here.

17
The Techniques of Decision Analysis
  • State the Decision
  • Develop Objectives
  • Classify objectives into MUSTs and WANTs
  • Weigh the WANTs
  • Generate Alternatives

18
The Techniques of Decision Analysis
  • Screen alternatives with the MUSTs
  • Compare alternatives against the WANTs
  • Identify adverse consequences
  • Make the best balanced choice

19
Techniques of DADecision Stmt and Objectives
  • State the decision
  • review case discussion (W 86-87, B 90-91)
  • Develop and classify objectives
  • MUSTs are measurable GO/NO GO
  • WANTs are additional desirables
  • see case discussion (W 87, B 91-92)

20
Techniques of DAWeighting
  • Weigh the objectives
  • most important one(s) get a 10 all others get
    weights between 1 and 10
  • Danger signals
  • too many high or low numbers
  • too many reflecting a single viewpoint
  • Review the case discussion (W 88, B 92-93)

21
Techniques of DAGenerate MUSTs
  • Generate alternatives
  • Generate, Generate, Generate!
  • Do Not Evaluate -- yet!
  • Once generated, compare the alternatives to the
    MUSTs
  • Retain if GO on all MUSTs
  • Drop if NO GO on any MUST
  • See case example (W F7 90-91, B F6 94-95)

22
Techniques of DAWANTs
  • Compare against the WANTs
  • Alternative that best satisfies the WANT gets a
    10
  • Others are scored relative to this alternative .
  • This scoring is based on selecting the best
    alternative not on determining closeness to an
    ideal.

23
Techniques of DAWANTs
  • If none of the alternatives deserve a 10 comes
    up repeatedly, consider
  • are the objectives realistic?
  • do we need to generate more alternatives?
  • Alternatively, if all alternatives score very
    high on all objectives, consider
  • do the objectives need to be more demanding?

24
Techniques of DAWeighted Scores
  • See case example ( W F8 92-93, B F7 96-97)
  • Next compute the weighted score for each
    alternative under each WANT
  • multiply objective weight by alternative score
  • Total the weighted scores for an alternatives
    total weighted score.

25
Techniques of DATentative Choice
  • See case example (W F9 94-95 , B F8 98-99)
  • The highest total weighted score becomes the
    tentative choice.
  • This choice is not the best balanced choice yet
    since risks have not been considered.

26
Techniques of DAWhy Evaluate Risks
  • Identifying risks is often skipped. Why?
  • A clear winner as a tentative choice
  • Attitude of pessimism
  • Dont want to revisit painful lessons from the
    past
  • To make the analysis objective and rigorous, we
    must evaluate risks!

27
Techniques of DAQuestions to Evaluate Risks
  • Considering adverse consequences
  • What are the implications of being close to a
    MUST limit?
  • What information might be invalid? What are the
    implications?
  • What could go wrong in the short-term? Long-term?
  • What might keep this alternative from being
    successful?

28
Techniques of DAEvaluating Risks
  • Evaluating adverse consequences
  • alternatives are evaluated separately, not in
    comparison to one another.
  • State the consequence
  • Rate its probability
  • Rate its seriousness
  • See Case example (W 97, B 101)

29
Techniques of DABest Balanced Choice
  • Start with the Tentative Choice Alternative
  • Ask are we willing to accept the risks of this
    choice to gain the benefits?
  • If yes, select as the best balanced choice
  • If no, move to the next highest weighted score
    and re-ask the question.
  • See case discussion (W 98, B 101-102)

30
Decision Analysis Summary
  • DA does not guarantee a perfect decision every
    time.
  • DA provides for the productive use of all
    available information judgements.
  • DA enables a manager to reduce the incidence of
    poor decision making by providing a systematic
    framework for evaluating alternatives.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com