The Need for Continuous Monitoring and Assurance of Financial Transactions. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

The Need for Continuous Monitoring and Assurance of Financial Transactions.

Description:

The Need for Continuous Monitoring and Assurance of Financial Transactions. Miklos A. Vasarhelyi KPMG Professor of AIS, Rutgers Business School, Technical Lead ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:110
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 23
Provided by: Michael2294
Learn more at: https://raw.rutgers.edu
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: The Need for Continuous Monitoring and Assurance of Financial Transactions.


1
The Need for Continuous Monitoring and Assurance
of Financial Transactions.
  • Miklos A. Vasarhelyi KPMG Professor of AIS,
    Rutgers Business School, Technical Lead, ATT
    Laboratories
  • Michael Alles, Associate Professor, Rutgers
    Business School
  • Alexander Kogan, Professor, Rutgers Business
    School

2
Outline
  1. Why dont we learn?
  2. The anatomy of a crisis
  3. Monitoring financial institutions
  4. A proposed solution methodology
  5. Issues for research

3
1. Why dont we learn?
4
Why dont we learn?
  • In 1997/1998 LTCM failed precipitously forcing
    the Fed intervention to coordinate 16 banks to
    contribute close to 4 bi dollars to shore up an
    institution largely deregulated that was
    operating with leverages around 30 times capital,
    ignoring even their swap and derivative positions
  • The total effect on the economy, justifying the
    Feds action was estimated to be about 1 trillion
    dollars
  • Among the major players for countertrades and
    financing for LTCM were Bear Sterns, Chase, and
    Merryl Lynch
  • The epilogue was that these firms escaped
    largelly unscatted and recovered their investment
    and loans with positive returns in about 18
    months after Mr. Greenspans interest lowering

5
Why dont we learn? (2)
  • Greatly contributing to the crisis, net of the
    different international currency crises, were
  • the total lack of transparency of LTCM positions
  • the ignorance by counterparties of LTCM of their
    intricate web of relationships and exposures
  • the nearly totally unregulated nature of hedge
    funds
  • the immense greed of both LTCM partners and their
    counterparties
  • the lack of disclosures on derivatives by all
    parties

6
Why dont we learn? (3)
  • Since those days (10th Year anniversary
    celebration of LTCM)
  • The FASB issued derivative disclosure rules
  • Many other types of financial instruments
    continue to be non-reported under the guise of
    competitive impairment
  • As private equity and hedge funds remained
    largely unregulated and Sarbanes increased the
    onus of regulation a large amount of funds was
    routed to these entities
  • The financial institutions refined the use of
    SPElike entities for their funds
  • The amounts at serious risk are now in the
    hundreds of billions not in the pittance amount
    that partners were forced to contribute at LTCM

7
Background considerations
  • The ill defined nature of the boundaries of
    business entities making them outside the scope
    of existing audit practice.
  • The inability to fully assess the value at risk
    from financial instrument and contracts.
  • The interlocked nature of financial entities and
    instruments that are being measured,
  • Even seemingly sophisticated real-time controls
    have weaknesses stemming from their own lack of
    security, monitoring and alarm handling features.

8
2. The anatomy of a crisis
9
Six waves
8
6
5
2
4
1
3
Sub prime
Derivative Instruments
Hedges Private Equity
Swaps
US Recession
International Recession
7
10
Some other key effects un-antecipated
  • A major crisis of confidence melting the
    intermediate markets
  • Substantive de-leveraging aggravating the lack of
    credit
  • The disappearance of the large US investment
    houses in the form we know them

11
Effects on the six waves
  • Sub prime Derivative Instruments
  • Increased liquidity from the sub prime lead to
    derivatives
  • Credit-default swaps are derivatives, meaning
    they're financial contracts that don't contain
    any actual assets. Their value is based on the
    worth of underlying loans and bonds.
  • Derivative Instruments Hedges Private
    Equity
  • I think there's a major risk of counterparty
    default from hedge funds,'' Cicione says. It's
    inconceivable that the Fed or any central bank
    will bail out the hedge funds. If you have a
    systemic crisis in the hedge fund industry, then
    of course their banks will take the hit.''
  • Hedges Private Equity Swaps
  • Investors can't tell whether the people selling
    the swaps - - known as counterparties -- have the
    money to honor their promises
  • Combination of absolute fear and investors really
    not knowing

12
Effects on the six waves (2)
  • Swaps US Recession
  • With the deepening of operational financial
    problems, bonds default, and swap obligations
    become due
  • 5) US Recession International Recession
  • The interconnectivity of markets, a basis for
    their increased efficiency, becomes a compounding
    / accelerating factor
  • 6) Derivative Instruments Swaps
  • There is no real regulation in swaps and their
    trading creating a shadow market that is larger
    than regulated markets

13
Effects on the six waves (3)
  • Swaps Sub prime (encompassing intermediate
    waves)
  • Billionaire investor George Soros says a chain
    reaction of failures in the swaps market could
    trigger the next global financial crisis.
  • The market is unregulated, and there are no
    public records showing whether sellers have the
    assets to pay out if a bond defaults. This
    so-called counterparty risk is a ticking time
    bomb.
  • On May 8, American International Group Inc. wrote
    down 9.1 billion on the value of its CDS
    holdings. The world's largest insurer by assets
    sold credit protection on CDOs that declined in
    value. In 2007, New York-based AIG reported 11.5
    billion in writedowns on CDO credit default
    swaps.
  • US Recession Sub prime (encompassing
    intermediate waves)

14
How can CA and/or CM help?
  • A forward looking environment
  • Monitoring companies close to real time will
    allow for identifying and preventing potential
    issues (i.e. defaults in sub prime)
  • Analyze schema of debt and understand the impact
    with income and mortgage terms to determine
    predictors
  • Use of analytic continuity equations to create
    linkage
  • Publish process relationships and forward looking
    metrics
  • Transparent monitoring can create additional
    instability in the markets
  • Alike fair value regulations can be blamed for
    increased instabilities
  • But will reduce counterparty opacity
  • Necessary for long term regulation and stability

15
Perverse incentives
  • Loan originators and loan carriers
  • Praying on uneducated consumers
  • Too complex titles
  • Rating agencies
  • Being paid by the rated entities
  • Accounting rules
  • Allowing again off balance sheet entities
  • Fair value valuations precipitating unintended
    consequences a cooling period with double
    reporting would help
  • Clueless in non regulated markets
  • Clueless in dealing with regulated interfacing
    with unregulated parties
  • Clueless in general ? ? ? ?

16
Markets Disappearing
  • The credit crisis has choked off many of the
    markets that banks in recent years relied on to
    take assets off their balance sheets. Issuance of
    mortgage-backed securities has dropped sharply,
    while demand for more complex instruments such as
    collateralised debt obligations packages of
    loans that have been sliced to create new
    securities has dried up completely. Many
    bankers think it will be months, if not years,
    before they can start issuing these securities
    again. If and when they do, investors are bound
    to demand higher returns than before and are
    likely to require banks to demonstrate confidence
    in the securities by keeping a greater proportion
    themselves.
  • In short, this means that banks will be forced to
    fund more of their future loans from their own
    balance sheet resources.

17
3. Monitoring financial institutions
18
Are the raters reliable monitors?
  • Standard Poors to revamp its governance
    procedures, analytics and ratings transparency
    mark the latest in a series of mea culpas from
    the leading credit rating agencies as they
    attempt to restore their credibility with
    investors.
  • Moodys, Fitch and SP have in recent months come
    under intense fire from investors and regulators
    in the US and Europe after complex structured
    finance instruments they rated have suffered
    losses far in excess of the rating agencies
    initial expectations.

19
Is the government a reliable monitor?
  • The government has stayed largely in the
    sidelines watching the financial bubble grow
  • The regulator umbrella is cumbersome, prone to
    political intervention, and lacks effective
    weapons to deal with the powerful banking
    establishment
  • Since the deconstruction of the Glass Seagall act
    banks have become investment banks and
    vice-versa. Hedge funds and private equity have
    taken secondary and tertiary roles in this
    process.

20
Are auditors reliable monitors?
  • External audit methodology is anachronistic
  • The point-in-time audit is not designed to
  • Monitor fast moving financial operations
  • Detect going concern weaknesses in short periods
    of times
  • Measure integrated risk faced by financial
    institutions
  • Deal with the fuzzy boundary issues of
    interlinked financial agents
  • Internal audit groups
  • Are better positioned to deal with these issues
  • Do not have the monitoring and control charter
  • Need to develop a comfort zone for monitoring and
    assurance functions to be negotiated among the
    Basel II, compliance, fraud, Sarbanes, and
    operating groups

21
4. A proposed solution methodology
22
  1. Database to database confirmations

Counterparty 1
4. high level set of risk KPI and monitoring
alarming
3. library of derivative valuation programs
5. Analytic continuity equations
2. A reporting level control panel
FI enters in thousands of Derivative transactions
6. alarming/management methodology
Counterparty n
  • Many transactions are multiparty
  • Similar instruments are actual different
  • There are tight and loose hedges
  • Catastrophic changes in markets are of dubious
    headgeability

23
A proposed approach
  • A library of derivative valuation programs drawn
    from various sources, both external and
    internally developed.
  • A template for a linkage methodology where
    related derivative instruments part of a
    coordinated hedge will be linked
  • A high level set of risk KPI and monitoring
    alarming features
  • A reporting level control panel in addition to
    other alternate views.
  • An initial taxonomy of instruments, valuation
    measurements, and controls
  • A set of analytic continuity equations linking
    varied outside market conditions clearance
    agents derivative instrument and security
    positions, and different views of risk exposures

24
A proposed approach (2)
  • A representation of clearance agents, clients,
    other paper issuers, SPEs, and other relevant
    entities
  • A representation/experimentation in the concept
    of confirmatory extranets in the validation of
    the existence of tertiary transactions and of
    ownership of particular securities
  • An alarming/management methodology to mitigate
    the danger of rogue trading and unbalanced
    derivative positions
  • Simulation of several alternate
    conditions/contingencies based on published
    reports of recent frauds at Societe Generale,
    Citigroup, Barings and so on to test the
    validity of the proposed approach as a preventive
    and detective control.

25
5. Issues for research
26
Outcomes
  • The result is that a banking industry has turned
    out to be supporting a much larger asset base
  • To make matters worse, the previously hidden
    assets are often those whose value is the most
    suspect.
  • The financial system has become leveraged to a
    greater extent than one could have guessed
  • The government intervention in Bear creates an
    immense moral hazard problem / Lehmans failure a
    serious mistake
  • The injection of resources in the system and
    drastic reduction of the interest rate create the
    danger of long term inflation / short term
    deflation and the roots for the next financial
    bubble
  • We may be nearing limits on the ability of the US
    government to borrow
  • A New Deal II program unavoidable

27
Research questions
  • Can a technologically based solution and new
    audit methodologies be derived to deal with or
    mitigate these problems?
  • How good are the current risk management
    platforms at the financial institutions?
  • Can a platform just involving one institution
    without spanning its counterparties be relied
    upon?
  • How to reduce the moral hazard of greedy bankers
    and traders where society will finish up paying?
  • While regulators diddle with the desirability of
    XBRL the question that looms is if version 2.1 is
    adequate to represent fast moving instruments or
    new XML extension languages have to be created to
    deal with the live financial report
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com