Title: Animal Science 400 Nutrition Management Decision-making: An Intensification Strategy for Beef Cattle Systems in Tizim
1Animal Science 400Nutrition Management
Decision-making An Intensification Strategy for
Beef Cattle Systems in Tizimín, Yucatán, México
2www.elca.org
3Issue and problem, México, USA and beef
production
- Migration and population increase
- Demand for animal product (Delgado et al.,1999)
- NAFTA
- Cow-calf production
4www.realestateyucatan.com
5(No Transcript)
6Cow-calf production system
7Target audiences of our project
- 1. The owners of the beef reproduction ranches in
the study site - 2.Local professionals
8 9- The end of June,
- the early rainy season
10The end of October, The early dry season
11d
The end of March, the late dry season
12The forage growing cycle of the year Source,
Magaña, UADY
13Irrigation
- Pumps from under ground
- The cost of irrigation is expensive.
14Forage quality
- Tropical forage contains a lot of cell walls (Van
Soest., 1994) - -High temperature, the length of the day
- -High NDF, lignin, low CP
- Season is known to have a large effect on NDF,
lignin, CP(Licitra et al., 1998) -
15Reproduction, Calving Interval (CI)
- Brahman in Texas (Browing Jr ,1995)
- -one calf per year (12-13 mo)
- Brahman in our study site
- -14 month for mature cows
- -15-17 mo for 1 st lactation cows
- (Magaña et
al., 2002)
16Problem statement
- seasonal variation in the supply and quality of
forage is a primary constraint affecting beef
cattle productivity in Tizimín herds. - Extended Calving interval, economic losses.
17Body Condition scoring
- Beef cattle scale 1(Thin)-9(Fat)
- Use body reserve for early lactation (high energy
requirement) and when the feed supply is
inadequate - Restore reserve after the energy supply is
improved - These should be included in nutritional
management, (Reynoso-Campos., 2003), the amount
of the energy for these, is not small in our case
and many cases.
18Body Condition scoring (continued)
- Strong link between BCS and reproductive
performance - At least the cows need a BCS 5, and 6 for
breeding heifers for next calving (Herd et al.,
1995)
19Source Virginia State University and Virginia
cooperative extension
www.ext.vt.edu
20What is her BCS?
21Problem-solving approach
- The energy intake is low
- The postpartum intervals from parturition to the
nadir of negative energy balance were correlated
with the number of days from parturition to first
ovulation (Canfield and Butler 1989,1990, Beam
and Butler, 1997) - effective reproductive management requires
analysis of energy balance and dietary
supplementation strategies to replenish
catabolized tissue reserves and to shorten CI. - indicate which season is best for calving, and
which season should be avoided for calving.
22(No Transcript)
23Objectives of our project
- Determine nutrient requirements and appropriate
dietary supplementation strategies throughout the
year for key management groups of females to
efficiently achieve productivity and reproductive
goals - Management goals include prompt recovery from the
postpartum energy balance nadir to allow
ovulation and conception to occur, and to assure
adequate body tissue reserves over the
reproductive cycle to minimize the calving
interval
24What information is needed?Energy balance
throughout the CI
- How can we know the energy balance throughout the
calving interval? - Use the CNCPS as a tool.
- (Rueda et al., 2003,
Reynoso-Campos et al., 2004, Nherera 2005) in the
tropics
25Procedures
- Use panel of experts to describe current
situation - Describe each group in the beef herd
- Describe forage composition available during each
season of the year - Predict nutrient balances for each group in the
herd when consuming forages available during each
forage growth season
26ProceduresManagement group for the simulation
- Physiological stage
- -Early lactation stage
- (first 90 d)
- -Mid late lactation
- stage(150 d)
- -Early dry
- -Late dry (last 90 d)
-
- Parity
- - 1st lactation cows
- -2nd lactation cows
- -Mature cows
- -Breeding heifers
27Seasons
- Season 1(calving on June 1 , the early
rainy season) - Season 2(calving on August 1, the late dry
season) - Season 3(calving on October 1, the early dry
season) - Season 4(calving on February 1, the late dry
season)
28.Forage composition for the CNCPS simulation Yucatán assumptions .Forage composition for the CNCPS simulation Yucatán assumptions .Forage composition for the CNCPS simulation Yucatán assumptions .Forage composition for the CNCPS simulation Yucatán assumptions .Forage composition for the CNCPS simulation Yucatán assumptions .Forage composition for the CNCPS simulation Yucatán assumptions .Forage composition for the CNCPS simulation Yucatán assumptions
Season CP() NDF () Lignin in DM Ashin DM NDF rate /hour Ether extract in DM
Season 1 9 67 6 12.7 8.6 3
Season 2 8 72 7 12 7.2 2.6
Season 3 7 74 8 11.5 7.2 2.2
Season 4 5 77 9 11 5.1 1.6
29Forage composition for the CNCPS simulation assumptions the average values of Juarez et al, and Rueda et al Forage composition for the CNCPS simulation assumptions the average values of Juarez et al, and Rueda et al Forage composition for the CNCPS simulation assumptions the average values of Juarez et al, and Rueda et al Forage composition for the CNCPS simulation assumptions the average values of Juarez et al, and Rueda et al Forage composition for the CNCPS simulation assumptions the average values of Juarez et al, and Rueda et al Forage composition for the CNCPS simulation assumptions the average values of Juarez et al, and Rueda et al Forage composition for the CNCPS simulation assumptions the average values of Juarez et al, and Rueda et al
Season CP() NDF () Lignin in DM Ashin DM NDF rate /hour Ether extract in DM
Season 1 9 67 5.5 12.7 8.6 3
Season 2 8 70 6 12 7.2 2.6
Season 3 8 71 6.5 11.5 7.2 2.2
Season 4 7 73 7 11 5.1 1.6
30 Inputs for the CNCPS, Magaña et al. 2002, 2006 and assumptions by the Yucatán panel of experts. Inputs for the CNCPS, Magaña et al. 2002, 2006 and assumptions by the Yucatán panel of experts. Inputs for the CNCPS, Magaña et al. 2002, 2006 and assumptions by the Yucatán panel of experts.
Item 1st lactation cows 2nd lactation cows Mature cows
Body weight, kg 400 460 500
Mature weight, kg 500 500 500
Calf body weight, kg 31.5 31.5 31.5
Calving interval, d 460(rainy) 500(dry) 420 420
Milk production early lactation, kg 4 (6.4) 4.5(7.2) 5(8)
Milk production mid-late lactation, kg 3(4.8) 3.3(5.3) 3.7(6)
31BCS change
- The next slide will be BCS change in each
season. - the CNCPS inputs
- Based on Delgado 2000 with our assumptions.
32Table 6 Table 6 Table 6 Table 6 Table 6 Table 6
Season 1(Calvingon June 1, the beginning of the rainy season) Season 1(Calvingon June 1, the beginning of the rainy season) Season 1(Calvingon June 1, the beginning of the rainy season) Season 1(Calvingon June 1, the beginning of the rainy season) Season 1(Calvingon June 1, the beginning of the rainy season) Season 1(Calvingon June 1, the beginning of the rainy season) Season 2 (Calving on August 1 at the middle of the rainy season) Season 2 (Calving on August 1 at the middle of the rainy season) Season 2 (Calving on August 1 at the middle of the rainy season) Season 2 (Calving on August 1 at the middle of the rainy season) Season 2 (Calving on August 1 at the middle of the rainy season) Season 2 (Calving on August 1 at the middle of the rainy season)
Parity Calving( 1 day) Early lactation(1-90 days after calving) Mid-late lactation(90-240 days after calving) Early dry Late dry Parity Calving(1day) Early lactation(1-90 days after calving) Mid-late lactation(90-240 days after calving) Early dry Late dry
1st 4.5 4 4 4.5 5 1st 5.5 4.5 4 5 6
2nd 4.5 4 4.5 5 5.5 2nd 6 5 4 5 6
Mature 4.5 4 4.5 5 5.5 mature 6 5 5 6 6
Season 3( Calving on October 1, the beginning of the dry season) Season 3( Calving on October 1, the beginning of the dry season) Season 3( Calving on October 1, the beginning of the dry season) Season 3( Calving on October 1, the beginning of the dry season) Season 3( Calving on October 1, the beginning of the dry season) Season 3( Calving on October 1, the beginning of the dry season) Season 4 (Calving on Feb 1 the middle of the dry season, the data is originally BCS change for the dry season) Season 4 (Calving on Feb 1 the middle of the dry season, the data is originally BCS change for the dry season) Season 4 (Calving on Feb 1 the middle of the dry season, the data is originally BCS change for the dry season) Season 4 (Calving on Feb 1 the middle of the dry season, the data is originally BCS change for the dry season) Season 4 (Calving on Feb 1 the middle of the dry season, the data is originally BCS change for the dry season) Season 4 (Calving on Feb 1 the middle of the dry season, the data is originally BCS change for the dry season)
Parity Calving( 1 day) Early lactation(1-90 days after calving) Mid-late lactation(90-240 days after calving) Early dry Late dry Parity Calving( 1 day) Early lactation(1-90 days after calving) Mid-late lactation(90-240 days after calving) Early dry Late dry
1st 6 5 4.5 4.5 5 1st 5 3.5 3.5 4 5
2nd 6 5 4.5 4.5 5.5 2nd 5 4 3 4 6
mature 6 5 4.5 4.5 5.5 Mature 6 5 4 4.5 6
33Analytical framework and preliminary results
- The results of the simulation (EB) are
combinations of - Energy requirements
- -Lactation (High especially in the early
stage) - -Pregnancy( low, but higher in the late
stage) - -BW or parity (growth rate, and
maintenance) - Energy supply
- -Grass (Season 1 is the best, and
Season 4 is the worst) - BCS change
- -Body tissue mobilization
- -Body tissue repletion
-
34Simulation 1
- Compare energy balance with and without body
tissue contribution (with and without BCS change
in each physiological stage) -
35Early lactation 3 mo in S4 S4 G100 T sup
17.72 -Btis(6-5)2.21 T req 22.43
-.Maint- 16.72 -Lac -
5.714 EB- Mius 4.72, The 2.21 Mcal helps the
cow
Early dry -3 mo in S3 G3100 T sup 19.59
T req 17.34 Maint-15.14 Pre - 0.79
to BT- 1.09 BCS(4-4.5) EB- (2.56)
Mid-late lactation -1 mo in S4 -2 mo in S1 -2 mo
in S2 G4G1G2122 T sup 19.99 From
BT(BCS5-4) -1.22 T req 19.32
Maint- 15.05 Lac - 4.23 Pre -
0.04 EB - (0.67)
Late dry -1 mo in S3 -2 mo in S4 G3G412 T
sup 18.428 T req 22.89 - Maint-15.28 - Pre
- 4.3 to BT- 3.35 BCS(4.5-6) EB (-4.46)
36Simulation 2, Which season is good for calving,
and which season should be avoided?
- I do not know exactly yet. More simulations are
needed. - To have a calf per year, cows must get pregnant
at 75 days after calving (The Brahmans pregnant
period in our study site is 290 d) - Energy Balance
- -Energy supply is different in seasons
- -Energy requirement is different in
physiological - stages
- BCS 5, at least needed at calving
-
- Prompt recovery is necessary from the postpartum
energy balance nadir to allow ovulation and
conception to occur -
-
-
37- E-Lac
- - 2 mo in S1
- - 1 mo in S2 G1G221
- Mi- lac
- -1 mo in S2
- - 4 mo in S3 G2G314
- E-Dry
- - 3 mo in S4 G4100
- L-Dry
- -1 mo in S4
- -2 mo in S1 G4G112
38Simulation 3, with Molasses (M) and Poultry Manure
- Some farmers feed 1 kg of M and PM for cows in
the lactation stage, and some cows in the dry
season , I am asking Fernando Duarte. - Both are by-product feeds
- - Molasses CP 4 , Fat 4.2,
Sugar 70 DM - -Poultry Manure CP 15.8 , Fat 0.5, and
Sugar 1.9 DM -
(Tedeschi et al., 2002) - M PM are added for the entire CI to see the
difference with and without M PM
39(No Transcript)
40Conclusion of simulation 1, 2 and 3
- The CNCPS predicts the energy balance included
the fluxes of the body tissue - Supplementation strategies would be needed for
all the seasons to achieve a 12 mo CI. I can not
still indicate the best season for the calving - Calving Season 4 looks not very good to achieve
the 12 mo CI - Season 4 grass (High NDF and lignin content
forage) constraints feed intake. - In our simulation, molasses and poultry manure
help cows in the dry season, but 1 kg of M and PM
is insufficient.
41Goals for shortening the CI
- Reach nadir as soon as possible after calving.
- Have cows in optimum BCS at calving.
- Need to achieve zero energy balance over the
reproductive cycle.
42Thank you