Formation and evolution of early-type galaxies - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Formation and evolution of early-type galaxies

Description:

Formation and evolution of early-type galaxies Pieter van Dokkum (Yale) – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:109
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 27
Provided by: Pieterva90
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Formation and evolution of early-type galaxies


1
Formation and evolution ofearly-type galaxies
  • Pieter van Dokkum (Yale)

2
Testing theories of galaxy formation
  • Early-type galaxies have highest halo/stellar
    masses provide strong constraints on galaxy
    formation models
  • or
    ?

3
Early-type galaxies at 0ltzlt1.5
  • Can be identified out to z1.5 (ACS/z)
  • Make up sizable fraction of Extremely Red
    Objects

Moustakas et al 2003
4
Early-type galaxies at 0ltzlt1.5
  • Can be identified out to z1.5 (ACS/z)
  • Until recently, mostly studied in clusters

RXJ0848 z1.27 vD Stanford 03
5
Early-type galaxies at 0ltzlt1.5
  • Can be identified out to z1.5 (ACS/z)
  • Until recently, mostly studied in clusters
  • Studies of colors, line strengths, Fundamental
    Plane stars formed at high redshift
  • e.g., Ellis et al. 1997, Bernardi et al 98,
    Stanford et al 95/98, van Dokkum et al 98,01,
    Treu et al 99,02,

6
Early-type galaxies at 0ltzlt1.5
  • Can be identified out to z1.5 (ACS/z)
  • Until recently, mostly studied in clusters
  • Studies of colors, line strengths, Fundamental
    Plane stars formed at high redshift
  • e.g., Ellis et al. 1997, Bernardi et al 98,
    Stanford et al 95/98, van Dokkum et al 98,01,
    Treu et al 99,02,
  • Only small differences between field and cluster
    galaxies contrary to expectations

7
Cluster versus field early-types
Datapoints vD et al 98,01, vD Ellis 03 see
also Treu et al 99,02 van der
Wel et al 03 Models Diaferio et al. 01
8
Early-type galaxies at 0ltzlt1.5
  • Remarkable agreement observationally early-type
    galaxies seem to have formed very early
  • Caveats
  • Results depend on IMF, metallicity, models
  • Progenitor bias may miss youngest progenitors
  • Assembly time may be (much) later than mean star
    formation epoch
  • Solution look for massive galaxies at zgt2

(vDFranx 01)
9
  • L Sb/c galaxy at z3 K ? 23, R ? 28
  • Would not be selected by any current method

10
Selecting optically-red zgt2 galaxies
  • Adopted criterion J-K gt 2.3
  • Models selects galaxies at z gt 2, ages larger
    than 500 Myr (in absense of dust)
  • Corresponds to U-V gt 0.1 in the rest-frame for
    galaxy at z 3 would select most nearby gals
  • Also expected
  • Dusty galaxies at z gt 2 (enhances break)
  • Extremely dusty galaxies at z lt 2

Franx et al. 03, van Dokkum et al. 03, Daddi et
al. 03
11
FIRES VLTISAAC 176 hours J,H,K imaging
MS 1054-03 Foerster-Schreiber et al. 04 5.4 x
5.4, seeing 045
HDF South Labbe et al. 03 2.4 x 2.4, seeing
045
12
Optically-red galaxies at zgt2
2
  • Substantial surface density
  • 0.8/arcmin to K21 (from both fields)
  • 2/arcmin to K22 (from HDF-S)
  • 3/arcmin to K23 (from HDF-S)

2 2 2
13
Optically-red galaxies at zgt2
  • Substantial surface density
  • 0.8/arcmin to K21 (from both fields)
  • 2/arcmin to K22 (from HDF-S)
  • 3/arcmin to K23 (from HDF-S)
  • SEDs very different from Lyman breaks

2 2 2
14
Foerster Schreiber et al., in prep
15
Optically-red galaxies at zgt2
  • Substantial surface density
  • 0.8/arcmin to K21 (from both fields)
  • 2/arcmin to K22 (from HDF-S)
  • 3/arcmin to K23 (from HDF-S)
  • SEDs very different from Lyman breaks
  • Spectroscopic redshifts tough - 11 so far

2 2 2
vD et al 03, Wuyts et al, in prep
16
Optically-red galaxy at z2.43
Keck/NIRSPEC, 1½ hrs vD et al, ApJ, submitted
17
Optically-red galaxies at zgt2
  • Substantial surface density
  • 0.8/arcmin to K21 (from both fields)
  • 2/arcmin to K22 (from HDF-S)
  • 3/arcmin to K23 (from HDF-S)
  • SEDs very different from Lyman breaks
  • Spectroscopic redshifts for 11 so far
  • Rest-frame optical spectroscopy SED fits
    massive, dusty, star-forming galaxies

2 2 2
vD et al 03, Wuyts et al, in prep
vD et al, ApJ, submitted Foerster Schreiber et
al, in prep
18
vD et al, ApJ, submitted
  • Best constrained parameter stellar (and dyn) mass

19
Comparison to other star forming galaxies
LIRGS Armus et al 1989
normal nearby galaxies Jansen et al 2000
Solar
20
Comparison to other star forming galaxies
21
Correlations with linewidth
  • Combining z3 LBGs and z2.6 ORGs linewidth
    correlates with color and stellar mass

vD et al, ApJ, submitted
22
Kinematics of massive galaxies at 0ltzlt3
vD et al, ApJ, submitted
23
Kinematics of massive galaxies at 0ltzlt3
Early-type
?
ERO
ORG
?
Spiral
LBG
24
Kinematics of massive galaxies at 0ltzlt3
Early-type
ERO
ORG
Spiral
LBG
25
Progenitors of early-type galaxies
  • Substantial population of massive galaxies at zgt2
    with rest-optical colors similar to normal nearby
    galaxies
  • Ideas have evolved rapidly .. not settled at all
    !
  • lt1996 Radio galaxies, EROs
  • 1996 Lyman breaks
  • 2000 Scuba sources, hard X-ray sources
  • 2003 K20 objects, ORGs (J-Kgt2.3)
  • 2004 Gemini Deep Deep Field galaxies

Franx et al 03, vD et al 03,04, Daddi et al 03,
Foerster Schreiber et al 04
26
Progenitors of early-type galaxies
  • Galaxies have optical breaks, and probably
    familiar metal lines in their rest-optical
    spectra
  • Absorption line studies stellar kinematics,
    masses
  • Presence of dynamically cold hot components
  • Diagnostics of stellar populations
  • Not possible with current instruments/telescopes
  • Keck 12 hrs to measure kinematics at z1.27
  • At z3 requires NIR capability (J/H sufficient)
  • JWST too small
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com