Henrieta Martonakova (henrieta.martonakova@undp.org) - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 33
About This Presentation
Title:

Henrieta Martonakova (henrieta.martonakova@undp.org)

Description:

Strategic Environmental Assessment for Environmental Mainstreaming Henrieta Martonakova (henrieta.martonakova_at_undp.org) – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:145
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 34
Provided by: lindaghan
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Henrieta Martonakova (henrieta.martonakova@undp.org)


1
Henrieta Martonakova(henrieta.martonakova_at_undp.
org)
Strategic Environmental Assessment for
Environmental Mainstreaming
2
Presentation Outline
  • Brief introduction to SEA
  • Latest developments
  • - in region
  • - UNDP
  • SEA and Biodiversity
  • SEA and Adaptation to Climate Change

3
  • SEA Range of analytical and participatory
    approaches to integrate environmental
    considerations into policy, plans and programmes
    and evaluate the inter linkages with economic
    and social considerations (OECD, 2006)
  • not a single, fixed and prescriptive approach
  • largely principle-based
  • continuous, iterative and adaptive
  • applied throughout the entire decision-making
    process
  • focused on strengthening institution and
    governance
  • adapted and tailor made

4
SEA is not
  • An approach for mainly developing environmental
    strategies, programmes and action plans, but
    rather for developing area based and sectoral
    plans, which take account of the objectives
    formulated in environmental strategies,
    programmes, etc.
  • A responsibility of the environmental ministries
    and authorities but rather of sectoral ministries
    and authorities responsible for area strategic
    development (regional government, municipality,
    etc.)

5
SEA Up-streaming environmental considerations
into the decision-making hierarchy
Source OECD. 2006. Applying Strategic
Environmental Assessment Good practice Guidance
for Development Co-operation.
6
Key entry points for SEA in country development
processes
Lead authorities Focus area/entry point Instruments (e.g.)
National Government and Cross-Sector Ministries (e.g. Departments of Finance/Planning) National-level overarching strategies, programmes and plans National Policy reforms and Budget Support programmes Poverty Reduction Strategy Papers (PRSPs) MDG-based National Development Strategies Development Policy Lending
Sector or Line Ministries (e.g. Mining, Health, Agriculture) National sectoral policies, plans or programmes (e.g. energy or health sector reform) Infrastructure investment plans and programmes Sector-Wide Approach (SWAp) Sector Budget Support Sector Policy Lending Loans Equity investments
Sub-national, regional and local Governments National and sub-national spatial development plans and programmes Technical assistance and investment
International/trans-boundary agencies Trans-National plans and programmes Technical assistance and investment
Source OECD. 2006. Applying Strategic
Environmental Assessment Good practice Guidance
for Development Co-operation.
7
SEA is effective if
  • Integrates environment in a cross-cutting manner
    to other sectors
  • Address broader social concerns is not only
    environment
  • Is a process integrated within the broader
    strategic national development planning process
  • Is adapted to national government specificities,
    and ensures capacity needs assessment and
    capacity building
  • Encourages broad and effective participation to
    ensure local ownership and innovation in the SEA
    process
  • Is reliable and relevant
  • includes economic and financial analysis of
    costs and benefits of policy measures

8
SEA in Europe and the CIS region
  • EC SEA directive in force from July 2004
  • UNECE SEA Protocol
  • - Signed by EU and SEE countries, Armenia,
    Georgia,
  • Moldova Ukraine
  • Ratified by Albania, Bulgaria and Czech Republic
    (in ECIS
  • region)
  • Accession indicated by Azerbaijan, Belarus and
    Kazakhstan

9
Belgrade SEA Initiative
  • Invited to be adopted by the Belgrade conference
    by Armenia, Belarus and Moldova
  • Main objective to support capacity development
    in EECCA
  • Priority actions related to Protocol
    implementation issues in EECCA
  • Development of effective SEA procedures
  • National transposition of the Protocol
    requirements
  • Development of appropriate SEA guidelines
  • Developing necessary capacities for SEA
  • Evaluating SEA processes
  • Explaining benefits of SEA to decision-makers
  • UNDP, UNECE and REC partnership
  • Initiating the Belgrade SEA Strategy
  • Organizing the' SEA side event at the Belgrade
    conference

10
OECD DAC Guidelines and Reference Series
Strategic Environmental Assessment Applications
in Development Co-operation
  • Produced by the OECD DAC Network on Environment
    and Development Co-operation Task Team on
    Strategic Environmental Assessment.
  • Task Team co-chaired by UNDP and Department for
    International Development (DfID), with over 25
    partners
  • Task Team received 2006 International Association
    for Impact Assessment Institutional Award for aid
    agency cooperation.

11
UNDP SEA Implementation Plan
  • .supporting UNDP environmental mainstreaming
    agenda
  • Outcomes
  • Supporting SEA application in development and
    implementation of (MDG-based) national and
    sub-national development strategies, policies,
    plans and programmes
  • Supporting SEA application for integrating
    environment and energy aspect into the UN and
    UNDP programming
  • Capacity development for SEA implementation both
    in countries of the region and within UNDP staff

12
UNDP comparative advantage for SEA support
  • Long and strong tradition in working with
    national and local governments since they are
    responsible for applying SEA in development of
    national and sub-national strategic documents
  • Wide and well established environmental portfolio
    (referring to GEF in particular) creating
    opportunities and entry points for SEA
    application on one hand and providing good
    substantive input for analytical part of the SEA
    process (needs assessment, impact assessment,
    etc.) on the other hand
  • Strong involvement of UNDP in the framework
    national and regional development programming
    (e.g. UNDP Crimea Integration and Development
    Programme and UNDP Upper Drina Regional
    Development Programme)

13
BRC SEA Focus
  • Support to the Belgrade SEA Initiative
    implementation
  • Capacity development for SEA application in the
    countries as well as within UNDP
  • Regional SEA training for trainers (South
    Caucasus and EE)
  • On-line SEA training for UNDP staff under
    development
  • SEA pilot projects Azerbaijan (spatial
    planning) Crimea (regional development strategy
    preparation)
  • Awareness raising on SEA benefits and potential,
    and on entry points for its application
  • Capacity development of COs in SEA application
    (training, fact sheets, guidelines)
  • Identification of potential national SEA
    interventions / projects and their implementation
  • Resource mobilization for national SEA
    interventions / projects and their implementation

14
Areas for COs support
  • Awareness raising on SEA benefits and potential,
    and on entry points for its application
  • Capacity development of COs in SEA application
    (training, fact sheets, guidelines)
  • Identification of potential national SEA
    interventions / projects and their implementation
  • Resource mobilization for national SEA
    interventions / projects and their implementation

15
SEA for mainstreaming Adaptation to Climate Change
16
SEA for Mainstreaming Adaptation to CC
  • Draws upon guidance in the Adaptation Policy
    Frameworks for Climate Change (APF) and in the
    OECD DAC Guidance on SEA
  • Objective
  • To support national development priorities
    through
  • improved policies, plans and/or programmes.
  • support climate change adaptation mainstreaming
  • leverage SEA frameworks in place

17
Rationale for SEA and APF combination
  • SEA supports the integration of adaptation
    measures and strategies simultaneously with other
    environment concerns national and sub-national
    development and sectoral strategies, policies,
    plans and programmes
  • More systematic consideration of climate change
    adaptation in strategic development planning
    processes as SEA is supported / required by
    national and even international legislation in
    many countries, expanding the usership of the APF
  • APF strengthens SEA by providing the explicit
    steps necessary for integrating future climate
    change risks and adaptation into the SEA process,
    helping to ensure that development policies and
    plans do not increase risks to the target system
    in the long term

18
SEA basic stages
  • Establishing the context for the SEA
  • - Screening
  • - Setting objectives
  • - Identifying stakeholders

2. Implementing the SEA - Scoping (in dialogue
with stakeholders) - Colleting baseline data -
Identifying alternatives - Identifying how to
enhance opportunities and mitigate impacts -
Quality assurance - Reporting
3. Informing and influencing decision-making -
Making recommendations (in dialogue with
stakeholders)
4. Monitoring and evaluating - Monitoring
decisions taken on the policy, plan or
programme - Monitoring implementation of the
policy, plan or programme - Evaluation of both
SEA and the policy, plan or programme
Source OECD. 2006. Applying Strategic
Environmental Assessment Good practice Guidance
for Development Co-operation.
19
SEA approach for adaptation mainstreaming-
examples of adaptation-related questions for each
SEA stage
  • Stage 1 Establish the context for the approach
  • What development objective(s) or outcome(s) are
    sought?
  • Are the objectives in line with national
    environmental
  • objectives and sustainable development policies?
  • What kind of information is available on
    environmental
  • challenges, climate change vulnerability and
    projected
  • impacts, and what does the information suggest?
  • On which time horizon are climate change risks
    expected?
  • Who are the stakeholders and how should they be
    engaged
  • in the SEA approach to Adaptation?
  • Is there a need for institutional strengthening
    and capacity building
  • on the SEA approach to Adaptation?

20
  • SEA approach for adaptation mainstreaming-
    examples of adaptation-related questions for each
    SEA stage
  • Stage 2 Implement the approach
  • What are the relevant criteria and indicators for
    the assessment?
  • What methods should be used to assess future
    vulnerability and
  • adaptation needs, characterize future
    climate-related risks, etc.?
  • What impacts will climate change likely have on
    the effectiveness
  • of the policy, plan and programme, and the target
    population?
  • What impacts will the policy, plan or programme
    have on
  • environmental sustainability and development
    outcomes?
  • What responses (options) would reduce climate
    risks impacts
  • and improve development outcomes?
  • What are the barriers, costs, and impacts of
    those options?
  • Are the views of stakeholders being included in
    the process?

21
  • SEA approach for adaptation mainstreaming-
    examples of adaptation-related questions for each
    SEA stage
  • Stage 3 Inform and influence decision-making
  • What are the main conclusions on adaptive
    measures?
  • Are there adequate mechanisms for these to be
    reflected in the
  • policy and decision-making process?
  • Are financial resources sufficient to implement
    the activities
  • identified as needed to ensure sustainability and
    other
  • development outcomes?
  • Stage 4 Monitor and evaluate
  • What is the strategy for reviewing, monitoring
    and evaluating
  • impacts?
  • What indicators will be used for monitoring? How
    will they be
  • tracked?

22
SEA may be applied for mainstreaming adaptation
in case of
  • Applying adaptation at national, sub-national and
    sectoral level (not at the project level)
  • Countries having legal obligations to apply SEA
  • Countries developing capacity for SEA application
    by implementing SEA pilot projects

23
Next steps for completing combined SEA APF
approach
  • Identify pilot projects for testing the approach
  • Revise the SEA approach to Adaptation methodology
    based on the gained experience
  • Publish and disseminate the SEA approach to
    Adaptation guidance, case studies,
  • Organize training
  • Draft technical paper on merging SEA and APF
    is available at EEG Staff Work Space
  • http//content.undp.org/go/bdp/eeg/Strategic-
    Environmental-Assessment

24
SEA for Mainstreaming Biodiversity
25
Overall objective of SEA
  • To ensure that the conservation and sustainable
    use of biodiversity is pursued as a fundamental
    objective of strategic decision-making.
  • To both advocate, to raise awareness of
    biodiversity issues, and to facilitate
    integration with environmental, social and
    economic considerations

26
Biodiversity triggers for SEA
  • Attention required when
  • area affected by a policy, plan or programme
    known to provide one or more important ecosystem
    services
  • policy, plan or programme concerned with
    interventions producing direct drivers of change
  • policy, plan or programme concerned with
    interventions affecting indirect drivers of
    change (e.g. trade policy, poverty reduction
    strategy, tax measures)

27
Examples of plans likely to require biodiversity
considerations
  • Poverty Reduction Strategies
  • National Park Management Plans
  • Offshore oil and gas licensing plans
  • Catchments or watershed management plans
  • Waste Management Plans
  • National or regional development plans
  • Sectoral development plans, e.g. for mining,
    tourism, transport, water resource management,
    farming, forestry
  • Integrated coastal zone management plans
  • Housing strategies

28
SEA has a mean to
  • build biodiversity objectives into plan
    development
  • provide an opportunity for those with an interest
    in, and responsibility for,
  • biodiversity to influence plan-development
  • identify biodiversity-friendly alternatives
  • focus on the longer term and larger scales
  • consider all the threats affecting biodiversity
    in an area, enabling identification
  • and assessment of cumulative threats and impacts
  • suggest effective mitigation strategies to ensure
    no net loss of biodiversity
  • throughout the development and implementation of
    plans, allowing sufficient
  • lead-time to ensure that effective mitigation
    can be put in place
  • establish monitoring to provide necessary
    biodiversity data and to enable
  • remedial measures to be taken.

29
SEA and the Convention on Biological Diversity
  • SEA requirement of the Convention (article 14,
    par. 1b)
  • Each Contracting Party, as far as possible and
    as appropriate, shall introduce appropriate
    arrangements to ensure that the environmental
    consequences of its programmes and policies that
    are likely to have significant adverse impacts on
    biological diversity are duly taken into account
  • Response to this requirement Voluntary
    Guidelines on Biodiversity-Inclusive Impact
    Assessment

30
Examples of biodiversity-related questions for
each SEA stage
  • Establishing the context for the SEA
  • Is the plan likely to have a significant effect
    on biodiversity?
  • What are relevant environmental / biodiversity
    policies and objectives and does the plan
    conflict with any of these?
  • Which biodiversity experts need to be involved?
  • 2. Implementing the SEA
  • What are the main biodiversity implications of
    the plan and its proposed
  • activities?
  • Do existing objectives for biodiversity
    incorporate all important biodiversity
  • interests relevant to this plan?
  • What data on biodiversity exist and who holds
    them? Are there additional data requirements to
    understand biodiversity impacts?
  • What are impacts on biodiversity associated with
    this plan and
  • alternatives?
  • What opportunities are there for avoiding impacts
    on biodiversity?

31
Examples of biodiversity-related questions for
each SEA stage
  • 3. Informing and influencing decision-making
  • Has consultation influenced the content and
    direction of the plan to benefit biodiversity
    interests?
  • 4. Monitoring and evaluating
  • What indicators/measures are to be used as a
    basis for monitoring biodiversity issues and who
    will be responsible for data collection?
  • Is there a high level of uncertainty about
    predicted impacts or plan outcomes for
    biodiversity? If so, recommend monitoring to
    reduce uncertainty.

32
Sources
  • Information on SEA and EIA for biodiversity,
    including case studies can be found in the
    Toolkit for
  • Capacity Building for Biodiversity-inclusive
    Impact Assessment
  • at
  • http//www3.webng.com/jerbarker/home/eia
    toolkit/overall/home.html

33
Voluntary Guidelines on Biodiversity-Inclusive
Impact Assessment
  • Endorsed by the eight meeting of the Conference
    of the Parties to the CBD in Curitiba, Brazil
    (20-31 March 2006)
  • Developed from initial applications of SEA and
    from initial practice lessons
  • Guidance on whether, when and how to consider
    biodiversity in both project- and strategic-level
    environmental assessments
  • Consider SEA as an approach for improving
    integration of national biodiversity strategy and
    action plans and national development strategies
    and promote the establishment of clear
    conservation targets through national
    biodiversity strategy and action plan process
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com