MOLECULAR GENETIC RELATIONSHIPS OF THE ZOKORS (RODENTIA, MYOSPALACINAE): ANALYSIS OF D-LOOP REGION POLIMORPHISM Tsvirka Marina1, Pavlenko Marina1, Korablev Vladimir1, Pang Junfeng2 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

MOLECULAR GENETIC RELATIONSHIPS OF THE ZOKORS (RODENTIA, MYOSPALACINAE): ANALYSIS OF D-LOOP REGION POLIMORPHISM Tsvirka Marina1, Pavlenko Marina1, Korablev Vladimir1, Pang Junfeng2

Description:

MOLECULAR GENETIC RELATIONSHIPS OF THE ZOKORS (RODENTIA, MYOSPALACINAE): ANALYSIS OF D-LOOP REGION POLIMORPHISM Tsvirka Marina1, Pavlenko Marina1, Korablev Vladimir1 ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:92
Avg rating:3.0/5.0

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: MOLECULAR GENETIC RELATIONSHIPS OF THE ZOKORS (RODENTIA, MYOSPALACINAE): ANALYSIS OF D-LOOP REGION POLIMORPHISM Tsvirka Marina1, Pavlenko Marina1, Korablev Vladimir1, Pang Junfeng2


1
MOLECULAR GENETIC RELATIONSHIPS OF THE ZOKORS
(RODENTIA, MYOSPALACINAE) ANALYSIS OF D-LOOP
REGION POLIMORPHISM Tsvirka Marina1, Pavlenko
Marina1, Korablev Vladimir1, Pang Junfeng2
  • 1Institute of Biology and Soil Science, Far
    Eastern Branch Russian Academy of Sciences,
    Vladivostok, 690022, Russia2Kunming Institute
    of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming,
    650223, Yunnan, China

2
(No Transcript)
3
PROBLEMS
  • Among others subterranean rodents, zokors
    (Myospalacinae) are still remains poorly studied
    in viewpoint of taxonomy and evolution. Recent
    molecular phylogenetic studies have demonstrated
    that zokors are closely related to Spalacinae and
    Rhyzomyinae in the family Spalacidae (Norris et.
    al, 2004 Jansa, Weksler, 2004)
  • However relationships among the species within
    Myospalacinae are not clearly understood.

4
PROBLEMS
Genus Myospalax Subgenus Myospalax M. myospalax
M. aspalax M. psilurus Subgenus Eospalax M.
rothschildi M. smithii M. fontanieri ( M.
f.cansus, M. f. rufescens ,
M. f. baileyi) (Corbet, 1991)
Genus Myospalax M. myospalax M. aspalax M.
psilurus Genus Eospalax M. rothschildi M.
smithii M. fontanieri M. cansus M. rufescens
M. baileyi (Zheng, 1994 )
5
Map of Zokors Distribution in the Russia
M. myospalax
M. psilurus
2n64
2n44
M. aspalax
2n62
2n62
M. armandii
6
Background
  • Professor N. N., Vorontsov prominent Russian
    biologist was initiator of study of fossorial
    rodents in Russia and adjacent countries
  • L. Martynova, N. Vorontsov, 1975. Population
    cytogenetic of Zokors Chromosomes
  • L. Martynova, 1976. Chromosomal differentiation
    of three species of zokors.
  • L. Martynova, I. Fomicheva, N. Vorontsov, 1977.
    Electrophoretic study of blood protein of zokors.

7
Electrophoretic patterns of transferrin (TF) of
zokors (Pavlenko Korablev, 2003 2005)
1
2
3
4
5
  • 1. Tf-A M. aspalax, Transbaikalia
  • 2. Tf-B M. psilurus, Primorye
  • 3. Tf-C M. psilurus, Transbaikalia
  • 4. Tf-C1 M. armandii
  • 5. Tf-D M. myospalax, Altai region

8
Map of Zokors Distribution in the China
M. fontanieri
M. cansus
M. baileyi
2n62
M. rufescens
2n62
M. smithii
M. rothschildi
9
  • C. Zhou and K. Zhou. The validity of different
    zokor species and the genus Eospalax inferred
    from mitochondrial gene sequences / Integrative
    Zoology 2008 3 290298.

Myospalax and Eospalax genera
10
Phylogenetic relationships of zokors based on the
RAPD-PCR analysis (Tsvirka et al., 2009)
M. psilurus
100
4 species groups within genus Myospalax
54
M. smithii
74
M. aspalax M. armandii
100
M. myospalax
11
Puzachenko A., Pavlenko M., Korablev V.
Craniological variability of the zokors
(Myospalacinae) with simplified first upper
molar. Abstracts of 11 International Conference
"Rodens et Spatium", 24-28 July 2008, Myshkin
(Russia). P.144 Puzachenko A., Pavlenko M.,
Korablev V. Variability of skulls in Zokors
(Rodentia,Miospalacinae) // Zool. Z. 2009. V. 88.
?1. P. 92-112.
  • 3 species groups with taxonomic ranks of the
    genera or subgenera
  • M. myospalax
  • M. aspalax and M. armandii
  • M. smithii and M. psilurus

12
The aims of the present study were
  • to determine the systematic position of Myospalax
    and Eospalax
  • to clarify the phylogenetic relationships among
    zokor species
  • to confirm or contradict the taxonomic position
    of M. armandii as a distinct species
  • to confirm or disprove previous data concerning
    genetic differentiation of Manchurian zokors M.
    psilurus from Khanka Plain and Transbaikalia.

13
MATERIAL
  • 54 specimens of 7 species from 30 different
    localities in Russia and China.
  • 1 specimen of Spalax judaei from GenBank was
    used as outgroup.

M. cansus
14
METHODS
Sequencing 5 end of the D-loop
  • Phylogenetic reconstructions using MEGA 4 (Tamura
    et al., 2007) Neighbor-Joining (NJ), Maximum
    Parsimony (MP), Minimum Evolution (ME),
    unweighted pair-group method with arithmetic
    averaging (UPGMA)
  • Calculation of genetic distances based on Kimura
    two-parametric (K2P) estimator.

15
RESULTS
  • The alignment of the mt DNA sequences of 7 taxa
    comprises 518 nucleotides.
  • 206 (40) nucleotides were variable.
  • 187 (36) nucleotides were parsimony informative.
  • The average ratio of transition/transvertion was
    3.58.

16
NJ and UPGMA trees of Zokors based on the D-loop
sequences (MEGA-4.1)
M. psilurus Primorye
M. psilurus
M. psilurus Zabaykalye
M. aspalax M. armandii
M. smithii M. cansus M. rufescens
M. myospalax
17
Interspecific relationships within the genus
Myospalax
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
1. M. cansus -
2. M. smithii 0.120 -
3. M. rufescens 0.123 0.062 -
4. M. aspalax 0.190 0.167 0.164 -
5. M. armandii 0.185 0.185 0.181 0.070 -
6. M. myospalax 0.225 0.226 0. 224 0.177 0.190 -
7. M. psilurus (?) 0.158 0.154 0.154 0.076 0.084 0.159 -
8. M. psilurus (?) 0.164 0.164 0.160 0.108 0.104 0.181 0.063 -
Estimate value of Kimura two-parametric distance
matrix for 8 taxa of Myospalax
18
Genetic distances for nuclear (RAPD) and
mitochondrial (D-loop) DNA
Distances RAPD D-loop
within species 0.05 0.003-0.028
within forms of M. psilurus 0.04-0.05 0.003
between species (M. aspalax - M. armandii M. smithii - M. rufescens) 0.08 0.062- 0.07
between two forms of M. psilurus 0.08 0.063
between distant species (Myospalax Eospalax) 0.25-0.35 0.154-0.226
between genera (Myospalax Spalax) 0.31 0.238-0.304
19
Conclusions
  • Our results didn't confirm the hypothesis of
    validity of the genus Eospalax suggested by Zhou
    and Zhou (2009). The all studied zokor species
    should be divided into 3 species groups within
    one genus Myospalax "myospalax",
    "psilurus-armandii-aspalax" and
    "smithii-cansus-rufescens".
  • The species within the "psilurus-armandii-aspalax"
    (M. psilurus, M. armandii, M. aspalax) as well
    as within "smithii-cansus-rufescens" (M. smithii,
    M. cansus, M. rufescens) groups were closely
    related among themselves. The M. myospalax,
    differs from the other species in chromosomal and
    molecular features, is more closely related with
    the first species group than the second one.
  • The hypothesis of species status of M. aspalax
    suggested on craniometrical analysis of zokors
    were confirmed (Puzachenko et al., 2009).
  • The hypothesis about the independent species
    status of two geographical populations of M.
    psilurus from Khanka Plain and Transbaikalia
    earlier suggested on t biochemical and
    karyological data (Pavlenko, Korablev, 2003) was
    also confirmed on the results of mt DNA analysis
    .

20
The Authors
Marina Pavlenko
Marina Tsvirka
Vladimir Korablev
Junfeng Pang
21
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The study was supported by the RFBR (grant nos.
06-04-39015) and FEBRAS (grant nos. s
09-III-?-138).
THANKS FOR YOUR ATTENTION
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com