EU Policy on the Abolition of the Death Penalty - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 19
About This Presentation
Title:

EU Policy on the Abolition of the Death Penalty

Description:

Title: Slide 1 Author: Sieber Andrea Last modified by: mod Created Date: 12/3/2004 3:36:59 PM Document presentation format: On-screen Show (4:3) Company – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:117
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 20
Provided by: Sieb89
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: EU Policy on the Abolition of the Death Penalty


1
EU Policy on the Abolition of the Death Penalty
  • European/World Day against the Death Penalty, 10
    October 2009
  • DG RELEX, Unit Human Rights and Democratisation
  • September 2009

2
Key messages
  • The European Union has a strong and principled
    position against the death penalty.
  • The abolition of the death penalty worldwide
    represents one of the main objectives of the EUs
    human rights policy. Where the death penalty
    still exists, the EU calls for its use to be
    progressively restricted and insists that it be
    carried out according to international minimum
    standards.
  • The EU uses all its available tools of diplomacy
    and cooperation assistance to work towards the
    abolition of the death penalty.
  • The EU is leading institutional actor and lead
    donor to the efforts by civil society
    organizations around the world in the abolition
    of the death penalty.

3
Europe
  • All EU Member States have abolished DP
  • In terms of regional ensembles, Europe is in a
    unique position - only Russia has yet to formally
    abolish DP and only Belarus still carries out
    executions.
  • Commitment under accession to Council of Europe
    to establish a moratorium and to ratify Protocols
    No 6 and 13 to the European Convention on Human
    Rights.

4
Global figures
  • 139 countries have abolished the death penalty in
    practice or in law.
  • 58 countries retain and use the DP, but the
    countries where executions are carried out is
    much smaller (according to Amnesty International,
    at least 2,390 people were known to have been
    executed in 25 countries during 2008, while 8864
    individuals were sentenced to death in 52
    countries).
  • In 2008, 93 per cent of all known executions took
    place in 5 countries - China, Iran, Saudi Arabia,
    the USA and Pakistan.

5
Global trends
  • Trend towards abolition. Over 55 countries have
    abolished the DP for all crimes since 1985. Most
    recently, Argentina, Uzbekistan, Burundi and Togo
    and the US State of New Mexico.
  • Once abolished, DP is seldom reintroduced. Since
    1985, only 4 abolitionist countries reintroduced
    DP.

6
International law
  • Death Penalty is not prohibited under
    International law
  • Its use is restricted UN ECOSOC minimum
    standards ban on execution of juvenile offenders
    (International Covenant on Civil and Political
    Rights (ICCPR) article 6, Convention on the
    Rights of the Child article 37).
  • International treaties providing for the
    abolition of DP
  • World-wide 2nd Optional Protocol to the ICCPR
    (peacetime).
  • Regional Protocol to the American Convention on
    Human Rights, Protocols No 6 and 13 to the
    European Convention on Human Rights.
  • International criminal law International
    Criminal Court Statute and International Criminal
    Tribunals for Rwanda/Former Yugoslavia exclude DP
    from the punishments the courts are authorised to
    impose.

7
Arguing against the Death Penalty
  • Imposition of the death penalty contravenes the
    right to life and the right not to be subjected
    to cruel, inhuman or degrading punishment.
  • The death penalty does not deter crime more
    effectively than other punishments.
  • Abolition of the death penalty does not lead to
    an increase in crime.

8
Arguing against the Death Penalty (2)
  • Miscarriages of justice, which are inevitable in
    any legal system, are irreversible.
  • Prisoners on death row can include juveniles,
    mentally ill or mentally retarded persons,
    pregnant mothers.
  • Cruel and inhuman execution methods (e.g.
    stoning).

9
EU DP Guidelines
  • Adopted in 1998 and revised in 2008, DP
    Guidelines form the basis for EU action.
  • Provide criteria for making general or individual
    representations outline minimum standards to be
    applied in countries retaining the death penalty.
  • A policy area where there is a strong EU
    consensus.
  • The EU is the only international actor to
    actively pursue the abolition of the DP as a
    policy goal.

10
EU DP Guidelines (2)
  • State that abolition of the death penalty
    contributes to the enhancement of human dignity
    and the progressive development of human rights.
  • Establish the EU objectives as
  • work towards universal abolition of the death
    penalty as a strongly held policy view agreed by
    all EU MS.
  • Where the death penalty still exists, to call for
    its use to be progressively restricted and to
    insist that it be carried out according to
    minimum standards.

11
EU DP Guidelines (3)
  • The EU to intensify its initiatives, including
    declarations or demarches on the DP, on
    international fora and towards other countries.
  • In 2008, the EU carried out numerous demarches
    worldwide (on individual cases, general use of
    the DP, UN General Assembly action).

12
EU DP Guidelines general demarches
  • The EU will raise the issue of DP in its dialogue
    with third countries (call for abolition, or at
    least a moratorium)
  • Demarche when policy of the third country is in
    flux/countries on the cusp campaign
  • Demarche or public statement where countries take
    steps towards abolition
  • Other initiatives may include human rights
    reporting, encouraging third countries to accede
    to international or regional instruments, raising
    the issue in multilateral fora, bilateral and
    multilateral co-operation, e.g. UN General
    Assembly (UNGA) Declaration 19 Dec. 2006, UNGA
    Resolutions 62/149 (18 December 2007) and 63/168
    (18 December 2008), EU and Council of Europe
    initiative for the European Day against the Death
    Penalty (10 Oct.)

13
EU DP Guidelines individual cases
  • The EU does not and cannot carry out demarches on
    all individual cases.
  • EU will consider a demarche only in cases which
    violate the UN minimum standards.
  • Speed and facts are essential.
  • Sources EU missions and Delegations,
    international and local NGOs.

14
EU DP Guidelines the UN minimum standards
  • Capital punishment may be imposed only for the
    most serious crimes (not for example for
    financial crimes, religious practice, expression
    of conscience, sexual relations between
    consenting adults, or as a mandatory sentence).
  • Capital punishment may not be imposed on
  • persons below 18 years of age at the time of the
    commission of the crime
  • pregnant women or new mothers
  • persons who have become insane.

15
EU DP Guidelines the UN minimum standards (2)
  • Capital punishment may be imposed only when guilt
    of the person charged is based upon clear and
    convincing evidence leaving no room for
    alternative explanation of the facts.
  • Due process/Fair trial (article 14 of ICCPR).
  • Effective right to appeal to a court of higher
    jurisdiction.
  • Right to seek pardon or commutation of the
    sentence.
  • Capital punishment must inflict the minimum
    possible suffering. It may not be carried out in
    public or in any other degrading manner.

16
EIDHR Fight against DP
  • Activities in support of the abolition of DP
    traditionally represent a key priority under
    EIDHR.
  • Activities include
  • raising awareness amongst the public and key
    opinion makers on the principal arguments against
    the DP
  • monitoring of conditions of implementation of DP
    and the application of minimum international
    standards
  • legal reform to limit the use of abolish DP and
    the provision of legal assistance to cases of
    particular concern
  • promotion of Second Optional Protocol to ICCPR.

17
EIDHR
  • EIDHR is the lead source of funding for
    abolitionist projects worldwide.
  • Solid track record In the past (starting 1994),
    the Commission funded over 30 projects worldwide,
    with an overall budget of over 15 million.
  • EIDHR 2007-10 In addition, following the last
    call for proposals, the EIDHR is currently
    allocating over 8 million to 16 abolitionist
    projects around the world.

18
Useful websites
  • DG RELEX http//ec.europa.eu/comm/external_relatio
    ns/human_rights/adp/index.htm
  • EuropeAid http//ec.europa.eu/europeaid/where/worl
    dwide/eidhr/index_en.htm
  • Death Penalty
  • Amnesty International www.amnesty.org
  • Human Rights Watch www.hrw.org
  • World Coalition Against the Death Penalty
    http//www.worldcoalition.org
  • Ensemble Contre la Peine de Mort
    www.abolition.fr

19
Contact points
  • COM focal points for EU policy against the death
    penalty
  • RELEX Christian BEHRMANN, B1 (policy, thematic
    input, EIDHR programming)
  • AIDCO Angela DELLA PORTA, F2 (EIDHR
    implementation and evaluation)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com