Negotiation Indices - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 10
About This Presentation
Title:

Negotiation Indices

Description:

The Issue of Distributive Justice and Thematic Balance Distributive Justice Traditional ODA neither involves ... Negotiation Indices Author: M ller Last modified by: – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:119
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 11
Provided by: Mll87
Learn more at: https://eurocapacity.org
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Negotiation Indices


1
ecbi
Lessons learnt and next steps in the negotiations
presented Benito Müller East and Southern
African Regional Workshop Hilton Hotel Nairobi
3 March 2010
european capacity building initiative initiative
européenne de renforcement des capacités
for sustained capacity building in support of
international climate change negotiations pour un
renforcement durable des capacités en appui aux
négociations internationales sur les changements
climatiques
2
The Issue of Distributive Justice and Thematic
Balance
  • Distributive Justice
  • Traditional ODA neither involves obligations to
    pay, not entitlements to receive. Hence, strictly
    speaking, there is no issue of contributing or
    receiving a fair share
  • The nature of financial payments for climate
    change activities, particularly in the case of
    adaptation and response to climate impacts is one
    of restitution.
  • Hence there are both obligations to pay and
    entitlements to receive, which implies that
    equity, in these sense of either shouldering a
    fair share of the payment burden, or receiving a
    fair share of the revenue is an issue.
  • At present, the focus really has only been of the
    former (e.g. Mexican and Swiss proposals). Few
    have raised the issue of how to distribute
    climate finance equitably.
  • Thematic Balance
  • Climate change finance involves a number of
    different themes (mitigation, adaptation
    ,technology transfer, etc. ), and the issue of
    thematic balance is whether each of these
    themes receives an appropriate share of the
    revenue.

3
Three Fundamental Dichotomies
Fragmented v. Consolidated Centralized v.
Decentralized Devolved v. Retained
(a) Retained, Fragmented, Decentralized (b)
Devolved, Consolidated, Decentralized (c)
Retained, Consolidated, Centralized
4
Centralized Decision Making The Problem of
Administrative Size
Multilateral Fund (0.19 people/m)
Global Fund (0.21 people/m)
Expected Size (0.2 people/m)
5
RFM Core Consolidation and Decentralization
through Devolution
UNFCCC Conference of Parties (COP)
External Audit
Operating Entity
Executive Board
Expert Advisory Panel(s) (as required)
Administrative Services
RFM Trustee
Thematic Assessment Units (one per disbursement
window)
Internal Audit
Secretariat Services
International Level
Domestic Level
Designated Funding Entities
Direct Access
Legend Governance Relation (under the authority
of) Contractual Relation (MOU or contract)
6
Funding versus Disbursement
  • Disbursements to Designated (National) Funding
    Entities
  • Funding is financing (incl. approval and
    evaluation) of activities such as projects,
    programmes)
  • Disbursements are dependent on the disbursement
    criteria for each theme, as well as the thematic
    allocations (both approved by the COP on
    recommendation by the EB). They do NOT rely on
    evaluations of projects, plans or strategies.
  • Disbursement Criteria
  • Disbursement criteria will vary from theme to
    theme. For example
  • Mitigation disbursements could be on a
    performance basis, with an flat per country
    component
  • x million y million for the MRV reduction in
    the previous period
  • Adaptation disbursements should be carried out by
    a very simple disbursement formula, e.g. a flat
    per country component a component proportional
    to the number of poor inhabitants.

7
RFM International Funding
  • The bulk of the transactions in terms of size of
    the RFM is (ultimately) meant to be carried out
    through money-in-money-out disbursements to
    designated (national) funding entities.
  • However, there will still be a need for
    international funding in the more traditional
    sense, such as currently developed under the
    Adaptation Fund.
  • For one, not all funding purposes lend themselves
    naturally to be devolved to the country level.
    While mitigation and adaptation per se would seem
    to be prime candidates for such a devolution,
    funding decisions for certain types of capacity
    building and technology transfer activities may
    be better kept at the international level.
  • Even with respect to the other themes, there will
    for some time to be the need to retain a more
    traditional international funding capacity, for
    it may take some time before all countries will
    be able to participate in the devolved
    disbursement regime.

8
The LCA Draft Decision
UNFCCC COP
Finance Board
Climate Fund/Facility
9
Coordination or Consolidation Potential for
Compromise?
UNFCCC COP
RFM Administration
Finance Board
International Level
Climate Fund/Facility
Operating Funding Entity 2 (Adaptation)
Operating Funding Entity I (Mitigation)
Administrative Services, incl. Thematic
Assessment Units
National Level
Designated Funding Entity
Legend Governance Relation (under the authority
of) Contractual Relation (MOU or contract)
Oversight and governance/contractual RFM
Operating Entity Disbursement/Certification
International funding/Coordination
10
  • Thank you!
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com