Emergency Communications Management - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Emergency Communications Management

Description:

Emergency Communications Management Jonathan Rood CIO and Associate VP, San Francisco State University Laine Keneller Business Continuity Planner & Project Manager, – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:307
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 17
Provided by: rpe97
Learn more at: https://www.educause.edu
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Emergency Communications Management


1
Emergency Communications Management
  • Jonathan Rood
  • CIO and Associate VP, San Francisco State
    University
  • Laine Keneller
  • Business Continuity Planner Project Manager,
  • University of California, Davis
  • Rodney Petersen
  • Government Relations Officer, EDUCAUSE

2
EDUCAUSE Western Regional Conference 2008
Planning for the UN-planned
  • Real time Connections
  • With Technology
  • Emergency Communications Management

3
  • Emergency Communications System
  • Great Expectations
  • Can notify 40K individuals in seconds
  • Will be able to explain exactly what action to
    take
  • Will know when to send updates and what
    information to include
  • Everyone will know what to do especially
    faculty, as students will turn to them in a
    crisis
  • Appropriate individuals will be available at the
    exact start of the emergency and be available to
    collaborate

4
  • Emergency Communications System
  • in Practice (Reality Check)
  • Takes time to make messages that are clear,
    instructive
  • Need many backups of responsible assigned staff
  • Overlapping messages may cause confusion
  • Txt and voice message must be brief but
    recipients have many questions
  • System is needed beyond initial incident Plan
    beyond the message, with pre-established roles
    for faculty, staff, managers
  • Message should follow pre-set guidelines which
    include
  • message delivery times
  • anticipated number of follow-up notices
  • user comprehension
  • type of emergency
  • understanding of pre-established leadership roles
  • all established procedures

5
  • System Requirements
  • More Than a Little Software
  • Extensive feature set, including
  • Schedule/send to multiple phones peer user plus
    text, e-mail, TTY
  • Group management
  • Reporting tools with statistical results
  • Contact administration for delete, add, change
  • Assurance that calls have priority routing
  • Hassle-free data upload with flexible attributes

6
Integration with Civic Infrastructure
  • Adoption of city / state emergency communication
    systems
  • Tap into civic services / notifications
  • Two-way communication call / response for
    skilled resources
  • e.g., need available electricians/nurses/language
    translators
  • Identification, notification, and authentication
    by skill/certification
  • Campus can both request and provide resources

7
  • Ready, Set,
  • Delivering a System
  • Need policies, procedures, task assignments
  • Whos involved? University Police, Information
    Technology, Human Resources, Public Relations /
    Communications, Enrollment Services and
    Registrations, Student Affairs, Health Center,
    Faculty Affairs, Administration Finance and
    more
  • Security of personal data and policies for use of
    contact data
  • Collecting datahow to encourage, mandate vs.
    opt-in
  • Testing, small, medium and full scale
  • Creating a feedback loop
  • Ongoing review process

8
UC Davis Emergency Notification System
  • UC Davis began RFP process in June of 2006
  • Committee representation from Police Department,
    Operations and Maintenance, Purchasing and IET
  • September 2007, the last phase in the purchase
    process was completed

9
We Have Your Number!
  • Chancellors Taskforce created in October 2007
  • API built from on-line directory to WARN
  • 54,000 records uploaded
  • December 2007, Chancellor sent email asking
    faculty staff to update contact info

10
Network Test
  • 5 separate tests
  • Clearly defined goals
  • 2 day time frame
  • 13,000 participants
  • Staff, Faculty Students

11
Interesting Test Facts
First message acknowledged 1 second from test
initiation
  • Speed of Delivery per Device
  • SMS Text Messaging / Cell
  • Email
  • Work Phones
  • Pagers

Number of emails delivered on campus within 5
seconds 76
  • March Incident Approx 55,000 emails sent and
    received within 16 minutes

12
Technical Issues Identified
  • Incoming carrier trunk capacity issues
  • Missing calls not received during test
  • Majority of pager messages not delivered
  • Approximately 800 emails unaccounted for

13
Whats Next?
  • Modify on-line directory to accept emergency
    information
  • Public Awareness Campaign
  • Determine ongoing testing schedule
  • In the absence of industry standards, need to
    establish UC System benchmark
  • What of population should be notified?
  • How soon should they be notified?
  • Continuous improvement

14
Implementation Tool Kithttp//vpiet.ucdavis.edu/e
ms/
  • Functional Requirements
  • RFP
  • Vendor Scoring Matrix
  • Chancellors Charter Letter
  • Emergency Notification Policy
  • Test Plan
  • Test Results
  • Communication Plan
  • FAQs

15
Discussion
  • Share your experiences and questions with your
    colleagues as together we sketch out a roadmap to
    providing this important service.
  • Who must be involved in the planning and
    management of these systems?
  • What policies are needed?
  • What is happening on your campus?
  • Other questions?

16
Resources
  • EDUCAUSE Emergency Communications Constituent
    Grouphttp//www.educause.edu/15272
  • EDUCAUSE Connect Emergency Notification
    Systemshttp//connect.educause.edu/term_view/Emer
    gencyNotificationSystems
  • NACUBO Campus Safety and Security
    Projecthttp//www.nacubo.org/x10053.xml
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com