Results - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Results

Description:

Title: No Slide Title Author: Benedikt Halld rsson Last modified by: jen Created Date: 11/13/2000 12:52:28 AM Document presentation format: Custom – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:25
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 2
Provided by: Bened73
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Results


1
Using a Modified Computer Version of the PASAT to
Induce Negative Affect in College Students
Melissa C. Beattie1, Shannon L. Leffler1, C.W.
Lejuez2, Jennifer P. Read1
1University at Buffalo, The State University
of New York, Buffalo, New York, 2University of
Maryland, College Park Presented at the 38th
Annual Meeting of the Association for Advancement
of Behavior Therapy
Discussion Across two different
measurement approaches, results provide support
for the use of the PASAT-C for induction of
stressed/negative affect in analogue studies with
college students. Examination of patterns of
responding on the AG by CES-D status offers some
modest evidence to suggest that the
mood Manipulation shows differential effects
based on general depressive symptomatology. While
Affect Grid valence scores actually increased
(toward more positive mood) from T1 to T2 in the
low depressive symptom group following the
negative MIP, negative mood scores increased in
the group who were higher on depressive symptoms.
This task may be of particular utility in that it
simulates the types of negative affect (i.e.,
performance-induced stress) which may commonly be
experienced by college students. The small
sample size for this study represents a
significant limitation, as it resulted in low
statistical power and limited our ability to
examine finer grained effects, such as
differential effects of the PASAT-C on mood by
gender or ethnicity. Future work will need to
replicate these findings with larger and
more diverse samples. References Lejuez, C. W.,
Kahler, C. W., Brown, R.A. (2003). A modified
computer version of
the Paced Auditory Serial
Addition Task (PASAT) as a laboratory-based
stressor. Behavior Therapist. 26(4), 290-293.
Orme, J. G, Reis, J. Herz, E. J. (1986).
Factorial and discriminant validity of the Center
for Epidemiological Studies Depression (CES-D)
scale. Journal of Clinical Psychology. 42(1),
28-33. Russell, J. A., Weiss, A., Mendelsohn,
G. A. (1989). Affect Grid A single-item scale of
pleasure and arousal. Journal of Personality and
Social Psychology. 57(3), 493-502. Watson, D.,
Clark, L. A., Tellegen, A. (1988). Development
and validation of brief measures of Positive and
Negative Affect The PANAS scales. Journal of
Personality and Social Psychology. 54(6),
1063-1070. This work was supported in part by a
grant from the National Institute on Alcohol
Abuse and Alcoholism to Dr. Jennifer Read
(R03AA014261 ).
  • I n t r o d u c t i o n
  • Analogue tasks that effectively elicit negative
    affect will facilitate laboratory examination of
    negative mood and related factors. Recent
    research suggests that the Paced Auditory Serial
    Addition Task (PASAT) may be used to induce
    negative mood in laboratory paradigms (Lejuez et
    al., 2003). The purpose of the present study was
    to assess the efficacy of a modified PASAT
    (PASAT-C) to induce negative mood in a sample of
    college students. Additionally, the present study
    examined whether reactivity to this mood
    induction varied by levels of baseline depressive
    symptomatology.
  • M e t h o d
  • Participants
  • Participants (N42, 12 males) were regularly
    drinking college students at a mid-sized
    university in the Northeastern United States.
    Participants varied in age from 18-24 years. The
    mean age was just over 20 years old (see Table 1
    below). The majority (n37, 88.1) of
    participants were White. Approximately
    three-quarters of the participants (n33, 78.5)
    reported being upperclassmen.
  • Method (Cont)
  • Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS
    Watson et al., 1988).
  • - Two dimensional measure
  • - 20 items assess positive (10 items) and
    negative (10 items) affect
  • - Indication of affect at present time (i.e.,
    right now)
  • - Continuously rated on Likert-type scale
    range 1-5
  • Center for Epidemiological Studies-Depression
    Scale (CES-D Orme et al. 1986).
  • -22 items to assess depressive symptomatology
  • - Items rated separately on Likert-type scale
    (0-3) depending on
  • frequency of symptom occurrence
  • - Higher scores indicative of greater
    depression
  • - Coefficient alpha .78
  • Procedure
  • One-hour experimental sessions were conducted
    individually. Participants were required to
    complete self-report questionnaires and a series
    of computerized tasks. At the beginning of each
    session, baseline self report assessments of mood
    were administered. Following baseline assessment
    of mood, participants were randomly assigned to
    complete a modified version of the computerized
    PASAT (PASAT-C Lejuez et al 2003) designed to
    induce a stressed mood, or to a timed arithmetic
    task designed to elicit a neutral mood. The
    PASAT-C stressor task required participants to
    view a series of numbers sequentially on a
    computer monitor and to add the two most recently
    viewed numbers at increasing speeds thus inducing
    psychological stress. Participants also were
    given bogus normative feedback regarding their
    performance in order to increase their level of
    distress. Following the induction task,
    participants were then re-administered the two
    state mood measures. Informed consent was
    obtained at the beginning of each experimental
    session.
  • Analytic strategy
  • Separate analyses of covariance (ANCOVA)
    with the PANAS and Affect Grid measures were
    conducted to assess the efficacy of the PASAT-C
    in eliciting negative mood. Scores on the CES-D
    were included in the models as an independent
    variable to examine the influence of baseline
    depressive
  • symptomatology on mood outcomes. Baseline
    (pre-mood induction) mood was the covariate in
    these analyses. In exploratory analyses, we
    examined patterns of effect of mood induction
    paradigm (MIP) by high and low CES-D scores.

Results PASAT Mood Manipulation PANAS Outcomes.
Results of the ANCOVA with PANAS as the dependent
variable revealed a significant main effect for
mood condition, F(1,34)5.3, plt.05, with those in
the negative mood condition reporting higher
levels of general negative mood on the PANAS mood
subscale after controlling for baseline negative
mood (see Figure 1 below). We found no main
effect for depressive symptoms (CES-D) on mood
outcomes. Affect Grid Outcomes.
ANCOVA results with the Affect Grid as the
dependent variable, though only marginally
significant, yielded similar findings to those of
with the PANAS as a dependent variable. Those
assigned to the PASAT-C negative mood
manipulation reported greater negatively-valenced
affect post MIP than those in the neutral
condition, F(1,35)3.5, p.07 (see Figure 2). In
these analyses, we also found a significant main
effect for CES-D scores, F(1,35) 5.0, plt.05.
Though sample size prohibited sufficient
statistical power to examine interaction effects,
we examined differences in Affect Grid scores by
MIP condition based on a median split of CES-D
scores to explore patterns of effects. These are
presented in Figure 3.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com