Title: Delivering trees to farmers: improving strategies for germplasm supply
1Delivering trees to farmers improving strategies
for germplasm supply Session 2.3. Particular
issues for germplasm access, quality and
management at a smallholder farm level Tuesday
30 October 2007
2Introduction
- Particular features of smallholder agroforestry
systems that are constraints on tree germplasm
supply and quality - Will consider tree spatial distributions and
germplasm management practices by smallholders - Why do we need to consider these issues? Since
they need to be understood in order to develop
appropriate interventions at a local level
3Introduction
- We are interested particularly in considering the
implications of distributions and management
practices for diversification in order to
understand how to enable farmers to diversify
their businesses and environment through planting
a greater variety of trees of appropriate quality - Will focus on example of work done in East Africa
can consider if similar elsewhere
4Tree spatial distributions
- Farm tree inventories tell us that
- There are often many tree species in the farm
landscape, but these often show very aggregated
distributions. Sometimes aggregation can be at a
community (between village) level - There are many tree species in the farm landscape
but most are at very low (sometimes extremely
low) densities
5Tree spatial distributions
- In a recent survey in Kenya, more than 300 tree
species were observed, but 75 of species had
densities of less than one seeding tree per
hectare. More than 50 of species, primarily
indigenous, had a density of less than 0.25 trees
per hectare - The exception on low density is for a few
dominant species. These are generally exotic,
although, more rarely, can be indigenous.
Sometimes these taxa dominate simply because
germplasm of these is the most readily available
6Tree spatial distributions
- Some of the consequences are
- As farmers often must rely on on-farm sources for
their germplasm (often the only sources currently
available to them), low densities and aggregation
lead to limited access to a diversity of species
(and associated information) at an individual
farmer level - As densities are often very low, trees may not
set seed (many species need a mate to breed
with!)
7Tree spatial distributions
- The final result is
- It is difficult for farmers to plant a wider
range of species to diversify their businesses,
even if they would like to
8Germplasm management practices
- Nursery and farmer germplasm source surveys tell
us that - Once trees have become established on farms,
farmers often rely on these for further supply of
germplasm for subsequent planting rounds (one
off introductions) - When undertaking germplasm collection, farmers
and nursery managers tend to collect from only a
small number of trees
9Germplasm management practices
- In a recent survey in East Africa, seed to
establish nursery lots was collected from an
average of only 6 trees. In 22 of cases, seed to
establish nursery populations was sampled from
only a single tree
10Germplasm management practices
- Some of the consequences are
- The genetic base of tree species in farm
landscapes, which may already be low, will become
increasingly narrow. This narrowing may result in
productivity losses many tree species suffer
from inbreeding depression, resulting in loss in
growth, loss in fruit production, etc. - A narrowing of genetic variation also results in
a loss of adaptability to various pests/diseases,
and an inability to respond to changing markets
11Germplasm management practices
- The final result is
- Farmers begin to experience lower productivity
from the individual tree species that they
cultivate. Ultimately, this may result in the
loss of functionality, and hence value, of entire
farm ecosystems
12Possible interventions at a local level
- How can we address the limitations imposed by
- Aggregation
- Low tree density
- Limited collection of mother trees
- Limited new introductions
- ?
13Exercise possible interventions at a local level
- What possible interventions can be applied to
address these limitations? - Table groups meet for discussion for 15 min
- Choose a reporter and very briefly discuss
results in plenary two key interventions only