MA in English Linguistics Experimental design and statistics - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

MA in English Linguistics Experimental design and statistics

Description:

MA in English Linguistics Experimental design and statistics Sean Wallis Survey of English Usage University College London s.wallis_at_ucl.ac.uk – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:182
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 70
Provided by: SeanW150
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: MA in English Linguistics Experimental design and statistics


1
MA in English LinguisticsExperimental design and
statistics
Sean Wallis Survey of English Usage University
College London s.wallis_at_ucl.ac.uk
2
Outline
  • What is a research question?
  • Choice and baselines
  • Making sense of probability
  • Observing change in a corpus
  • Drawing inferences to larger populations
  • Estimating error in observations
  • Testing results for significance

3
What is a research question?
  • You may have heard this phrase last term
  • What do you think we mean by a research
    question?
  • Can you think of any examples?

4
Examples
  • Some example research questions

5
Examples
  • Some example research questions
  • smoking is good for you

6
Examples
  • Some example research questions
  • smoking is good for you
  • dropped objects accelerate toward the ground at
    9.8 metres per second squared

7
Examples
  • Some example research questions
  • smoking is good for you
  • dropped objects accelerate toward the ground at
    9.8 metres per second squared
  • s is a clitic rather than a word

8
Examples
  • Some example research questions
  • smoking is good for you
  • dropped objects accelerate toward the ground at
    9.8 metres per second squared
  • s is a clitic rather than a word
  • the word shall is used less often in recent years

9
Examples
  • Some example research questions
  • smoking is good for you
  • dropped objects accelerate toward the ground at
    9.8 metres per second squared
  • s is a clitic rather than a word
  • the word shall is used less often in recent years
  • the degree of preference for shall rather than
    will has declined in British English over the
    period 1960s-1990s

10
Testable hypotheses
  • An hypothesis a testable research question
  • Compare
  • the word shall is used less in recent years
  • to
  • the degree of preference for shall rather than
    will has declined in British English over the
    period 1960s-1990s
  • How could you test these hypotheses?

11
Questions of choice
  • Suppose we wanted to test the following
    hypothesis using DCPSE
  • the word shall is used less in recent years
  • When we say the word shall is used less...
  • ...less compared to what?
  • traditionally corpus linguists have normalised
    data as a proportion of words (so we might say
    shall is used less frequently per million words)
  • But what might this mean?

12
Questions of choice
  • From the speakers perspective
  • The probability of a speaker using a word like
    shall depends on whether they had the opportunity
    to say it in the first place
  • They were about to say will, but said shall
    instead

13
Questions of choice
  • From the speakers perspective
  • The probability of a speaker using a word like
    shall depends on whether they had the opportunity
    to say it in the first place
  • They were about to say will, but said shall
    instead
  • Per million words might still be relevant from
    the hearers perspective

14
Questions of choice
  • From the speakers perspective
  • The probability of a speaker using a word like
    shall depends on whether they had the opportunity
    to say it in the first place
  • They were about to say will, but said shall
    instead
  • Per million words might still be relevant from
    the hearers perspective
  • If we can identify all points where the choice
    arose, we have an ideal baseline for studying
    linguistic choices made by speakers/writers.

15
Questions of choice
  • From the speakers perspective
  • The probability of a speaker using a word like
    shall depends on whether they had the opportunity
    to say it in the first place
  • They were about to say will, but said shall
    instead
  • Per million words might still be relevant from
    the hearers perspective
  • If we can identify all points where the choice
    arose, we have an ideal baseline for studying
    linguistic choices made by speakers/writers.
  • Can all cases of will be replaced by shall ?
  • What about second or third person shall ?

16
Baselines
  • The baseline is a central element of the
    hypothesis
  • Changes are always relative to something
  • You can get different results with different
    baselines
  • Different baselines imply different conclusions
  • We have seen two different kinds of baselines
  • A word baseline
  • shall per million words
  • A choice baseline (an alternation experiment)
  • shall as a proportion of the choice shall vs.
    will (includingll ), when the choice arises

17
Baselines
  • In many cases it is very difficult to identify
    all cases where the choice arises
  • e.g. studying modal verbs

18
Baselines
  • In many cases it is very difficult to identify
    all cases where the choice arises
  • e.g. studying modal verbs
  • You may need to pick a different baseline
  • Be as specific as you can
  • words ? VPs ? tensed VPs ? alternating modals

19
Baselines
  • In many cases it is very difficult to identify
    all cases where the choice arises
  • e.g. studying modal verbs
  • You may need to pick a different baseline
  • Be as specific as you can
  • words ? VPs ? tensed VPs ? alternating modals

alternation different words, same meaning
20
Baselines
  • In many cases it is very difficult to identify
    all cases where the choice arises
  • e.g. studying modal verbs
  • You may need to pick a different baseline
  • Be as specific as you can
  • words ? VPs ? tensed VPs ? alternating modals
  • Other hypotheses imply different baselines
  • Different meanings of the same word
  • e.g. uses of very, as a proportion of all cases
    of very
  • very N - the very person
  • very ADJ - the very tall person
  • very ADV - very slightly moving

alternation different words, same meaning

semasiologicalvariation
21
Probability
  • We are used to concepts like these being
    expressed as numbers
  • length (distance, height)
  • area
  • volume
  • temperature
  • wealth (income, assets)

22
Probability
  • We are used to concepts like these being
    expressed as numbers
  • length (distance, height)
  • area
  • volume
  • temperature
  • wealth (income, assets)
  • We are going to discuss another concept
  • probability (proportion, percentage)

23
Probability
  • Based on another, even simpler, idea
  • probability p x / n

24
Probability
  • Based on another, even simpler, idea
  • probability p x / n
  • e.g. the probability that the speaker says will
    instead of shall

25
Probability
  • Based on another, even simpler, idea
  • probability p x / n
  • where
  • frequency x (often, f )
  • the number of times something actually happens
  • the number of hits in a search
  • e.g. the probability that the speaker says will
    instead of shall

26
Probability
  • Based on another, even simpler, idea
  • probability p x / n
  • where
  • frequency x (often, f )
  • the number of times something actually happens
  • the number of hits in a search
  • e.g. the probability that the speaker says will
    instead of shall
  • cases of will

27
Probability
  • Based on another, even simpler, idea
  • probability p x / n
  • where
  • frequency x (often, f )
  • the number of times something actually happens
  • the number of hits in a search
  • baseline n is
  • the number of times something could happen
  • the number of hits
  • in a more general search
  • in several alternative patterns (alternate
    forms)
  • e.g. the probability that the speaker says will
    instead of shall
  • cases of will

28
Probability
  • Based on another, even simpler, idea
  • probability p x / n
  • where
  • frequency x (often, f )
  • the number of times something actually happens
  • the number of hits in a search
  • baseline n is
  • the number of times something could happen
  • the number of hits
  • in a more general search
  • in several alternative patterns (alternate
    forms)
  • e.g. the probability that the speaker says will
    instead of shall
  • cases of will
  • total will shall

29
Probability
  • Based on another, even simpler, idea
  • probability p x / n
  • where
  • frequency x (often, f )
  • the number of times something actually happens
  • the number of hits in a search
  • baseline n is
  • the number of times something could happen
  • the number of hits
  • in a more general search
  • in several alternative patterns (alternate
    forms)
  • Probability can range from 0 to 1
  • e.g. the probability that the speaker says will
    instead of shall
  • cases of will
  • total will shall

30
A simple research question
  • What happens to modal shall vs. will over time
    in British English?
  • Does shall increase or decrease?
  • What do you think?
  • How might we find out?

31
Lets get some data
  • Open DCPSE with ICECUP
  • FTF query for first person declarative shall
  • repeat for will

32
Lets get some data
  • Open DCPSE with ICECUP
  • FTF query for first person declarative shall
  • repeat for will
  • Corpus Map
  • DATE


Do the first set of queries and then drop into
Corpus Map
33
Modal shall vs. will over time
  • Plotting probability of speaker selecting modal
    shall out of shall/will over time (DCPSE)

1.0
p(shall shall, will)
shall 100
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
shall 0
0.0
1955
1960
1965
1970
1975
1980
1985
1990
1995
(Aarts et al., 2013)
34
Modal shall vs. will over time
  • Plotting probability of speaker selecting modal
    shall out of shall/will over time (DCPSE)

1.0
p(shall shall, will)
shall 100
0.8
0.6
0.4
Is shall going up or down?
0.2
shall 0
0.0
1955
1960
1965
1970
1975
1980
1985
1990
1995
(Aarts et al., 2013)
35
Is shall going up or down?
  • Whenever we look at change, we must ask ourselves
    two things

36
Is shall going up or down?
  • Whenever we look at change, we must ask ourselves
    two things
  • What is the change relative to?
  • What is our baseline for comparison?
  • In this case we ask
  • Does shall decrease relative to shall will ?

37
Is shall going up or down?
  • Whenever we look at change, we must ask ourselves
    two things
  • What is the change relative to?
  • What is our baseline for comparison?
  • In this case we ask
  • Does shall decrease relative to shall will ?
  • How confident are we in our results?
  • Is the change big enough to be reproducible?

38
The sample and the population
  • The corpus is a sample

39
The sample and the population
  • The corpus is a sample
  • If we ask questions about the proportions of
    certain words in the corpus
  • We ask questions about the sample
  • Answers are statements of fact

40
The sample and the population
  • The corpus is a sample
  • If we ask questions about the proportions of
    certain words in the corpus
  • We ask questions about the sample
  • Answers are statements of fact
  • Now we are asking about British English

?
41
The sample and the population
  • The corpus is a sample
  • If we ask questions about the proportions of
    certain words in the corpus
  • We ask questions about the sample
  • Answers are statements of fact
  • Now we are asking about British English
  • We want to draw an inference
  • from the sample (in this case, DCPSE)
  • to the population (similarly-sampled BrE
    utterances)
  • This inference is a best guess
  • This process is called inferential statistics

42
Basic inferential statistics
  • Suppose we carry out an experiment
  • We toss a coin 10 times and get 5 heads
  • How confident are we in the results?
  • Suppose we repeat the experiment
  • Will we get the same result again?

43
Basic inferential statistics
  • Suppose we carry out an experiment
  • We toss a coin 10 times and get 5 heads
  • How confident are we in the results?
  • Suppose we repeat the experiment
  • Will we get the same result again?
  • Lets try
  • You should have one coin
  • Toss it 10 times
  • Write down how many heads you get
  • Do you all get the same results?

44
The Binomial distribution
  • Repeated sampling tends to form a Binomial
    distribution around the expected mean X

F
  • We toss a coin 10 times, and get 5 heads

N 1
X
x
45
The Binomial distribution
  • Repeated sampling tends to form a Binomial
    distribution around the expected mean X

F
  • Due to chance, some samples will have a higher or
    lower score

N 4
X
x
46
The Binomial distribution
  • Repeated sampling tends to form a Binomial
    distribution around the expected mean X

F
  • Due to chance, some samples will have a higher or
    lower score

N 8
X
x
47
The Binomial distribution
  • Repeated sampling tends to form a Binomial
    distribution around the expected mean X

F
  • Due to chance, some samples will have a higher or
    lower score

N 12
X
x
48
The Binomial distribution
  • Repeated sampling tends to form a Binomial
    distribution around the expected mean X

F
  • Due to chance, some samples will have a higher or
    lower score

N 16
X
x
49
The Binomial distribution
  • Repeated sampling tends to form a Binomial
    distribution around the expected mean X

F
  • Due to chance, some samples will have a higher or
    lower score

N 20
X
x
50
The Binomial distribution
  • Repeated sampling tends to form a Binomial
    distribution around the expected mean X

F
  • Due to chance, some samples will have a higher or
    lower score

N 26
X
x
51
The Binomial distribution
  • It is helpful to express x as the probability of
    choosing a head, p, with expected mean P
  • p x / n
  • n max. number of possible heads (10)
  • Probabilities are inthe range 0 to 1
  • percentages (0 to 100)

F
P
p
52
The Binomial distribution
  • Take-home point
  • A single observation, say x hits (or p as a
    proportion of n possible hits) in the corpus, is
    not guaranteed to be correct in the world!
  • Estimating the confidence you have in your
    results is essential

F
p
P
p
53
The Binomial distribution
  • Take-home point
  • A single observation, say x hits (or p as a
    proportion of n possible hits) in the corpus, is
    not guaranteed to be correct in the world!
  • Estimating the confidence you have in your
    results is essential
  • We want to makepredictions about future runs of
    the same experiment

F
p
P
p
54
Binomial ? Normal
  • The Binomial (discrete) distribution is close to
    the Normal (continuous) distribution

F
x
55
Binomial ? Normal
  • Any Normal distribution can be defined by only
    two variables and the Normal function z

? population mean P
? standard deviationS ? P(1 P) / n
F
  • With more data in the experiment, S will be
    smaller

z . S
z . S
0.5
0.3
0.1
0.7
p
56
Binomial ? Normal
  • Any Normal distribution can be defined by only
    two variables and the Normal function z

? population mean P
? standard deviationS ? P(1 P) / n
F
z . S
z . S
  • 95 of the curve is within 2 standard deviations
    of the expected mean
  • the correct figure is 1.95996!
  • the critical value of z for an error level of
    0.05.

2.5
2.5
95
0.5
0.3
0.1
0.7
p
57
The single-sample z test...
  • Is an observation p gt z standard deviations from
    the expected (population) mean P?
  • If yes, p is significantly different from P

F
observation p
z . S
z . S
0.25
0.25
P
0.5
0.3
0.1
0.7
p
58
...gives us a confidence interval
  • P z . S is the confidence interval for P
  • We want to plot the interval about p

F
z . S
z . S
0.25
0.25
P
0.5
0.3
0.1
0.7
p
59
...gives us a confidence interval
  • P z . S is the confidence interval for P
  • We want to plot the interval about p

60
...gives us a confidence interval
  • The interval about p is called the Wilson score
    interval

observation p
  • This interval reflects the Normal interval about
    P
  • If P is at the upper limit of p,p is at the
    lower limit of P

F
w
w
(Wallis, 2013)
P
0.25
0.25
0.5
0.3
0.1
0.7
p
61
Modal shall vs. will over time
  • Simple test
  • Compare p for
  • all LLC texts in DCPSE (1956-77) with
  • all ICE-GB texts (early 1990s)
  • We get the following data
  • We may plot the probabilityof shall being
    selected,with Wilson intervals

p(shall shall, will)
62
Modal shall vs. will over time
  • Simple test
  • Compare p for
  • all LLC texts in DCPSE (1956-77) with
  • all ICE-GB texts (early 1990s)
  • We get the following data
  • We may plot the probabilityof shall being
    selected,with Wilson intervals

May be input in a 2 x 2 chi-square test
- or you can check Wilson intervals
63
Modal shall vs. will over time
  • Plotting modal shall/will over time (DCPSE)
  • Small amounts of data / year

1.0
p(shall shall, will)
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0.0
1955
1960
1965
1970
1975
1980
1985
1990
1995
64
Modal shall vs. will over time
  • Plotting modal shall/will over time (DCPSE)
  • Small amounts of data / year
  • Confidence intervals identify the degree of
    certainty in our results

1.0
p(shall shall, will)
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0.0
1955
1960
1965
1970
1975
1980
1985
1990
1995
65
Modal shall vs. will over time
  • Plotting modal shall/will over time (DCPSE)
  • Small amounts of data / year
  • Confidence intervals identify the degree of
    certainty in our results
  • Highly skewed p in some cases
  • p 0 or 1 (circled)

66
Modal shall vs. will over time
  • Plotting modal shall/will over time (DCPSE)
  • Small amounts of data / year
  • Confidence intervals identify the degree of
    certainty in our results
  • We can now estimate an approximate downwards curve

(Aarts et al., 2013)
67
Recap
  • Whenever we look at change, we must ask ourselves
    two things
  • What is the change relative to?
  • Is our observation higher or lower than we might
    expect
  • In this case we ask
  • Does shall decrease relative to shall will ?
  • How confident are we in our results?
  • Is the change big enough to be reproducible?

68
Conclusions
  • An observation is not the actual value
  • Repeating the experiment might get different
    results
  • The basic idea of inferential statistics is
  • Predict range of future results if experiment was
    repeated
  • Significant effect gt 0 (e.g. 19 times out of
    20)
  • Based on the Binomial distribution
  • Approximated by Normal distribution many uses
  • Plotting confidence intervals
  • Use goodness of fit or single-sample z tests to
    compare an observation with an expected baseline
  • Use 2?2 tests or independent-sample z tests to
    compare two observed samples

69
References
  • Aarts, B., Close, J., and Wallis, S.A. 2013.
    Choices over time methodological issues in
    investigating current change. Chapter 2 in Aarts,
    B. Close, J., Leech G., and Wallis, S.A. (eds.)
    The Verb Phrase in English. Cambridge University
    Press.
  • Wallis, S.A. 2013. Binomial confidence intervals
    and contingency tests. Journal of Quantitative
    Linguistics 203, 178-208.
  • Wilson, E.B. 1927. Probable inference, the law of
    succession, and statistical inference. Journal of
    the American Statistical Association 22 209-212
  • NOTE Statistics papers, more explanation,
    spreadsheets etc. are published on
    corp.ling.stats blog http//corplingstats.wordpre
    ss.com
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com