Making Sense of the Math Revisions - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 41
About This Presentation
Title:

Making Sense of the Math Revisions

Description:

Making Sense of the Math Revisions George W. Bright, Ph.D. Special Assistant to the Superintendent OSPI George.Bright_at_k12.wa.us – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:135
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 42
Provided by: wer103
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Making Sense of the Math Revisions


1
Making Sense of the Math Revisions
  • George W. Bright, Ph.D.
  • Special Assistant to the Superintendent
  • OSPI
  • George.Bright_at_k12.wa.us

2
Overview of the Session
  • National Mathematics Advisory Panel
  • Legislative Actions Graduation Requirements
  • Revised Mathematics Standards Feb 29 version
  • Platter Review and Recommendations
  • Digging into the Revised Standards

3
National Mathematics Advisory Panel
  • Final Report released on March 13, 2008.
  • 45 Recommendations and Findings
  • Major Topics of School Algebra
  • Critical Foundations of Algebra
  • Benchmarks for the Critical Foundations

4
National Mathematics Advisory PanelK-8 Curriculum
  • The mathematics curriculum in Grades PreK8
    should be streamlined and should emphasize a
    well-defined set of the most critical topics in
    the early grades.

5
National Mathematics Advisory PanelInstruction
  • Instructional practice should be informed by
    high-quality research, when available, and by the
    best professional judgment and experience of
    accomplished classroom teachers. High-quality
    research does not support the contention that
    instruction should be either entirely student
    centered or teacher directed. Research
    indicates that some forms of particular
    instructional practices can have a positive
    impact under specified conditions.

6
National Mathematics Advisory PanelTeachers
  • Our citizens and their educational leadership
    should recognize mathematically knowledgeable
    classroom teachers as having a central role in
    mathematics education and should encourage
    rigorously evaluated initiatives for attracting
    and appropriately preparing prospective teachers,
    and for evaluating and retaining effective
    teachers.

7
National Mathematics Advisory PanelEffort
  • Use should be made of what is clearly known from
    rigorous research about how children learn,
    especially by recognizing a) the advantages for
    children in having a strong start b) the
    mutually reinforcing benefits of conceptual
    understanding, procedural fluency, and automatic
    (i.e., quick and effortless) recall of facts and
    c) that effort, not just inherent talent, counts
    in mathematical achievement.

8
National Mathematics Advisory PanelAssessment
  • NAEP and state assessments should be improved in
    quality and should carry increased emphasis on
    the most critical knowledge and skills leading to
    Algebra.

9
National Mathematics Advisory PanelResearch
  • The nation must continue to build capacity for
    more rigorous research in education so that it
    can inform policy and practice more effectively.

10
Major Topics of School Algebra (1 and 2)
  • Symbols and Expressions
  • Polynomial expressions, Rational expressions,
    Arithmetic and finite geometric series
  • Linear Equations
  • Real numbers as points on the number line,
    Linear equations and their graphs, Solving
    problems with linear equations, Linear
    inequalities and their graphs, Graphing and
    solving systems of simultaneous linear equations
  • Quadratic Equations
  • Factors and factoring of quadratic polynomials
    with integer coefficients, Completing the square
    in quadratic expressions, Quadratic formula and
    factoring of general quadratic polynomials, Using
    the quadratic formula to solve equations

11
Major Topics of School Algebra (1 and 2)
  • Functions
  • Linear functions, Quadratic functionsword
    problems involving quadratic functions, Graphs of
    quadratic functions and completing the square,
    Polynomial functions (including graphs of basic
    functions), Simple nonlinear functions (e.g.,
    square and cube root functions absolute value
    rational functions step functions), Rational
    exponents, radical expressions, and exponential
    functions, Logarithmic functions, Trigonometric
    functions, Fitting simple mathematical models to
    data
  • Algebra of Polynomials
  • Roots and factorization of polynomials, Complex
    numbers and operations, Fundamental theorem of
    algebra, Binomial coefficients (and Pascals
    Triangle), Mathematical induction and the
    binomial theorem
  • Combinatorics and Finite Probability
  • Combinations and permutations

12
Critical Foundations of Algebra
  • Fluency with Whole Numbers
  • Fluency with Fractions
  • Particular Aspects of Geometry and Measurement

\
13
National Mathematics Advisory PanelBenchmarks
Whole Numbers
  • 1) By the end of Grade 3, students should be
    proficient with the addition and subtraction of
    whole numbers.
  • 2) By the end of Grade 5, students should be
    proficient with multiplication and division of
    whole numbers.

14
National Mathematics Advisory PanelBenchmarks
Fractions
  • 1) By the end of Grade 4, students should be able
    to identify and represent fractions and decimals,
    and compare them on a number line or with other
    common representations of fractions and decimals.
  • 2) By the end of Grade 5, students should be
    proficient with comparing fractions and decimals
    and common percents, and with addition and
    subtraction of fractions and decimals.
  • 3) By the end of Grade 6, students should be
    proficient with multiplication and division of
    fractions and decimals.

15
National Mathematics Advisory PanelBenchmarks
Fractions
  • 4) By the end of Grade 6, students should be
    proficient with all operations involving positive
    and negative integers.
  • 5) By the end of Grade 7, students should be
    proficient with all operations involving positive
    and negative fractions.
  • 6) By the end of Grade 7, students should be able
    to solve problems involving percent, ratio, and
    rate and extend this work to proportionality.

16
National Mathematics Advisory PanelBenchmarks
Geometry and Measurement
  • 1) By the end of Grade 5, students should be able
    to solve problems involving perimeter and area of
    triangles and all quadrilaterals having at least
    one pair of parallel sides (i.e., trapezoids).
  • 2) By the end of Grade 6, students should be able
    to analyze the properties of two-dimensional
    shapes and solve problems involving perimeter and
    area, and analyze the properties of
    three-dimensional shapes and solve problems
    involving surface area and volume.
  • 3) By the end of Grade 7, students should be
    familiar with the relationship between similar
    triangles and the concept of the slope of a line.

17
Reflection on the NMAP Final Report
  • Which of the findings and recommendations
    strike you as unusual or particularly important?
  • How might the findings and recommendations of
    the National Mathematics Advisory Panel affect
    discussions and decisions about standards,
    curriculum, and testing in WA?

18
Legislative Actions in 2008
  • Legislative actions were completed prior to the
    release of the Final Report of the National
    Mathematics Advisory Panel.
  • Implementation of these actions may be
    influenced by that Final Report.

19
Status of Legislation Standards (Bill 6534)
  • By May 15
  • receive report of national consultants review
    of Feb 29 version of Standards
  • consult WA Mathematics Panel about the
    consultants recommendations
  • hold public hearing
  • direct modifications to consultants report
  • forward final report and recommendations to
    OSPI for implementation

20
Status of Legislation Standards (Bill 6534)
  • By July 01
  • OSPI shall revise the mathematics standards
    to conform precisely to and incorporate each of
    the recommendations of the State Board of
    Education
  • By July 31
  • approve adoption of the standards
  • OR
  • develop a plan to do this by September

21
Probable Schedule Standards
  • By April 17
  • SBE approves K-8 standards
  • By May 15
  • SBE approves standards for Algebra 1,
    Geometry, Integrated Mathematics 1, Integrated
    Mathematics 2
  • By July 15
  • SBE approves standards for Algebra 2,
    Integrated Mathematics 3

22
Status of Legislation WASL (Bill 3166)
  • shorten the tests for grades 3-8
  • create diagnostic tools (NOTE diagnostic is
    not defined)
  • by 2010 create end-of-course tests for Algebra
    1 and Integrated Mathematics 1
  • by 2011 create end-of-course tests for Geometry
    and Integrated Mathematics 2
  • in 2013 end-of-course tests may substitute for
    10th grade WASL
  • in 2014 end-of-course tests replace the 10th
    grade WASL

23
Issues of Scheduling WASL
  • In order to have end-of-course tests ready for
    use in Spring 2010, the standards for Algebra 1
    and Integrated Mathematics 1 must be approved by
    May 15.
  • Any delay beyond that date would put new
    creation of new tests in jeopardy.
  • This puts some urgency into the discussion of
    standards by the State Board of Education.

24
Graduation Requirements State Board of Education
  • 3rd mathematics credit required for graduation
    in 2013
  • The State Board of Education will determine the
    list of permissible courses.
  • The expectation is that these decisions will be
    made in July 2008.

25
Revised K-12 Mathematics StandardsFeb 29
version Organization
  • K-8 organized by grade
  • Core Content, Additional Key Content, Core
    Processes
  • High School organized by courses
  • Algebra 1, Geometry, Algebra 2
  • Mathematics 1, Mathematics 2, Mathematics 3
  • also, topics for possible 4th year courses

26
Review of the Feb 29 Version
  • The State Board of Education asked Linda
    Plattner to review the Feb 29 version of the
    Revised K-12 Mathematics Standards. Report
    submitted to Legislature on March 10, 2008.
  • Linda Plattner reviewed the GLEs in Summer 2007
    and the Jan 21 version of the Revised K-12
    Mathematics Standards.
  • The Legislature delayed action until after
    Linda Plattners review of the Feb 29 version.

27
Revised K-12 Mathematics StandardsFeb 29
version Plattner Review
  • We first want to commend the substantial work of
    Washington educators and community leaders, OSPI,
    and the Dana Center. Washington has broken new
    ground in its approach to organizing grade level
    content by priorities rather than mathematical
    strands. The writing teams were inclusive, the
    stakeholder feedback extensive. The document
    clearly is thoughtful and written with
    mathematical expertise.

28
Revised K-12 Mathematics StandardsFeb 29
version Plattner Review
  • Standards inherently involve tensions. They are
    goal statements about which different people,
    even different experts, will have varied
    opinions. They require negotiations, and
    represent compromises among varied legitimate
    participants and groups.
  • Confrey, Jere, Tracing the Evolution of
    Mathematics Content Standards in the United
    States Looking Back and Projecting Forward
    towards National Standards, a paper prepared for
    the Conference on K12 Mathematics Curriculum
    Standards, sponsored by CSMC, NCTM, Achieve,
    College Board, MAA, ASA (February 2007).

29
Revised K-12 Mathematics StandardsFeb 29
version Plattner Review
  • The new mathematics standards for grades K8 are
    very close to excellent. These standards do
    compare favorably with the best in the nation and
    the world. The Performance Expectations are
    specific, measurable, important mathematical
    topics that are both focused at particular grades
    and developed across grade levels.

30
Revised K-12 Mathematics StandardsFeb 29
version Plattner Review
  • While they the high school standards are much
    improved from OSPI's January version, further
    revision is needed. Some areas, such as
    occasional imprecision of language, is similar to
    grades K8 and just as easily fixed. Other areas,
    such as missing content and content organization,
    are more problematic.

31
Revised K-12 Mathematics StandardsFeb 29
version Plattner Recommendations
  • 1. An exemplar review of the OSPI February
    standards K8 and 912, similar to last year's
    comparison to other states, countries and
    national frameworks using the nine criteria to
    provide external validation that these are the
    best standards. In order to compress the timeline
    we suggest fewer grade levels and fewer
    documents.
  • 2. Substantive edit for grades K8. The content
    is very good language is almost ready. These
    standards are so close that work could be
    completely very quickly.
  • 3. A revision of the high school standards.
    The core content of the subjects is in the
    document and many of the examples are excellent.
    The language needs to be tightened and there is
    some more work to be done on the content. This
    means it will take slightly longer than the grade
    K8 work.

32
The Substance of the Revised Standards
  • Given the pivotal role of standards in testing,
    curriculum review, and instruction, lets turn
    our attention to what mathematics Washington
    educators have said is important for students to
    learn.
  • Attend first to K-8 standards.

33
Depth of Content
  • Where is the first mention of each of the
    following ideas? Where is the last mention?
  • multiplication of whole numbers
  • mean of a set of data
  • area formulas for triangles
  • What do you notice about the range of grades for
    these topics?

34
Debriefing Depth of Content
  • multiplication of whole numbers
  • mean of a set of data
  • area formulas for triangles

35
Grade Band Discussions K-2, 3-5, 6-8
  • What key mathematics would students in your grade
    band learn for each of the following?
  • operations, geometry, data
  • How do the main ideas develop across your grade
    band for each of the following?
  • operations, geometry, data

36
Debriefing Grade Band Discussions
  • operations
  • geometry
  • data

37
Student Learning
  • What is the image of mathematics that the
    Standards for this grade band communicate?
  • What is the residual learning that students
    will have as they leave this grade band?

38
Debriefing Student Learning
  • image of mathematics
  • residual learning

39
High School Standards
  • If Algebra 2 is for ALL students, what content
    should it include?
  • If Algebra 2 is for COLLEGE-BOUND students,
    what content should it include?
  • What options to Algebra 2 should there be?

40
Revised High School Standards
  • How well do the High School Revised Mathematics
    Standards reflect what students should know?
  • Tentatively, Algebra 2 standards should be
    approved about July 2008.

41
Closing Comments
  • Share this information with colleagues.
  • Communicate with Legislators and members of the
    State Board of Education about what should be in
    Washington States Revised K-12 Mathematics
    Standards.
  • Support local teachers as they learn about the
    revised standards and begin to implement them.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com