Weed%20Risk%20Assessment%20for%20non-botanists - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Weed%20Risk%20Assessment%20for%20non-botanists

Description:

Title: PowerPoint Presentation Author: Peter Williams Last modified by: WilliamsP Created Date: 4/22/2003 10:51:09 PM Document presentation format – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:125
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 17
Provided by: PeterW212
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Weed%20Risk%20Assessment%20for%20non-botanists


1
Weed Risk Assessment for non-botanists Peter
A.Williams Landcare Research Nelson, New
Zealand Williamsp_at_landcareresearch.co.nz
2
Definitions
  • Weed a plant species controlled ( or potential
    to be so) because of its impact
  • Impact interference with human health, economy,
    or environment etc.
  • Weed risk probability x intensity of weed
    impact
  • Invasiveness spatial spread

3
(No Transcript)
4
Invasion is crossing barriers
  • Human responses love it or hate it
  • Spatial continents to farm-scale
  • Biological pollinators, dispersers etc.
  • Environmental temperature, nutrients etc.

5
Four Elements of Risk
  • Probability - likelihood, chance
  • Uncertainty - the unknowable
  • Consequences - impact in space and time
  • Manageability - resources, timing

6
Constraints to weed prediction
  • Uniqueness of species x environment matches
  • Non-reoccurring events
  • Not measurable directly prior to invasion
  • Continuous change through time

7
Science, sociology,economics
People
Pathways
Weed-risk assessment
Plants
Habitats
8
lt 1 spp.per year p.a.
16 spp.per year
9
WRA opportunities
Risk component Pre entry Post entry
Probability Low High
Uncertainty High Low
Consequences Estimate Measurable
Manageability Estimate Measurable
10
(No Transcript)
11
Elements of a Pre Border WRA
  • Origin of the plant and climate match
  • History of the species
  • Pathways of introduction
  • Establishment and spread likelihood
  • Impacts features

12
(No Transcript)
13
WRA outcome thresholds and examples
Score range Outcome Example species Actual score
lt 1 Accept Camelia -14
1-6 Evaluate Cineraria 1
1-6 Reject Gorse 22
14
Table 1. Accuracy rates for weeds and non-weeds
using the WRA system from various studies outside
Australia (with locally-adapted questions but
without the decision tree of Daehler et al.,
2004). Sensitivity is the percentage of known
weed species which had a reject outcome.
Specificity is the percentage of known non-weed
species which had an accept outcome.
Study Sensitivity ( true weeds predicted) Specificity ( true non-weeds predicted)

Pheloung et al. 1999 69 92
Daehler and Carino 2000 90 54
Daehler et al. 2004 ? 66
Jefferson et al. 2004 100 40
Krivanek and Pysek 2006 73 71
Mean ?? 65
15
Elements of a Post Border WRA
  • Evaluate weed risks
  • Invasiveness criteria
  • Impacts criteria
  • Potential distribution
  • Feasibility of control
  • Current distribution
  • Costs and duration
  • Weed management priorities
  • Weed risks versus feasibility of control

16
Mathematics and Post Border WRA
  • Evaluate weed risks
  • modelling traits
  • modelling spread
  • environment matching
  • Feasibility of control
  • optimum search strategies
  • determining real costs
  • Weed management priorities
  • cost benefit analysis
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com