Characterizing the U.S. Cultural Heritage Management Industry with Independently Collected and Analyzed Data - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 20
About This Presentation
Title:

Characterizing the U.S. Cultural Heritage Management Industry with Independently Collected and Analyzed Data

Description:

Characterizing the U.S. Cultural Heritage Management Industry with Independently Collected and Analyzed Data Donn R. Grenda, Ph.D., RPA1 Michael Heilen, Ph.D., RPA1 – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:142
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 21
Provided by: Michael3136
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Characterizing the U.S. Cultural Heritage Management Industry with Independently Collected and Analyzed Data


1
Characterizing the U.S. Cultural Heritage
Management Industry with Independently Collected
and Analyzed Data
  • Donn R. Grenda, Ph.D., RPA1
  • Michael Heilen, Ph.D., RPA1
  • Teresita Majewski, Ph.D., RPA, FSA1,2
  • 1Statistical Research, Inc. 2Statistical
    Research, Inc. and president, American Cultural
    Resources Association
  • European Association of Archaeologists
  • 19th Annual Meeting
  • Pilsen, Czech Republic
  • 2013

2
American Cultural Resources Association
  • National trade organization for CHM firms in the
    US
  • Promotes common interests of CHM firms
  • Prioritizes political advocacy and education
    regarding best practices

3
Industry Surveys
  • ACRA recently conducted two industry surveys
  • A rapid survey to gauge overall industry size
  • A detailed survey of firms to understand their
    composition and operation

4
Industry-Size Survey
  • The industry size survey sampled CHM firms
    (within and outside ACRA) to collect data on
  • firm size (numbers of FTEs)
  • employee educational levels, and
  • firm revenues

5
Industry-Size Survey
  • A comprehensive list of more than 1000 CHM firms
    was developed
  • The survey obtained responses from 230 firms
    (more than 20 of invited firms)
  • Several cases had to be removed from analysis
    because of anomalous or contradictory information
    that skewed metrics
  • Statistical techniques were applied to reduce the
    effects of bias and obtain estimates

6
Industry-Size Survey
  • Sources of bias
  • Large firms better represented than small firms
  • Several firms had unusually high revenues per FTE
    (removed likely pass-through firms)
  • A few firms had revenues far in excess of other
    firms and likely were including non-CHM revenues
    (removed)

7
Industry-Size Survey
  • To account for bias in making estimates, industry
    metrics were calculated using
  • Bootstrap analysis with outliers removed (20
    sample, 10,000 iterations, 95 confidence
    interval
  • Survey weights (0.5 for large firms, 0.75 for
    medium-sized firms, 1.0 for small firms)
  • Range of estimates of number of operating firms
    (1000 to 1300 firms)

8
Industry-Size Survey
  • These firms generated over 1 billion in revenue
    in calendar year 2012

Estimated Firms 2012 Gross Revenue for Industry (billion ) 2012 FTEs 2012 FTEs w/ graduate degree 2008 FTEs 2008 FTEs w/graduate degree
1000 0.84 0.04 7978 339 4605 166 8381 350 4536 176
1100 0.93 0.04 8776 373 5065 182 9219 384 4990 193
1200 1.01 0.04 9574 407 5526 199 10057 419 5443 211
1300 1.09 0.05 10372 441 5986 215 10895 454 5897 228
Minimum 0.805 7,639 4,439 8,032 4,361
Maximum 1.131 10,813 6,201 11,349 6,125
9
Industry-Size Survey
  • These firms generated over 1 billion in revenue
    in calendar year 2012
  • The analysis results were used to support the
    following statistics (1300 firms was considered
    the best estimate)
  • 1300 firms employ some 10,000 CRM professionals
    nationwide
  • These firms generated over 1 billion in revenue
    in calendar year 2012

10
Industry-Size Survey
  • These firms generated over 1 billion in revenue
    in calendar year 2012

11
Detailed Firm Survey
  • The detailed survey collected data from ACRA
    member firms on
  • annual sales
  • firm composition
  • business practices
  • employee benefits and compensation, and
  • how ACRA can benefit the industry

12
Detailed Firm Survey Services Offered
13
Detailed Firm Survey - Employees
14
Detailed Firm Survey - Wages
15
Detailed Firm Survey Biggest Challenges
16
Detailed Firm Survey ACRA Activities
17
Detailed Firm Survey Member Benefits
18
Detailed Firm Survey Ways for ACRA to Grow
19
Conclusions
  1. Provided the first industry-size estimates for
    law makers
  2. CHM is strong in the USA but it has been flat
    over the past few years.
  3. The industry employees over 10,000 professionals
    and generates over 1 Billion in revenue
  4. ACRA now has a detailed understanding of how to
    support the industry

Lessons Learned
  • Start the survey early
  • Have multiple people review the potential
    questions
  • Hire an outside firm to conduct the survey (cost
    about 20k)
  • Have various people take the survey online prior
    to starting

20
  • Thank You!
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com