P H I L O S O P H Y - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 13
About This Presentation
Title:

P H I L O S O P H Y

Description:

Hume denied that there is any ... Karl Popper argued that falsifiability is a criterion of scientific theories. P H I L O S O P H Y Thomas Kuhn argued that ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:70
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 14
Provided by: Julie488
Category:
Tags: hume | kuhn | popper

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: P H I L O S O P H Y


1
P H I L O S O P H Y
  • A Text with Readings
  • TENTH EDITION
  • M A N U E L V E L A S Q U E Z

2
P H I L O S O P H Y
  • There are two common views regarding the sources
    of knowledge rationalism and empiricism.

3
P H I L O S O P H Y
  • Rationalism states that some knowledge is based
    on reason rather than on sensory perception.

4
P H I L O S O P H Y
  • René Descartes was a rationalist concerned with
    discovering something that he could hold as true
    beyond any doubt. He concluded that no one could
    doubt that a human is a thinking being, that a
    thinking thing exists, that God exists, and that
    the world exists. All of this, he claimed, could
    be established by reason alone.

5
P H I L O S O P H Y
  • Empiricism states that all knowledge comes from
    or is based on sensory perception and is a
    posteriori.

6
P H I L O S O P H Y
  • John Locke held that objects have primary
    qualities that are distinct from our perception
    of them, such as size, shape, and weight. He also
    believed that they have secondary qualities that
    we impose on them, such as color, smell, and
    texture. We know the objective world through
    sensory experience, which is a copy of reality
    and which gives us our ideas of reality.

7
P H I L O S O P H Y
  • According to George Berkeley's subjectivism, we
    know only our own ideas. Carried to an extreme,
    this position can become solipsism, the position
    that only I exist and everything else is a
    creation of my subjective consciousness.

8
P H I L O S O P H Y
  • David Hume pushed Locke and Berkeley's empiricism
    to its logical conclusion. Arguing that all
    knowledge originates in sensory impressions, Hume
    distinguished between two forms of perceptions,
    impressions and ideas.
  • Impressions are lively perceptions, as when we
    hear, see, feel, love, or hate.

9
P H I L O S O P H Y
  • Ideas are less lively perceptions they are
    reflections on sensations.
  • Hume denied that there is any logical basis for
    concluding that things have a continued and
    independent existence outside us. He denied the
    possibility of any certain knowledge, arguing
    that both rationalism and empiricism are
    inadequate to lead to truth and knowledge. He is
    thus termed a skeptic.

10
P H I L O S O P H Y
  • Immanuel Kant's transcendental idealism, an
    alternative to empiricism and rationalism,
    distinguishes between our experience of things
    (phenomena) and the things as they are (noumena).
    The mind, claimed Kant, possesses the ability to
    sort sensory experiences and posit relationships
    among them. Through an awareness of these
    relationships, we come to knowledge.

11
P H I L O S O P H Y
  • Inductionism is the view that all science is
    based on the process of sensory observation,
    generalization, and repeated confirmation. This
    process is often used to establish scientific
    laws, and simplicity is one criterion for
    choosing among competing generalizations.

12
P H I L O S O P H Y
  • The hypothetical method view says that science is
    also based on the creative formulation of
    hypotheses whose predictions are then tested and
    used to guide research. Karl Popper argued that
    falsifiability is a criterion of scientific
    theories.

13
P H I L O S O P H Y
  • Thomas Kuhn argued that scientific theories are
    those that are widely accepted by a community of
    scientists. They are the basis of paradigms that
    guide research but that are abandoned in a
    scientific revolution, when too many anomalies
    appear that cannot be accounted for by the
    paradigm. Scientific theories must be accurate,
    consistent with other widely accepted theories,
    capable of explaining phenomena other than those
    they were developed to explain, capable of
    organizing phenomena that were previously thought
    to be unrelated, and fruitful insofar as they
    generate new research and new discoveries.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com