Using Enforcement to Reduce Underage Drinking - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Using Enforcement to Reduce Underage Drinking

Description:

Using Enforcement to Reduce Underage Drinking Michael Sparks Alcohol Policy Specialist Michael_at_sparksInitiatives.com – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:198
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 62
Provided by: Alexa201
Learn more at: https://www.eiu.edu
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Using Enforcement to Reduce Underage Drinking


1
Using Enforcement to Reduce Underage Drinking
Michael Sparks Alcohol Policy Specialist
Michael_at_sparksInitiatives.com
2
Question
  • Please answer, in the chat box
  • What campus are you from?
  • What is your role in prevention?
  • Do you work with a coalition?

3
Todays Discussion
  • Public Health Model of Prevention
  • Laws as one type of environmental prevention
  • Logic Model of Community Influences of Underage
    Drinking
  • The role of law enforcement in reducing underage
    drinking

4
Poll 1
  • How familiar are you with environmental
    approaches/strategies?
  • Very familiar
  • Kind of familiar
  • Not familiar

5
Public Health Model
Individual
Alcohol
Environment
Alcohol-Related Problems
6
College Party
7
What works Reviews of the U.S.
and global research literature
  • CDC Guide to Community Preventive Services

8
Policy Approaches to Prevention
  • Formal legal and regulatory mechanisms, rules,
    and procedures for reducing risky behaviors
    (e.g., the consumption of alcohol or risky
    drinking behaviors)
  • Implementation and enforcement of these measures

Grube Nygaard, 2001 Toomey Wagenaar, 1999
9
The Environmental Perspective
  • Targets the social, physical or public
    environment where sales/use occurs
  • Views alcohol and other drug problems not just as
    individual addiction, but rather as the
    collective reflection of community norms and
    practices
  • Targets are policy makers and others with
    authority to change environments
  • Seeks to change physical, legal, economic
    social processes of communities

10
The Role of Laws in Environmental Prevention
11
Purpose of Enforcement of Alcohol Policies
  • Decrease availability of alcohol by increasing
    economic costs and opportunity costs
  • Deter drinking, heavy drinking, or
    drinking-related problem behaviors
  • Moderate relations between drinking and problem
    outcomes

12
Laws
Community Norms
13
Focus on Enforcement Itself
14
Discussion Questions
  • What are the conditions in your community that
    require some sort of enforcement action?

15
Levels of Enforcement
  • Institutional
  • Home
  • School
  • Community
  • Neighborhood
  • City
  • County
  • Society
  • State
  • Federal
  • Parent
  • Teacher/Administrator
  • Association/Watch
  • Police
  • Sheriff
  • ABC, DPS

16
Levels of Enforcement
  • Institutional
  • Home
  • School
  • Community
  • Neighborhood
  • City
  • County
  • Society
  • State
  • Federal
  • Parent
  • Teacher/Administrator
  • Association/Watch
  • Police
  • Sheriff
  • ABC

17
Arrest Rate
Only 2 of every 1000 occasions of underage
drinking result in arrest
Source Wagenaar Wolfson, 1994
18
Action Against Outlets
Only 5 of every 100,000 occasions of underage
drinking result in action against outlet.
Source Wagenaar Wolfson, 1994
19
Deterrence Theory
  • Legal threat of punishment encourages or prevents
    behavior
  • Punishment must be
  • Certain
  • Swift
  • Severe
  • General and specific deterrence

20
Laws are effective when they are perceived as
  • Legitimate
  • Practical
  • Effective
  • Proportional to the problem

21
The Role of Coalitions in Promoting Effective
Enforcement
  • Key Coalition Functions
  • Include enforcement agency in all deliberations
    regarding enforcement of policy at the start of
    the policy process
  • Build strong organizational and personal
    relationships with key enforcement personnel
  • Identify shared self-interest associated with
    enforcement
  • Take responsibility for making the case to the
    community for the importance of enforcement
  • Creatively collaborate to address enforcements
    financial constraints associated with
    implementation
  • Use the media to publically support enforcement
    activities and give credit to enforcement agency
    when they are carried out

22
Question
  • Can you please type into your chat box examples
    of enforcement strategies you have implemented.

23
A Logic Model for Reducing Underage Drinking..
The Role of Enforcement in Impacting
Alcohol-Related Problems
24
Underage Drinking Basic Research
Evidence Population Prevention Effects
Strong
Moderate
Low (target group only)
None (no target or population)
Visible Enforcement
Retail Availability of Alcohol to Youth
Alcohol-Related Problems (Traffic crashes,
Injuries, School performance. Unsafe sex,
Violence, etc.)
Price
Social Availability of Alcohol to Youth
Underage Drinking Laws
Underage Drinking
Drinking Beliefs
Community Norms About Youth Drinking
Family, School, and Peer Influence
Drinking Context
Alcohol Promotion (Advertising, Point of Sale
Promotion , Sponsorship of Community Events)
Holder/Saltz Pacific Institute for Research and
Evaluation
25
Underage Drinking Evidence-based Theory of
Change
Retailer Training rewards
Compliance checks, citations, license loss
Retail Sale of alcohol to youth
Underage drinking laws
Visible enforcement
Underage Drinking
Social availability of alcohol to youth (parties,
peers, families)
Party patrol, Shoulder taps, Beer keg
registration
Family, School, Peer Influence
Local alcohol policy
Community norms about youth drinking
Legal risks for providing alcohol to underage
Media advocacy
26
Does Enforcement Work?
27
Minimum Legal Drinking Age
28
James Fell et al. The Impact of Underage
Drinking Laws on Alcohol-Related Fatal Crashes
of Young DriversAlcohol Clin Exp Res, 2009
  • Methods
  • Analysis of the Fatality Analysis Reporting
    System from 1982-2004
  • Examined the effects of the minimum legal
    drinking age of 21 on the ratio of drinking to
    non-drinking drivers under age 21 in fatal
    crashes
  • Controlled for
  • Zero Tolerance Laws
  • Graduated License Night Restrictions
  • Use/Lose laws
  • Administrative License Revocation
  • .10, .08 BAC per se
  • Mandatory seat belt laws
  • Per capita beer consumption
  • Unemployment rate
  • Vehicle miles traveled
  • Frequency of sobriety checkpoints
  • Number of licensed drivers
  • Ratio of drinking to non-drinking drivers
  • Age 26 in fatal crashes
  • Ratio of drinking to non-drinking drivers age 26
    in fatal crashes

29
Fell et al., Alcohol Clin Exp Res, 2009 (cont)
  • Results
  • Minimum legal drinking age was independently
    associated with a 16 decline in the ratio of
    drinking to non-drinking drivers in fatal crashes
    under age 21
  • Other laws that independently predicted lower
    involvement of drinking drivers under age 21 in
    fatal crashes
  • Use/Lose laws ?5
  • Zero tolerance laws ?5
  • 0.08 BAC limit ? 8
  • 0.10 BAC limit ? 7
  • Administrative license ? 5
  • revocation (ALR)
  • Seat belt laws ? 3

30
Fell et al., Alcohol Clin Exp Res, 2009 (cont)
  • Conclusions
  • Minimum legal drinking age of 21 reduced
    involvement of drinking drivers under 21 in fatal
    crashes (16)
  • Zero tolerance laws and Use/Lose laws targeted
    drivers under 21 also produced reductions
  • Laws targeting drinking drivers of all ages also
    reduced involvement of drinking drivers under 21
    in fatal crashes (0.08 and .10 BAC limits, ALR,
    seat belt laws)

31
but theres more than just minimum legal
drinking age laws!
32
DUI Enforcement
  • General vs specific enforcement
  • Sobriety checkpoints
  • Saturation patrols
  • Revocation/suspension
  • Ignition interlock
  • Last drink
  • Check-in programs

33
Sobriety Checkpoints
  • Restrict traffic flow in a designated area and
    check drivers for signs of impairment
  • Primarily general deterrence increase perceived
    risk
  • High visibility media coverage
  • Random breath test vs selective
  • Blitz vs regular
  • Shults, Elder, Sleet et al (2001)
  • Review studies from 1980-2000
  • 12 RBT studies average 18 decrease across
    outcomes
  • 11 SBT studies average 20 decrease across
    outcomes

34
  • Recently updated previous checkpoint review
  • Added 15 studies from 2000-2012
  • 10 studies examined alcohol-involved
  • fatal crashes -gt 8.9 decrease
  • Other 5 studies found decreases in
  • drivers above .08 (28-64)
  • alcohol-involved fatalities/VMT (4.6)
  • alcohol-involved collisions (19)
  • nighttime crashes (22)
  • Task Force Finding
  • The Community Preventive Services Task Force
    recommends publicized sobriety checkpoint
    programs based on strong evidence of
    effectiveness in reducing alcohol-impaired
    driving.

35
DUI CheckpointsKey Resourcehttp//www.nhtsa.gov
/people/injury/alcohol/saturation_patrols/SatPats2
002.pdfCommon Challenges
  1. Generating community/political will
  2. Finding overtime dollars for police
  3. Ensuring training on checkpoint best-practices
  4. Supporting development of materials for
    dissemination at checkpoint
  5. Ensuring visibility -- using media to publicize
    checkpoints before and after event

36
Upstream DUI Enforcement
  • It is too late once an intoxicated individual
    gets behind the wheel
  • It is difficult to identify and apprehend
    intoxicated drivers
  • It has been estimated that less than 1/1000 DUI
    trips results in an arrest (Miller, Spicer, Levy,
    Lestina, 1998)
  • Car crashes are but one of the many negative
    health consequences associated with intoxication
  • Focusing exclusively on DUI enforcement may send
    the message that, as long as someone is not
    driving, it is OK to get intoxicated

37
Poll 2
  • Have your coalition/group participated in
    sobriety checkpoints?
  • Yes
  • No

38
Underage Compliance Checks
  • Sting or Decoy buys
  • Police hire an underage (lt21 years old)
    individual to attempt to purchase alcohol
  • If an illegal sale is made, citation issued to
    either the seller or the establishment
  • Penalty may vary from warning to a fine to a
    liquor license suspension/revocation (usually
    depending on previous citations)

39
Compliance Check Effectiveness
  • Growing research literature that compliance
    checks are effective
  • CDC conducted a review of studies that examined
    enhanced enforcement programs that increased
    or intended to increase frequency of compliance
    checks
  • 8 studies from 1994-2005
  • all 8 studies examined sales to a decoy
  • average 42 reduction
  • 3 studies examined alcohol consumption
  • 20 reduction
  • 2-7 reduction
  • 4-6 relative decrease

40
Compliance Check Effectiveness
  • Task Force Finding
  • The Community Preventive Services Task Force
    recommends enhanced enforcement of laws
    prohibiting sale of alcohol to minors, on the
    basis of sufficient evidence of effectiveness in
    limiting underage alcohol purchases. Further
    research will be required to assess the degree to
    which these changes in retailer behavior affect
    underage drinking.

source Elder, Lawrence, Janes, et al. (2007).
Enhanced enforcement of laws prohibiting sale of
alcohol to minors systematic review of
effectiveness for reducing sales and underage
drinking. Transportation Research E-Circular
2007Issue E-C123181-8.
41
Compliance Checks Key Resourcehttp//www.udetc.
org/aps/ComplianceChkDB.htmCommon Challenges
  1. Generating community/political support
  2. Generating police support
  3. Finding overtime dollars for police
  4. Convincing state Liquor Control to partner
  5. Building support for prosecuting violators

42
Poll 3
  • Has your coalition/group supported or sponsored
    compliance check?
  • Yes
  • No

43
Party Patrols/Social Host Laws
44
Problem Setting Residential Parties
Party Patrols/Social Host Laws
Son held drunken party for 600 friends after
banishing parents to bedroom of their
multi-million-dollar mansion By Mail Foreign
ServiceUPDATED 2055 EST, 14 October 2010
45
Intent of Social Host Policies
  • Change community CULTURE and CONDITIONS
  • Change the FOCUS from underage drinker to
    provider/enabler
  • Decrease PROVISION
  • Decrease furnishing alcohol to an underage person
  • Change CONTEXT and SETTING
  • Deter underage drinking parties

46
Social Host the Evidence
  • Viewed as a useful tool by law enforcement
    officers (Oceanside, CA and Vista, CAsee
    Evalcorp, 2009a)
  • May result in changes in youth norms related to
    the riskiness of drinking (Long Beach City,
    NYunpublished data)
  • May result in fewer calls for service, either
    overall, or related to disturbances. For
    example, Petaluma, CA had 9.3 fewer calls for
    service related to disturbances from the year
    prior to passage (2006) to the second year after
    passage (2009) (Petaluma, CAunpublished data).
  • San Diego County had 8 fewer disturbance calls
    from the year preceding passage (2002) to the
    year following passage (2004) of its SHO (UDETC,
    2003)

47
Party Patrols
  • Enforcement strategy that targeting community
    high priority underage drinking party areas.
  • arranged to both deter parties (through LE
    visibility) and find and address parties that are
    going on (through LE action).
  • Law enforcement reports that party patrols can be
    effective deterrents if there are existing
    laws on the books that hold adults or
    other responsible parties accountable for
    underage drinking parties in homes.

48
Party Dispersal
  • An ongoing party is often difficult for officers
    to break it up with maximum impact on deterring
    underage parties from happening in the future and
    preventing teens from fleeing the scene.
  • Party dispersal training gives officers
    and departments a strong foundation
    to systematically address parties
    and hold underage drinkers and
    providers responsible.

49
Landlord Lease Agreements
  • Language that landlords include in leases that
    prohibit underage parties from occurring.
  • There are often fines and penalties that escalate
    to eviction.
  • Can effectively reduce the number of rental
    properties in which loud and unruly parties
    occur if, strongly enforced and adopted by
    all/most landlords.

50
Party Patrols/Social Host Laws Key
Resourcehttp//www.udetc.org/documents/Party_Pat
rol_Guidebook.pdfhttp//venturacountylimits.org.s
94613.gridserver.com/resource_documents/model_sho_
fnl_nashville.pdfCommon Challenges
  1. Identifying/adopting policy to enforce
  2. Generating community/political support for policy
  3. Generating police support to use resources
  4. Finding overtime dollars for police
  5. Training law enforcement to use enforcement
    techniques
  6. Building support for prosecuting violators

51
Poll 4
  • Has your coalition/group supported or sponsored
    party patrols?
  • Yes
  • No

52
Poll 5
  • Has your coalition/group supported or sponsored
    the adoption of a social host ordinance?
  • Yes
  • No

53
Three Enforcement Strategies Frequently Used By
Coalitions
  1. Compliance checks for sales to minors at
    off-premise outlets
  2. Party patrols/social host laws
  3. DUI checkpoints

54
Poll 6
  • Which of these strategies are you most interested
    in considering?
  • DUI Checkpoints
  • Party Patrols
  • Social Host Laws
  • Compliance Checks
  • Landlord Lease Agreements

WHY?????
55
Questions About Enforcement Strategies to
ReduceAlcohol Related Problems?
56
Safer California UniversitiesProject Goal
  • To evaluate the efficacy of aRisk Management
    approach to alcohol problem prevention
  • NIAAA grant R01 AA12516with support from
    CSAP/SAMHSA.
  • Bob Saltz

Prevention Research Center
57
Integrated Intervention Strategies for Off-Campus
Parties
  • Compliance Checks
  • DUI Check Points
  • Party Patrols
  • Pass Social Host Response Cost Ordinance
  • A Social Host Safe Party Campaign

58
Practical Significance
  • At each campus, 900 fewer students drinking to
    intoxication at off-campus parties and 600 fewer
    getting drunk at bars/restaurants during the fall
    semester at intervention schools relative to
    controls.
  • Equivalent to 6,000 fewer incidents of
    intoxication at off-campus parties and 4,000
    fewer incidents at bars restaurants during the
    fall semester at Safer intervention schools
    relative to controls

59
In addition No Displacement
60
SoWhat are the Implications for Your Coalition?
61
Thank You!
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com