Moving Toward Comprehensive Internationalization: Insights from the Process David A. DeCenzo, Ph.D. President Coastal Carolina University

1
Moving Toward Comprehensive Internationalization
Insights from the ProcessDavid A. DeCenzo,
Ph.D.PresidentCoastal Carolina University
???????????????
2
Although we may be able to provide mechanisms
for student mobility without the continuing
engagement of the faculty, that mobility will not
only be less sizeable, but also, in and of
itself, it will not deliver the learning,
discovery and engagement that we seek through
internationalization. Stohl, M. (2007). We
have met the enemy and he is us The role of
faculty in the internationalization of higher
education in the coming decade. Journal of
Studies in International Education, 11(3/4),
359-372. (Quote page 360)
?????????????????????????,????????????,??????????
,????????????????????????
3
Coastal Carolina University places primary
emphasis on high quality teaching and engaged
learning, and it supports faculty research,
creative activities and expert collaboration in
the community, state, nation and world.  --
Coastal Carolina University Mission
???????? ???????????????????????,??????????????
???????????????????????.
4
Eight Barriers to Faculty Participation in
InternationalizationDewey, P., and Duff, S.
(2009). Reason before passion Faculty views on
internationalization in higher education. Higher
Education, 58(4), 491 - 504.
Comprehensive Internationalization through
Faculty Development
?????????????

• General lack of coordination and information
  about international activities
• Limited funding to support international
  activities
• Multiple administrative policies and procedures
• Lack of support staff and personnel to facilitate
  effective internationalization initiatives
• Lack of clarity about the role of such
  international work in their professional success
  at the institution
• Challenges in adapting course and/or program
  curricula to facilitate internationalization
• Intensive work required to develop and lead
  short-term study abroad programs versus on-campus
  courses
• Identifying (and financing) replacement faculty
  for longer term international activities

• ?????????????????????
• ???????????
• ?????????
• ????????????????????
• ??????????????????????
• ??????,??????????????
• ???????,????????????????????
• ??(?????)?????????????

5
Faculty support to help build internationalization
has been changing in the USACenter for
Internationalization and Global Engagement
(2012). Mapping Internationalization on U.S.
Campuses 2012 Edition. Washington, DC American
Council on Education.
Comprehensive Internationalization through
Faculty Development
??????????????????????

• 11 include international work or experience as a
  part of faculty tenure and promotion decisions.
• 68 give preference to hiring faculty with an
  international background up from 32 in 2006.
• Funding for faculty to participate in
  international conferences (48) or research
  abroad (31) has decreased 8 percentage points
  since 2006.
• Funding to support faculty leading study abroad
  and teaching abroad has remained steady (24).
• On-campus faculty internationalization
  initiatives have declined.

• 11????????????????????????
• 68???????????????,?2006?32??????
• ?2006?,??????(48)?????(31)???????????
• ????????????????????????(24)
• ???,?????????????

6
Enhancing comprehensive internationalization in
institutions of higher education requires that we
invite, challenge, engage, support and enhance
our faculty members as cooperating partners in
this process.
Comprehensive Internationalization through
Faculty Development

• INVITE Leading Study Abroad Programs
• CHALLENGE Curricular Internationalization
• ENGAGE - Teaching and Learning Abroad
• SUPPORT - Provide Assurance and Recognition
• ENHANCE - Engaging our Global Peers

• ??- ????????
• ??- ?????
• ??- ???????
• ??- ???????
• ??- ????????

????????????? ???????????,? ????????????? ??,?????
?
7
Faculty Opportunities and Institutional Progress
INVITE
Comprehensive Internationalization through
Faculty Development
?????????????

• Leading study abroad
• Faculty Peer Mentoring Program for Study Abroad
• Writing Circles and Workshops for bringing
  faculty together for innovative and sustainable
  study abroad programs
• 2015 program in cooperation with Beijing
  Institute of Graphic Communication that will
  bring CCU and BIGC students and faculty together!

• ????????
• ????????
• ??????????????????????????????
• 2015???????????????????????!

8
Faculty Opportunities and Institutional Progress
CHALLENGE
Comprehensive Internationalization through
Faculty Development
?????????????

• Curricular Internationalization
• Direct budget support to challenge departments to
  internationalize
• Support for matching external grants to enable
  faculty to further curricular internationalization
  
• National Integrative Technology Grant (Political
  Science) in cooperation with Ecuador
• Partners in America (co-wrote grant for Health
  Promotion curricular internationalization)

• ?????
• ?????????????
• ??????????,???????????
• ??????????????????(???)
• ??????? (??????????????????)

9
Faculty Opportunities and Institutional Progress
ENGAGE
Comprehensive Internationalization through
Faculty Development
?????????????

• Teaching and Learning Abroad
• Scholarly reassignment enables faculty to pursue
  multiple projects through Fulbright or other
  programs
• International consortia (research projects with
  the European Union and multiple universities for
  geoinformatics and cultural tourism in Greece)
• Teaching abroad at partner universities (South
  America, China, Germany, France) expands
  partnerships

• ???????
• ??????????????????????????????????
• ?????? (?????????????????????????)
• ???????? (??,??,??,??) ,????

10
Faculty Opportunities and Institutional Progress
SUPPORT
Comprehensive Internationalization through
Faculty Development
?????????????

• Provide assurance and recognition
• Manage Faculty Exposure to Risk and Liability
• Comprehensive review and communication patterns
  ensure that faculty are aware of and supported in
  their actions abroad
• Revisit best practices continuously
• Faculty Excellence Summit (Beginning September
  2014)
• Fair Compensation
• Global Learning Outcomes for Assessment of
  Learning

• ??- ???????
• ????????????
• ???????????????,???????????????????,?????
• ?????????
• ???????? (2014?????)
• ?????
• ??????????????

11
Faculty Opportunities and Institutional Progress
ENHANCE
Comprehensive Internationalization through
Faculty Development
?????????????

• Engaging our global peers
• Visiting Scholar Programs with Faculty Mentors
  provide beneficial cooperation for all partners
• Visiting class presentations
• Exploration of long-term use of technology to
  coordinate presentations
• Embedding approval of research direction, and
  linking with a faculty mentor in the same field,
  makes for a better social and professional
  development outcome

• ????????
• ??????????????????????
• ??????
• ??????????????????
• ????????????,??????????????????????????????

12
Comprehensive internationalization requires an
investment in and partnership with our faculty.
Comprehensive Internationalization through
Faculty Development
????????????,??????

• INVITE Leading Study Abroad Programs
• CHALLENGE Curricular Internationalization
• ENGAGE - Teaching and Learning Abroad
• SUPPORT - Provide Assurance and Recognition
• ENHANCE - Engaging our Global Peers

• ??- ????????
• ??- ?????
• ??- ???????
• ??- ???????
• ??- ????????