Building Trainer Competency for Secondary/Tertiary Systems - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 20
About This Presentation
Title:

Building Trainer Competency for Secondary/Tertiary Systems

Description:

Building Trainer Competency for Secondary/Tertiary Systems Don Kincaid, University of South Florida Kimberli Breen, Illinois PBIS Network Session Objectives This ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:227
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 21
Provided by: KimB135
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Building Trainer Competency for Secondary/Tertiary Systems


1
Building Trainer Competency for
Secondary/Tertiary Systems
  • Don Kincaid, University of South Florida
  • Kimberli Breen, Illinois PBIS Network

2
Session Objectives
  • This session will cover two state-wide models for
    training trainers and assisting others in
    becoming fluent TA providers.
  • Florida
  • Illinois

3
BLUEPRINT FOR SCHOOL-WIDE POSITIVE BEHAVIOR
SUPPORTPROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT
  • The Blueprint will be organized around four major
    foci
  • Trainers
  • Technical Assistance (coaching)
  • Training Content and Delivery
  • District/Region/State Implementation
    /Professional Development Planning
  • Well also be discussing Evaluation

4
Why is Training of Trainers Key?
5
Challenges in TransformingTraining to Practice
  • Training staff in content without district
    support/agreement to change related
    tools/practices/policy
  • Ex. Training in FBA/BIP but district doesnt have
    a comprehensive FBA/BIP process that works
  • Only having access to audience for 1, 2, 3
    sessions
  • Ex. Local coop/agency thinks their staff only
    need to hear it once or twice and then they can
    train
  • Training trainers who dont intend to
    implement/use the tools/materials themselves, but
    only to train others on them
  • Ex. Training on the Competing Behavior Pathway
    when a person has never used the tool

6
Past Practice
  • Regional or state-level training
  • Trainings titled as one-shot (ex. Day 1 Targeted,
    Day 2 Targeted)
  • Primarily teachers/practitioners in attendance
  • Great when principals came to training rarely
    had Director of SpEd, Asst. Sups., Coaches
    supervisors
  • TA provided at building-level with only some
    district level TA
  • Coaching recommended (not required)

7
Current Strategies Illinois
  • District support necessary to change practice
  • Memorandum of Agreement
  • District Leadership Team
  • Coaching required allocated FTE, especially for
    Tier 2/3 support
  • In-district training TA
  • Audiences of ALL Principals, ALL SWs/Psychs,
    etc.
  • TOTs for our Trainers District Coaches
    (in-training)
  • Trainings Regional, semi-regional, in-district,
    go-to-mtgs.
  • TA thru on-going go-to-mtgs., conference calls,
    network/coaches mtgs., scheduled in-district
    regional TA sessions

8
Current Strategies Florida
  • Tier 2
  • Must have District Action Plan
  • Schools must identify readiness for Tier 2
  • Tier 1 fidelity, student outcomes, classroom
    implementation, etc.
  • Used to do local or giant annual training - 1
    day, 1 strategy
  • Training team would include subset of Tier 1 team
  • ToTs with experienced District Coordinators
  • Moved to a web-based training format
  • Tier 3
  • Must have a separate District Action Planning
    process for Tier 3
  • Do not provide training initially
  • Technical assistance provided to evaluate
  • Process, Products, Practices, Outcomes, etc.
  • Establish effective district system and process
    to support evidence-based practice prior to
    training.
  • Training is not didactic in nature
  • Content, practice, systems, collaboration,
    capacity to coach, etc.

9
Florida Structure for Training
  • Most Tier 2 training and TA provided via Adobe
    Connect
  • Modules are self-contained and result in
    permanent product and action plan
  • Individuals or teams can go through module
  • Initial module is open to any team or member
  • Based on scores PBS staff permission to move to
    next module

10
Florida Curricula
  • Are you ready for Tier 2?
  • Assessment of current supports/decision points
  • Providing Classroom Consultation now in Tier 1
  • Identifying students who need Tier 2
  • Progress monitoring
  • Measuring the fidelity of implementation
  • Making decisions and selecting interventions
  • Introduction to BEP

11
Illinois Structure for Training
  • Training for schools
  • Series of trainings that can be repeated (ex.
    S100)
  • Standardized format so easier to teach all
    trainings once fluent with one
  • Modeled for Coaches so they can train in future
  • Training for district level personnel
  • All SWs/Psychs in one district come together
  • District Forums for District Leadership Teams
  • Training designed for District Coaches
  • Training Trainers and TA providers

12
Structure for Coaching
  • Internal to school (Internal Coaches)
  • External Coaches provided by district (community
    agencies or Cooperatives)
  • Requires allocated FTE
  • Regional/state Trainers TA providers
  • Transition from support to schools, to Internal
    Coaches, to External Coaches
  • Alignment with blueprint/national center
  • All of the above for coaching at
  • Tier 1, 2 3

13
Number of Illinois Districts Adopting PBIS and
Number of External Coachesas of June 30, 2009
14
Developing Tier 3 Demo Districts Build Capacity
  • FY05, only 28 of the data support for Tier 3
    was led by district staff
  • FY09, 100 of the Tier 3 plans supported by the
    online Tier 3 data system was provided by
    district social workers and other district
    personnel.

15
Tertiary Demos Sites Assume Responsibility for
Data
16
Structure for Evaluation
  • School outcome process data
  • District outcome process data
  • State/network outcome process data
  • Process data must be emphasized illustrates if
    interventions are happening, effective etc.
  • Emphasis on USE and Ownership (schools/districts
    must use their own data, collect it for internal
    evaluation, value it)

17
(No Transcript)
18
Floridas Evaluation at Tiers 2 and 3
  • Progress monitoring forms on website
  • State-wide database that measures
  • ODRs
  • Minor incident reports
  • Progress monitoring data (DPR, BRS)
  • Screening/Nomination data
  • Classroom Observation Form
  • Data integrity
  • Fidelity measures PIC, BOQ, BAT
  • Academic data

19
Florida Tier 3 Process
  • Formation of a district leadership team
    responsible for coordinating Tier 3
  • Evaluation conducted by FLPBS-RTIB of the
    districts current Tier 3 processes and products
  • An interview process is conducted with the Tier 3
    leadership team to evaluate the districts
    current Tier 3 process
  • The district agrees to submit five to ten
    recently completed FBA/BIPs to be assessed for
    technical adequacy
  • Meeting with PBS-RtIB and the Tier 3 district
    leadership team to share results of process and
    product evaluation
  • Facilitation of the development of a long-term
    action plan with goals and activities to address
    areas needing improvement.
  • Regularly scheduled follow-up meetings to
    evaluate progress on action plan and determine
    next steps

20
Florida Tier 3 Training
  • Will utilize newly developed and approved
    district process and products
  • May have some web and didactic training
  • Will involve direct coaching of district
    personnel to implement process and use products
  • Evaluation of knowledge, consultation skills,
    systems support, etc.
  • Evaluation of staff competencies will parallel
    systems supports (student outcomes, fidelity of
    impementation, etc.)

21
ContactsNational Website www.pbis.org
  • Floridas Positive Behavior Support Project
  • Illinois-PBIS Network
  • Phone (813) 974-7684
  • Fax (813) 974-6115
  • Email flpbs_at_fmhi.usf.edu
  • State Website http//flpbs.fmhi.usf.edu
  • Phone (708) 482-4860
  • Fax (708) 482-4875
  • Email kim.breen_at_pbisillinois.com
  • State Website
  • www.PBISIllinois.org
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com