Choosing%20an%20Open%20Source - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Choosing%20an%20Open%20Source

Description:

Choosing an Open Source Digital Collection Software Solution: Eprints DSpace Drupal Omeka – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:126
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 91
Provided by: joseph611
Learn more at: http://www.masshist.org
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Choosing%20an%20Open%20Source


1
  • Choosing an Open Source
  • Digital Collection Software Solution
  • Eprints
  • DSpace
  • Drupal
  • Omeka

2
  • Joseph Fisher
  • Database Management Librarian _at_ UMass Lowell
  • Digital Commonwealth Executive Committee
  • Student in the University of Arizona SIRLS
  • Graduate Certificate Program in Digital
    Information Management (DigIn)

  • digin.arizona.edu

3
Objective
  • Five stages of implementation
  • Installation (DSpace)
  • Branding
  • Collection setup
  • Item ingest
  • User Interface

4
LAMP
  • Linux
  • Apache
  • MySQL
  • PHP/Perl
  • Eprints
  • Omeka
  • Drupal

5
  • Linux
  • Tomcat
  • PostgresSQL
  • Java
  • JSP/XSLT

DSpace
6
  • EPrints
  • DSpace
  • Drupal
  • Omeka

7
EPrints
  • University of Southampton, UK
  • First released (v 2.0) 2002
  • Current version 3.2.7 (v3 2006)
  • Linux / Windows (Perl)
  • EPrints is the easiest and fastest way
    to set up repositories of open access
    research literature, scientific data, theses,
    reports and multimedia.

8
EPrints Key Features
  • software links to the SHERPA/RoMEO database so
    authors can easily verify their publisher
    policies
  • LCSH framework included that can be manually
    expanded
  • Supports internal and external authority files or
    auto-fill from previous database entries.
  • Multiple item import and export options
  • Thumbnails and preview images of search items

9
EPrints Branding
10
(No Transcript)
11
(No Transcript)
12
(No Transcript)
13
(No Transcript)
14
(No Transcript)
15
(No Transcript)
16
(No Transcript)
17
(No Transcript)
18
Step 1 /usr/share/eprints3/archives/archivename/c
fg/subjects Step 2
Step 3 bin/import_subjects archivename
filename
19
Step 1 /usr/share/eprints3/archives/archivename/c
fg/subjects Step 2
Step 3 /bin/import_subjects ltarchive idgt -xml
20
Collection Division Setup
21
(No Transcript)
22
(No Transcript)
23
(No Transcript)
24
(No Transcript)
25
EPrints Item Ingest
26
(No Transcript)
27
(No Transcript)
28
(No Transcript)
29
(No Transcript)
30
(No Transcript)
31
(No Transcript)
32
EPrints Conclusion
  • Easy to install, easy to brand, best for a single
    subject-specific repository
  • Designed for documents, though now supports
    multiple file types
  • Easy embargo, default thumbnail and preview
  • Some preservation support History module for
    tracking changes, METS export plugin
  • V3 does enable easier development of plugins
    (20-30 listed per year)

33
EPrints Challenges
  • Not all Dublin Core fields provided (relation,
    source, contributor, coverage)
  • Lack of theme options
  • Possible with Views to create custom collection
    space within a repository?
  • Statistics? Permissions? Plugins?
  • Documentation not well developed

34
(No Transcript)
35
  • EPrints
  • DSpace
  • Drupal
  • Omeka

36
DSpace
  • HP-MIT Libraries Alliance (2002)
  • DuraSpace (2009)
  • Current version 1.7.1 (2.0 due in Oct.)
  • Linux / Windows (Java)
  • DSpace preserves and enables easy and open
    access to all types of digital content including
    text, images, moving images, mpegs and data
    sets.

37
DSpace Key Features
  • Preservation support Bit integrity checker,
    format registry, item history, handles, DuraCloud
    backup
  • Discover faceted seach/browse interface
  • Qualified Dublin Core base or MODS thru xmlui
  • Embargo capability
  • OAI-PMH harvesting, both data and service
    supplier
  • Manakin XMLUI provides flexible though
    challenging customization capability (multiple
    custom archives)

38
Dspace Installation
  • Prerequisite Software
  • Linux or Windows
  • Oracle Java JDK  
  • Maven (Java build tool for stage 1)
  • Ant (Java build tool for stage 2)
  • PostgreSQL or Oracle
  • Tomcat
  • Perl

39
JSPUI Java Server Pages User Int.
40
XMLUI Manakin (default theme)
41
/dspace/config/xmlui.xconf
Stop / Start Tomcat
42
Kubrick theme
43
_at_Mire Mirage Theme
http//demo.dspace.org/xmlui
44
Changing home page XMLUI
  • /dspace/config/news-xmlui.xml

45
(No Transcript)
46
(No Transcript)
47
(No Transcript)
48
New Preservation Tool 1.7
49
OAI Harvesting
50
(No Transcript)
51
(No Transcript)
52
(No Transcript)
53
(No Transcript)
54
(No Transcript)
55
(No Transcript)
56
(No Transcript)
57
(No Transcript)
58
(No Transcript)
59
(No Transcript)
60
(No Transcript)
61
(No Transcript)
62
(No Transcript)
63
(No Transcript)
64
(No Transcript)
65
(No Transcript)
66
(No Transcript)
67
DSpace Conclusion
  • Very functional out of the box with easy branding
  • Increasing preservation management support
    (PREMIS support coming in v2.0)
  • Good documentation, training materials, and broad
    support base
  • Platform is versatile and flexible with ability
    to customize collection interfaces
  • OAI-PMH/ORE/SWORD (postponed)
  • SOLR-based statistics engine
  • Metadata registry, option to add new schemas

68
DSpace Challenges
  • Research Projects
  • Discovery faceted search
  • Embargo
  • DSpace Statistics
  • Thumbnails
  • XMLUI Customization

69
  • EPrints
  • DSpace
  • Drupal
  • Omeka

70
Drupal
  • Became Open Source project (2001)
  • Current version 7 (Jan. 2011)
  • Content Management Framework (CMF)
  • LAMP / Windows (PHP)
  • Drupal allows anyone to easily publish, manage
    and organize a wide variety of content on a
    website. .

71
Drupal Key Features
  • Numerous themes
  • Extensive module availability
  • Custom Control Kit (CCK) allows creation of
    fields for input and display
  • Faceted Search
  • Image administration
  • Advanced Search
  • Views create customized lists and queries
  • OAI-PMH module

72
Drupal Conclusions
  • Flexible and versatile but takes time and effort
    to put all the pieces together
  • Large, varied, and active community of users and
    developers with good documentation
  • Limited only by module availability, of which
    there are nearly 8,000 (back to version 4.x)
  • Challenges modules are managed individually and
    the entire structure manually constructed

73
  • EPrints
  • DSpace
  • Drupal
  • Omeka

74
Omeka
  • Center for History and New Media at George Mason
    University (2008)
  • LAMP / Windows (PHP)
  • V 1.3.2 (2011)
  • Omeka is a free, flexible, and open source
    web-publishing platform for the display of
    library, museum, archives, and scholarly
    collections and exhibitions.

75
Omeka Key Features
  • Designed with non-IT specialists in mind
  • as easy as launching a blog
  • Over a dozen themes
  • Over 30 Plugins
  • OAI-PMH Harvester
  • Exhibit Builder
  • LC Subject Headings
  • Comments
  • Social Bookmarking
  • Item Relationships

76
Omeka.net
  • Cloud web hosting
  • Five tiers
  • 500MB for free with 1 site, 4 plugins, 4 themes
  • Tier 1 49 for 1GB, 2 sites, 6 plugins
  • Tier 4 999 for 25GB, unlimited sites and
    plugins

77
(No Transcript)
78
(No Transcript)
79
(No Transcript)
80
(No Transcript)
81
(No Transcript)
82
(No Transcript)
83
(No Transcript)
84
(No Transcript)
85
Omeka Conclusion
  • Extremely easy plug and play functionality
  • Exhibit plugin enables easy customized collection
    interfaces
  • Immediate metadata field additions
  • Limited user and development base, but still new
    and growing
  • Very easy OAI-PMH capability

86
Why Open Source?
  • Mission
  • Open source is a development method for software
    that harnesses the power of distributed peer
    review and transparency of process. The promise
    of open source is better quality, higher
    reliability,

  • and an end to
  • The Open Source Initiative (OSI)
    http//www.opensource.org/

lower cost,
more flexibility,
predatory vendor lock in.
87
Lower Cost !!??!!
  • Server
  • Technical-savvy staff
  • Programmer?
  • Time

88
Choice Criteria
  • Institutional Repository or Digital Archive
  • Ease of use
  • Metadata flexibility
  • OAI Harvesting
  • File format support
  • Multiple collection interface customization
  • Popularity / Reputation
  • Size of active community
  • Development commitment

89
Insource Outsource
  • two major problems

First, the core mission of for-profit service
providers is not to preserve and provide access
to significant digital objects. It is, however,
to generate a profit and stay in business.
Second, if an outsourcing trend takes hold and
gains momentum, then cultural institutions are at
great risk of losing their own value proposition
and viability as institutions in the digital age.
Tyler O. Walters, Katherine Skinner. Economics,
sustainability, and the cooperative model in
digital preservation. Library Hi Tech (28.2) 2010
90
Librarians of the World Unite!!
Viva la Revolución!
We have nothing to lose!!
Control the means of Production!!
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com