Improved beam line for Hall A - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Improved beam line for Hall A

Description:

... $20K 1H00 harp omitted. ... Can it be moved next to IPM1P03A? This allows better optics control at the Compton electron-laser interaction point. – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:47
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 16
Provided by: JayB156
Category:
Tags: beam | hall | harp | improved | laser | line

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Improved beam line for Hall A


1
Improved beam line for Hall A
  • layouts, present and proposed
  • optics in altered region
  • benefits of proposed layout
  • costs of proposed layout
  • conclusions

2
layouts present and proposed
ep not possible after Moller scattering (per Kees)
1m of 10cm tube with H/V corr, 3 BPM, switch to
2.5cm tube, quad, 2m fast raster, BPM, H/V
correctors
4.5m available where ep is shown, not 5m
3
Optics plots altered region (combined optics)
4
Optics plots 2 (combined optics)
p extent
BPM
PIVOT
BPM
TargetRaster
Moller raster
MOLLER Target
PIVOT
5
Smaller spot at target
Betas (top) and beam envelopes (bottom) with
minima 5m upstream of pivot. Is this better or
worse for beam spot size stability give slow
0.05 changes in quads?
6
Benefits
  • fast raster after all quads so its always what
    you set
  • quads after Compton may be set for target beam
    size and BPM phase advance
  • better control of beam size due to new quad
    locations
  • more correctors and BPMs to eliminate scraping
    and improve orbit locks
  • better control of orbit through raster and eP due
    to new BPMs and correctors
  • fewer ion chamber trips
  • double raster length eases engineering for 11 GeV
  • 4.5m drift before diagnostic girder allows for
    either eP system or MOLLER target insertion
  • high current Moller polarimetry feasible via
    combined optics

7
Costs
  • Existing fast raster system mounted on leg of
    Compton before the electron detector as Moller
    raster. -250 microns at electron detector, 5K
  • Single QR or QA-pair inserted between 1C18 A/B
    harps on French bench. 45K
  • GEANT simulations to determine effects of
    elements on 1 beam pipe after Moller
    spectrometer dipole and the shielding changes
    needed as a result. We need to keep S/N up in
    Moller polarimeter detectors.
  • ME design 100K
  • Two girder extrusions and two stands, one
    extending inverted girder 20K
  • Three additional BPMs and electronics 36K
  • S/H cards for new BPMs 30K??
  • Three additional H/V corrector sets and power
    supplies 24K
  • New fast raster system 100K??
  • If eP not retained, yet another BPM/corrector
    pair in that drift, 20K
  • 1H00 harp omitted. May fit immediately after
    IBC/IUN/IBC as its mounted there now I need
    more accurate dimensions. Can it be moved next
    to IPM1P03A? This allows better optics control
    at the Compton electron-laser interaction point.
    New vacuum vessel will be needed for this region
    as the middle Compton dipoles move up 8 cm. Add
    NEG pumps to improve vacuum near electron
    detector.
  • quad upgrades not in 12 GeV project two 20A
    power supplies

8
Further work needed
  • Layout to pin down locations to centimeters
    (Accelerator and Engineering)
  • 11 GeV raster design 40 longer coil and power
    supply with twice the voltage, 40 more current.
    If the pair of coils of the same plane must be
    driven in series, four times the voltage and 1.4
    times the current. (TBD)
  • Moller polarimeter dipole and detector S/N
    modeling shielding design with BPMs, correctors
    and rasters where 4 pipe now exists. Primary
    beam through Moller dipole what corrector
    strength is needed? (Hall A collaboration)
  • Combined optics must be implemented to allow high
    current Moller polarimetry. This requires one
    quad between the Moller dipole and the fast
    raster, increasing design problem of the latter.
    It will also constrain either beam size or phase
    advance in 7m before target. (Physics and
    Accelerator)

9
Conclusions (1)
  • A rearrangement of the Hall A line is proposed
    which removes a severe optics constraint, raster
    performance
  • Beam quality will be improved for all
    experiments, especially 11 GeV parity experiments
    including MOLLER.
  • Ion chamber trips will be reduced, improving
    availability and reducing irritation in MCC and
    the other halls
  • Cost of order 0.8M design, procurements,
    installation

10
ep system
  • The ep system is not functional.
  • It is very difficult to steer in the Compton with
    the ep ion chambers set to trip at low values.
  • Compton optics matching will take several hours
    and disrupt the other halls unless one hour mask
    durations may be applied to Compton and ep ion
    chambers during optics data acquisition using
    harps.
  • Do any of the remaining 6 GeV experiments require
    the ep system? Will the system be of any use at
    higher energy?
  • Might the system be easier to repair if removed
    from the hall during January 2010? Replace with
    10 cm beam tube for vacuum conductance.

11
UVa Polarized target chicane
  • 2007 design for g2p requires removal of Moller
    polarimeter shielding, inverted quad girder, and
    final diagnostic girder for vertical chicane.
    Moller polarimeter will be non-functional.
  • Proposed design has room for vertical chicane
    after final correctors, in space designated for
    ep and final diagnostic girder. Moller
    polarimeter intact.
  • Space for second fast raster in proposed design
    may be occupied by slow raster.
  • Tungsten calorimeter can substitute for Unser and
    second BCM as on next slide.

12
Beamline Chicane
EP
Moller
Target center
Chicane Design Jay Benesch (JLab CASA) Two
upstream Dipoles, one with vertical degree of
freedom. Reuse the dipoles from the HKS
experiment. Utilize open space upstream of
target. Minimal interference with existing
beamline equipment.
Major Installation
UVA/Jlab 5 T Polarized Target Upstream Chicane
and supports Slow raster and Basel
SEM. Instrumentation for 50-100 nA beam. Local
beam dump. Hall A Septa.
13
layouts g2p and this proposal
1m of 10cm tube with H/V corr, 3 BPM, switch to
2.5cm tube, quad, 2m fast raster, BPM, H/V
correctors
4.5m available where ep is shown, not 5m
14
The Experiment
E0(GeV) µ(deg) Days
1.1 6 1.0
1.7 6 1.5
2.2 6 1.6
3.3 6 2.9
4.4 6 2.7
4.4 9 6.0
Data Taking 15.7
Qweak has polarization control for g2p _at_ 2.2, 3.3
and 4.4 GeV
Overhead 8.4
Total Days 24.1
15
Conclusions (2)
  • The ep system should be removed from the hall
    ASAP. Repair offline if the collaboration
    wishes.
  • The proposed Hall A line is more compatible with
    the vertical chicane needed for the UVa polarized
    target and g2p than is the present line.
  • If mechanical design begins in January 2010 and
    labor is available it should be possible to
    install the new line and g2p in the six month
    2011 down.
  • BTW I hope youve got the He3 needed for the
    dilution refrigerator. DHS has exhausted the
    supply.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com